What is New?

WHAT IS NEWEST ON THIS BLOG?
August 27 New Post: Some Possible Things to Say to Narcissists (an alternative to the DEEP method)
August 7 New Post: Once Narcissists Try to Hurt You, They Don't Want to Stop. It's One of Many Reasons Why Most Survivors of Narcissistic Abuse Eventually Leave Them. (edited)
July 24 New Post: Is Blatant Favoritism of a Child by a Narcissistic Parent a Sign of Abuse? Comes With a Discussion on Scapegoating (edited for grammatical reasons)
July 20 New Post: Why "Obey Your Elders" Can Be Dangerous or Toxic
June 19 New Post: Why Do Narcissists Hate Their Scapegoat Child?
May 26 New Post: Folie à deux Among Narcissists? Or Sycophants? Or Maybe Not Either?
May 18 New Post: Home-schooled Girl Kept in a Dog Cage From 11 Years Old Among Other Types of Egregious Abuse by Mother and Stepfather, the Brenda Spencer - Branndon Mosely Case
May 11 New Post: Grief or Sadness on Mother's Day for Estranged Scapegoat Children of Narcissistic Families
April 29 New Post: Why Children Do Not Make Good Narcissistic Supply, Raising the Chances of Child Abuse (with a section on how poor listening and poor comprehension contributes to it) - new edit on 6/6
April 10 New Post: The Kimberly Sullivan Case. A Stepmother and Father Allegedly Lock Away a Boy When He Is 12, Underfeeding Him, and Home Schooling Him, and at 32 He Takes a Chance of Being Rescued by Lighting the House on Fire (includes updates since posting)
PERTINENT POST: ** Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does it Work?
PETITION: the first petition I have seen of its kind: Protection for Victims of Narcissistic Sociopath Abuse (such as the laws the UK has, and is being proposed for the USA): story here and here or sign the actual petition here
Note: After seeing my images on social media unattributed, I find it necessary to post some rules about sharing my images
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Showing posts with label the silent treatment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the silent treatment. Show all posts

Monday, March 25, 2024

Silencing From Narcissistic Parents: "I wasn't allowed to talk about my feelings, thoughts and experiences, and if I tried to I was told to shut up or get over it."

 

This will be part of a series on stonewalling and silencing. This post concentrates more on silencing than on stonewalling.

Silencing is different than the silent treatment, but they do share a few things in common such as that the narcissist, malignant narcissist or sociopath (the more likely people to use it) has decided that what you have to say is either not worth hearing or worth understanding ... or that what you say doesn't fit in with their world view and general perspectives, or that they are not interested in what you have to say.

This can happen even if they accuse you of something and they walk away from any kind of defense or rebuttal to what you say. It can happen when they abuse you or hit you: they may say that any reactions you have towards their abuse are not to be expressed, or are not valid, and that they do not care how their abuse is effecting you. 

It also happens in war, and that would be the more extreme example.

Let us say some invaders have taken over a city, and a few residents are still left. The soldiers march into someone's house and tell them they have to leave, that the house belongs to the invaders now. A family member says to the soldiers, "You are stealing our house? Is that right? Would you like it if someone stole your house? We have nowhere to go!" 

A few soldiers don't want that kind of resistance, even if it is the truth, so they rough handle the member and toss him out the door and tell him to run or that he will be shot. 

So, that didn't work. Another family member decides not to handle things this way, so asks the soldiers if they can be transported out of their house in a truck with their belongings and food. 

"I think this one needs to be tossed out too", one soldier tells the others. "Listen, lady, this is a war, and you are lucky you didn't get killed in the bombing! If you want to live, I'd leave now!" And she does.

So the survivors that are left start shaking and clustering together in an ever tighter bunch, and try to compromise another way forward. "You will at least let us have a suitcase with clothes! We have to walk quite a ways out of here, and we need clothes to keep warm. We could die otherwise in the elements. You seem to have an interest in keeping us alive, of not shooting us, so can we take some clothes, please? Maybe let us take some bedding too? Is there anyway we can get some transportation out of here?" 

The head soldiers says, "Listen lady, I'm not up to hearing demands from you. Like I said, this is a war and our duty is to clear out these residences so that our people can move in. We have the right to kill you if you resist. Our leader has made that clear. If I were you, and some heavily armed soldiers walked into my house, I'd want to leave."

Some other soldiers suggest a meeting. They decide that the family can carry one suitcase or bundle out, and that they have 15 minutes to pack while being overseen so that they don't carry out anything the soldiers disapprove of, that can be made into a weapon. 

If anyone asks for a little more they are told to shut up, and if they ask for more time, they are told to shut up, and if they ask if they can carry another suitcase, they are told to shut up, that the orders are clear. 

And then if they cry, they are either beaten or told to shut up, and tossed out the door without their suitcase. They are told to be grateful that they are allowed anything at all. 

This is to say that silencing is very common when any type of aggression is going on, including child abuse. And child abuse with silencing is what this post is about. 

Some silencing kinds of sentences used in child abuse, and adult child abuse are:

(note: trigger warning):
- "We've been over this, and you are not to talk about it again." - even if the subject is something egregious that has to be solved (even lawfully solved, like the abuse of another family member). 
- "You need to get over the past. Live in the present."
- "You won't talk about this again if you know what is good for you."
- "If you're going to continue to talk, you will be punished."
- "If you insist on talking about that when you've been told not to, there will be dire consequences for you!"
- "If you know what is good for you, you will not continue down this path. You will learn to shut up when we tell you to."
- "I have never been interested in what you have to say, so I'd stop now."
- "You need to get over things. So you were hurt! Big deal! Everyone gets over it, but not you!"
- "I have no interest in continuing to hear what you have to say. I'm done."
- "I can't stand to hear you talk! It's all drivel. You can't even talk without stuttering. And stuttering is a sign of lying." - no it is not. Stuttering and stammering, and forgetting words, can happen when a survivor is around abusive people. It is actually a sign of trauma. 
- "Have I ever cared what you thought? No, I never did! So you can stop talking now!"
- "You need to let these things go! It doesn't do me any good, and it doesn't do you any good either if you think about it." (again, this kind of person doesn't understand how trauma works)
- "You are so brain-dead! You have absolutely nothing to say! I have better things to do than to listen to someone so stupid!"
- "You need to apologize to me, and then maybe we can talk. But we're only going to talk for five minutes and never talk about this again." (this person would also not understand trauma).
- "You can never say anything right, so you might as well not talk at at all."
- "Did I say I wanted to hear that!? No, I didn't! You can be silent now!"
- "You need to sit in your room until you can apologize to me for saying that! If you don't apologize for talking about it, then you won't have a parent who cares about you. Is that what you want? It's up to you to apologize and to be silent about this."
- "I can't stand you when you talk about this!"
- "What a bunch of nonsense! We're not talking about this subject again!"
- "If you continue with this, I'll never be able to hear another word you say!"
- "Shut up already!!"
- "Hearing all of your crap is never going to be good for me. You need to stop now!"
- "I can't stand to hear you talk!"
- "Okay! You're going to be punished for talking when I've made it clear I don't want to hear any more of it!"
- "You seriously need to get over the past. No one is going to go back into the past with you, no one cares about your past, and no one wants to hear about it any more."

One reason a child might bring up a subject over and over again is that for the child, issues are unresolved. They are unresolved for two reasons: 

# 1. To be redundant, but to also make clear this is important: If children keep bringing up a subject over and over again, it mainly means that it hasn't been resolved. Actually adults do it too, but they may not be as persistent about it. A narcissist would say, "it mainly means it hasn't been resolved in my child's mind."

No, that isn't what is happening. A parent who makes it known that they will silence a child out of some kind of existence in the parent's life, or in an on-going event like a silent treatment, means that the child will have trauma symptoms. Trauma isn't just a mind situation; it is an evolutionary involuntary brain situation: experiences which brought on the trauma are located and experienced in a different part of the brain than memories and are often experienced more as a present event than a past event, effecting the anterior cingulate cortex. And no, narcissists don't care about this. 

This means that unresolved trauma has to be resolved so that the brain can go back to normal. And the way it is resolved is to heal it to the extent where it becomes a mere memory than a nightmare (nightmares are the result of the intrusive memories and often the profound lack of sleep associated with PTSD, which are the result of the activation of the anterior cingulate cortex, as well as amygdala hijacking). This is where trauma therapy comes in, and why narcissists have to be out of your life altogether to give the activated parts of the brain some peace. 

And it is also necessary because narcissists typically love the silent treatment and other traumatization measures.  

If narcissists aren't interested in anything, they aren't interested in healing anyone, let alone healing anyone from trauma. They are not healers and never will be. Most of them are barely capable of remorse, and their type of empathy does not exist enough to be true healers of any kind of malady. They will continue the silencing and their hostilities. The good news is that this means that exceptionally few narcissists are going to be in the trauma therapy business, so it is likely you'll get the healing and empathy that you need there, as well as more sleep, more peace, less intrusive memories. 

The desire to talk to family members you used to be able to talk to can be problematic if they are not sympathetic to your plight. Most survivors make the mistake of sharing intimate details with certain family members they should not be sharing with (I've done it myself). And that lack of empathy in others, and especially if you are silenced because they want control over the topics you bring up, can bring back the intrusive memories, the anxiety, the lack of sleep, etc. You might not have to cut them all the way out, but realistically they are probably making you feel like you are dealing with another narcissist.

Families with narcissists in them typically do not want to be reminded of the traditions of abuse that the narcissists practice, and the silencing that they do, and they don't want you talking about all of the healing modalities you had to go through because of the family, so a narc will just have to get a smear campaign going, and brainwash a few minds and ---> out you go: as close to zero family members with empathy as the narcissist can create!

# 2. The second reason is that narcissists are not interested in resolving issues in relationships; they are only interested in getting their own way, chronically ... and manipulating character, and events, and the truth to suit getting their way. This is no secret. They let you know it over and over, and over and over again throughout your relationship with them, if you can call it a relationship at all. In their ambition to try to get other people not to hear you out, which can frustrate you, it will be bottled up until you can adequately share it with a trusted person - it's unhealthy, no doubt about it, and unhealthy blockages make for a lot of horrific symptoms and suffering, but unless you want to get hurt, you have to stop talking to people who have an agenda against you (and yes, silencing you counts). 

A real adult relationship is not going to be full of silencing other people. 

However, narcissistic families end up that way eventually, going against victims in favor of serving the narcissist, even if it takes 7 - 10 years to turn their backs on the victims. Calming and helping the narcissist usually comes first because narcissists are much louder than victims, and they make it plain that their emotional regulation (i.e. keeping them from raging and attacking) is more important than empathy for traumatized members - and they also get people more oriented towards panicked decisions (also the result of narc rages).

Reasonable decision-making by letting a member decide what they want to do about healing family discord is not all that likely in narcissistic families.

Loyalty to narcs tends to be high because they get people panicked, out of sorts, and hijacked by fake victim stories and false narratives enough to create fawning in other people, to do what the narc wants, and become sycophants so as to avoid their inevitable punishments and rage (we even see this in government). 

Also I would be extra careful and private if you are silenced by people who know the narcissist and who have chosen regulating them over compassion for you, or if they aggrandize the narcissist. Member-comparing is also a narcissistic family trait that they may practice, another bad sign. Again, real adult relationships aren't about comparing family members, and who is sweeter than whom, and who does more of something for a narc than another family member. And it goes without saying that narcs who insult and call members names should be avoided.  

 These are some of the things that can be going on with people who start to withdraw empathy from you and silence you from talking about things which effect you:
- They are being used or lied to in order that they go against you
- They are narcissists themselves or have narcissistic traits
- If you are a scapegoat, they are afraid of being scapegoated themselves, so they sacrifice the relationship with you to keep the head narcissist(s) happy or from going into a potential rage
- They are receiving money from the narcissist and feel that has to come first before you and your feelings do
- They are being charmed or promised something and feel they have to sacrifice you to get it
- They do not treasure the relationship with you, and don't really care what you say or feel 
- They think you are expendable "for now", but that they can get you back again if they want
- They aren't feeling well, and they need a temporary break from talking to others (but usually they tell you this so that they don't hurt your feelings, so that you won't think the relationship has been trashed)

What ever the reasons are, you're not likely to feel comfortable sharing anything with them. They have broken the trust that you used to have in them. It is just another walking on eggshells situation where you are being asked not to be yourself, not to share much of anything of import with them, and where you have to manage down the relationship to breadcrumbing diminishments. When you have to do that, it is a broken relationship that does not take you into consideration, only them.  

If they are silencing you with contemptuous words or tones, they often don't care about you any more than the narcissist does. Their brains have been hijacked by both fear and attention to the narcissist. It is a challenge and test for them: to submit to the narcissist and be ego fodder and a flying monkey for them over and over again.

These days, if I'm in a situation like this, I look for a lack of empathy first to clue me in as to their intentions towards me. If I hear, "I'm sorry. I know you have good intentions, and that you've been through a lot, and I don't want to lose you, but I just can't talk about this now. Can we be agreeable to that?" shows more empathy, more of a relationship than, for instance, "I'm not interested in what you have to say and I refuse to talk about your trauma, perspectives or issues again." The latter shows more hostility, that they aren't interested in an adult relationship; only a relationship on their own terms.

They may not be interested in a relationship at all.  

Ghosting is pretty common these days too, especially with the younger generation (or that's what I've heard from my own older generation). Don't talk to people who ghost you. Ghosting is a definitive statement. And if it is coming from someone who is part of a narcissistic family system, and you don't know why it was done, it's toxic.

Again, in real relationships, at least you are in communication as to why.  

A lot of people know you are traumatized, because they know what violent, power hungry, raging, gaslighting, rejecting people (who tend to be narcissists, or alcoholics with narcissistic traits) can do to your life, and if they don't show empathy for your plight, and can't see beyond what they want for themselves only, I'd say put them on some back burner (you might relegate them to the "unicorns, rainbows, bubbles and fluff" talk, if even that). The more insistent they are in not wanting to know you, or what you experienced, or how you think and feel, either they are extremely brainwashed, or lied to, or self serving, or entranced/traumatized by the narcissist, or they don't want a relationship with you to begin with ... or unfortunately they can be narcissists out to shut down people who are too much of a liability to them, or tell them what they want to hear.

Information should only be shared with people you trust whole heartedly, and where the relationship is not lopsided. That is obvious. It doesn't matter what the relationship was before they silenced you. Silencing does not belong in any close personal relationship, period. It falls under the category of "stonewalling" and is one of the four horseman of the apocalypse. When one of the four horseman is part of a relationship, usually what follows is that once that one person withdraws from wanting to hear what you feel, think and experience, then you will turn away too. It's the very normal common response, and scientifically vetted and proven.  

If you are trauma bonded, you may not turn away altogether or right away, but you will turn away ... until there is finally nothing left of your former relationship. 

I would also say silencing falls under contempt too, which is another one of the four horseman, unless the person is going through something temporarily and just cannot listen to upsetting information. Most people don't shut other people down unless contempt is present, which in these terms is "inconvenient hearing", "adversely hearing", and "hearing with prejudice or hate".   

When it comes to children, the damage of not being able to trust a parent with pertinent or critical information about you, also means both parties turning away from each other unless there is a trauma bond. With children, that is likely, unfortunately.

The "turning away" will be easier and more complete if you are falsely accused, but anger over the injustice can stick with you longer than the grief of losing a parent to silent treatments. 

A trauma bond with silencing, stonewalling and contemptuous parents is not just unhealthy, but downright toxic, and actually, if we are honest with ourselves, dangerous for a child, physically, emotionally, psychologically, including altering their immune system, altering their brain in some instances, and altering their ability to emotionally regulate efficiently. It is a lot of psychological and emotional neglect and harm at the very least. But usually there is so much more to it than that. 

A parent who stonewalls, silences and has contempt for their own child's thoughts, feelings and experiences, and is trying to intimidate a child with a continual trauma bond too, is probably abusing them - I'm 99 percent sure about that. I'm all for letting a child have another chance in a foster home with this going on. 

In terms of the sayings I featured above, every child abuse survivor I have ever known has gone through more of the silencing kinds of sayings than they can count. And what is even more incredible is that these parents keep doing this to their child when the child is a full adult. Go over these sayings again, and you will see that they are completely unfeeling and inappropriate adult-to-adult behavior. Imagine a parent talking this way to their adult child in front of children, and husband, and in-laws, and even great grandchildren. It's no wonder so many adult children eventually go no contact with parents who think this is fair, adequate, good behavior. But that is one of the things that never stops: child abuse doesn't stop unless the child stops it by removing themselves, whether a little or a lot. 

In fact, these phrases are typically part of daily life with a narcissist, malignant narcissist, and a sociopath. Most of these types of people like to silence individuals. The reasons they like to silence are pretty similar from one narcissist to the next, and one sociopath to the next. And they particularly silence children, and shame them about not being silent, and shame them for talking about any topic that is not something they want to hear, whether the words are or are not an immediate boost to their ego.  

When done to children, it can have serious ramifications, and one of them is stuffing thoughts, feelings and either giving up on verbal communications with their parent, or giving up on themselves as verbally competent intelligent people who can decipher right and wrong, truth and non-truth, and what their feelings and thoughts really are without interference from their out-of-control parent. All of the ramifications will be explored in another post. This post is more of a 101 introduction to the topic. 

As I've hinted at before, silencing has a lot of components of perspecticide, invalidation of feelings and thoughts, pretend mind-reading (very typical of narcissists), as well as a lot of gaslighting, and escalating contempt and prejudice due to the exceptionally fixed confirmation biases that narcissists are known for.  

What it sounds like when perspecticide, invalidation and pretend mind-reading are part of silencing:
- "I know what you are feeling and thinking, so you can stop talking now."
- "You think I'm going to sit here and listen to a bunch of lies?" - when their child is not lying. "You must really take me for a sucker! Ha! I'm not listening to any more of what you have to say! So you can be quiet now!"
- "You really think I'm going to believe that's what your feelings are!? Well I'm not, so you can be silent now!"
- "You really think you can talk people into believing anything! Well, you can't! I have the last word on who is going to believe what! So you can be silent." 
- "Sure you feel that way! I know a liar when I see one!" when they didn't lie. "You sure do think I can be hoodwinked! And that's why I don't choose to hear a word you have to say!"
- "I can't stand to hear what your feelings and thoughts are because they are all bullsh%t! You might as well keep that trap closed so no one has to hear you anymore!"
- "You don't really think that way. What you really think is that you have a lot of respect for your aunt, but that you are pretending not to so that she won't discipline you. So you can stop talking about your aunt now. I don't want to hear any more of it."
- "What a fake apology! You made me look bad! Next time just keep your mouth closed and I'll do the apologies for you!" (not a good idea, and here is why).
- "I know that you can't possibly feel that way. You just had a bad day. You're not looking at things straight. You need to listen to me. I know what you feel. You only think you do."
- "Why can't you see anything straight? Obviously I have to tell you what you think because you're too crazy to get it right. Now I'm burdened with that!" - all narcissists try to take hold of verbalizing what their victims are thinking and feeling, and they tell others that it is a burden that they are dealing with a crazy person who doesn't know their own mind, so they won't be accused of being controlling, and going for domination and power over that child (it is perspecticide, invalidation, mixed with gaslighting)
- "Do I have to listen to your feelings again? Perhaps you need to take this to a therapist." - good idea, except therapists will usually want you to separate from narcissists and sociopaths. 
- "I really don't want to talk about your feelings. I have better things to do. You should learn how to control your feelings so you won't need to talk about them."
- "I could care less about what you have to say about your feelings. I don't even think they are real feelings! I think they are excuses to hurt me, and to pretend that you didn't have the best parent."
- "Your feelings aren't important! They only exist when you want to see me as a bad parent. The rest of the time, they are put away. So I'm not listening to this any more."
- "I don't really like listening to your feelings and thoughts about anything. You should have been able to tell that I don't like listening to you. But you continue to hound me. Why can't you be nice and quiet like other children? Why can't you just be silent?"

What it sounds like when gaslighting is part of the silencing:
- "You know what you did, and I'm not hearing any more lies about it!" - trying to convince a child that the truth is a bunch of lies.
- "You know that you're acting like an innocent princess which is why I'm not listening to another word you say unless it is about your guilt!" - when they aren't guilty for anything
- "You are never aware of things that you do. You're crazy, do you understand? You know that you are because I let you know that you are. That's why I never listen to you, and why you need me to tell you of all the bad things you do, and all of the bad things that you are" - quite evil on the parent's part. 
- "You make a lot of assumptions and conjectures based on your own twisted mind which is why I don't listen to you. You need to stop talking." - also evil. 
- "I don't care to hear another word from your crazy perspectives!" 
- "I can't believe you still talk! You should have been silent long ago! You don't have anything worthwhile to say."
- "I wish you knew when to talk and when not to talk. You get it wrong every time!" 
- "Poor thing! It's your mind again! You never know how to perceive things, so I guess I'll have to tell you what is really going on. In the meantime, you need to be quiet because you get things wrong all of the time, even though you think you are right!"
- "I don't know how many times I've told you not to talk! But you keep doing it, and it all sounds insane! Stop now!" 
- "Your thoughts are so distorted! How can you think this way?! You should have had your head examined a long time ago! The least you can do is shut up already!"
- "You are faking at being sick! I can tell! So you better stop talking about it and get ready for school!" Narcissistic parents usually tell at least one of their children that they fake illnesses. I was in a study group about this phenomenon myself (perhaps some day I will share the findings).
- "Why, oh, why, can't you stop thinking about this and getting over the past. What's wrong with your mind that you can't just stop talking about this nonsense? Your feelings aren't that important to anyone but you!"  

What is incredible is that narcissists like being this way. They don't want to change it. 

Why?

Power, control and domination. They like being in charge of their child's self image, as well as telling them what they feel and think, and what they are doing wrong with how they might be feeling and thinking. 

Is it more compulsion than thinking about the ramifications clearly and "going after this aggressively"? I would say it depends on the narcissist.

WHY NARCISSISTS FEEL THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO TELL YOU
WHAT YOU THINK, FEEL AND EXPERIENCE
(from a trauma perspective)

Any person who tries to reach in aggressively to take over your feelings, thoughts and self esteem and verbalize them for you is probably on the Cluster B spectrum. There is a very good explanation for why narcissists feel they have a right to do this, and one of the reasons is that they were probably exposed to a lot of lying when they were a child. They learned that nothing is as it seems, so they assume people are lying a lot of the time, or most of the time, and that they, the narcissist, needs to fill it in with the truth. 

But by doing that, they also drive people away because the relationship is not about knowing what you truly think and feel; it is about them deciding whether you are lying or not, and filling it in with what ever they don't understand to be the truth right away. They compulsively decide what they want to believe or what they think your words should be replaced with.

And typically what they want to believe and what they want to replace it with will be a lot more hostile than what was meant, because narcissists typically grow up in abusive hostile circumstances. As we know, abusive environments can create as much PTSD as war does. And if the environment is also full of lying, which it usually is, then they are at war with lies too, except their overly-aggressive approach to replacing what people think and feel with their own spin on it, or their own flawed mind reading is, can create even more illusion (i.e. where they are lying to themselves).  

It has a lot to do with why and how they have scapegoats who they deem to be "all bad" too. That individual may remind them of the person in their early environment who lied all of the time, so they assume their scapegoat child is lying all of the time too. 

And to make matters worse, if their scapegoat disagrees with their narcissistic parent's assessments about them lying, then their narcissistic parent is likely to rage and hate the scapegoat more for pointing out the narcissist's flaws (at not being a perfect mind-reader and lie detector of the child). 

Scapegoats are told they are liars a lot, as well as being crazy, so it is no wonder that about 90 percent eventually go no contact with their parent. 

If the narcissistic parent isn't willing to work on all of their judgements and assumptions, then being in a relationship where you are constantly accused of lying, of not feeling what they say you feel, and of not thinking what they say you think, it is not a relationship that can work. It eventually ends up to be all that the relationship is about: constant accusations, constant judging (and lots of wrong judging at that), and so much silencing that it is barely a relationship at all (because most relationships are about talking things out and sharing). Again, it isn't about knowing you, but about aggressively invading you and your mind and your feelings with their dirty interpretations. 

The more wrong they are about their perceptions, the wider the rift, the less likely anything can be resolved. 

For instance invaders that try to convince a population that they are all Nazis and all hostile liars, and must be weeded out as vermin, and especially when it isn't true, are not going to gain the enemy's trust with that thought. They are going to meet with resistance at every turn (and possibly lose their entire standing army). Close personal relationships aren't much different. 

The "wrong turn" that narcissists take when growing up in an environment like this is that they decide they are going to be lie detectors (which is okay if you do it the right way, slowly, gathering a lot of evidence), and aggressively invade and punish people who they think are lying to them, while at the same time lie a lot themselves to protect themselves from any abuse or fall-out of their reputation. That often means keeping secrets, and extra-marital affairs, and can mean stealing and hiding things. None of this works in close personal relationships. 

One reason why scapegoats tend to become the truth-tellers and why truth tellers tend to become scapegoats in most narcissistic families is because they see more of the downsides of lying than the upsides, especially if a sibling is lying in order to get an unfair advantage over them. But they also tend to be more truthful than other family members because they see much more clearly the way lies are destructive to the entire family unit, and can also be disgusted with a narcissistic parent who will give themselves permission to lie over and over again, even for nefarious self serving purposes, but be completely rageful, intolerant and punishing of even the most innocent white lie of other family members. 

In other words, they are aware that the narcissistic parent that tells lies about them is destructive. They see that the narcissistic parent's lies about others to be destructive too. They see relationships become ruined over lies. They don't see the positives of lying, so they don't do it. 

Golden children can be rewarded for lying, especially if they are lying for the parent, and parent's reputation. 

SURVIVORS OF PARENTAL NARCISSISTIC ABUSE WEIGH IN
ON HOW IT FELT TO BE TOLD INSTEAD OF ASKED
WHAT THEY WERE FEELING, THINKING AND EXPERIENCING

I grabbed these from a number of forums and groups. Each entry marked with a "*" is another survivor.

 I did contribute to this in one entry (but again, anyone would be hard-pressed to know which one). Again, I chose entries where I didn't need to clean up grammar.

I thought these would be useful to see what others go through.

* I was never allowed to talk about my feelings about how I was abused and mistreated. But the prevailing attitude has always been that I “live in the past” when I try to talk about how emotionally hurt I was because nobody cared. And so because of that there is something wrong with me.  * Hard relate! My mother's go to response "quit feeling sorry for yourself".
There is nothing wrong with you. People have set you up to feel like you need permission to heal from being affected. They train us up to be always in survival mode and fear the day we begin to thrive.
Closure is something they will never allow, and they believe our closure is impossible without them. It's all a lie.
I so get it!

* I was told to forget about my oldest sister who died in a terrible accident! They didn't want to see me cry any more after five days !!! They wanted me to re-focus my attention on them. These people are monsters! They will never have empathy for us or anyone but themselves! Maybe the point is to forget about the parents who say these kinds of things so that you can adequately grieve and pay homage to the sister.

* I relate. My family does not understand why I can’t “let it go.” They are not interested in the truth or how the past affected me and the family as a whole. Instead, they soothe themselves in harmful ways and pretend everything is great. It’s not you. It’s them. Big hug.

* You don't just get over trauma. There is a reason why we don't snap out of it, and if we did, it would be a really unhealthy experience of compartmentalization. We all have a right to have our feelings heard and addressed. They certainly want their feelings addressed ALL OF THE TIME!! We're supposed to shut up about our our own feelings and their feelings are supposed to be front and center at ALL TIMES. Crazy-making bs that I don't want to be a part of any more. NC for me.

* “The past is alive in the present”…we can’t forget trauma because it haunts us in the present. People who invalidate us have no idea. There is nothing wrong with you, this is just what trauma does and people who are ignorant don’t understand. (Trauma therapist and trauma survivor here)

* Trauma experiences are stored in a different way than most memories. The trauma is experienced as more of a present event rather than a past event. This is why pushing the memories out often makes them bounce back harder in the form of disturbed sleep, anxiety and nightmares. It isn't healthy to stuff the feelings, and stuff your narrative no matter how much they want you to. You owe it to yourself to talk freely about traumatic experiences and have them addressed. Our minds keep them valid, and you have a right to keep them valid too. (another trauma therapist here)

* And these parents get away with it over and over again. Everyone else looks frozen while they push their unempathetic responses at you again and again. That's such a flaw in human beings and leads everyone else around them to be flying monkeys eventually, to feel that they have a right to shut you up too when ever you want to express yourself. Or they talk over you as though only their perceptions and feelings are valid. If you have to be that quiet in your family, and tiptoe around like your mind and feelings don't matter, you might as well be no contact.

* It's why a lot of us feel better when we are no contact. We weren't seen or heard any way. We didn't matter in that situation. We will always be more comfortable in situations where we matter to others. They think we go off and that we don't matter to other people too, because they have this iron-clad bias and devaluation against us, and an internal arrogance that tells them that that the way they experience things is better than the way you do. They would probably be surprised at how much we are loved.

* I hated being a scapegoat of this kind of crap. They would do it to me over and over again, at least a couple of times a week. Rage and then blame me for reacting. It's the game they all play so don't take it personally.
When I went almost completely silent and refused to answer their insipid self serving questions, and realized that showing my feelings or thoughts to them wasn't wise, they not only devalued me, they discarded me.
Lesson: they want you to talk, but only when asked, and on their terms. They want you to say what they want to hear, so that is all on their terms too. They want you to feel something, so that they'll stop raging, so that's on their terms too. They want you to only feel the way they want you to feel. They try to manipulate certain feelings out of you which doesn't work out so well for them because they aren't you and you have different feelings than they have. If you don't have the feelings they want you to have and demand that you have, they will call you crazy. That is obviously all on their terms too. Rinse, repeat week after week, year after year.
Then they send you to college and expect a phone call every week - without ever telling you that. When you don't call the first time, they rage and threaten to take college away. When they take college away, they call you inept because you don't have the skills they need you to have, and the money they require you make.
This is why it is no use to relate to narcissistic parents in any long term way. Everything they do is about ordering you around and manipulating certain feelings and calling other feelings you have that they don't want to deal with as "crazy". They want to control us to every little detail, even when and how we respond to them and their rages.
Not that I liked being discarded over not having the perfect feelings they thought I should have, but I definitely felt relieved when I could finally feel something without it being thought of as "Wrong! You need to feel this way!"
These kinds of parents don't know anything about trauma and traumatic reactions to being raged at twice or more times a week, and they rarely help us with the healthy expression of feelings. In fact, they don't even understand the workings of a healthy mind at all. For their sake we are supposed to stuff our feelings.
Everything they do is meant for them and their ego. I wasn't enough of an ego regulator and up-lifter so they just had to get rid of me somehow and cooked up a lie they refused to hear me refute.
After 14 years I am okay with it. I wouldn't have healed without it. I would be more like my sister who is nothing more than a constant ego think-u-lator for our parents. All of them seem so ignorant. A family's ignorance can definitely hurt you for a long while, but once you know more about this stuff than they do, your life will be much better, richer, more colorful than theirs ever was.
If I was still a kid, I would have put up a sign on my bedroom door that said, "You cannot control other people's feelings at all. Or their thoughts. Do not enter unless you understand."

* I never knew this before! I think you could actually use this to your advantage. Like pretend to have feelings you don't have to give them an ego boost. Kinda too late for me as they discarded me too and I was always confused because I didn't know this was how I was supposed to play their game. Confusion ended!

* Yea, it's how to play their game, but it isn't genuine. What if they tell you that you don't mean it? A lot of scapegoats are told by their narcissistic parents that you are a liar, that you are constantly pretending to get something out of them. It wouldn't have mattered no matter what you did. They are such paranoid individuals that when you are authentic, they think you lie, and when you lie they think you are authentic. That is because they are like that!
Just let them leave to their head games to use on other narcissists and psychopaths they know. I don't think this kind of game can end well for an empath. And besides it's a time-suck. I don't envy my sister who, as I said, is the ego think-u-lator. Having to think about their feelings while denying - or pretending - is no way to live.
Life is about finding your own feelings, thoughts, power and purpose, and putting descriptors and words to them. It is not about being sucked into their game of getting you to prop their ego for them 24/7.

* Thank you. I needed that. Yer right. It's time for me to stop being concerned with the way they think and feel and to find ways to understand the way I think and feel. My own feelings and thoughts were denied so long by them, and I also denied my own to serve theirs, even though nothing worked, and even though I never understood they were trying to play a game.
I'm totally out on my own without any contact, and it was their choice years ago, so I might as well use the time to figure everything out that I wasn't allowed to even wonder about when I was with them. It's not exactly like if I said, "Oh, I get the game now! I'm supposed to boost yer ego by pretending to have feelings different from the ones I actually had! I get it now! I'm supposed to deny my feelings and pretend to have other feelings that boost yers! Then I'm accepted! You're ego satisfied! Right?" - they would have beat me up AND kicked me out.
Granted, I didn't want to hear what you said about this, but it was the best thing I could have heard. Yer right that it is the wrong path for me. I would have had a role just like your sister!

* Exactly. She hasn't really done anything with her life except to pretend to think and feel the way my parents want her to. They don't like everything she feels and thinks either, and gets corrected constantly. But at least she's a willing slave to it all. I wasn't. My sister is the one who they hang up as an example of a "good child"! When she is a woman of 32 years old, not a little girl, and all she does is serve my parents? Anyone should be suspect at their claim that this is their good child and that I'm their bad child when I am married, have children, and help run a business with my husband, and have never been arrested or drunk. Any parent who wants to keep their child a child and who is touting that example as "the best child" is both evil and toxic.
Note that my sister has no ambitions except counter-manipulating my parents! And she pretends plenty! It's not a life I wanted, nor should any parent, so I accepted giving it up, and I'm way better off for it.

* When you are with parents like this you aren't allowed to talk about anything. They talk over you or they tell you what is real, what you're thinking and what you're feeling. Whether you are no contact or in contact, the result is the same. It's totally about silencing us so that we don't really exist for them. They make sure their existence, and their thoughts and feelings are known to everyone, and that we're their audience.
I think this is the worst thing about child abuse

* Therapy. That’s the safe place to work out stuff in the past and overcome issues to be more adaptive in the present. Unfortunately generally people don’t do the work and don’t know how to do the work to help others get there. So there are observations and feedback and not always too sensitive and hurts from the interference of others and lack of growth because of it allegedly, but there is a place to pursue that growth and the public or private arena just aren’t suited well to help. If you want to actually heal go talk to someone who knows how to help with it and don’t settle for the feedback of the prevailing attitude.My family’s favorite saying, ‘oh get over it.’

* I have gotten to the point where I have been silenced so much that it has destroyed my capacity to listen to my NM. I am finding that I blank out when she talks. Is it years and years of being manipulated by her, and my mind has just said, "No more manipulation"? Is it years and years of gaslighting to the point where if I respond to anything, she will call me crazy? Is it my choice to blank out when she talks? It doesn't feel like it. It might be good to know what she is talking about so that I don't get a surprise attack. I have no idea what she has said most of the time these days. It's like I come out of a dream after she is done talking. No one else creates this in me, except her. Actually Trump on T.V. can make my mind go blank too. I hear only so much and then "wipe out!" and I'm gone.
Is this common?

* I have no idea if it is common, but it might be trauma related. I think if we compare it to war, we turn off the continual sounds of guns, bombs and airplanes to survive. When your brain is over-loaded with attacks, maybe you just enter a space where those noises are cut off?

* Yea, like when she begins to say anything, I roll my eyes, and then I don't hear anything more. Maybe there is nothing worth hearing, but I wouldn't know because it seems automatic at this point. One time she was screaming at me and the people around us were surprised I didn't respond. I feel like I live in my head so much. It's like I've got a separate world going on inside, and why bother pretending I'm in a one sided conversation with an NM who can't hear or understand what I'm saying. She either has layers of defenses if I respond, or goes on the attack if I'm not saying something she doesn't want to hear. Maybe she blanks out on me too when I talk which is why she interrupts me every time I respond. I'm not really a part of her monologue. I'm just a gravestone she decides she needs to vent to and about. 

* I think we are always dead to them. They are primarily assuaging how much power and control they can detect we are willing to give them, and as a side line, wondering what we think of them, and whether we place them up or down on a hierarchy that for a lot of us doesn't even exist.

* Oof, I could have easily written this.
There is nothing wrong with you. Someone(s) traumatized you and it's hard to move forward when you've never been able to get validation or resolution or closure.
Idk if this helps, but coming to the conclusion that my family would never be able to give me any of that and working on myself was how I got my closure.

* agree with all of this
♥️ we’ve all experienced this to some extent in this group. So, share those feelings whether it be rage, disappointment, rejection, whatever it is here with us. It’s a safe place to get the recognition and validation. You’re seen. Keep going lovely. You’re not alone

* This is all gaslighting. It's about saying, "You're too crazy to know what you think and feel. So I'll tell you!" And the worst of it is that they can punish you for how they interpret your feelings and thoughts, especially if they sense that you are bucking their so-called entitlements to control you all of the time, especially if they think you are hurting their ego.
Be careful of going along with this belief that they are mind-readers and can tell what you are thinking and feeling just to get some peace. I did this, and it made them even more entitled to tell me what I was thinking and feeling, and gave them a sense that they really were great mind readers. They are not.
Even tho defending yourself and arguing with them is really uncomfortable, it keeps them from going down the rabbit hole of thinking that they are super human mind readers. They are not even close. We all know that. It takes empathy to be able to understand other people. They don't have that ability and that needs to be drilled into them over and over again.
Once they get the feeling that they are mind readers - watch out! They will punish you for all sorts of things that are not even happening! They act more like sociopaths at that point than narcissists.

* Having people tell you what you feel is the worst kind of human interaction I can fathom. It's like being imprisoned for crimes you did not commit. When I was a child I was constantly accused for things I didn't feel. And yes, I was punished for them. It's like our parents have decided they are in a war with us and that they have to strike us down before we find out what they are trying to do to us. It's like they are in fear of phantom enemies.
I think this is why parents have scapegoats.
Needless to say I was discarded once I turned into an adult.

* Ongoing gaslighting and emotional manipulation. This is the way they keep the dysfunctional system in place and their foot pressed on our throats. I'm in the process of growing my capacity to honor my needs and validate my experiences within that toxic system, regardless of their agenda to keep me prisoner of their toxicity.

* My mom's favorite response is, "So what do you want?!" Or, "Well, that was a long time ago. Time to move on, that's what adults do." Not only is this stuff *not* really in the past because the abuse continues to this day, but we werent allowed to feel and process our feelings when the incidents were happening. They're never going to take responsibility. They're never going to understand that the closure we need is healthy and normal, and they're the dysfunctional ones for denying and hindering that. The way you felt and feel about what happened to you is valid. This is part of how they try to silence us so they can continue as they always have. You deserve better. Talk to chosen family and friends you trust who are in a good place to support and listen, and if you have access to a trauma-qualified therapist it can be a wonderful help in self-validation and processing all this stuff that you've never been safe to address. You are not alone.
💜




* Narcissists will silence you over things that bring them shame, as parents, as people, per their reputation in the family or community. They don't like to know they aren't perfect either, that they make as many mistakes as other people, if not more of them. It is typical for them to silence you, and then give you the silent treatment, as though you have callously hurt them by bringing up a topic, even if it is an important topic that most parents would discuss with their child. Realize that this is part of narcissism, and if they refuse to talk, you can walk away. Some narcissists will make sure the shame lands on your shoulders instead of on theirs, which is why this sometimes graduates to the silent treatment, were they try to make you out to be the most shameful person that ever lived. Don't be influenced by that. It isn't your fault.
(said by a therapist)

* I have gotten numb to the silent treatment. When I get the silent treatment, I tend to talk to other people more. And when NM is in not in one of her silent treatment modes and gets really talkative, I get quiet and so reserved you'd probably think I was a zombie.

* Please call a domestic violence shelter and ask if they offer trauma consell8ng. That is what I chose to do. Trauma is sonething they 7nderstand and can help with. Or ask your doctor for numbers of other associations that may. . You are worth it. Childhood trauma is just as valid as any trauma. Your feelings now and your feelings as a child are also valid.

* Look at it this way. Manipulating us to have certain feelings or no feelings at all means they don't know us and never will. They will claim to know us throughout our childhood, and even through adulthood even when we are estranged, but how can you know someone when they can't tell their parent what they really think and feel, when the parent tries to take charge of that? They don't know anything. Literally, they don't you any better than a neighbor they wave to but never talk to.
And we are expected to live in that environment full time?
We are nothing more than a neighbor they wave to. They can register that we exist and that is about all.
And that is what makes them really, really bad parents. You can't just acknowledge that your child exists, and that you're the only one who gets to decide what they are feeling and thinking, any more than a neighbor would put up with another neighbor deciding what they are thinking and feeling based on what they see through a window.
But that's what it is like growing up with disordered parents.

* Yea, and it's one of those situations where the window is translucent, where they can tell you're there, but only the rough shape.
This is all so relatable. I can't tell you how many times I thought, "My father doesn't know me or understand me." His accusations of hostility were so off the wall. He determined that I ruined his life! No use in defending myself or talking. He decided whether I defended myself or not. I tried to get him to hear a reasonable perspective on what I was actually thinking and feeling. He was determined to wipe it all out and put his interpretation on it.
Getting away from my father was the best thing I could do. I could explore what I thought and felt rather than have it shot down over and over again without discussion. I still see him once in awhile in large family gatherings, and he still does it there, does all of the talking about what I do, feel, think, etc., but I also make it clear how often we see each other, like once every three years and only at big family events, and that he doesn't know me or my life at all.
They say that family will stick together against a scapegoat, but I think he is just too domineering and crazy for a lot of them to take seriously. He's seen as an interrupting attention-seeking blow-hard with a bad swearing and drinking problem. An unpleasant person in other words.

* Classic manipulation by ppl who don't want to face what they've done or be accountable for their actions. This is one of their favorite go-tos.

* This is why the gray rock method doesn't work. Who ever thought that up had to have their head examined. It only works if you want to keep the more egregious abuse at bay, but only for a little while. They will still want to start up an argument to get their narcissistic supply, and denying them that by distracting them with boring subjects is going to make them enraged.
They constantly make up what you feel and think whether you are gray rock or not. And they try to get arguments going about it too.
Every therapist should suggest going no contact first and foremost, and really press their clients to consider it, and if the client refuses, then only talk about the gray rock method then. However, I think people who decide what you're feeling all of the time are going to be the people who will not stand for gray rock and be determined to punish you for not being drawn into an argument.
Narcissists are not reasonable and they are pathologically stupid about how to relate to other people.

* Highly relatable. The general public have a very low emotional tolerance for hearing about abuse. The denial is strong. Nothing compared to our abusers though.
I can confirm that having therapy with a psychologist specializing in trauma has been incredibly healing and massively cathartic.

* Same here. My NM always said: "You've always felt like you got the short end of the stick". And I always believed I was not worthy of her love- let alone anyone else's. I'm at the beginning of my healing journey and so far going NC has been the best decision I've ever made.

* I tried the gray rock method. It means your family can attribute more feelings to you that you're not having because you are no longer defending yourself.
NC is the only way to go. It frees you from the internal depression, rage and helplessness you feel constantly when your parent guts out your real feelings and thoughts with their evil intentioned ones over and over for eternity. You can never get out of feeling that way without going NC.
The depression, rage and helplessness can eat away at your soul.

* And not only that, but they think they are good parents when they do this, and that we should be eternally grateful to them for getting us wrong all of the time. Cuckoo.

* Don't most of us stop talking when they get us wrong? Won't they punish us for explaining ourselves more than if we kept silent? Don't most of these parents want us silent so they can attribute things to us without blow back?

* My GC has denied my truth forever and I’ve finally cut him out of my life for it, among other things. My husband and kids however give me the validation and understanding that I need and I appreciate it so much. AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH YOU!

* They'd tell me, "You're obsessed with the past!" the day after they shouted me down and wouldn't let me talk about an experience I had that any parent would be concerned about. They didn't want to listen to what I had to say no matter what.
Why didn't they want to listen to it? Because they have no empathy. So instead of saying, "I don't want to listen to it because I have no empathy, and you don't want me to fake that, do you?" they say, "You're obsessed with the past!" They try to find the flaw in you rather than make it about their own lack of empathy.
In your mind, just call it for what it is: their lack of empathy speech. And then laugh at how they desperately, desperately, and without success, try to make it about a flaw in you. It's their "perfect" blame-shifting tactic at work, except it isn't so perfect because we can see right through it.

* You have to be very selective of who you share with. If I would ever get that comment my response would be that I live very much in the present but I have not forgotten the past. The past informs my future.

* I think this is just another patriarchal thing that narcissists take advantage of. You are only allowed to talk if you are a man. They can say absolutely anything want, but the girls and women in the house have to shut up and listen to a man order them around. It is how my mother used our stepfather. She'd tell him what orders to give us, and he gave them. I was hushed into submission so many times and my brother was asked for the truth. It was a barely survivable environment and one in which I felt I had to go no contact with.

* Interesting about that. Yes, they will use any old standard to get girls to be submissive. My mother wore the pants in the family, and my father was the one who she decided needed to listen to her. If he confronted her, she'd get retaliatory and run away. Years later he no longer wanted to hear her words because she lied about so many affairs. He said she'd lie about anything at that point. Then the family split up, and after that she decided I had to listen to her and become an absolutely submissive part of my former self. My brother was spared and was allowed to say anything, and he took after her, lying all of the time about nearly everything.

* Wow, so he let his wife talk and decide everything, including silencing others of the same sex?

* She said she liked men more than women. She said that all mothers pretend to love their daughters, but that they really don't. They only love their sons first and their husbands and lovers for a little while until they get sick of them and want to find another. She said she had no use of little girls unless they were like maids. She had no trouble hiding her feelings about that to me. At age 16, she no longer wanted me and I went to live with my grandmother. My grandmother didn't really like girls any more than my mother. I went no contact with that side of my family when my daughter was born.

* I have to say that I'm still in shock over the fact that my NM refused to talk to me about my brother's bullying and his domestic violence of his ex-wife and most of his children. She insisted I apologize to my brother, and when I wouldn't (I did say it was crazy to apologize which probably injured her poor ego), she said she didn't want to talk about my brother again. After a couple of months went by, she gave me a life-long silent treatment. She spread a lot of false narratives about me to get other people to vilify me.
It's amazing that they think their lies will re-instate their bigger than life ego. It's amazing when you find out they don't love you and that all they care about is that you apologize to abusers in the family.
It's amazing that they'll give you up just to promote a false fantasy. It's amazing that they don't care about you at all when they do their final discard after a life time of pretending to love you. It's amazing how little they care about and for their own children. It's amazing that they can live with what they've done without reflection or remorse. It's amazing that social services said that they'd take me if they didn't straighten out their act, but that they keep re-playing their act after your childhood has ended, and that they show no self reflection over being a bad parent. It's amazing that they are out to prove that you are a worse child than they are a bad parent, and again, when they have to make up stories about what you did, and what they did is in writing by a head psychiatrist at a mental health facility.
It's amazing that they will do anything, and I mean anything, to protect their sorry ego. It's amazing how far they will go to that end. They will sacrifice everything and anything to honor their ego. If they have to protect their ego with that many lies, maybe their ego isn't worth protecting, but do they consider that? No. They'll give up every relationship, everything they have, everything they are, to hang on to protecting their ego, but will stop at nothing to shoot yours down, over and over, and over again.
Maybe silence is golden when their ego protections have gotten to this kind of toxic level.

* Protecting their ego when they have done wrong is always going to be toxic - for everyone. Most of the people left in their lives will be effected by it too, but they don't realize it right away.

* Narcissism is always going to about protecting their ego. It's a disease of admiring the self at all cost.

* Knowing this, it is possible not to care about them any more than they care about you. The requirement to pump up their ego doesn't do you any favors, and it certainly doesn't do them any favors. They make it a life and death issue, and it is not. They need to learn that. They can't have you around if they want to pretend the mirror has no cracks. If they have you around, they have to be reminded that they sacrificed their child and lied about their child to protect their ego. Is that what they want for their lives? No way.
It is why they move on in a cold way.
I think we owe it to ourselves to realize that talking to them is always going to be about how well we are ego pumping. Enjoy the silence as much as you can, and don't take their silent treatment as a reflection on you.

* I have learned how to deal with my NM's silencing and silent treatments and I am no longer effected by them. I have learned they are ego temper tantrums and that they are responsible for building themselves back up by right action instead of wrong action. I have a right to accept or refuse her ack into my life. There are a lot of boundaries now. She refused to talk to me, and now I have refused to talk to her about any personal subjects. She is the last person I want to share that part of myself with. We have managed a very simplified relationship, and when ego dramas rear their ugly head again, I tell her that it's not my job to fluff her ego up while she tries to destroy mine, and that the best thing for both of us is to take a break from each other.
It is how I've managed the relationship. So far there is more silence between us than talking, but that is fine with me. It keeps me having to deal with the narcissistic side of her. She only really wants to parade me around as her "successful daughter" to her friends any way. Aside from that, the relationship doesn't consist of much.

* I'm a truth teller and they love shouting me down and trying so hard to get me to stop talking. To no avail!!!
These people love lies and living in lies! Who is kidding who? 
I used to be abused for speaking the truth, but now I'm not scared at all. I succeeded in life, and that scares the hell out of them, so now they are quiet. 
I love how I could turn the tables on them. 

* Silencing someone is a gaslighting tactic. Don't be influenced by it. Just say to yourself, "I'm being gaslighted" and talk to people who can better handle the important things you need to talk about.
Remember that narcissists have their ego in everything they do and everything they say. That is why they can't hear you, and can only hear you based on how it is effecting their ego.
(written by a therapist)

* I'd get, "You never said that!" when I said it over and over and over again, but they'd shoot me down and tell me not to talk about it. Then when something happens that they don't like, and all of a sudden they pretend that I never talk to them about important stuff. It's a dirty rotten game, and I'm done playing it.

* With me, they shut me up when they don't want to hear what I have to say and then demand that I talk if I don't want to talk about something. They will punish me if I don't shut up, and they will punish me if I'm the one who wants to stay quiet and not tell them things. They have to be in control of when I open my mouth, what I say, how I say it, and what they don't want me to say. Sometimes there is literally nothing I want to say to them, and they decide that there is, that I'm keeping things from them. I can't win at their game and like another poster above said I can't listen to them any more anyway. They can't keep on subject and because of that they accuze me of things I never said, or even experienced. I think I just need to give up on them in terms of any more long discussions. I don't know oif that means no contact or just moving, but I'm in the process of putting my own life together.

* Growing up with parents who don't want you to talk, and can't hear what your saying is sooooooo hard! Its easy to fall into the wallflower role. Like trying to match the wallpaper so that they don't see you and pick on you. Once they pick on you, they don't want to hear what you have to say. Only they get to interpret the world around you. Your supposed to listen to them and get an idea of what is happening only. That is just not right. Their versions, even tho they spend way more time talking than we do are more insan, if we can't get more than a word in edgwise.
I think the reason why they like to talk about what is real is that they know they are out of touch with reality so much that the only way they can convince themselves and us that they aren't living in a fantasy is to persuade us and others that they are the ones with a grip on reality, never us.

* I am so allergic to being told to shut up and keep quiet that I no longer want a relationship with my parents. It was my way of giving them exactly what they wanted: quiet in their world forever.

* So do any narc parents care what we have to say? Or are they always more focused on getting us to shut up so that they can coerce us with their words?

* I think they know that scapegoats can't be coerced because we are allergic to them as authority figures. We know that what they have to say is only for their benefit. I don't listen to my parents any more than they listen to me which is almost never. I'm not going to have them talk at me and deny me a response. Not happening!

* My family is like a bad cult. My parents only give themselves permission on when to talk and what to talk about and most of it is BS. We are supposed to be entranced and follow the leader. Didn't work. I was the first one to leave.  

* Yep. My mother would say "I don't remember that." Or she would remind me of the terrible things going on in the world. Just another way of minimizing my feelings.

* I don't tell anyone what's going on with me anymore. Just 1 friend and my husband.

* Talking with narcissists is like walking in a minefield. You never know when they will blow up at you. I have no problem with keeping silent these days. They can tell me to be silent all day long if they want. Much more of a relief than when they demand gossip.

* I could have written this , im currently in the last few months at university and writing a dissertation.
When i was a child i was never allowed to express myself, and was told off talking about myself, in the dissertation we were told to write an artist statement which is talking about your self. I've found it very difficult to separate my personal self from my artist self. I was told today to talk less about myself and more about art. I understand what she was saying but it brought up a lot of past trauma. Im nearly 38. I've been refured for therapy but it could take a year before i see someone. It is such a hard road ...

* I am in a very similar situation. The waiting is hard. I feel I have suffered so much for so long it is time for me. I am worth it, and so are you

* I know exactly how you feel, people will abuse you and when you react to their abuse they will call you the crazy one

* I used art to express myself because I couldn't at home with my NM ruling the roost. I was encouraged by many teachers because they said I had talent. I thought it was one way to avoid feeling frustrated at never being able to express how I really felt and thought around her. If I dared to talk, she'd rephrase and correct everything to make it sound bad.
My father drank as his escape and refused to stand up to her no matter how awful she got.
Wouldn't you know that she couldn't stand my art, my last mode of expression. One day while I was at school she ripped it all up and told me that I was no longer allowed to make art. It broke my heart and a couple of my teachers told her that I had real talent, that I should be encouraged. She wouldn't listen to them, and when I got home she yelled, "How dare you get your teachers to call me! I will not stand for it!"
It was like she threw away my identity.
Somehow I managed to pursue my passion any way. When I was crying that my mother would just rip up everything I did, my grammar school teacher came up with the idea that she could save my drawings and paintings until I left home. She saved the work I did in high school too.
It was clear that I was only to be a drudge for my mother. I wasn't willing to accept that in the long run even though I had to accept it living under her roof.
I put myself through art college and I have been a practicing artist ever since. And I don't have a relationship with my mother any more.
God forbid I sneak around doing art instead of drinking like my father and eldest brother!

* I've heard that many narcissists disapprove of artist daughters. I wonder why that is?

* Probably because they have talent and the parent doesn't. Narcissists don't like anyone outshining them.

* Why not pick on male carpenters and woodworkers too? "They're making something that I can't make! Oh, no! Put a stop to that!"

* Yer right. There is a bit of a double standard there!

* Patriarchal society. They are proud of men and in competition with women.

* Mine focused so much on the past, that I dared to sneak art making into my life despite her disapproval, but had no trouble telling me that I focused on the past too much when a discussion got uncomfortable for her, which was about always.

* I can very much relate to this, it has been used against me many times.
Remember.... just because they say it doesn’t mean it’s true ( probably the opposite)
Something that I have found helpful lately is that I have been rephrasing their rubbish in my mind to the actual reality of the situation so for this one it would be...
“ I have seen exactly who you are from your past actions and behaviour and I will act appropriately on that information ”
They can call it living in the past or holding grudges or whatever they want but in reality who would keep touching a fire when they know it burns? Saying that something was in the past doesn’t excuse it at all, without a genuine apology and without a change in behaviour it is nothing more then manipulation.
It’s just another tactic to keep you exactly where they want you to be.

* Sometimes I find talking about things helps me heal or understand more. Then I find it easier to let go or in fact not let go sometimes and know that someone did something to me and I don't have to just forgive or feel guilty. I don't have to live in the past but understand it more good or bad.. so you talk but find the correct person or people to talk to. The narcissist will use what you say against you or say your crazy or you live in the past. They don't care or want to care about you. Sending strength and positive thoughts.

* Yep. Same for me. Therapy and no contact is the only way to peace. These people don't change.

* There is nothing wrong with you.. you’re allowed to talk about your feelings and hurt. People that tell you that you live in the past are invalidating you and shutting you down. Have your voice heard and speak up.
Similarly I’ve had parents treat me like this. Try and talk about something and I’m told I have problems. More like they are blocking and don’t want to acknowledge my feelings or their behaviour

* That's gaslighting. They love to ignore that you were hurt by them. If you got over it really fast, they'd say, "What's the matter with you?! You never think about anything?" too. It's a no win situation.

* Gaslighting. I can not say anything referencing my past or its ‘stop living in the past’. Narc families most toxic and invalidating mantra towards the scapegoat. Yet they are allowed to make jokes and poke fun about things in my past THEY’VE chose to make a topic to embarrass and exploit me.

* I love it when some family member comes to me and tells me to stop talking about family dynamics. They really, really love living in illusions and lies and posturing. Phonies to the max!! 
While I won't talk to them any more, poor pitiful things, I can just as easily talk everywhere else - and they HATE, HATE, HATE me because I won't stop!! And I have so much evidence to back up the false facades!
Hahaha

* I tried to make sense of why they feel allowed to talk about anything and everything, and why their own children, even when 40 years old, are not allowed to talk about anything except what narcissistic parents allow. There is simply no way to understand this. I found that the best thing to do is to share only with people who don't try to shut you up or shut you down. If they start that, it's time to walk away. They are just not safe people if they are doing that. 

* Oh, they act ferocious, but really they only act that way because they are wimps when the big bad truth finally shines a light on them. Once the truth is out there, they look like victims for a change, instead of us. 

* "The past is in the past" but only for you, not for them. They hold grudges forever. But it's their favorite saying to get you to shut up about any subject except for them!!! 

FURTHER READING

Stonewalling: Narcissist’s Silent Treatment Method - by Saul Mcleod, PhD & Julia Simkus for Simple Psychology
excerpt:
     ... Stonewalling involves withdrawing from communication and deliberately avoiding providing any information, feedback, or emotional response, effectively shutting down a conversation or interaction. ...
     ... Stonewalling is commonly observed in conflicts or disputes between individuals in a relationship. According to psychologist John Gottmann, this behavior can have serious consequences for a relationship because it creates a sense of disconnection and frustration between the people involved. ...
     ... While stonewalling is typically used as a way to avoid conflict, narcissists will use stonewalling as a tool for manipulation. ...
     ... The narcissist consistently ignores your requests, needs, or concerns, showing a lack of consideration or empathy for your emotions. If you speak to them about something important to you, they might dismiss you, ignore you, cut you off, or say something like “who cares” or “just be quiet.” They might also dismiss you by belittling or laughing at what you are saying. ...
     ... Feeling ignored, dismissed, or shut out by someone you care about can be hurtful and can lead to feelings of rejection and inadequacy. Social rejection and exclusion can evoke significant emotional pain. Stonewalling is a form of ostracism and is often interpreted as a threat to the body and brain. In response to stonewalling, our alarm system (fight/flight response) is set off. This can lead to feelings of panic, anxiety, depression, and/ or anger. Stonewalling threatens our fundamental need to belong.

For abuse to occur, a child’s voice must be silenced  - gcyp.sa.gov.au (Australian government site)
excerpt:
11 July 2017
     For abuse of a child to occur, the first necessary condition is that the child remain silent, that their voice not be heard. 
     This silence may be engineered by the abuser, using their status, fear or shame. It may be engineered by institutions that are passive in protecting children or complicit in covering it up or by adults and peers who are not alert to the signs or do not know how to respond. ... 

Silent treatment from parents: The psychological implications on kids and why it should be avoided - Times of India


Ways Manipulative Narcissists Silence You: Part IV (Narcissists enjoy making malicious remarks at a survivor's expense) - by Shahida Arabi for Domestic Shelters.org

Ways Manipulative Narcissists Silence You: Part II (Does your abuser shift blame, change the subject, name-call or nitpick?) - by Shahida Arabi for Domestic Shelters

How Narcissists Silence Their Partners - Narcissisms.com

Unknowingly Silencing Others – Are You A Conversational Narcissist? - by Tatiane Garcia, Executive Contributor for Brainz
excerpt:
     Have you ever noticed a friend who, despite giving you sporadic moments of attention, primarily uses your presence as an opportunity to unload their thoughts and feelings without truly listening to yours? Indeed, we've all experienced the one-sided nature of such "friendships." ...
     ...Growing up in a family of women, I was always fascinated by our unique social skills. However, none of us possessed the necessary skills to truly listen to one another. Taking into account factors such as our culture, environment, age, beliefs, and ambitions, I often listened to my sister's narrative with a certain bias. I sometimes disagreed with their wrong or incorrect views, comparing my struggles to theirs without realizing that the conversation was about them, not me.
     When we find ourselves in the opposite position, needing a secure space to express ourselves, we quickly realize our mistake in speaking. Often, we feel stifled, misunderstood, embarrassed or even smaller, and the conversation ends up revolving around the other person. The sensation of being ignored induces an immediate feeling of sadness and discouragement. ...


The Effects of Silencing Your Child’s Voice - by Dr. Ernest Waith, DMin. for Medium

Silent Treatment: Preferred Weapon of People with Narcissism - by Andrea Schneider, LCSW for Good Therapy






Thursday, March 30, 2023

Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does It Work?

This post isn't necessarily like other posts I have written for this blog, but it does foray into a discussion about abuse eventually so that you can see what can happen when people try to hurt others to teach them a lesson. This means I will also be discussing who perpetrates abuse (mostly people with personality disorders in the Cluster B realm).

And it is quite obvious that abusive people like to hurt others in order to get people to change their behavior (often with very little luck - and it will become obvious as to why). 

But even if you are not abusive, and don't want to hurt the other person to get them to change, will that work?  

The research says: Not too likely unless there are certain components in your pleas for change. 

TRYING TO GET ADULTS TO CHANGE
WITHOUT HURTING THEM
AND WITH HURTING THEM

introduction

Here is an excellent psychology article that describes why it is so hard and frustrating to get people to change behaviors so that a more healthy relationship can emerge (I suggest reading the whole article): 

How to Teach Someone a Lesson (Warning: What they learn might disappoint you.) - by Tina Gilbertson LPC for Psychology Today.

The main takeaway from that article is that you have to be the change that you want to see. Shaming someone does not work, especially if you can't practice what you preach. 

At the very least, the person you are shaming has to see you as a benevolent teacher, someone who has their best interests at heart, someone who is living and behaving in the way that they are touting as the best way for you to behave too.

And the person who is going to think of you as a good advisor or teacher already clearly respects you, has a good relationship and rapport with you, senses that you are compassionate, steady and reasonable, and probably already takes your advice to heart.

If you don't have a good trusting relationship with someone you are trying to teach, they will not listen to you.

Most adults do not want people who insert themselves into a "teacher position" in our lives without our consent to have them in that position. We must welcome it, and we most likely won't welcome it unless we know they care about us a great deal. If they are doing it on behalf of themselves, or another person (as pressure to get us to move in a certain direction), it will most likely backfire - because it is an aggressive act. And like most unwanted aggressive acts, we are likely to balk and step back. If they step forward and get more irate with judgements and criticism, we are likely to step back even further. 

If you are being critical in a number of different ways of the person you are trying to teach, the best take-away you are going to get is that you are "a highly critical and judgmental person". 

Being judgmental has its issues because judgmental people aren't seeing you as a whole person, your good points, your bad points, what goes on in your mind, your life and ambitions, your morality, how you live, how you treat lots of other people in your life, what your life story is, and everything in-between. 

When a person is highly critical and judgmental about us, what we will see are their blind spots about us, their inability to see others as they truly are, that they can't see us for what we are either, and their ego-driven audacity to criticize us when they are so flawed themselves (even in the way they are criticizing us). This is usually the stand-out thing we will focus on and walk away with. 

And if the critical judgmental person is more immoral and unethical than we are, we are going to scoff at what they have to say. Either it is: "Ppppptttt! Look at who you are! Like you are better in that department than I am? If anything you look worse in that department than I do! How dare you try to teach me a lesson!" or  "Pppptttt! Look at them! They did x, y and z and they are going to criticize me and lecture me for something they do all of the time?! Not going to happen!"

Even if the judgmental critical people in our lives aren't hypocrites, most of us are still going to search far and wide for hypocrisy to make sure your intentions are pure. This is one area where empathy and compassion can't be faked. The person giving us advice or criticism has to have a vested interest in, and compassion, for us, where their ego isn't involved, and we have to believe in it whole-heartedly, otherwise the advice or criticism is just not going to stir us to change.

It is especially hard to do for those of us who have gotten burned by fake empathy or a person whose empathy seemed to shut down instantly when we were vulnerable so that they could get more power, control and domination for themselves over us in our weakened state. We aren't going to hand over trust to you just so you can do that to us again, or like the last person did to us. 

A teacher is someone you believe has greater knowledge than you do, who you endow confidence in to bring you into a higher state of knowledge. If you don't feel that way about them, they are not your teacher. A teacher is a "special position" to be in, and requires special social and personal skills and considerations on their part. If the teacher is insulting, judgmental, arrogant, highly critical, insolent, boorish, or abusive, they are not a good teacher. They need to be fired right away. It is my observation that they get fired from someone's mind first (the insults the offender spews boomerang off of a person's natural defenses) before they realize they are an unwanted teacher themselves. Unwanted teaching is a form of  harassment, especially if it is hostile, bullying, insulting, denigrating, judgmental and unwelcome.

It is very difficult to shame adults anyway. Unless we are ruining our lives with criminal acts, lots of lies, lots of false narratives, unethical acts that normally bring social derision, living with lots of paranoia that all of our acts will be exposed, addictions, abusing others, having second thoughts, and being rattled with shame or toxic secrets, we are most likely happy with who we are. The more ethical we try to be, the more at peace with ourselves we will be too.

Who we are isn't likely to be rattled by someone who is less understanding or less ethical than we are. It might be if their ethics are noticeably higher than our own, but even there, most of us have to be sure enough that they are, indeed higher in ethics, and that takes a lot of time and investment in the relationship. We also have to want to make the positive changes in ourselves.  

For highly unethical people, shaming is even less likely to work. Shame-ers tend to only be known for their shaming.

And if they are shaming us too much, and too loudly, and for too many pointless issues and  extraneous reasons, or if there is hypocrisy involved, they tend to be narcissists or sociopaths who DARVO situations so that they don't feel at fault for the dirty acts that they commit and put the fault on us. That is not going to shame us. We are going to be looking at the tactic first and foremost. They just pretend the dirty acts belong to you instead. They are happy with the DARVO tactic if they are using it. If they aren't happy with it, they'd stop it. It's that simple, and they do have a choice. 

If you are an ethical person and you are dealing with someone who DARVOs you all of the time, their ways of teaching you a lesson will not work unless your self esteem and boundaries for respect are so low that you allow them to make you into a doormat. Being a doormat is a trauma response, and most of us don't feel well enough after awhile to stay in it (being a doormat for any length of time will start to give you trauma symptoms). So perhaps the best thing to do in those situations is to find relationships where ethics and morality match. We all need to be in relationships where people care about us, and DARVO-ing us shows us that they don't care about us at all. Really: they don't care about us at all if they are using this tactic. It's a criminal-type mind that does this (criminals use the DARVO tactic a whole lot). 

If the people giving us judgments, lectures, advice and criticisms aren't close to us, or don't know us, the same results will happen. What ever they say will be taken with a grain of salt because no relationship of trust or empathy has ever been established. So why do they do it? 

Here is something I went through: 

I remember someone who I had barely spent more than two days with in my whole life, giving me advice as to whether I should get married. She had a lot of opinions too, not just a few. And there was some coercion in her delivery. My first thought was: "That's so jacked up! Where does she get off!?" I didn't even look at her, and probably rolled my eyes. I don't even understand people who think that it's okay to do that, or even think that way.

All that it shows are these possibilities: that they think they know me after two days (no, they do not), that personal decisions like this can be influenced by them (no, they can't be), that they think their own opinions are so valuable and noteworthy that other people will listen to them (no, I won't, and I doubt other people would either), that they are so high on the ethics scale that I would actually take what she had to say seriously (no, she wasn't high on the ethics scale by the company she kept, by her highly critical, judgmental, and biased nature in the short time I saw her in action, by being a blind follower of someone I do not respect). I knew she had no interest what so ever in anything to do with me unless it benefited her and her husband. People who don't know you and think they can make such a highly personal decision for you and your life are probably either delusional, have a very high opinion of themselves, think your intelligence is so below par that you would actually consider what they have to say, or are highly aggressive (or maybe all of those things). These don't make for qualities that are trustworthy, or even "listen-able", for other people.  

The choice of a mate, the choice of whether to get married, the choice of who to allow into a discussion about it, are filled with many moments of deep thought and consideration by the person who is making those decisions, and they have a right to make those decisions by themselves, without input. I never said, "I want input from you." The only person I listened to in my life, was someone I had known and spent a great deal of time with for over a decade, and also knew my husband in a profound way too. 

My main concern with anyone entering into my life is, "Will they try to hurt me? Are we equals, and will I be treated as an equal?" 

If those things aren't present, I lose interest right away. 

And with people who want to give me advice it is: Are they selfish and self-serving, lying, back-stabbing, hypocritical, aggressive or passive aggressive, judgmental, dis-respectful, punishing people? Do they have arrogance, do think they are superior; do they want me serving their needs and wants and giving up my own; are they interested in listening to me?" Obviously I wouldn't want their advice or to learn any of their lessons. That's normal.

It can take time to know who people are, where they are coming from and what their agenda is. And it's normal not to want advice or criticism from these kinds of people either. 

what kinds of personalities want to hurt other people

Now in terms of people who want to hurt you in order to teach you a lesson, this is always categorized as abuse. Right now some states make an exception: some laws in some states allow parents to hurt children under the age of 16 years old (but with a lot of counter laws so that it doesn't turn into abuse, which it tends to if they are hurting you a lot). However, most psychologists do not agree with these laws, and there is evidence that if a parent is purposely hurting a child or children to teach them lessons, that it tends to escalate to child abuse. The laws remain, however, because parents still want rights to hurt their children, within reason (no marks on the body).

In Great Britain, you are not allowed to emotionally hurt your children and you can be arrested for child abuse. The United States has yet to catch up on the research that hurting children often leads to child abuse, including escalating into physical abuse. 

The reason why countries consider taking measures against the emotional abuse of children is that it has a huge impact on society, and in producing productive forward thinking adults. That will become clear as your read further into the post. 

As for administering pain in other parts of society, if you are a judge or jury in a criminal matter, there are allowances to hurt criminals, and also rules, laws and standards as to how much you can hurt someone who has been convicted of a crime. But even in these incidences, the focus is going more and more in the direction of rehabilitation, precisely because hurting others does not produce much remorse or guilt. If anything, the verbal and emotional defensive walls tend to go up to protect themselves from more pain, even if they are criminals. This comes from all of the professional studies and literature on what hurting others produces. Some of those articles are listed below.  

For the purposes of this discussion, any adult sixteen and over, and any adult in a close personal relationship who is experiencing a punishment or a lesson that involves hurting you (from a partner or spouse, a parent, an adult child, a sibling, a close friend, a grandparent, in-laws, step-family, for instance) then it is always categorized as abuse. To get the skinny on how much you are being abused and what tactics they are using to get you into a state of pain, go to this post

As for who does this, and who are the masters of abuse, it tends to be individuals with Cluster B personality disorders: Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Histrionic Personality Disorder, and some individuals, but not all, with Borderline Personality Disorder. It is a spectrum disorder, so many of the Cluster B personality disorders can over-lap in one individual. Most of the Cluster B personality disorders are associated with abusive behavior, but not necessarily Borderline Personality Disorder, unless the individuals who have it feel they are being taunted in some way, or abandoned by a person, or they have some narcissistic traits in addition to the Borderline traits. In other words, it's complicated. If you are being abused, reading about the disorders will give you a better understanding of what is going on, and why. 

People with Borderline Personality Disorder, if they abuse at all, tend to reactively abuse. In other words, something sets them off and they react. 

People with Narcissism tend to reactively abuse and proactively abuse. Proactive abuse is what it sounds like: they abuse when there is no threat; they abuse when they think there may be a threat; they abuse as an assurance that they will come out on top (i.e. have superiority over their victim); they abuse if they think they may lose a competition (narcissists tend to have pronounced levels of jealousy and they spend an inordinate amount of time competing). Overt Grandiose Narcissists tend to be a little more reactive than proactive, Covert Vulnerable Narcissists tend to be a little more proactive than reactive, and Malignant Narcissists (who tend to have a conglomerate of all of the Cluster B personality disorders) tend to be quite a bit more proactive than reactive including elaborate plans of attack, revenge planning and revenge fantasies, tit-for-tat responses, an addiction to some forms of sadism, fantasies that they are in control of their victims' lives and other people's lives much more than they actually are, pronounced grandiose delusions and ambitions, a criminal mind ... but they can be reactive too: mostly when they feel power, control and domination is slipping away from them; they can react with rage and violence.

People with Antisocial Personality Disorder tend to be proactively abusive, and even prefer it so they are not detected until they can make the most devastating impact on their victims. In other words, they wait to attack at the most opportune moment. They have no remorse for hurting others and often feel their victims deserved every part of it. This is even true for innocent victims or child victims: "They shouldn't have been so stupid to trust me" is their common response when they hurt others who never provoked them. A lot of them tend to be loners. Males show contempt for animals early on and females destroy, give away or steal other people's property. Most do not follow laws or codes of conduct and have criminal minds and criminal thinking (i.e. what can they get out of each situation). The lack of empathy is pronounced, and most of them have delusions that they are superior precisely because they have no empathy and get away with a lot of unethical behavior. More than half of the prison population are made up of folks with Antisocial Personality Disorder. 

Then there is the Dark Triad which is an individual with malignant narcissism with pronounced Machiavellian traits, and the Dark Tetrad, which is an individual with malignant narcissism with pronounced sadism traits plus Machiavellian traits. 

Borderlines have remorse for the state their victims are in when they hurt them, and for the state they are in (in terms of reputation, trustworthiness, feeling shame about their emotional dysregulation). Many Borderlines are willing to change their behavior, and to regulate their rage to get along better with others, unless they have pronounced arrogance. 

Narcissists have little or no remorse for the state their victims are in when they hurt them in terms of empathy, but do have remorse for what it does to their reputation, whether people will trust them again, and whether their emotional outbursts will bring them shame. They have very little desire to change, preferring to blame their victims instead. They don't do well in therapy because narcissists tend to rage when they feel criticized and their behaviors are being judged, and they don't like to be taught. They want to be in the superior position, teaching, lecturing, criticizing others, so they overwhelmingly quit therapy. 

Some people with Antisocial Personality Disorder care that hurting others might mean they will be held accountable, and some hurt others without worrying about whether they will be held accountable. Most have no remorse for hurting other people and can have the attitude that they can talk themselves out of anything. Therapy often doesn't work because they look at it as a "cat and mouse game", a game where they can or can't manipulate the therapist, so rehabilitation is very difficult. If they are incarcerated, therapy is usually part of the incarceration, and they may be less resistant to therapy, and to teaching, in order to leave prison in good standing. Because sociopaths can be charming, and try to talk their way out of consequences, the therapist has to be "charm-resistant".  

do they succeed in hurting other adults?
and do they teach other adults an effective lesson on how to behave?

People who want to hurt others can succeed at it. And sometimes that is all they want, to prove to themselves that they can hurt another person, and perhaps how much they can get away with it too. 

But the bigger question is, what are the ramifications of succeeding at hurting other people? 

Let's just focus on the topic of this post, which is about whether they can succeed at teaching another person a lesson by hurting them. Can they do that? 

Probably not, and certainly not in the way they were hoping for, or what they thought would be the outcome. Some articles follow this section of the post as to why. 

The problem here is that hurting another adult is abuse. The perpetrator knows it is abuse unless they are living under a rock, and their victims know it is abuse too, unless they too are living under a rock. 

Abuse brings out trauma symptoms. Unless a perpetrator is well educated as to what trauma symptoms will do to his victim, and has a keen Machiavellian approach way beforehand of what he will do once his victim starts having symptoms, he is not going to know what to do. The victim has failed to learn the lesson in the way the perpetrator wanted.

Most often abusers just keep trying to hurt the victim, as if kicking a broken toy to see if kicking it will make it work better, and learn better. And, of course, that produces more trauma symptoms. And it doesn't make the victim "work better in the way that he wants it to work", so he usually kicks the victim "to the curb" instead ("abuse and abandon", or "abuse and kill"). - He will blame the victim for this failure: "Terrible defective toy!" 

Abusers tend not to know what trauma symptoms will do to their plans. They tend to be very low in emotional intelligence. If they knew that hurting others would do to their plans, they probably wouldn't abuse, but they don't know. They act on impulse or plan, and do it anyway, hoping that things will go their way. And they expect their impulsive actions to give them great rewards (because most abusers have an "arrogance problem" too: the arrogance keeps them blind). And it makes so many of them so blind that they think it's not their plan that went awry, but some faulty part in their victim. They think victims should act in some preconceived way.  

The other issue is that most abusers have a "self reflection" problem too. If they could put themselves in their victims' shoes, and think about how they would react if someone treated them the way they treat others, then they would see that they, themselves, would not react the way they expect their victims to react. In fact, they might be even more resistant to abuse others.

They might think before they indulge in impulsive or planned retaliation too (because abusers tend to dwindle downwards into retaliation instead of thinking of other ways to cope with interpersonal issues). But unfortunately, most of them don't get to the self reflection part: they don't even think to attempt to look at how victims might feel, and what they might be going through. They just think if they abuse, then their victims will automatically do what they expect. Not too bright. Lack of self reflection makes them blind too. 

Another issue is that most abusers don't change their own behavior themselves. In fact, if they are narcissists or sociopaths, they are extremely resistant to change. How is a person who can't change their behavior going to teach another person how to change their behavior? Teaching someone else something means that they are experts in the subject of "how to change your personality so that other people will approve of you." Being abusive is not a way to get approval. You wonder what their logic is. Not very bright. You might as well be getting "behavior lessons" from a three year old who is having a tantrum.  

Another problem is that most abusers want either an infantilized person they can shout orders to (as though the victim is a child who needs to be told what to do, how to do it, and gets its self esteem from being an abusive authoritarian) or a parentified person who takes care of the perpetrator's every need (as though the victim is a parent who should be providing all of the perpetrators needs, and as though the perpetrator is a child who needs to be soothed out of tantrums), or both. These are sick roles that either lead to co-dependency or trauma bonding and don't end up in behavioral changes that either party will be grateful for in the end. 

Another issue is that most abusers show that they are exploitive once they start abusing. It's the first thing victims see: "They want something from me and are intimidating me and blackmailing me to try to get it. They think abusing me is their ticket to get it. This is outrageous!" Victims will either try to go lateral ("Let's talk this out like adults and get rid of this power trip you are trying to pull on me", "Let's share the power and come to an understanding rather than me taking commands from you", "I don't do submission. You need to get a grip") or they walk ("I'm not playing that power game with that abuser", "I'm not going to be intimidated! Find some other victim to play head games with!", "They have got to be kidding! I can see their dirty motives and blackmail schemes a mile away!"), or they are going to be trauma bonded (they will get symptoms, work like a broken toy that can't do anything right for the abuser). If abusers were as smart as their arrogance tells them that they are, then they'd know their victims could see their unethical uncaring horrific motives and not want to play, given the chance.

Also a note on the previous chapter ... When victims are abused, they tend to look at abuse as "the perpetrator hates me, and therefor does not have good motivations towards me." It is why victims never learn what perpetrators want them to learn. It produces either the flight response in victims, or trauma symptoms. Take your choice. 

One other issue: they have very low ethics. How are they going to teach another person how to behave better when they can't even begin to do it themselves? How are they going to teach people to have empathy for them when they have very little or no empathy themselves and just want to go around poking people where it hurts just to get an emotional reaction out of them (narcissistic supply), more submission, and more power and control for themselves? We're supposed to learn how to behave from them? From people who have lower ethics than we have? From people who like to indulge in revenges, lies, smear campaigns, sadism, or other diabolical acts? From people who are so blind that they don't know what their abuses do? What planet are they living on? And why are they so arrogant when they are like this? You would think that their arrogance would fail them at this juncture. But no! It's kind of like a flea trying to teach a human how to behave. Fleas are annoying; they are exploitive, they leave welts that itch and hurt. No. They are not going to teach us lessons beyond what kind of person they are showing us that they are. That's not going to change our behavior in ways that they want or like. Again, not too bright. 

I will be talking about emotional intelligence in another post, but you can tell that abusers have very low amounts of it. They really know very little about human behavior, and human reactions to being controlled, trauma bonded, intimidated, or even teaching people lessons on how to behave. 

Need some more professional articles that basically say the same thing as the Psychology Today article above? Note: this is not the end of this post - in the next chapter I talk about hurting under-age children in order to teach them a lesson)

What It Means to Teach People How to Treat You - Medically reviewed by Karin Gepp, PsyD — By Margarita Tartakovsky, MS — Updated on August 12, 2022 for Psych Central

Should I Go To Couples Therapy With My Abusive Partner? - by National Domestic Hotline
excerpt:
     We at The Hotline do not encourage anyone in an abusive relationship to seek counseling with their partner. Abuse is not a relationship problem. ...

Abusive Relationship Therapy: Is It Helpful? (Couples therapy isn’t often recommended for abusive relationships, but individual counseling and other strategies may help.) - The Administrators of Psych Central

Why Couples Therapy Doesn’t Work For People In Abusive Relationships With Narcissists - by Shahida Arabi for Psych Central (re-published for Malahide Counseling and Psychotherapy)

That Will Teach You! Why Punishment Damages Relationships - by Dr. Ari Hahn, LCSW, Ph.D. Clinical Social Worker/Therapist for Choose Help

Is it Okay to Punish Your Spouse? -  The Marriage Counseling Blog

What Couples Should Know About the Silent Treatment (How to Know When Silence Is Abusive) - by Sheri Stritof, Medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Mind

Giving your partner the silent treatment isn't harmless — it can be devastating - by Kellie Scott for ABC Everyday

13 Reasons Why A Punishment Of Your Husband Isn’t A Good Idea (2023) - by Bijan Kholghi for Coaching Online
     Note: this article talks about women who punish their partner, but his advice and insights can be applied to any relationship, especially any of your close personal relationships

The silent treatment devastated me as a child. Then I used it as an adult - by Kellie Scott for ABC Everyday

Infidelity: Consequences of Punishing the Offending Partner - by Jim Hutt, PhD for Good Therapy

Unacceptable Relationship Behaviors (Unacceptable Behaviors That Will Destroy Your Relationship Real Fast) - by Beth McColl for Ask Men

Punishing - by Susan Felsch for Central Coast Counselling

Boyfriend punishes partner by criticizing her when she cries - by Neil Rosenthal for The Denver Post


CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN
(HURTING CHILDREN PHYSICALLY AS A WAY OF TEACHING THEM A LESSON)
DOES IT WORK?

Not really. 

Read: an article from the World Health Organization on corporal punishment: Corporal Punishment and Health

Some take-aways from the article:

Evidence shows corporal punishment increases children’s behavioural problems over time and has no positive outcomes.

All corporal punishment, however mild or light, carries an inbuilt risk of escalation. Studies suggest that parents who used corporal punishment are at heightened risk of perpetrating severe maltreatment. 
My note: in other words it is a gateway to child abuse. Once abuse is introduced by a parent to hurt a child, it almost always escalates.  

Corporal punishment is linked to a range of negative outcomes for children across countries and cultures, including physical and mental ill-health, impaired cognitive and socio-emotional development, poor educational outcomes, increased aggression and perpetration of violence.

Corporal punishment is a violation of children’s rights to respect for physical integrity and human dignity, health, development, education and freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 

Consequences
Corporal punishment triggers harmful psychological and physiological responses. Children not only experience pain, sadness, fear, anger, shame and guilt, but feeling threatened also leads to physiological stress and the activation of neural pathways that support dealing with danger. Children who have been physically punished tend to exhibit high hormonal reactivity to stress, overloaded biological systems, including the nervous, cardiovascular and nutritional systems, and changes in brain structure and function.

Despite its widespread acceptability, spanking is also linked to atypical brain function like that of more severe abuse, thereby undermining the frequently cited argument that less severe forms of physical punishment are not harmful.

The whole article is worth reading. 

The American Academy of Pediatrics has also taken a firm stance against corporal punishment. 

Read: Facts About Corporal Punishment - by Amy Morin, LCSW, fact checked by Adah Chung for Very Well Family

excerpts from the article (underlined are the most crucial parts of the article):

     The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has taken a firm stance against any type of corporal punishment. Its policy on corporal punishment, published in 2018, encourages parents and caregivers to use healthy forms of discipline when correcting their children and to refrain from using corporal punishment.

      The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends healthy forms of discipline, such as positive reinforcement of appropriate behaviors, limit setting, redirecting, and setting future expectations. The AAP recommends that parents do not use spanking, hitting, slapping, threatening, insulting, humiliating, or shaming. 

     The AAP policy also indicates that corporal punishment is ineffective over the long-term and leads to negative outcomes.

     In 2006, the Committee on the Rights of the Child released a statement declaring that corporal punishment is a form of violence that should be banned in all contexts.3 Other human rights organizations have issued similar warnings about spanking.

     Research has shown that children who are subjected to corporal punishment, such as spanking, pushing, grabbing, and paddling, are more likely to develop mental health disorders. One study reported that harsh physical punishment was associated with increased odds of mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and personality disorders.7

In my own generation, corporal punishment was all of the rage in terms of parents disciplining children.

My husband remembers a time when most of the children in his school had signs of physical abuse, from parental abuse to peer bullying: whip lashes, cuts, scabs, bruises, and infected wounds were most visible. 

There was a huge generation gap when he finally reached adulthood too. Many from his generation did not respect their parents, especially those who received corporal punishment. Most who received corporal punishment past five years old were also recipients of child abuse. Most who were recipients of child abuse also experienced the silent treatment, lots of insults, the parents rarely, if ever, listened to their children and their concerns, there was way too much infantilization or parentification, a parent lashed out over so many things that were never their child's fault (unjust blaming), and so many "You are -" statements that the adult children could no longer remember all of them.

In my generation and in his generation, so many of us have experienced estrangement in adulthood from the parent as well. I know many artist friends who were and some who still are, estranged. It was either initiated by a parent, or by us over disrespect or abuse (for many of us it was initiated by the parent, but the parent told the family and/or their friends or wrote on-line that it was initiated by us - in other words, the blame-shifting tactic and the DARVO tactic were put to use by these parents, which furthered the lack of respect that we had for them). Most of us who were recipients of corporal punishment or child abuse thought our parent was "out of control", dysregulated emotionally, terrible teachers, saboteurs, terrible influences on our own children, terrible parents, with terrible respect for our boundaries as adults. Also "the bad years" of relating to our parent far outweighed "the good years". What a sad legacy. 

So, I have to say that at least corporal punishment is increasingly being taken off the table for parents.  Some parents will probably resort to other methods of hurting their children, but at least that one is getting more and more outlawed in the western world. 

For those of us adults who never hit a child, and never thought of hitting a child, we can be proud that we are ending this scourge. Hopefully it also pushes us into an era of more world peace, and peaceful resolutions as well. 

OTHER FORMS OF PUNISHMENT ON CHILDREN
(AS A WAY OF TEACHING THEM A LESSON)
DOES IT WORK?

No. Anything that hurts children, especially if hurting them is a habit, will mean trauma symptoms. Children are much more vulnerable to getting PTSD (or C-PTSD) than adults. Most of them don't have the wherewithal to know why they are being hurt, or how to stop it. While behavioral lessons are important, the best teaching method is to model the behavior that you want to see in your children. 

Most psychologists say that modeling empathy, ethics, morality, forgiveness, adult ways of regulating emotions, showing how to resolve relationship issues, showing how to forgive, showing children respect for their feelings, thoughts and experiences are also a much better teacher than punishment.

If you feel you must punish your children, check yourself first for transgressions so that you aren't giving them mixed messages (i.e. "It's okay for me to insult you, but it's not okay for you to insult me" will never be a good lesson, and will at best confuse a child, and at worse, he will resent you and your lessons). Some psychologists suggest small "time-outs" no longer in minutes than a child's age, but even that practice is being studied as counter-productive since it is most used when a parent is angry. It teaches children that when the parent is angry, that the child is invisible to them. 

But if you make it a bad habit, time-outs can also seem punitive and unfair unless you state clear reasons why it is good for them and good for you, and listen to their responses with empathy.  

Most of us don't want to hurt our children because we are aware that it diminishes their trust in us as a safe place to go, as a reasonable source of learning, as a good sounding board for what ails us. If we hurt them, it will wound the relationship itself. 

However, parents that make a habit out of hurting their kids probably do not entirely realize this. Or if they do realize it, they make an impulsive decision to use their baser instincts instead. They will have a very hard time keeping and enjoying a healthy attachment and re-establishing trust. 

Here are just a few non-physical punishments that should not be used on children, and what these punishments do to children (when I could find links):

What Shaming Teaches
and What it Does to Children

Shaming can be so subtle that you are not aware of it (some of the articles I feature explain subtle forms of shaming that a lot of us take for granted), and shaming can be really abusive too, especially if it is accompanied by a lot of insults and other forms of punishment.

Most of the research that has been done on shaming children has shown it to be an ineffective way of disciplining a child. It doesn't work, and even tends to backfire. 

When I taught in public schools, shaming by teachers and other school authorities was not allowed, and was grounds for being fired. 

Habitual or over-the-top abusive shaming can produce trauma symptoms just like any form of abuse.

You can't be a good teacher of behavior and be shaming at the same time. Too much shaming will mean your child eventually won't want to hear what you have to say. All that it does in the end is cause hurt to your child, and make them disappear emotionally, and disrespect the lessons you are trying to teach because you are defining him in a bad way rather than teaching him a lesson that he will determine is beneficial to him.

So, what I'm saying here is that a child's mind always has to be going in the direction of: "My parents care about me; they are invested in helping me become all that I can be; my parents care about my behavior because my behavior and my ethics will help me to survive in the world; my parents ethics are better than mine and I have something to learn from them; my parents know how to regulate their emotions and how to get along better with others better than I do, and they are worth listening to for those reasons." 

If, for instance, the parents have worse morals and ethics, when their behavior is worse than their child's, when there's more hurt to the lesson than there is modeling and teaching, when you don't show that you care about how he will survive or how he is surviving, you may end up with an emotionally distant, non-trusting, and even an estranged child.  

Why Shaming Your Kids Isn't Effective Discipline - Jennifer Wolf, medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Family

Think hard before shaming children - by Claire McCarthy, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard, for Harvard Health Publishing, Harvard Medical School


What Blaming Teaches
and its Effect on Children


Blaming a child a lot has similar effects to shaming. Where assigning blame can get tricky is if the child is not actually a culprit of the blame. This can cause him to blame his parents later on for being blind, punitive, unjust, unloving, unfair, terrible parents. 

Getting a child to feel culpable for actions he actually does commit takes a lot of thought, and perhaps even education. Usually where you find unacceptable behavior, that behavior has been modeled somewhere in the child's life, and it can even be modeled by the parent. So adopting ethics when you are a parent is necessary if you want your children to tell the truth, to treat you with respect, and to be ethical and willingly accountable when they are culpable, themselves. 

There is also a lot that can go on between siblings. Let us say that sibling A accuses sibling B of a transgression (like stealing). But actually sibling A  did the stealing, not sibling B. This is very common for siblings to do up to age 8 years old. They get scared that the parent will punish them for stealing, so they stick their sibling with the fault instead.

It is before 8 years old, and even much earlier that parents need to nip this activity in the bud. Left unchecked, it can lead to a sibling using it in many other situations. The sibling relationship won't be close. If it goes past the age of 8, a continuation of these acts can lead to sibling abuse. I have heard many stories where it goes all the way to a sibling hijacking the parent's Will and Trust by planting false narratives and accusations into a parent's mind about the intentions of their siblings. There is an article in this section below that covers how to get siblings to stop blaming each other early on for things they did themselves. If it is not addressed early, it can turn children into liars, two-faced individuals and blame-shifters. 

If the parent is a blame-shifter themselves, children won't respect what a parent has to say about blame-shifting, so that part of a parent's behavior needs to be cleaned up in order for them to teach a child or children why blame-shifting is not acceptable behavior. 

Again, if you are going to be an effective teacher, you can't expect your students to do things that you don't do, can't do, make excuses not to do, or refuse to do. It becomes a completely ineffectual lesson, just as a bus driver teaching civil engineering who has never studied or practiced it, cannot and will not make a bridge.  

Blaming can also be a slippery slope, where, if you use too much of it on one child and not on another, your child will see that he is being singled out for blame. The lesson he will learn is not going to be about what you are blaming him for: it will be about how you love his sibling more than you love him.

If he is being singled out for punishments too, then he is also likely to experience escalating trauma symptoms as well. 

Again that doesn't teach him anything other than that his parent is unfair, unloving, unusually punitive and ethically wrong. 

Most children cannot deal with the injustice of being "the blamed one" in the family. Usually when a child is blamed to this extent the parent cannot handle blame themselves, or they want to protect the reputation of another child or family member, so they give the one child all of the blame for family incidences that crop up. 

This is called scapegoating. Scapegoating is basically blaming in the extreme. Most scapegoats cannot count the number of times they were blamed because it was just too constant, a painful way of life they had to endure. This isn't teaching a lesson, obviously. 

Scapegoating is basically constant blaming where you have the realization that you aren't ever going to be be able to please your parent. You are an outcast, a virtual stranger where no one sees your good qualities.

Let's say that you are the truth-teller in the family, which many scapegoats are. If you are from a family of liars, and deniers, blame-shifting schemers, or criminals, they aren't going to appreciate your truth-telling. They are going to hurt you or ostracize you in order to get you to shut down your truth-telling, and probably even your talking. Definitely your insights. At the very least, they won't be interested in what you have to say. They'll interrupt, tell you to stop talking, tell you that you are crazy, give you the silent treatment or tell you that you are no longer welcome. 

So what is the lesson here for a child? "Lie a lot and be like us"? "Truth-tellers are bad people"? "Insights and intelligence are no good"? "Believing in liars is what is good for this family, and for society"? What's the main point of the lesson here, especially if the child is going to school and learning that "Truth is good; you should not lie; you should have insights and intelligence if you want to get the most out of school and get into a profession that you'll love" and so on. 

Scapegoating is always categorized as child abuse. Usually where you find a scapegoat child, you also find that the parent has a favorite golden child too who he or she keeps shielded from any blame, even if that favorite child is at fault in many incidences. The incidences are seen as excusable, even when they are not. 

Usually where you find scapegoating you find mob bullying, shaming, lots of verbal abuse, lots of emotional abuse, ostracizing, the silent treatment, lots of gaslighting, blame-shifting, lots of invalidation, many smear campaigns, even physical abuse, and you also find parents who are either narcissists, sociopaths or psychopaths. Some Borderlines can scapegoat too, but usually are enlisted by narcissists, sociopaths or psychopaths to do so. If they are part of a bullying mob, they can also go in the direction of scapegoating. If they grew up seeing scapegoating or prejudice, they can, in some instances go in the direction of scapegoating too, however most Borderlines have empathy, and feel terrible when they hurt others, so it is not very likely they will take this path on their own. The area where it becomes problematic: Borderlines are often attracted to narcissists and narcissists are often attracted to Borderlines, and this is how a Borderline can join in on mob bullying, even if it doesn't feel right to them (Borderlines also have a poor sense of who they are, and narcissists come in and have no trouble assigning roles as to who they are, and can convince them that they need to join the mob). 

Just as in society, where scapegoats are often of a different race, religion, or cultural background, and are being prejudiced against, conspiracy theories will usually be the main mode of how a scapegoat is viewed in the family as well. If a number of members are using the DARVO tactic, you can pretty much guarantee that there will be many, many conspiracy theories and smear campaigns with a lot of conspiratorial thinking swirling around the scapegoated child too.

Since scapegoating is mob bullying with each person in the mob having their own agendas and reasons for being part of the mob, the abuse will escalateAbuse always escalates, but it will escalate much faster and more egregiously if there is a mob involved. 

Scapegoating will always have additional prejudices and conspiracy theories, and be initiated primarily by narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths (who overwhelmingly tend to be abusive, and who like to abuse others). 

Therefor scapegoating is very, very dangerous for the scapegoat

If something happens to the scapegoat, specifically crimes against them, the people in the mob will most likely side up with each other the way they always have. 

What kind of possible positive lesson is available to the child with this kind of outcome? 

Let's get real here. Conspiracy theories, gaslighting and smear campaigns are no longer about the child. They are about the bullying mob's intentions, projections, aggressions and group-think, period. 

A scapegoated child will learn:
"Abuse escalates."
"Mobbing is about prejudice and conspiracy theories."
"Conspiracy theories get so far out, like a hallucinatory trip."
"The mob is dangerous."
"I better find a way out." 
"I better buy home and auto security systems." - if they are an adult child
"I better call the police." - if they are an adult child

That's what we want to teach our children, to protect themselves from us parents? 

I hope I have proved why and how a trauma-bonded scapegoat can die.   

Scapegoated members usually are ostracized from the family or quit themselves. And the mental health community encourages scapegoats to quit too.    

Blaming can turn into scapegoating. Therefor, parents are encouraged to find other ways of dealing with issues so that blaming does not get out of hand, out of control, and escalate to this degree. And: if you can't take blame yourself, or have issues around being blamed, you should not expect your children to handle it any better than you handle it. That just makes sense. 

A parenting expert shares the common mistake that psychologically damages kids—and what to do instead - by Hunter Clarke-Fields, Contributor, CNBC
excerpt:
     Blaming is a put-down, and it can easily cause children to feel guilty, unloved and rejected. Even worse, it prevents you from developing a positive relationship with them.

The Blame Game - by Bonnie Harris for Connective Parenting

When Parents Blame Their Children (Does it really take a village to raise a child?) - by Ugo Uche, reviewed by Abigail Fagan for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     One of the most difficult things I find myself doing as a psychotherapist is holding parents accountable. Typically when you have a teen engaging in unhealthy behavior, you have a parent who makes it his or her own priority to set the teen on the right path. However, there seems to be a caveat.
     “Please help me help my kid, but don't you dare tell me I am at fault.” ... 
     ... children and teens with bad tempers usually have at least one parent (in their lives) who has a bad temper. The teen goes to school and displays a bad temper and gets penalized, then comes homes and displays the bad temper and gets penalized, all the while witnessing one of his parents periodically display episodes of bad tempers with no consequences. ...

3 Reasons Your Adult Child Treats You Like Dirt (Many well-intentioned parents express their concerns in off-putting ways.) - by Jeffrey Bernstein Ph.D. for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     3. Expressing Criticism and Invalidation
     ... When adult children sense criticism and invalidation, they can develop feelings of abandonment or rejection. Using guilt, shame, or other manipulative tactics to control an adult child's behavior can cause significant emotional harm. This can make the child feel like they are not in control of their own life and lead to feelings of resentment and anger. Lastly, parents who do not respect their adult child's boundaries and independence can run the risk of having their adult children alienate them. This is because your adult child likely feels like they cannot escape your influence or control. ...

How Can I Get My Son to Stop Blaming His Younger Sibling for His Own Bad Behavior? - by Emily Edlynn, Ph.D. for Parents

What Does It Mean to Be the Family Scapegoat? - by Nadra Nittle, Medically reviewed by
Yolanda Renteria, LPC
excerpts:
     ... Commonplace in families with unhealthy dynamics, scapegoating tends to start in childhood when children are blamed for all of the problems in dysfunctional households. ...
     ... When children are assigned this role, the impact can be detrimental to their mental health and emotional well-being for a lifetime. ...
     ... In addition, it results in an upbringing in which the scapegoated child’s inherent worth, goodness, and lovableness are ignored. Instead, insults, bullying, neglect, and abuse are deemed appropriate for the child forced into this position. ...
     ... Why a parent decides to scapegoat a child tends not to make any sense because this behavior is rooted in dysfunction. For example, a child who is sensitive, inquisitive, attractive, and smart might be perceived as a threat and scapegoated by a parent who lacks these qualities. ...
     ... Being a scapegoat or a favorite is never about a child’s inherent worth as a human being. ...
     ... Being a scapegoat is a lonely, heartbreaking experience for a child, but it may also yield a more desirable outcome in some cases. For example, the maltreatment scapegoats endure in families is often the impetus that drives them to leave the dysfunctional, high-conflict home. ...
     ... Moreover, scapegoats very often decide to end the generational cycle of abuse when they start their own families. ...

3 Ways To Exit The Role Of ‘Family Scapegoat,’ According To A Psychologist - by Mark Travers for Forbes
excerpt:
     Many people come to therapy when they feel underappreciated by their family. They may say things like:
1. “Someone is constantly making accusations against me for no fault of my own.”
2. “My parents keep blaming me for one thing or another as if it is always my responsibility to ensure everything goes right.”
3. “I am never praised for my achievements. Instead, I get belittled in front of everyone.”
It is no secret that families can be complicated. All too often, a single family member becomes the ‘scapegoat’ for the family’s problems.
     A family scapegoat is a person who takes on the role of ‘black sheep’ or ‘problem child’ in their family and gets shamed, blamed, and criticized for things that go wrong within the family unit, even when these things are entirely outside of their control.
     Scapegoating parents often have fragile, needy, and narcissistic personalities. They unnecessarily project hostility onto the scapegoated child.
     ... Parents/family authority figures maintain control by attacking and forming alliances that isolate the victim. ...
     ... Parenting figures distort reality to deny the target child’s legitimate needs and to act as if the victim child is the cause of not only the family’s problems but also the parent figure’s dissatisfaction. ...

What the Silent Treatment Teaches Children
and What It Does to Them

The silent treatment is most always defined as a form of abuse when given to children (and even when it is done to adult children and partners). It is a favorite form of punishment by narcissists. Narcissists tend to be abusive in order to get power, control and dominance in their relationships. 

If it is not being used as a form of punishment, it can be used as a way for someone who does not have good emotional coping skills, or as way for them not to hurt the other person any more than they have. However, if the silent treatment is accompanied by other abuses, or threats, it is pretty much guaranteed to be a punishment, especially when the target is a child.

Because it is a form of abuse, trauma symptoms in the child are likely to emerge too. It is quite a bit more egregious than shaming in most situations if the silent treatment is used habitually or goes on for a long period of time. 

The silent treatment is also known to cause chronic pain, similar to physical pain. It activates the anterior cingulate cortex part of the brain that senses physical pain. Even so, real physical pain can also be experienced in terms of generalized anxiety disorder, which often goes hand-in-hand with being abused and experiencing PTSD or C-PTSD. To children (and even adult children), the pain starts out as the PTSD symptom of hypervigilance. This keeps your mind in "fight or flight" mode. 

When children experience hypervigilance, especially if they live with their parents, they are mainly going to feel it as a "flight response". Most underage abused children know they can't fight with their parents and get a good outcome, thus the flight response is usually activated: trying to figure out the best way to get out of the situation they are in. It can mean the child will eventually fawn to the parent's demands, but it is never going to be an authentic response because the parent has activated the PTSD symptom of hypervigilance. 

And even when the parent is satisfied with what they got out of the deal (a fawning child), the child is still going to be experiencing a hypervigilant state, even if it is relaxed somewhat to the point where he can get more sleep even if he isn't getting enough sleep. The reason why it is still activated is because the brain is still on high alert that it will happen again.

And there is a good reason why it is on high alert that it will happen again: because usually it does happen again. As I've mentioned many times, abuse escalates, and that means the silent treatment will escalate too

The way the silent treatment escalates is that it certainly happens again and again, but more importantly it goes on for longer and longer periods of time the more it is used. Some silent treatments go on for a decade or more, and some go on, and on, and on, to the point of estrangement. And of course, a child is never going to be able to fix a parent's use of this destructive abuse tactic. Parents will give excuses for using it over and over again, and increasing the level of pain, just like a batterer will give excuses for putting his partner in the hospital with an escalation of bruises and cuts. It is up to the abuser to give up on the abusive tactic. 

Since the point of abuse is to get more power, control and domination for the parent, the main focus that the parent will be to manipulate the child to be submissive to every command. The need for the parent to get more power, control and domination is working against biology; parents should be loosening the power, control and domination as the child becomes more adult, not the other way around. Also the child will be wanting more and more autonomy from his parent, at least in terms of making his own decisions, with the parent helping him along the way to be the best that he can be in terms of his own decisions - which is what teaching is about. The purpose is to get a student to be able to figure out problems on his own. If this isn't going on, you'll get a student like the ones every public school teacher sees: the ones who sit in the back of the classroom, un-interested, rolling their eyes, dismissing what you have to say. They are letting you know that they no longer want to be forced into lessons. 

There are a lot of very good reasons why abuse is not a good way to get submission; it is a very, very bad idea (for the society at large, and even for family dynamics). 

Anyway, when the silent treatment goes on for days, or weeks, this keeps the brain on high alert for any more attacks. And usually people who indulge in the silent treatment of their children, do attack them in other ways: taking toys or other possessions away, insults, degrading comments, shaming, unfounded blaming, false imprisonment like locking in them in their room for much longer than is healthy, a lot of gaslighting is also usually present, more threats of ostracism, smear campaigns, prejudice and conspiratorial attacks.

What hypervigilance also does is to keep the child's brain on such high alert that the child can't sleep, or they don't sleep very well (constantly waking up upset). If they do sleep, they are prone to nightmares which reflect the state they are in, that mimic his real life situation to a large degree. So it is like being haunted: he is haunted by the silent treatment night and day. Dreams don't even give him a respite.

So it is very upsetting, and the pain tends to be constant the longer it goes on. If they cry a lot from the nightmares and inability to relax enough to go to sleep, they may do so in private, especially when the parent or parents punish him for crying or feeling hurt in addition to the silent treatment. Narcissistic parents usually punish the child for having feelings about how they are being treated because narcissists have very little empathy, so they will not soothe a child who is crying over the silent treatment. They won't want to rescue him from it, or say "I've punished you enough." In fact, a child who is crying and pleading for it to stop will more likely set off a narcissistic parent's rage (in the way of the shame-rage spiral). This means that when they see the child's pain, they see it as a criticism of them, the parent. Unlike the rest of us who experience pain when we are criticized, narcissists react to criticism with rage, and for children, the rage is usually accompanied by more punishment.  

Therefor, many children who receive the silent treatment bottle it up, and then the bottling up creates more symptoms. 

The worry, the bottling up, being on high alert, the continued pain (even when the silent treatment has been temporarily relieved by the parent), can and does create Generalized Anxiety Disorder (typically referred to as GAD). About three quarters of the survivors I talked to who were given the silent treatment as children and beyond into adulthood experienced a lot of muscle pain (part of the anxiety disorder), headaches (also part of the disorder), and even significant heart pain (the heart is also a muscle, which would explain the pain there). Some of them experienced chronic stomach aches as well. The most common symptom started out as muscle aches all over the body, as though they had the flu.

For children and adult children who experienced the silent treatment for more than a year from a parent, most of them experienced Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms in addition to PTSD symptoms. The reason it wasn't 100 percent is because some children who started the emotional separation from their parent early on, when they were still a child - they withdrew so much by the time they were adults, that their parent had very little-to-no effect on them (in other words, the silent treatment was no longer hurting them because they didn't look to the parent for any  parenting - that kind of relationship was emotionally severed early on). They were estranged to the point where they didn't feel any connection or intimacy with their parent. It was as though the parent was just an irritating stranger.  

The adult children of child abuse who I have known, numbering in the hundreds, usually gave up on their parent at the point when the silent treatment went on longer than a year, and when the physical symptoms showed up to this extent, and especially the body/muscle aches. To experience those symptoms day in and day out, and night after night without let-up and with very little sleep, is torture.

The lesson here is that they are captives to torture, and that is it. 

However, you can get medication for Generalized Anxiety Disorder these days. So some survivors take it, their symptoms let up, and they go right back to their abusers because they feel better. So I'm not necessarily a proponent of medicating yourself for symptoms like this, and the medications themselves have some issues and side effects. And if you return and the escalation of abuse continues, which it will, the medication will cease to work very well, which can cause a dependency. 

The fact that your body is going through the symptoms in the first place is a sign that you cannot take any more abuse. That's a good message to get, not a bad message. Toxic families are called toxic for a reason. Abuse is a toxin when you are a child, and if the abuser uses a lot of lines of attacks, and if it keeps going on through adulthood, which it usually does, you are probably going to be receiving a lot of GAD symptoms. That's actually healthy compared to covering it up with meds, however, if you are pretty darned sure that you are not going to go back to abuse, medications can be a helpful way to move ahead, but always with some concerns (I hope to cover why in another post). 

The GAD symptoms are likely to subside eventually without medication, especially with time and continued distance, to the point where you can forget about them by focusing as much as you can on the present. There are also exercises you can do to bring your focus more into the present day so that you can stop ruminating about your victimhood and your parent (shifting focus is part of trauma therapy with a licensed therapist).

If you can find relationships that are fulfilling and mutually respectful, empathetic and reasonable, then that tends to relieve symptoms too. 

The survivors who had their self esteem totally blown out by the parent, who felt like empty vessels of themselves, who felt and who had other extreme issues going on in their lives, contemplated suicide a lot during parental silent treatments.  

For underage children (talked about by adult children), they felt trapped, under siege, like hostages to abuse, and thought about suicide a lot, sometimes every day. It took all of the strength they could muster to get them to adulthood to escape their situation. 

The silent treatment has been written about so much, and I have not read one professional article that touted any benefit to a child.   

The way that a parent sees the silent treatment as a lesson to a child, is that the punisher expects their victim to writhe in pain over the silent treatment and do anything for the narcissist in order for the silent treatment to end. While it can get the parent of an underage child what they want, temporarily at least, the fact that it was used at all makes a child feel anxious, fearful, distrustful, inwardly upset and traumatized, resentful, invisible, not worth anything to the parent outside of fulfilling commands and demands ... and if used into a child's teenage years or adulthood, it will probably eventually lead to full blown estrangement.

And as we know, the parent-child relationship is such that if it doesn't benefit the child too, the relationship will either be a shell of its former self, very very shallow and insignificant, or be a total estrangement. 

Abuse can be generational. Some children will adopt the silent treatment themselves as an adult and use it on their own children, or on the parent who used it on them, or on other members of a family. If there is a lot of estrangement in one extended family, I'd bet it had a lot to do with not knowing how to resolve issues beyond the unhealthy ways: silent treatments and other forms of abuse, stonewalling, blaming and shaming. This is where a child modeling the bad behavior of his parent can boomerang back on the parent or go down the generations as a family practice, sometimes with catastrophic effect. The silent treatment can and does produce suicide ideation and suicides, and I have been around enough survivor forums to know that it happens way more than it should - one therapist told me that one quarter of all children who get a long silent treatment lasting a year or more from a parent commit suicide (I am trying to find that source). Here is one source for now. But even so, there is a lot of talk in survivor forums about a sibling who died from suicide during their teenage years and twenties where a parent was ostracizing them or giving them the silent treatment at the time of death.

Again, that's not a good lesson: "Consider suicide because I don't care at all about you except what I can get out of you." 

I also notice that for every one male suicide, there are about 10 female suicides (again, not a statistic, just something I notice for those of you who are studying this branch of psychology who want to get statistics on the silent treatment). Anyway, to me it says that girls are given the silent treatment by a parent so much more than a boy is. It is similar to the statistics on childhood sexual abuse: girls are targeted much more than boys are. It also seems that girls are overwhemingly chosen for the scapegoat role in their families as well. It would be interesting to know why. Is it the same prejudice that's been going on for centuries that males are more worthwhile and useful to a family than a female is? Or is it the same kind of trend in terms of sexual abuse where girls are a lot more sexually abused than boys? I suspect that both have something to do with why.

In a later post, I will discuss why girls are, in general, much more subject to abuse than boys are. 

In a generational sense, the silent treatment when given to children, can also perpetuate the idea that this form of abuse should be used on the weak and vulnerable (like children, people undergoing tragedies, people who are disabled, and so on): perhaps you were given the silent treatment during a time when your own personal power was challenged. So you give the silent treatment when someone is going through a bad time!? That's supposed to teach what lesson now?

Again, children learn from parental modeling, especially if there are no repercussions for doing so or that they see right away. The child learns if he wants more power in a relationship, and to dominate someone, to attack that person in their most vulnerable, weakened state, a person who needs help. That's not a good lesson to be teaching. Plus it's even more trauma symptoms than the silent treatment during calm times. 

Children who have been taught to normalize abuse and estrangement, may not realize this tactic is so dangerous until one of their own children commits suicide or becomes totally estranged from them, unwilling to put up with any more silent treatments. Thus, since there is too much of a danger in it becoming generational, it should be abolished.   

There is not enough empathy behind the silent treatment to make it a useful tool to get a person to change their behavior. In fact it shows the child what their parents behavior is like more than their own. It is gross emotional negligence, and if anything, your child will eventually double down on resisting what you want, knowing it is about your need for more power, control and domination in your mutual relationship. Most teenage and adult children believe their parent has enough power, control and domination to begin with, and they don't want to give them any more of it, especially if the parent is going to be using it in this kind of bullying way.

The silent treatment rarely works as a learning lesson because the child will focus on how unempathetic the parent is, how long the parent used it and in what situations. If the parent used it when their child was down on their luck or otherwise vulnerable, don't expect a relationship with your child ever again. The trust that your child had in you to act on his behalf (to parent, to love you, to keep you safe, to be there for you in tragic times, to teach good helpful lessons) can never be re-established.  

Some material on the silent treatment and how it effects victims, including child victims (and why it is mostly attributed to narcissists):     

general:

THE SILENT TREATMENT: WHEN THE NARCISSIST GOES PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE - Dr. Les Carter, Psychologist, for Surviving Narcissism (You Tube)

Narcissists and the Silent Treatment - by Dr. Ramani Durvasula (You Tube) 


Silent treatment from parents: The psychological implications on kids and why it should be avoided - by the administrators of Times of India

What Does Gaslighting Teach Children?
and What Are the Effects on Them?


Gaslighting is rare for normal parents who feel empathy for their children. However, it can still happen, but maybe only a couple of times in the child's entire life, and in perhaps in the heat of a moment when your child's behavior has exasperated you to the extreme. However, I'm mainly talking about calling your child crazy, and not the whole campaign of gaslighting that abusive parents are known for. 

I'd bet you don't go around and tell all your friends and family that your child is crazy either, like abusive parents are known for. 

Which is to say there are several parts to gaslighting, and one of them is calling your child crazy. This basically does what shaming a child does (which I discuss in the section above), and will have many of the same effects on your child. 

Part of gaslighting is also a lot of attempts to deny his reality, deny the feelings that he has (and insist that he has other feelings instead), and deny the thoughts that he has (and insist that he has other thoughts instead). This part of gaslighting is called perspecticide - also referred to as invalidating

Even normal parents can slip up on this occasionally, especially when they are accusing a child of something that they feel has ironclad proof behind it (where their child might be denying he did it). But, again, normal parents are not doing it for an agenda. 

But it will probably be useful to know how abusive parents take it to an extreme, so that the rest of us don't go down the slippery slope of accusing our children of doing things, thinking things, and feeling things that they may not be experiencing, thinking or feeling. And getting these things wrong can build a really fast rift with your child. Which means that you have to develop an intelligent approach to accusations. 

As I made clear in the post above, blaming is not the panacea of family harmony anyway, even if you do get it right. But, blaming can put you at some amount of risk for getting it wrong. Fortunately, most of us know that. 

However, most narcissists and sociopaths do not know that, or if they are manipulative, they pretend not to know it. Most of them are so filled with arrogance and many play mind reader as well, that they consistently tell you what you experience, think and feel to the point where they will not even accept any other interpretation. They stonewall you instead (meaning that they stop the conversation), so that they don't hear your explanations. If their child persists in telling the parent they are wrong, they usually respond to the child with the silent treatment (because, again, they can't take criticism without raging).  

So for abusive parents, gaslighting usually goes hand-in-hand with the silent treatment, another type of abuse that I talked about in the preceding section. 

With the silent treatment the message is: "You are irrelevant unless you are submissive and doing everything I demand and command of you." With gaslighting, they add in: "All of your experiences, your feelings and thoughts are irrelevant too."

And by the way, I don't think they are faking this message. When people are almost entirely focused on how much power, control and domination that they want and are getting over others, it is an aggression that does not take into account what you feel and think about it. It is an onslaught to take you over, and turn you into a puppet without a brain or feelings (you are only supposed to be manipulated into being submissive for them, or else!). 

So the child learns, "I'm supposed to be an empty vessel that other people decide who I am? And how am I supposed to do that? What if they tell me I don't have the feelings I say I'm having? What if I still feel the feelings that they say doesn't exist? Are they supposed to be telling me how I feel, think and behave, or am I supposed to be telling them how I actually feel, think and behave even when they don't listen to me?" 

And if they do press the parent to accept that what they experience, and the way they feel and think is different than what the parent believes, the parent is going to see it as a criticism of their mind-reading. And what happens to narcissists and sociopaths when they feel criticized? They rage, and sometimes punish. 

Over not being mind readers? 

Yes. Most scapegoat abused children have been through this. 

The message is: "How dare you challenge my mind reading abilities!" 

And let me tell you, they are the least able to mind-read. The lack of empathy coupled with their lack of self reflection makes it impossible for them to do it.

This leads children to be silent, and letting other people define them. 

That's a good lesson? Hopefully you can see why this is a horrific thing to do to a child.

If you add in the silent treatment to the empty vessel that you've made your kid out to be where you pour in his mind what he's about, and what he thinks, and what he feels all of the time without listening to him, you have poured poison in (or at least that is how the child's brain interprets it: symptoms). And for abusive parents they are going to do this most of the time. Plus they are either going to say he's entirely wonderful and faultless, or entirely terrible and always at fault, the result of splitting) - this is definitely child abuse.

So the child is going to be experiencing trauma symptoms in addition to the trauma symptoms of being stonewalled and getting the silent treatment. Horrible. 

So what this teaches children is not to define themselves. Just let other people do it. 

And it teaches: don't defend yourself when others judge you, otherwise endure a rage and a lecture. 

And it teaches: let other people tell you what you think, feel and what you are experiencing, otherwise endure a rage and a lecture about that too. 

And it teaches: soft boundaries: let everyone walk all over your real feelings and wipe their dirty feet/thoughts on your clean thoughts; let everyone else define you; let people accuse you of things you didn't do (because again, you don't know your own mind; only other people do); let other people hate you and be prejudiced against you for unreasonable reasons; just be an empty old vessel for anyone's rage and judgements.   

And it teaches: don't talk, don't trust, don't feel, the hallmark of dysfunctional families. My own post about that is HERE. (Note: I'd suggest the link to the prior article rather than my own ... the link to my own article is mainly about an art piece I did on the subject). 

Or conversely, it teaches children not to trust people who criticize them (even if it is helpful), to rage when they are criticized (so that the other person will stop; they won't feel any criticism is warranted anyway, so they'll just act scary and rage to throw off the idea that anyone can criticize them); to not trust anyone (they've been brought up not to trust what people say about them because those people who brought them up always got it wrong); and to not care about ethics (because their primary caregivers didn't care about ethics when they made up stories about how the child thought, how he felt and what he experienced, so he'll be damned if he has ethics too). This is basically how you make another narcissist or sociopath for the world to endure. 

So the lesson here is to either make another narcissist or sociopath, or to make a child into a garbage can to dump rage and projections into. 

Children who experience heavy doses of gaslighting with rage, where they are continuously told they are crazy, especially when they are upset about being raged at or abused (common), are going to have a hard time making any decisions for themselves, even on school tests. 

We did a little survey in one survivor forum and the question was: "In school, did you have so much anxiety when given a 'multiple question test' of getting the wrong answer, that you simply froze and couldn't complete it?" Overwhelmingly the answer was "yes." Some survivors were so unnerved by tests like that, that they either handed in their tests a quarter done, half done, not at all done, or just filled in random blanks to say they did it and not be told by a teacher that they had to fill in all of it, or re-take it. A lot of them said they had terrible "shakes" (a sign of PTSD), and so much anxiety that they could barely read what the questions were (another sign of PTSD - also called an "amygdala hijack").

Meanwhile, the parents at home were expecting their children to be so "perfect" in the marionette department, that when they came home with bad grades they were told they were stupid and crazy (also very common for abused kids). 

How are you going to have a perfect marionette child, when the child is constantly in this hypervigilant state to the point where he can't concentrate? He can't concentrate in school and he can't concentrate at home. He goes right into the freeze response. 

A lot of abusive parents punish a child who has gone into a freeze response because the freeze response is not the marionette submissive response that the parent wants. 

And the child gets sicker, and sicker, and sicker, and it would seem from all of what I've read and put forward is that many of these children develop life threatening auto-immune disorders ... that is, unless another parent, or adult, is fighting for the child's survival, and for the legitimacy of his mind and feelings. Dr. Ramani Durvasula also mentions seeing abused patients with a lot more auto-immune diseases than usual. 

And we know that narcissists can't tolerate a marriage partner who challenges them. So they are likely to divorce over not being able to gaslight, by being challenged about the gaslighting. What does a narcissist do when they are challenged by their partner not to gaslight? They rage about being criticized.

Which puts the child in more danger unless the loving, protective parent can get custody. 

However, many survivors were able to write papers. They preferred tests that were not multiple choice tests with right and wrong answers. And they did much better on those tests. It does limit the kinds of professions they can enter, but at least there are some ways that children saddled with PTSD symptoms can succeed. 

Anyway, for the underage child it can get worse ... 

Many children who live in a perpetual freeze response, are gaslighted so much that they can't tell you how many times they were gaslighted in childhood, and never had a good sense of who they were. Everything they felt they were, was invalidated by the parent. It may also be invalidated by a favorite golden child sibling who is trying to mimic the parent to get brownie points. 

It's like a parent has put a worm in their abused child's brain, and in their ear, and is even becoming part of what they feel. They echo what the parent has told them. Their own voice, ambitions and dreams get so diminished and lost, purposely by the narcissist, that it is the narcissist's voice that speaks in their child's mind. 

It's like the robot has been completed, much like in the Stepford wives, except the trauma symptoms are still there, even though the child tries as hard as he can to split off the trauma symptom part of himself from the functional-to-his-parent part of himself. 

In extreme cases, all of these splits that the parent sees and is not tolerating very well in their ambition to hurt the child, and continually gain more domination over the child, can add up to Dissociative Identity Disorder. And even though a child might try to show only the functional side to the parent, and try to forget each and stash away the hurt and trauma to another part of himself that the parent inflicted, is not entirely possible.  

A lot has been written about how Borderline Personality Disorder develops too.

Almost every "symptom" of the Borderline can be attributed to being brought up by a narcissist too. 

Borderlines feel terrified that they will be abandoned. That is because narcissists abandon them repeatedly, through stonewalling, the silent treatment, the invalidation of their feelings and thoughts, and sometimes even abandon them altogether ("I want nothing to do with you any more"). 

Borderlines have a hard time defining who they are. They often can't tell you. And their dress and constant changing of careers reflects that: in one day, they can go from dressing Goth, to dressing like a secretary, to dressing like a dowdy maid, to experiencing the highest joy in the morning, to experiencing the depths of depression by the afternoon, to working as a waitress during the day to working as a research expert in the evening. One guy I have known for a good part of my life, looks drastically different from one day to the next, and has many, many outfits and styles of glasses to reflect it. He was egregiously abused too, a sign.

Anyway, Borderlines can even have 5 or 6 careers all going on at once, with at least one of them art-related. Some people label Borderlines as manic depressive, however, this is wrong. Manic depressives take days or weeks to change a mood. Many borderlines change from hour to hour or at the least one day to the next. Their moods are constantly shifting. That is because they survived by splitting themselves off into other sections, and one of them was tailor made for the narcissist. 

Borderlines feel emotions much more strongly than other people do. They can wail when they cry, and they can laugh more heartily than others do too. This has to do with a myriad of different reasons:

Narcissists get narcissistic supply by goading and baiting their victims into a negative response by arguing with them, insulting them and stonewalling them. Then they use the emotional response of their victims to judge the victims as crazy and out-of-control emotionally.

But there is also a double bind to this. Narcissists also teach people, including children, to stuff emotions (i.e. "If you weren't so sensitive and emotional, people might listen to you more." - this is an extremely likely gaslighting phrase by narcissists). The emotional energy that the victim is being expected to stuff has to go somewhere, so it tends to come out in extremes. Also narcissists tend to be cold, uncaring, unempathetic, the opposite of the Borderline. So kids, who need dire help, practically have to scream and cry and carry on to get the narcissist's attention - this means the emotions are going to be over the top. Narcissistic parents may still not care (they tend towards child neglect). Sometimes they'll say, "If you cry like that, you aren't going to get anywhere with me!" even if the issue is dire. And of course, that just perpetuates them getting hurt, where they have to bottle up some more pain, and where it is likely to create even more extremity of expression. Either way, the bottled up emotions are going to have to go somewhere, even if the narcissist shuts them down again and again and again. And it can be partly a brain issue: generally abused kids feel emotions much more than other kinds of people because there are actually changes in the brain due to the abuse and the stuffing of emotions. 

In Borderlines, suicide attempts, suicide ideation and cutting oneself can also be the result of having been abused. Suicide and suicidal thoughts come about because of the chronic pain the parent is putting the child through. Suicide is a relief of the chronic pain the parent is inflicting on the child. Whereas cutting is the way to echo your abuser and how much they hate you. You decide to hate yourself too so that the abuser will be happy and so they don't have to keep doing the abusing.

Narcissists tend to become calm and satisfied when their Borderline children are going through pain and tragedies, as long as the pain and tragedies aren't taking the child's attention away from the parent.  So in a way, cutting is just another way to serve the narcissist. 

A lot of Borderlines are also substance addicted. Substance addiction and being brought up by an abusive parent has been linked for a long time, and the studies on it keep showing more and more links. You can google it and a lot of professional articles show up. Again, substance addiction, especially if you are a scapegoat child in addition to being a Borderline, is a way to serve the narcissist with what they want. It also keeps the narcissist from hurting you if you are hurting yourself. 

Borderline Personality Disorder usually co-exists with PTSD or C-PTSD.

Then there is the Echoist who is past the point of splintering himself off into different sections. He has been drained so much of any personality or identity by a narcissist or narcissists, or lived through so much brutality, that he basically is only a survivor (no personality was able to develop). The echoist has usually been drained of humanity too (meaning that he faces prejudice). He has no boundaries or so few boundaries that just about any one can show up and tell him who is and he goes along with what ever the person happens to say about him. In fact, who he is, and how he is defined, can so drastically differ from person to person that it doesn't matter any more: he isn't anyone in particular. He is just who the next person decides he is, kind of like a chameleon, except he changes according to what the next person wants him to be.

This is the state that a gardener, Chance Gardner is in, in the book and movie, Being There (a brilliant movie about a true echoist state). The book was written by Jerzy Kosinski, a Jew who barely survived a brutal existence as a survivor of The Holocaust and wrote books afterwards. To write a book about an Echoist, and another book about the brutalities through the eyes of a boy, and later commit suicide, is not lost on me. This is what can happen. 

So, what does this teach children? That with enough abuse, a person can have PTSD, get Borderline Personality Disorder, get Dissociative Identity Disorder, be an Echoist, and die from suicide? That is what we want to teach children? 

But to get back to gaslighting. It gets worse.

Most narcissists and sociopaths tell their friends and family that their child is insane. There are a number of things this does:
* If the child complains about abuse, no one listens (because they are deemed to be insane, to not know what they are talking about)
* Isolates the child with the parent (people don't generally want to be close to a person who can't think straight) - isolating people from each (triangulation is huge in narcissistic abuse)
* People allow the parent leeway in all kinds of unethical ways (including total abandonment) because they have a crazy child to deal with
* Makes the child vulnerable to other human predators (they can tell everyone that the child is insane too, that their abuse of the victim never happened either)

It becomes the go-to way for a parent to get rid of the evidence. So it allows one evil occurrence to happen after the other. It allows a parent to continually be allowed to harshly judge and punish a child. It allows a lot more erroneous punishing (punishing over sadist reasons) than might otherwise happen. 

This is what we want for children? For children to be the garbage cans for a parent's rage (turning into everyone else's garbage can for rage too)? For children to be the garbage cans for abandonments and sadism? Because this is what we get when we have continuously gaslighted children.  

And yet, it still can get worse ... 

Gaslighting is often used in every situation where the parent is frustrated with the amount of attention, power, control, and domination they already have, which is just about always. There is never enough for them. Sam Vaknin, who I feature below at the bottom of the further reading section, has said in a number of videos that this lust for more power and the manipulation to get more of it lives in the mind of narcissists all of the time. All they can think of is how to be the authoritarian in what ever situation they are in. He also said that this lust, coupled with rage and jealousy are about the only emotions they feel too. 

They use gaslighting to discard and abandon their own children (and they do discard way more than they let on). Here is how it tends to happen:

The parent and adult child reach a point where the adult child is hurt way too much by the actions of the parent. Of course, all narcissists want their child to fix all relational problems. But the adult child can't. Perhaps the narcissist's henchmen have threatened him or abused him. So the adult child insists that the issues between them have to be worked out in therapy. The parent has touted therapy to be the big solution to all problems and that the child must go in order to make the child fit for family life. But the adult child sees that this was only done to get the parent's friends and family to look at the child as insane. The fact that the child would suggest therapy for both of them creates a narcissistic injury in the narcissist. The parent, feeling criticized by the suggestion that they both go to therapy, gives their adult child the silent treatment. The adult child attempts to re-connect. But the parent pushes him away and punishes him by continuing with the silent treatment and telling him he needs to learn a lesson. When the parent does reconnect, he blames, criticizes, shames, insults the adult child, trying to make him entirely responsible for what happened. But the adult child doesn't see it that way, and the silent treatment continues. Then the parent tells his friends and the family that the adult child has rejected them instead. You can see that this is highly unethical and immoral. And the parent keeps grasping at trying to teach the adult child through the same highly unethical behavior. When a child is more ethical than the parent, the parent can no longer teach a lesson. Trying to hurt him through the silent treatment and gaslighting has achieved what? And most adult children will want to back away from a parent who is this unethical. So then it is an estrangement that goes on and on, and the parent still insists that was his child's fault. This is extremely common when it comes to how narcissistic parents treat their own offspring. 

The very common DARVO tactic among narcissists and sociopaths is a type of gaslighting too, as well as all blame-shifting maneuvers. How is a parent supposed to teach a child anything good using this tactic?

Lying about what a child is about and how they act is a type of gaslighting as well.  Lying is second nature to most narcissists and is constant for sociopaths. Again, what is a parent teaching using this tactic, especially for children who go off to school and learn that most teachers, classmates, and school officials want the truth to be spoken. Either the child is going to deny, reject, play dumb, or lecture a parent who is lying so much. 

Gaslighting is also used by a parent to get a child to believe that the truth is a lie, and that a lie is the truth. And if the child doesn't go along with it, they get punished. Now what is that supposed to teach? 

And narcissistic parents also try to get children to believe that they, the parent, is the great sage of how to work out problems in relationships. They may lecture a child about the latest articles on how to make relationships work. That is laughable. They can't practice what they preach. So when they are doing the opposite of what all of these articles suggest (like throwing constant barbs and insults at their child - which is a type of grievous disrespect), they will talk about how the child needs to show respect. It's not too bright, but it is also about gaslighting. 

The end result is that the child is not likely to respect the parent or want to hear them talk about lessons ever again. 

A lot of survivors are estranged from their parent because there is nothing to talk to their parent about. They don't want to hear what their parent has to say any more because it's just about a bunch of blame-shifting, gaslighting, pointless drivel. A survivor might try to dumb-down the conversations to weather, cooking, and gray rock subjects to stop the crazy-making, hurtful, nonsensical lessons, but then a lot of parents get narcissistically injured by their child stonewalling all conversation except those subjects, and decide to continue the silent treatment over that (often after taunting and goading their children to respond to subjects other than the gray rock subjects).

A lot of therapists attempt to teach "gray rock" to their patients, and tell them to be patient, and that it will work over the long haul, but what is that teaching children? Don't talk, don't trust, don't feel, just like the parent teaches them to do all of the time? It's just another denial of self to placate a narcissist. I'd bet for Borderlines, Echoists and those with Dissociative Identity Disorder, it's the worst thing you could teach them. So I'm not a big proponent of that method unless it's a work situation. There's got to be a better way. 

The sad thing is that gaslighting a child is pretty much a given when it comes to narcissistic and sociopathic parents. It is incredibly common. And the rate of narcissistic and sociopathic individuals is growing (it accounts for the upswing in school and mass shootings as well - I'm working on a piece about that). Narcissistic parents may make up about 8 percent of parents (this accounts for the fact that many narcissists aren't diagnosed - they generally don't go to therapy). So this constant drumming for parents to teach children lessons that matter for society, like peaceful resolutions, respecting your fellow human beings, telling the truth, being kind, may be lost. While parents gaslight to get continually more power, control and domination over their children (and adult children for as long as the parent is alive), with very few laws or societal pressures to stop it, it does have a huge impact on society. And narcissists are consistently going to be teaching lessons that hurt people without any upside. 

Jealous, rageful, power hungry, unethical narcissists should not be teachers of children, period. And eventually some of the children they are trying to teach realize that too.  

My own feeling is that gaslighting will hold our evolution back in a big way, and for a long time. To have society full of amygdala hijacked PTSD'd adult children who can't talk to their parent and get reasonable responses, and the narcissists that prey upon them for their own selfish, self serving purposes, will create a culture that is not sustainable. Narcissists and sociopaths will never care about this fact (they don't even care about other people much), so it is up to the rest of us to care about this. 

Assuming that Putin may be a malignant narcissist, how is the lesson he is trying to teach the Ukrainian population working out? How are the torture lessons, in particular, working out? I bet you most of them are not learning that submission is a good idea. No, they are learning that Russians are dangerous, unreasonable, un-negotiable, impulsively destructive and terrorizing, that they don't have good intentions, and that they must be driven out. I bet that is the main lesson they are learning. I think even children learn the same lessons from malignant narcissistic parents (or any other family member). 

Dictators who invade other countries are usually arrogant Malignant Narcissists who tell people what to think, how to behave, what kind of decision-making they have a right to, and what to believe. They imprison people who make minor infractions while they have criminal intentions every day, have people murdered for instance. Their populations are lied to about the intentions of other countries on purpose. They are taught to be prejudiced. The dictators expect complete submission and loyalty to the dictator while he shows his loyalty to no one. This is the Hellish world we want for the human race going forward, for dictators to tell people what to do, how to think, and how to feel? 

And how do they do this? By gaslighting their population. Wars would be very hard to wage without lots of gaslighting and trying to turn people into full time echoists and submissive marionettes.   

Are You Gaslighting Your Kids? - by Sherri Gordon, medically reviewed by Ann-Louise T. Lockhart, PsyD, ABPP for Very Well Family

The Danger of Parents Gaslighting Their Children (They deserve respect, at every age.) - by Daniel S. Lobel Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Gaslighting: How a Parent Can Drive a Kid Crazy - Medically reviewed by Scientific Advisory Board — By Christine Hammond, MS, LMHC for Psych Central

The Top 5 Gaslighting Phrases of Struggling Adult Children (Shut down gaslighting by not getting sucked into it.) - by Jeffrey Bernstein Ph.D. for Psychology Today

27 Signs Your Parent Is Gaslighting You & What To Do About It - by Abby Moore, expert review by Chamin Ajjan, LCSW, A-CBT, CST

I also talk about how gaslighting can make children vulnerable to predatory relationships: Setting Boundaries (for Victims of Narcissistic or Psychopathic Abuse)

Are Gaslighters Aware of What They Do? (Do gaslighters know they're manipulative, or do they do it without realizing it?) - by Stephanie A. Sarkis Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Gaslighting in Families: Signs of Gaslighting Parents - by Stacey Colino, medically reviewed by Jean Kim, MD for Psycom

Gaslighting Parents: Signs & How to Respond - by Silvi Saxena MBA, MSW, LSW, CCTP, OSW-C, medically reviewed by Rajy Abulhosn MD for Choosing Therapy

WHAT THE ESCALATION OF ABUSE
HAS TO DO WITH THIS TOPIC

Most abusers don't stop to think, "Escalating abuse and keeping it going isn't working. They don't seem to be learning what I want them to learn. They don't seem to be changing in the way that I want them to change. They aren't trusting me or looking at me as a teacher. They aren't doing what I tell them to do. They don't even think my lessons are worth listening to." - no they don't think that way!

Most abusers live in fantasies: 
1. fantasies that people can change more than they actually can (if they looked at themselves, they'd notice they are highly resistant to change - so how are other people supposed to change to the drastic levels they expect?)
2. fantasies that they will keep gaining power, control and domination in relationships
3. fantasies that they are in control of others when they really aren't
4. fantasies that they are much more magnetic, persuasive, intelligent, wealthy, powerful and deceptive than they really are - a lot of us can see through this posturing, more than they'd be comfortable with, in fact.
5. fantasies of others submitting to their every wish and whim
6. fantasies that others will submit to being infantilized and/or parentified at the whims and commands of the abuser 

But the biggest fantasy of all is that if they keep increasing the pain on their victim, the victim will, after enough torture, change the way the abuser wants them to change. As I've pointed out before, they don't understand any of the research that has been done on personal change, otherwise they might take a second look at their methods and attitudes. Some of why they "just don't get it" comes from having such a profound lack of empathy - they can't even understand people on that level, so, of course, they don't understand people enough to know that growing their sadism is not a good choice for them

 What they really tend to think is this: "This isn't working. Apparently, I've got to increase the pain and keep increasing the pain until they come to their senses! Wow, are they stupid for not giving into me!" 

I hope I have proved above why they are the ones with the blind spots, not their victims. 

FURTHER READING
general

Abandoned child syndrome - Wikipedia

FEAR OF ABANDONMENT: THE LASTING EFFECTS OF TRAUMA - by Dr. Alison Block for her own website (Health Psychology Center)

Tips to Heal After Growing Up with a Dismissive Mother - by Sandra Silva Casabianca, Medically reviewed by Cydney Ortiz, PsyD for Psych Central 

19 Lasting Effects of Abandoning or Emotionally Unavailable Parents - by Audrey Sherman, Ph.D. for Psych Central

How To Overcome Abandonment Issues From Childhood - by Dr. Jonice Webb for her own website


Here's what spanking does to kids. None of it is good, doctors say. ("Discipline older children by temporarily removing favorite privileges, such as sports activities or playing with friends.") - by Maggie Fox for NBC News

The Problem with Time-Outs (Time-outs delivered in anger may have damaging effects.) - by Jessica Grogan Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Why Time-Out Is Out (Six experts explain why one of the most popular discipline tactics is also one of the most misused.) - from the Editors of Parents

5 Alternatives To Time-out That Actually Work - by the Editors of Our Little Play Nest

The Confusing Narcissistic Cycle of Abandonment and Return - by Christine Hammond, MS, LMHC, Medically reviewed by Scientific Advisory Board for Psych Central

How to Deal with a Narcissistic Mother - by Giselle Franco for CBT Psychology for Personal Development  

Campaigns against corporal punishment - Wikipedia

Corporal punishment - Wikipedia (history)

Consequences vs Punishment: What’s the Difference? - by Jim and Lynne Jackson for Connected Families 

6 Reasons Some People Hurt the Ones They Love ...and what you can do if you're on the receiving end. - by Claire Jack Ph.D., reviewed by Devon Frye for Psychology Today

Narcissistic parents identify their children as either a favourite or a scapegoat, and they pit them against each other - by Lindsay Dodgson for Insider.com 

Dealing With a Partner Who Doesn't Want Change - by Sheri Stritof, Medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Mind 

50 signs of Emotional Abuse: Meaning & Causes - by by Sylvia Smith, Approved by Paula Cookson, Registered Psychotherapist

There's no such thing as a 'mutually abusive' relationship, therapists say. With abuse, one partner is always in power. - by Julia Naftulin and Keyaira Kelly for Insider.com

When There Is No Getting Away: The Grief of Sibling Bullying - by Sarah Swenson, MA, LMHC 

Did anyone else have a golden child sibling and you were punished for their bad behaviour? - Reddit question (RaisedByNarcissists)

10 Ways to Deal with a Toxic Sibling - by Psych To Go
    
From Psychopaths to 'everyday sadists': why do humans harm the harmless? - by Simon McCarthy-Jones, Trinity College, Dublin for The University of Dublin

What It Takes to Fix a Broken Relationship (Co-rumination, moral repair, and forgiveness.) - by Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD, ABPP for Psychology Today

Its Okay to Cut Ties with Toxic Family Members (Would your life be happier, healthier, and more peaceful without certain people in it?) - by Sharon Martin, LCSW for Psych Central

Narcissistic Gaslighting: What It Is, Signs, & How Cope - by Hailey Shafir, LPCS, LCAS, CCS, Reviewed by: Benjamin Troy, MD for Choosing Therapy

Examples of Narcissist Gaslighting and Ways to Deal with It - by Chidi Mills for Overcomers Counseling

6 Common Traits of Narcissists and Gaslighters (How narcissists and gaslighters emotionally manipulate and exploit victims.) - by Preston Ni M.S.B.A., Reviewed by Lybi Ma for Psychology Today

The Narcissist and Their Children - by Supriya McKenna for The Life Doctor

The Hidden Trauma of Neglect in the Narcissistic Family (Neglect is the most common form of abuse.)
- by Julie L. Hall,  for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     Key Points:
     * Narcissists often cultivate the idea that they are “perfect” parents, but neglect is common in narcissistic families.
     * Narcissistic parents may neglect kids' emotional, physical, safety, medical, and/or educational needs.
     * Neglected children pay a high price in their physical, emotional, and psychological development.

How Narcissists Gain Emotional Control With Micro-Abandonments (Love bombing, and then sudden devaluation.) - by Erin Leonard Ph.D. for Psychology Today


3 Ways Narcissistic Parents Can Abuse Children 1. Viewing children as an extension of themselves. - by Imi Lo for Psychology Today

What Are Typical Behaviours of Narcissistic Abuse Survivors? Five things they have in common. - by Mariette Jansen Ph.D.

5 Manipulation Tactics Narcissistic Parents Use To Control Their Adult Children - by Shahida Arabi, MA for Psych Central
excerpt:
     Adult children of narcissists go through a lifetime’s worth of abuse. Narcissistic parents lack empathy, exploit their children for their own agendas, and are unlikely to seek treatment or change their destructive behaviors long-term (Kacel, Ennis, & Pereira, 2017). Their children often endure severe psychological maltreatment, as their parents employ behaviors like bullying, terrorizing, coercive control, insults, demands, and threats to keep them compliant (Spinazzola et al., 2014). This form of trauma places children of narcissists at risk for suicidality, low self-esteem, depression, self-harm, substance abuse, attachment disorders, and complex PTSD, leading to symptoms similar to children who were physically or sexually abused (Gibson, 2016; Schwartz, 2016; Spinazzola et al., 2014, Walker, 2013).
     If children of narcissists choose to remain in contact with their abusive parents, they will continue to encounter manipulation even as adults. The same tactics which were employed to control them as children can still be powerful even when they are adults – perhaps even more so because these methods cause them to regress back into childhood states of fear, shame, and terror.

Narcissistic Parents Are Literally Incapable Of Loving Their Children - by JOANNA MCCLANAHAN for The Scary Mommy website
excerpt:
     Narcissistic parents see their children’s independence as a direct threat to the control they want or need over their lives.
     Out of desperation to retain control, narcissists will try to deliberately sabotage their child’s sense of self-worth.

Tips to Heal After Growing Up with a Dismissive Mother (Dismissive parenting can impact the way you see yourself, others, and the world in general. Identifying the signs may help you heal.) - by Sandra Silva Casabianca, Medically reviewed by Cydney Ortiz, PsyD  for Psych Central

UNLOVED IN CHILDHOOD: 10 COMMON EFFECTS ON YOUR ADULT SELF - by Peg Streep for B.C. Construction Industry, Rehabilitation Plan

35 Common Gaslighting Phrases in Relationships and How To Respond, According to Therapists

(The lies that are told to create confusion.) - by Renee Hanlon for Parade Magazine

Mother-Daughter Jealousy: Why It Happens and How to Cope - by Fiona Thomas for Greatist
excerpt: 
     Broadly speaking, when a mother exhibits jealousy toward one or more of her offspring, she falls within the signifier of being a “narcissistic mother.”
     Senior therapist Sally Baker elaborates. “This is when a mother puts her own emotional needs above those of her children. It generally starts when the child is young, and growing up in a household headed by a narcissistic mother can be very damaging to a child’s development.”

Mothers Who Are Jealous of Their Daughters (A mother’s jealousy distorts a daughter’s normal development.) - by Karyl McBride Ph.D. for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     * A narcissistic mother may perceive her daughter as a threat.
     * When a mother envies and then criticizes and devalues her daughter, she diminishes the threat to her own fragile self-esteem.
     * As a daughter analyzes what her mother appears to be jealous about, she comes to feel unworthy.

Next up is a Richard Grannon video. His role is usually to help victims of narcissistic abuse, but in this video he acts the role of a narcissist who is intent on gaslighting and dominating his victim through erroneously blaming, and the reactions the victim has in being gaslighted. I'm not sure how I feel about him "acting the part of a narcissist", but this is exactly how it happens (especially for children and the vulnerable under the narcissist's "care"): Narcissist Speaking About Gaslighting

Narcissist Pays Heavy Price for Betrayal Fantasy - by Professor Sam Vaknin (You Tube) 
     Note: Sam Vaknin is a self described narcissist who educates others about Narcissistic Personality Disorder. He got a PhD in Psychology and is now a psychology professor

Why Narcissist Never Says “I am Sorry” - by Professor Sam Vaknin (You Tube)


FOUND ON FACEBOOK: