What is New?

WHAT IS NEWEST ON THIS BLOG?
August 27 New Post: Some Possible Things to Say to Narcissists (an alternative to the DEEP method)
August 7 New Post: Once Narcissists Try to Hurt You, They Don't Want to Stop. It's One of Many Reasons Why Most Survivors of Narcissistic Abuse Eventually Leave Them. (edited)
July 24 New Post: Is Blatant Favoritism of a Child by a Narcissistic Parent a Sign of Abuse? Comes With a Discussion on Scapegoating (edited for grammatical reasons)
July 20 New Post: Why "Obey Your Elders" Can Be Dangerous or Toxic
June 19 New Post: Why Do Narcissists Hate Their Scapegoat Child?
May 26 New Post: Folie à deux Among Narcissists? Or Sycophants? Or Maybe Not Either?
May 18 New Post: Home-schooled Girl Kept in a Dog Cage From 11 Years Old Among Other Types of Egregious Abuse by Mother and Stepfather, the Brenda Spencer - Branndon Mosely Case
May 11 New Post: Grief or Sadness on Mother's Day for Estranged Scapegoat Children of Narcissistic Families
April 29 New Post: Why Children Do Not Make Good Narcissistic Supply, Raising the Chances of Child Abuse (with a section on how poor listening and poor comprehension contributes to it) - new edit on 6/6
April 10 New Post: The Kimberly Sullivan Case. A Stepmother and Father Allegedly Lock Away a Boy When He Is 12, Underfeeding Him, and Home Schooling Him, and at 32 He Takes a Chance of Being Rescued by Lighting the House on Fire (includes updates since posting)
PERTINENT POST: ** Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does it Work?
PETITION: the first petition I have seen of its kind: Protection for Victims of Narcissistic Sociopath Abuse (such as the laws the UK has, and is being proposed for the USA): story here and here or sign the actual petition here
Note: After seeing my images on social media unattributed, I find it necessary to post some rules about sharing my images
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Showing posts with label shaming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shaming. Show all posts

Monday, October 16, 2023

Why Shaming Your Children Is Not Effective, How Narcissists Respond to Feelings of Shame, What You Can Do if You Are an Adult Child and Your Narcissistic Parents are Still Playing the Shaming Game, and How to Start Healing from a Lifetime of Parental Shaming



THIS POST IS PART OF SERIES ON SHAMING
the first post isshaming from abusers, narcissists
the second post isHow Shame is the Core Struggle of Most Narcissists. How it Gets Dumped Onto You, and How They Try to Harvest Regrets and Shame From You. Does It Work For Them?
the third post is this one
a fourth post will show how an environment of shaming, blaming, perspecticide and fawning can produce narcissism
a fifth post will follow on the connection between shame and rage in narcissism
and probably a sixth post too, which will focus more on the trauma aspects

Shaming is a type of abuse that narcissists and sociopaths use to get you to do what they want or demand, and when used in a close personal relationship, it is to get you trauma-bonded to them. 

Shaming will cause trauma in children, whether it is used directly against the child, or whether it is observed (a caretaker or parental figure using it on one child in front of another child). 

Most of what narcissists do is to serve their power and control needs through manipulating others and events. They especially do this to spouse, children, and their adult children, putting them in roles which serve their needs. When their desires aren't met in these manipulations, they generally take the road of hurting the spouse or children. 

Children experience shaming as painful, and if used throughout their childhood, they will develop trauma symptoms. People with Narcissistic Personality Disorder have many other traits and tactics which cause trauma to just about everyone, except primary psychopaths who are trauma-resistant, so with the combination of these other traits, it is highly, highly likely that most people will come out scathed if they are in any kind of close personal relationship with a narcissist. 

You may not notice the trauma symptoms right away, but they will start to appear little by little until your system is totally disabled by the symptoms. It is the reason why domestic violence counselors, psychologists who specialize in Cluster B Personality Disorders, and psychiatrists urge patients who are dealing with narcissists to either go "no contact" or "gray rock". Note that the gray rock method is not effective for scapegoat children of narcissists; however, it can be effective if your parent puts you into any other role aside from that one (the scapegoat role means that your parent is out to hurt you and blame you for things that are not your fault - most scapegoats end up without their family of origin, and no, there isn't anything you can do about it yourself ... I explain why later in the post). 

The reason why shaming is so damaging to children has been written about extensively. For one, enough shaming can "wipe out" their budding personalities, their budding interests, drives and ambitions, as well as their self esteem (self esteem is necessary in order to grow into a full functioning adult). It tends to delay emotional and psychological growth as well, and in some cases it can cause brain damage. The child is being pressured to put their attention on the parent first and foremost, and definitely in terms of what the parent wants from you (and the minefields that the parent sets up to hurt or reward a child again and again, often with no other choices than those two choices, however remember that whether you are hurt or rewarded is not your choice; it is in the parent's hands totally). This upbringing causes child neglect at the very least, as it puts more emphasis on denying the needs of the child in favor of the parent's, but most often it is not effective discipline at all. Children get the sense that they aren't liked, loved, cared about, that their existence isn't appreciated, and that they are being forced to supply all of this by other means, so they develop coping strategies that narcissists do not like, and do not care to understand. 

Here are some posts out of many as to why shaming children is not effective (note, my own writing continues after):

Why Shaming Your Kids Isn't Effective Discipline - by Jennifer Wolf and medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Family
     This article goes into what shaming does to children, and how it leads to the destruction of the relationship between parent and child. Here is an excerpt:
     ... Not only do you lose considerable relational equity, but shaming kids in public or online also tears down trust and self-esteem. At the same time, it zaps your child's motivation to engage in the very behaviors you're trying to encourage.
     ... What If You've Already Publicly Shamed Your Kids?
     Let's get real. You might be reading this and thinking, "Oh no! I've already done this." Now's your opportunity to apologize. Your kids need to see that you're human and willing to own your mistakes. So even if you're experiencing a degree of remorse that makes it extremely difficult to initiate that conversation, make it happen.

     My note: I agree that apologies go a long way, but if you have apologized for it before, and you keep doing it, your apology will only go so far in mending your relationship. Apologies are difficult for narcissists since they prefer to stick the person they have a conflict with, with "all of the fault". It is more likely to compound the rift. 
     The article also goes into words parents should avoid, how to address your child's behavior without shaming, phrases you should avoid (the following are taken from the article, although the article has explanations for each one of them: "You're such a bad girl", "You're just like your mother (or father)", "I don't know why I even bother with you", "I should ship you off to live with dad (or mom)", "I'm so tired of dealing with you"), how to influence your kids' behavior without shaming (and using these phrases instead: "I'd like you to tell me what happened", "What did that feel like for you?", "What could you have done differently?", "What will you do next time?", and "How can I help?")
     The article is worth reading and studying, especially if you've been shaming your kids, and you see absolutely no improvement from it (it is doubtful you will). 

Some other articles I found along these lines:

Think hard before shaming children - by Claire McCarthy, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing for The Harvard Medical School
excerpt:
     “Do you really want to go out looking like that?”
     “You let your teammates down during that game.”
     “Why can’t you get good grades like your sister?”
     “Why do you hang out at home all the time instead of going out like other kids?”
     “Why are you crying? It’s not that bad.”
     As we blurt out such things, we usually don’t think of them as shaming. We think of them as something that might help our child recognize a problem — and perhaps motivate them to change. We think of them as constructive criticism.

3 Dangers of Shaming (How shame leads to only bad consequences.) - by Dianne Grande Ph.D. for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     ... Research has shown that common problems linked to the shame experience include proneness to anxiety and depression. In particular, studies have shown a link between shame and social anxiety disorder as well as generalized anxiety disorder.
     Another way in which shame has been shown to harm the self is apparent in the association between shame and addiction. For some individuals who are susceptible to addictive behaviors, the addictive substance is used to numb the intense and painful negative feelings, including shame.
According to Internal Family Systems theory, the use of the substance may be the mind’s way of trying to protect itself from intensely painful emotions that might otherwise lead to suicide (Schwartz, 2020). This also may become a self-defeating cycle when the abuse of substances is in itself experienced as shameful behavior, possibly leading to more self-numbing through substance abuse.

     For narcissistic individuals, shaming them goes this way (from the article):
     ... For some individuals, the immediate sense of being flawed or of being unlovable is so painful that it cannot be acknowledged and corrected through rational self-statements. The defensive response is to put the blame on someone else. “It can’t be my fault; it must be your fault.” This pattern was explained in the recent post by Carol Lambert. Clearly, this type of reaction, if habitual, can be very destructive in relationships. ... 
     Violence and shame (from the article):
     ... Possibly the least well-known consequence of shame is its connection to violence. While most of us occasionally react to feelings of shame with either self-directed criticism or other-directed criticism (blaming), the most unstable and emotionally vulnerable among us react to feelings of shame with violence. A violent reaction may be self-directed or outwardly directed. Both are primitive and potentially deadly responses. According to research by Brene Brown, shame is highly correlated with both bullying and suicide, in addition to the consequences noted above.
     When shame leads to violence directed at others, those harmed may be close family members. They may also be complete strangers, as in the case of mass shootings that have tragically become so common in daily news. This is not to suggest that shame is the only motivating factor in mass shooting incidents; rather that it can be one of the factors. ... 
     A note here of my own: studies have shown that many mass shooters have significant narcissistic traits, and narcissism has been associated with feelings of deep shame (my post about narcissistic shame is HERE, the one on mass shootings will be published soon, I hope - or check back HERE for when it is published).
     In the meantime, here is a clue as to why narcissists can become violent if they think you might be unhappy with them or critical of their behavior: 
     This aggressive behavior in response to shame was studied by Donald Nathanson (2008) and labeled the “attack-other response.” Feelings of shame, including low self-esteem and a self-perception of being defective, are so intense that the person feels themself to be in danger. In effect, anger is used as a weapon to hurt the person(s) who triggered the feelings of worthlessness and hopelessness.
     Another note of mine on this part of the article:
     However, the triggers may be real and may not be real. "Triggers" are a PTSD word and concept. A soldier, for instance, can be triggered by a certain look on someone else's face, because the look was one that someone else used when they were being held at gunpoint. PTSD works in such a way as to bring back the memory when they see someone else with that expression. The memory can be so vivid that the PTSD'd individual may feel that they are back in the war again, and react the way he would in war: by hurting, damaging, injuring or killing, and not kidding. If the soldier was trained to kill the enemy so as not to be killed himself, this may be the reaction to the flashback, though exceptionally rare, even if his life is not in danger in any way during the moment. Hurting or killing someone in a PTSD flashback is something most of us have heard. The proliferation of guns without a lot of mental health background checks can create this sort of horrific ending too. So we would say that a soldier who is back home and having an emotional flashback based on how someone looked at him would be an unreal situation: the soldier is not in danger, even if his brain is telling him that he is. 
     What contributes to it is that PTSD keeps you in a hypervigilant state, so you have sleep disturbances: light sleep where any noise or dream can create a startle response where you wake up with your heart beating wildly, plus nightmares through the night. It can be so bad that you only get 2 -3 hours of "disturbed sleep" maximum, or you are up for three days with no sleep, and then crash on the fourth day, then up again for another three days, and so on. 
     Lack of sleep has been known to create hallucinations. So the "facial expression" of someone else can be interpreted by the soldier as "the enemy soldier is about to shoot me! I have to shoot him first!" It would be like having a "waking dream", where the PTSD'd person is going around half asleep and half awake, and in a heightened state of defense and hypervigilance against attacks to take his life. 

This is not to say that people with PTSD have violent or aggressive reactions when they get triggered, but narcissists do, especially the covert brand of narcissist and malignant narcissist. They are fighting a war all of the time against being shamed as a child, something I will be discussing further in the post. 

For most child abuse survivors, they adopted one of the trauma responses: fawn, fight, flight, freeze, or avoid (and a lot of times it is all 5 of them in varying degrees, and depending on the situations they are in). Abusive parents want, and try to mold the child to give the fawn response at all times during bullying and shaming sessions, but it is very dangerous for the child, and creates situations where the child will fawn in just about every situation with any perpetrator and with any predator (until they have a sense of their own power and that they have choices - situations where they can decide not to put up with it). Their very lives are at stake, and if we look at what fawning does to the brain, to the emotions, and how it gives them PTSD and generalized anxiety disorder, it destroys the child little by little emotionally, mentally and physically, especially if they have gotten to the point of suicidal thoughts (suicidal thoughts are extremely common for abused children who have both PTSD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder).

Besides shaming being bad for children physically, mentally, and emotionally, it's not the ethical thing to do to a child by their caretaker by a long shot. Trying to mold them to accept shaming, wipes out their ability to defend themselves adequately in any situation. 

It's kind of like they need to be re-wired when they are fawners. Many seek therapy after going through a couple of disastrous or abusive relationships where they are expected to fawn in those situations too.  Counselors in the domestic violence field, and trauma counseling are the most sought. The re-wiring is necessary to stop the fawning. In the end, it means not having abusers in your life, being able to tell who is likely to be abusive and who is not, which is one reason why, when parents are shaming, humiliating, being abusive or being unethical (like lying about you), it will end the relationship between the parent and child. 

You can't be going to trauma therapy, spending thousands of dollars on it, and getting pressured or threatened by parents to always be fawning, or endure a punishment ... You might as well flush your money down the toilet. 

In counseling with a domestic violence counselor,  you are being trained against fawning when people are disrespectful and aggressive towards you on any level. You learn the channels of self defense, including what laws, and law protection can do for you. 

It's the process of saving your life from any more predation and the continued degrading of your emotional, mental and physical health, or of being attracted to substances like alcohol or cocaine to keep from dealing with the horrible reality of the situation. It means you aren't spending your life being a reactor to abuse any more.

But first, the reactions of narcissists to shaming:

NARCISSISTS REACTIONS TO SHAMING 

When we look at narcissists, they grew up in a situation or situations where there was usually a lot of shaming going on, and usually a lot of "trash talking" about other people too. Possibly there was bullying too. And possibly there were perfection standards that were not reachable, or were weird or unattainable, or they were bullied and taught to treat the bully as a "superior being", or in ways that were hurtful, shameful or humiliating to the child. 

Growing up in an environment with a lot of shaming and trash-talking going on, even if it is not directed towards you, is traumatic for any child. For all intents and purposes, shaming is the emotional equivalent to bombs, arrows, bullets, landmines and invasions. There is rarely a good outcome to it where children either repeat what was modeled to them (i.e. where they can become another narcissist), or they become so overly fawning that they are used by other narcissists, psychopaths and human predators. 

Covert vulnerable narcissists react very similarly to being blamed and shamed as a soldier with PTSD would react, however they tend to "get rid of" (via a discard) of anyone they feel shamed by, again whether it's really happening or whether they are dealing with a PTSD trigger.

Overt grandiose narcissists react to shame as if they are only entitled to praise. Grandiose narcissists tend to grow up more on a pedestal than being bullied, where they are praised constantly, even when it isn't justified, or when they are being cruel or selfish, and where someone else in the family is constantly being disparaged. People who do this - whiten one child's motives, and blacken another child's motives - is called splitting in psychological terms. One child gets the nice Dr. Jekyll part of the parent; the other gets the mean, cruel Mr. Hyde part of the parent.  

Splitting is usually the result of a personality disorder: Borderline Personality Disorder, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and Antisocial Personality Disorder (the cluster B personality disorders). The latter two also put their children into roles most often for life (one golden child and one scapegoat, which exacerbates the splitting in the parent, makes it a stubborn trait of the disorder that is about impossible to dis-lodge by anyone, even by the most trained therapists, even when faced with many tragedies because of it). They just cannot let go of the feeling they have one child who is all good and the another that is all bad, even when presented with a lot of other views. 

It's part of the disorder.

They could even be shamed about splitting by their own parents, and they might act out the part that they love both of their children, but when they are behind closed doors, they go right back to their "all good/all bad" views of their own children. And it presents a real challenge to social workers. There aren't enough foster parents around to re-parent the narcissists' "abused, all bad children". 

And what makes a child look "all bad" to them aside from the dictates of the disorder?

A lot of reasons why scapegoat children are chosen by narcissistic parents is because one child makes them feel ashamed of something, and it can be just because the child exists, and I'm not kidding. 

Narcissists are exceptionally jealous, and if the scapegoat is naturally beautiful (which narcissistic Moms and narcissistic Dads have trouble with, for different reasons), has a lot of empathy (something narcissists lack), a lot of talents (something that narcissists can lack because they are a lot more focused on narcissistic supply, negative workplace gossip, triangulating workers against each other, and competition baiting, money and power grabs, than work, or talent), has a lot of authentic friendships (something else narcissists lack too - their friendships tend to be shams with a lot of lies and arm-twistings such as you might expect from politicians to get "group think" policies going), then it's the jealousy of the parent which keeps the child in a scapegoat role. 

Narcissists are always in competition, even with their own children. 

Both kinds of narcissists go through a shame-rage spiral when they feel criticized (i.e. shamed). But if you notice, covert vulnerable narcissists are "hypersensitive to criticism", whereas grandiose narcissists are just "sensitive to criticism". The rage they experience when feeling criticized or shamed is still off-the-charts for both, and rage, in general, over feeling shamed is part of the disorder. 

The shame-rage spiral is a post I'll be publishing soon, but I thought this post was necessary to understand that post. 

Anyway, narcissists don't deal with shame in healthy ways, and they either rage at, or rage about, or punish people who they think are trying to shame them. But first, they try to give what ever they feel ashamed about to you so that they can feel free of accountability and responsibility. If you refuse to take the blame or the shame, they rage again, and then feel shame again. The shame and rage spiral  down together, one feeding off of the other, and their ethics tend to spiral down with it all too. It is why they tend to get more abusive (escalating), not less so, and more desperate with trying to shame you by proxy once you have let them know that you can't deal with their escalations of abuse: smear campaigns and co-bullies (flying monkeys) are the most common. 

The more unethical they are, the less people want to relate to them. There is nothing to say to them any more at a certain point, which causes them more shame, and more aggression, until they are even further down in the moral dumpster. Then they play the victim once they are in a sorry enough state, which is even more immoral. Then they become ashamed of that. So this gives you a pretty good idea of how the spiral starts and where it goes. 

It has been proposed in psychology circles that covert narcissists may very well have PTSD, which would explain their incredible reactions to being criticized or of feeling shamed by others. The way they deal with their PTSD is to be aggressive unlike most of us (i.e. they develop the "fight" response as the result of feeling ashamed). But for them, they go to war against you. The more aggressive or punishing they are as a result of feeling shame, the more they are on the darker end of narcissism (more Antisocial Personality Disorder traits). And they can be dangerous because they are not in control of their emotions; they are very over-reactive, not just ultra sensitive to criticism, which explains why they rage so much, often discard relationships over it, blackmail over it, insist they dominate over it, and abuse others over it. It is referred to as "the mask falling", i.e. their false self starts disintegrating before your eyes and you are left with Hyde-like reactions and often an evil type of personality as well. 

They do make it very clear that they don't want to be criticized, ever, which makes relating to narcissists tough because they ask you to lie to them by omission if you have an issue with them. Actually, there is no winning this because they will most likely give you a double bind: "Don't lie to me or omit things you want to say to me, but don't bring up any issues you have about me either." Double binds are "no-win" situations and it is a sure recipe for more of their raging. 

So what started out to be one minor criticism of them (activation of shame), or may have only been interpreted as a criticism, they can retaliate by shaming you x 1,000. Getting as many flying monkeys as they can to shame you is one tack they take. Ostracizing or abandoning you is another and is also primarily about shaming you. Comparing you to others (in a negative way) is an extremely common add-on for narcissists too, which is supposed to seize your brain with humiliation and shame also. Then of course, they must criticize you themselves, and weigh you down with guilt for every single issue between you, even if they reframe those issues with false narratives and lies. Gaslighting is also a form of shaming: "You are SO crazy and you are so incapable because of it! In fact you should feel humiliated for being crazy and not seeing reality the way I see it!" - gaslighting is absolutely about shaming every time it is used. 

And of course, there is so much more than this that they add, and keep adding. So maybe it isn't retaliation by shaming x 1,000. Maybe it is a lifetime of shaming you in whatever ways they think will work to their benefit in trouncing you with more shame.

It can get to the point where every interaction with the parent is about that parent humiliating the child in some way. The parent insisting they are superior and the authority over a grown adult child is shaming in and of itself (which is to say that continual infantilizing via lectures are just more shaming). 

In art renditions, the scapegoat is weighed down with a heavy pack on his back (all of the things on his back are representative of the sins of the tribe), and of course, the scapegoat is sent out to the desert to die without food, water, and weighed down with all of the things the tribe finds shameful within themselves. Not being able to take shame, but dishing it out in spades would be one of the sins loaded onto the back of the scapegoat. 

And are we surprised that children walk away from this, that mental health professionals tell these patients not to take the narcissist's shaming tactics seriously (because it means that the narcissist can't take any shame themselves and they have to give it to you instead), that your symptoms are never going to be met with empathy and compassion because all that the narcissist cares about is retaliation and shaming, and that to heal you, you should go "no contact"? 

So what they can't take (criticism or activating their shame in any manner whatsoever, even a tiny amount of it), they do constantly to others and about others, without fail.

Hypocrisy and abuse always go together, fist in a glove with spiked knuckles. And hypocrisy is also the first sign you get that they are unethical. How hypocritical and unethical they go tells the tale of how disordered they are in their narcissism, especially if they go as far as sadism (which shows they probably have the malignant brand of narcissism, and have no remorse in hurting other people - these people can shame and hurt people all day long and sleep well at night). 

Now when they shame, they expect their children to absorb it like a sponge, and even insist on it, and to not act like them (use the trauma response of "fight" at all, and not to be in the least rebellious about being shamed like the way the narcissist acts). They insist that their children be docile, polite little sycophants to the narcissistic parent's out-of-control rages with a lot of impoliteness and abuse. Some narcissistic parents will even insist that their children act like sponges for other abusers too.

Most abused children do end up as fawners or as freezers. That is why they end up with crippling symptoms eventually. And what do narcissistic parents do when their child has crippling symptoms? They pile on more abuse, retaliations for not acting like a perfect sycophant (which children with PTSD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder cannot do anyway - both disorders keep them from doing so). 

THE IMPLICATIONS FOR CHILDREN
LIVING THROUGH THIS

Fawning, more than any other response, will get you terrible symptoms faster and be harder to treat the more you are absorbing shaming and abuse.

The trauma response of freezing is what happens when you get to the point where you either feel totally powerless in the situation, and/or when PTSD symptoms start to manifest. 

Now why would any parent want their child to freeze and get symptoms over them raging at them or shaming them? 

Normal healthy parents don't even get to this stage, and they don't need scapegoats or even want them the way narcissistic and alcoholic parents need and want them. 

The fact that narcissists have no empathy for their children, whether those children are fawning or freezing, is one reason why narcissists who gain ever more power can be so dangerous. Their ways of dealing with people in the world around them is to be aggressive, and to aggress upon, and to be so threatening as to get ever more fawning and freezing out of others, even though they would never do that themselves, even when they are on the world stage, such as a leader of a country.

Most narcissists on the world stage and in politics are invaders, the ultimates in aggression, as well as being triangulators and spouting false narratives. 

And that should tell you what narcissists are about in their ultimate form. 

A parent who has invaded their children and put shame and lots of unfounded unjust blame into them, that child will always manifest with trauma responses, and have trauma symptoms. In order to get those arrows out of the child, the child needs to be placed most often on a diet of "no contact" or "very low contact" with that parent, so that the arrows can be removed, and so that the slow process of healing can begin, and so that no more arrows will be shot into the child. 

Yes, it is a win-lose war for narcissists about who can come out on top in terms of who shoots the most arrows of shame. And therefor a game too, with game plans on how they are going to trash your self esteem even if you are on the sidelines or gone, trying your best to live your life in peace. They don't want you in peace; they want a war based on their terms and even knowing that they have the overwhelming advantage over you. It's the elephant fighting the ant in many of these situations, and most ants will go underground or skittle away. 

Which is to say that fawning is really unnatural, mostly only something human beings do in the animal world. Fawning is the response to kings and queens, to being a slave, to being deemed unimportant unless you are serving. 

Parenting is supposed to be about entrusting the parent to take care of children, their physical needs, intellectual needs via school, but also doing the best by them emotionally and mentally. Getting them to be fawning during times of out-of-control rages, during abuse, during being insulted a lot, during gaslighting, is not good emotional care by a long shot. It is the opposite of good care, and the fact that many fawning abused children get horrific symptoms is proof of it. 

And the other problem is that trying to get you into fawning positions takes place even when you are an adult too, even when you are 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 years of age. It never ends. And to keep you from being independent of their coercive controlling tactic of trying to force you to be submissive and fawning, they will withdraw love, make every attempt to withdraw others' love and attention too, withdraw family belonging, withdraw money and keep you out of the Will, to make every attempt to make it plain that your independence from fawning has no place in their life or the lives of other people you both know.

Yes this tactic is coercive control, and is likely to be illegal in most, if not all, states in the U.S.A. soon. It is now being reviewed in the states of New York and California. It is illegal in almost all of Western Europe. It means that narcissists will have a much more difficult time being who they are and using coercive control than they do now on the most vulnerable members of our society. 

Anyway, good parenting never means becoming a king and queen of your children where you can tell them how to serve you and your entitlements and rages, and how to be good little servants at all times to your needs for narcissistic supply.

Parentifying roles are bad for your relationship with your children as well. The way children become capable full adults able to support themselves is by pursuing their own interests. It doesn't mean you shouldn't be teaching them some practical lessons and assigning chores, but if they are balking a lot, it will not do any good to force them or threaten them, and particularly shame them (for having interests? - trying to make them take on yours? Not a good idea). 

In terms of healing, I think I've made it clear why having rageful abusive parents who can't live by their own standards in terms of shaming is pointless to try to fix or deal with any more, and why your healing should be done without their influence, comments, threats, and voice of disapproval in your head (of course they are going to disapprove of your healing - remember always that their agenda is to have you fawning always and forever, and in more refined ways, to get you to be the "fawniest of fawners" as Richard Grannon likes to say, so getting their voice out of your head any time it appears is necessary for a lot of survivors: telling the voice: "Go away!" - it does work after enough times). 

Also the hypocrisy should create some disgust in you if you have ethics yourself, and if it doesn't, then consider that you have normalized hypocrisy being okay for parents, but not for children. Also consider whether you want to change it to not being normal at all (most parents, as I've said before, do not act this way). 

The problem with fawning as a child to a parent's or caretaker's abuse, hypocrisies, shaming, rage-full-of-projection, and dangers is that a lot of fawners take fawning into other relationships with abusers too. 

There are children who do fawning like narcissists do it, who only fawn to people with more money, more status, more power than they have, but talk about them with derision behind their back, and reveal little about themselves to these higher-on-the-hierarchy people that they want to pretend they are the "fawniest of fawners" to.  

That's what seems to happen: the pretend fawners who are much more likely to become narcissists, and the real fawners who are likely to become victims of narcissistic partners and receive more abuse in marriage as well as in business. If you refuse to be more and more fawning, you will meet the same end as you did in childhood with your narcissistic parent. 

The best way to avoid narcissists is to stay away from people who are overly charming (especially those who charm people to their faces but deride them behind their backs, any Jekyll/Hyde behavior), people who are hypocrites, people who are arrogant and constantly interrupting, and anyone who displays a lack of empathy. Some good people with PTSD get to a point where they don't feel anything, not joy, not sorry, not even empathy, so as with all things, it's important not to be absolute about it, and to keep enough of a distance for up to two years. Most narcissists show their true colors before a year, with the exception of the "I-plan-attacks" kinds of narcissists who can wait for two years to show their true colors. 

However, the lack of empathy is the strongest indicator. To tell if the empathy is real or fake, you can go to THIS POST. But even there, there are no absolutes as you will read, which is why time and not rushing into anything is on your side. 

Also beware of the pro-social narcissist, which Richard Grannon explains nicely in his video, The Nice Guy Narcissist | 14 Traits. I have been around this kind of narcissist myself, and it is extremely, extremely challenging and traumatizing, to say the least. He was a nice guy narcissist with all of the traits that Richard Grannon lays out, plus all of the traits of Malignant Narcissism, plus a significant drinking problem indicative of the middle stage of alcoholism. Awful. If anyone traumatized me the most in my life, it was this individual, and it only took 4 months to happen. If I could put up the biggest warning sign for anyone, it would be this type of individual that Richard Grannon describes. As far as I can see, it means boundaries set by police. I talk further about this at the end of my post. 

Also, if this was me, I would go to domestic violence counseling with a certified domestic violence counselor, one who has experience with perpetrators and victims. Marriage/relationship counseling and mediation counseling is a disaster to go to with anyone who is highly manipulative and abusive behind closed doors, and many survivors end up in worse shape than they did before. Consider that abusive relationships are not really relationships; they are about one person trying to coercively control and hurt another person. It's never been a two-way street, and it never will be, which is why it is not really a relationship. It's one person giving into another, and it's about fawning, or being expected to fawn, to all of the shaming the narcissist does over, and over again without relief and without end. 

If it is a relationship, it is deadly, with way more dangers and symptoms than most people can handle. I do believe, over time, that it can degrade your morals and ethics too (who hasn't lied to a narcissist or a dangerous person just to keep safe, for instance? ... Who hasn't gotten really angry at them after being raged 100 times by them, and being baited?). So it's no good.  

If this was me, I would listen as much as I could to the counselor as I could, and stop listening to the perpetrator as much as I could too. Abusers are extremely manipulative during this period, and you don't want to get talked into things by them any more. In healthy relationships, luring and persuasion is not necessary; relationships feel a lot better without that. Abusive relationships mostly feel bad, and you get symptoms around them. Listen to what therapists say about cognitive dissonance in particular (which is how we put ourselves in danger over and over again), and about triangulation and gaslighting. Know that most abusers will promise things like "I will never do this again" - but they either don't mean it when they say it, or they are incapable of keeping promises (usually both). Again, they can't deal with shame in a healthy way, and most narcissists do not go to therapy to get more healthy, so breaking the promise and raging is likely to come up again if they feel at all shamed again in their life.

A list of domestic violence counselors in your area can usually be found at your local domestic violence center or domestic violence shelter. You can also get, in some instances, some limited free therapy and legal advice at either one. 

Not allowing yourself to be abused and saying no to abuse is only part of the picture because the brain has a way of storing traumatic events that make you feel that you are in continual danger, just like you were when you were with your perpetrator. And some of it is based on reality: stalking, stealing, home invasion, getting other people to attack you is part of the way that offenders keep trying to make you feel you are in danger, and keep adding to it to put you in constant turmoil. Abuse escalates always.

And for all of that, you need police investigations, recording what has happened with police, and police protection, plus a good home security system with cameras, preferably cameras from different kinds of manufacturers (even police will tell you that you should do this). 

You need to do what you can do to keep from being attacked again, and police have the best advice for that.  

Remember that narcissists do everything they can not to be shamed even one more time by you, and so you have the right to protect yourself from the myriad and continued onslaught of attacks and deep betrayals they keep giving you (retaliations x 1,000). They usually want separation from you for not fawning. You can have separation from them, including stringent boundaries to keep safe from attacks on all the tactics and people they use for these ends (and I bet you'll get attacks coming from all kinds of directions - and some of them break the law to attack you, especially the not-too-brilliant people with criminal mindsets). 

PTSD, hypervigilance, a rapid heartbeat, and all of the symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder are normal responses and normal symptoms when you are enduring people attacking you from all the angles narcissists and sociopaths love to use. 

However, if you have all of your protections in place and your home and life is peaceful (at last!), and you still feel a lot of symptoms (PTSD and/or Generalized Anxiety Disorder), and you haven't experienced any danger from attackers for several years, if this was me, and I could afford it, I would also go to a trauma therapist.  

In trauma therapy, you learn that your trauma symptoms are explainable by the events you lived, and how the brain functions in keeping those trauma experiences alive and practically branded into your brain (like a never-ending, if somewhat healed, wound, or nightmare) in your psyche. Vagus Nerve exercises and EMDR are usually highly effective, especially if your PTSD and/or your Generalized Anxiety Disorder are through the roof. How effective they are has to do with how traumatized you are, how bad your PTSD or Generalized Anxiety Disorder is, whether you have disassociation experiences, whether you have substance addictions (common for trauma patients), or whether you have other kinds of addictions not related to substances, and your usual coping mechanisms for dealing with trauma. And I bet anything that hypervigilance, sleep disturbances and nightmares are still part of the picture and the hardest to resolve. 

A lot of the approach of trauma therapy is not focused on what you did (not "Why did you stay in an abusive relationship so long and even go back? Don't you know that abusive relationships escalate? Why would you do something so hair-brained?", but the opposite). The approach is: "What did you live through?" This is even the approach to alcoholism. They aren't going to say, "How could you go to rehab 38 times, spend your parent's money to do so, and not come out with good results?" In fact, all kinds of therapists, not just trauma therapists, have learned that this doesn't work. It increases the shaming. Even alcoholism is treated as: "What kind of environment did you grow up in?" And studies have shown that most alcoholics grow up in environments that are traumatic. There is a direct correlation between alcoholism and trauma, and alcoholism and child abuse environments (another link and another link), even if they weren't the ones who were bullied. 

And I'm pretty sure a number of you will be asking if narcissism is one of those "What have you lived through?" conditions too? Yes. But you cannot treat your attackers. Even showing them empathy opens up a lot of lines for you to be attacked by them again (yes, they even exploit your empathy for continued attacks). The people that they should be going to are therapists - someone who specializes in treating Cluster B Personality Disorders, or who specializes in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, anger management classes, and possibly Schema Therapy (it sometimes helps them), plus a host of other therapies if needed including Dialectic Behavior Therapy and Trauma Therapy.

But it is not for you to suggest or to be at all involved unless you can do a family-wide intervention (a hard thing to pull off with narcissists especially - they are more likely to walk out and say they never liked any of you anyway). Be aware that most of them don't go to therapy because they are happy blaming and dumping all of their problems on to whoever they have adopted as their scapegoats (usually one of their children, an ex, a sibling, and one of the workers in their place of employment).

If they think it is easier for them to always believe someone else is at fault for everything they do that causes them to be angry, rageful, discarding, bullying, envious, depressed and attacking, they reason they don't need any therapy.

If they believe they can talk you into their anger, rages, discards, bullying, competitiveness, depression, broken promises, instability, inability to feel empathy, and attacking fests are always your fault, which they really do believe they can talk you into, then they feel they don't need therapy either. 

They do find out eventually that this won't work, but in the meantime, they live in a fantasy world about this. 

Either way, this is not of your concern. Your concern is to get healthy, to address all of the debilitating symptoms, to figure out who you are and discover all of your talents outside of the narcissists shadow, and to find a peaceful way forward. PTSD does and can get worse, so it is critical to re-wire and get on a healing path. 

For a lot of survivors of narcissistic manipulations, therapy is a god-send. 

As far as a new social group after you go no-contact or the narcissistic parent has discarded you, which many survivors find they want and need, fellow survivors and obvious no-B.S. empaths are also a god-send. For me personally, this is when my life felt like it was being put back together, and put back together in a way that was better than before. I noticed that a lot of my new relationships were with people who were a lot like me, in dress, in hair, in what they lived through, what their interests were (and the arts tended to dominate). A lot of survivors of narcissistic abuse are artists: what a great find and revelation!

I noticed, most of all, that my sleep improved, and it was always disturbed, even as far back as when I was a three year old child living in my first home, an apartment building. I had constant nightmares about being picked at and slowly eaten alive by crows more than once. I remember the nightmares more than I remember specific events, though I do remember how the apartment was laid out, that the stairs were in the center of the building, that there were four apartments in our unit, that our bathroom was long and skinny with the sink closest to the door, that clothes were hung out on a line outside my bedroom window, and that my parents' friends with a girl near my age lived downstairs on the opposite side of the building (kitty corner, via length, not width). 

My nightmares increased afterwards in our new home, to the point where it was often impossible to sleep except in the beginning hours. 

It finally told me what I needed to know: "what I lived through".

Every symptom that I had could be attributed to what I lived through, which didn't diminish the symptoms right away, but at least I knew where they came from and I could name them, and categorize them, and file them away, and not be confused or think about them as much, which, in and of itself, helped in diminishing them (except when they were needed - which I explain in the next chapter). 

For instance, I found that when I was around narcissists who weren't criminals, I always experienced headaches, and sometimes mini flashes of dizziness. Narcissists can be fun, and they can have an acerbic wit, and I did have fun sometimes when I was with them on a jaunt, but I would always come home with a headache, exhaustion, feeling unheard or silenced in one way or another, and those flashes of dizziness. It wasn't a good feeling, no matter how much I laughed, no matter how light-hearted I was, no matter how much I believed I had a good time. 

Around the criminal types of narcissists, I experienced high anxiety and a feeling that my head was buzzing (as if nerves could "buzz" in your head like bees). 

I tend to stay away from people now who give me headaches or where I get that "buzz" anxiety feeling. And usually those symptoms are dead-on accurate in terms of who I find they eventually are. I will not be pushed into relating to people I don't want to relate to either. Because my own experiences and system are way better detectors than anyone else. Most of us are not good detectors of toxicity and toxic people, especially people who are enchanted with any narcissist, and I have been led astray too by all kinds of do-gooders as well as people who liked seeing me being in traumatic situations, but now I have to rely on symptoms to clue me in. I have also tested some flying monkeys of narcissists' I know (ones who I have some respect for) just to see where their detection abilities are: not so good. It convinces me even more that I need to do this on my own terms. 

So symptoms are not always a bad thing: they are our warning systems not to get too close, to keep our guard up, and definitely not to fawn. 

There are other things I have done to heal, and to be on a healing journey in general, and I may share some of those anecdotes in the future. But the ones I have listed here are the major ones.  

I would say that finding out who you are without narcissists' constant comments and shaming is one of the first steps to living a better life. I'd bet you'd find you are a kinder person than you ever thought (narcissists have an agenda to always paint you as unkind, selfish and unhinged which you can't find out is untrue unless you separate from them completely, even when you have other people in your life constantly countering what the narcissist says, which, in my case, I did have - my father, my spouse, and other people who knew me well ... yup, I still wondered whether narcissists were telling the truth about me, and now I don't). You can find you are way more sane and able than the narcissist painted you as too (again, most narcissists will paint you as insane so that you put your decision-making in their hands and so that they can continue their power, control and isolating agendas). And you can find that you are way more talented and ambitious than you thought you were too (narcissists keep trying to make you feel too inept mentally, emotionally and physically to reach career and lifestyle goals). - As so many psychologists say, "Don't take what they have to say personally; take it as their disorder speaking through them." 

Finding out who you are and what you are capable of is one of the joys in life, and if that is being strung up and hobbled, break the chains of the trauma bond to experience what life truly has to offer. 

Most of all, realize what shaming does to children, and don't pass it down to the next generation.  

Shaming Children Is Emotionally Abusive (Children respect those who respect them.) - by Karyl McBride Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Parental Shaming vs. Encouragement (What feels better, works better.) - by Steven Stosny, Ph.D.
excerpt:
     ... Encouragement tends to evoke cooperation, almost as consistently as shaming evokes resistance. ... 

How to Avoid Shaming Your Child – And Keep Strong, Loving Boundaries - by Karen Young, psychologist, for Hey Sigmund

Shaming Children Leaves Scars on the Brain that Adversely Affect Emotional Health - by Jennifer Fraser, PhD. for Emotional Intelligence Magazine

Why Shaming Your Children Doesn’t Change Their Behavior - by Rachel Tomlinson, Registered Psychologist for Baby Chick
excerpt:
     Shaming kids is not a great discipline tool. It can be easy to slip into shaming comments out of frustration. You want to try and get some kind of response or reaction from your child. Or perhaps it was the way you were parented. You might say things like:
     “You’re such a liar. I can’t believe a word that comes out of your mouth.”
     “Why are you crying? It’s not that bad!”
     “All you do is whine and complain. You’re being annoying.”

When Parents Publicly Shame Their Kids - by Susanna Schrobsdorff for Time Magazine 
excerpt:
     The story was so disturbing, it instantly became the latest parable of punishment in the digital age. A dad in Tacoma, Wash., filmed his 13-year-old daughter with her long hair cut off and piled on the floor around her. She was being punished for sending a boy a racy photo. “Man, you lost all that beautiful hair,” says his voice in the background. “Was it worth it?”
     That video went viral–especially after news spread that within days, she had jumped to her death from a highway overpass. Outraged YouTube viewers called for the father to be criminally prosecuted. There were headlines all around the world: Teen commits suicide following father’s public shaming.

The Real Problem With Publicly Shaming Your Kids - by Elizabeth Flora Ross for Yahoo News
excerpt:
     ... Dr. Shefali Tsaberry, author, speaker and clinical psychologist, is not comfortable with the shaming of children in any manner for any reason. She describes shame as toxic. “[Shame] creates disconnection, a betrayal of trust. Shaming never works. Connection is the only way.”
     Katie Hurley, LCSW and author of “The Happy Kid Handbook” agrees.
     “Parenting has never been easy, and parents today are navigating new territory,” Hurley says. “It’s difficult to say what triggers one parent to take to the Internet to shame a child for‘misbehavior’ while another confronts the issue in the safety of the home, but there does appear to be a combination of anger and control beneath the surface of these posts.”
     Children of all ages make mistakes. Trial and error is the business of growing up, and they can’t get it right every single time. Shaming them, online or just in person, causes significant damage to the parent-child relationship. The parent-child relationship should focus on unconditional love and trust.

What’s the Best Way to Discipline My Child? - HealthyChildren.org, The American Academy of Pediatrics
excerpt:
     As a parent, one of your jobs to teach your child to behave. It's a job that takes time and patience. But, it helps to learn the effective and healthy discipline strategies.
     Here are some tips from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) on the best ways to help your child learn acceptable behavior as they grow. ... 
     ... Verbal abuse: How words hurt. Yelling at children and using words to cause emotional pain or shame also has been found to be ineffective and harmful. Harsh verbal discipline, even by parents who are otherwise warm and loving, can lead to more misbehavior and mental health problems in children. Research shows that harsh verbal discipline, which becomes more common as children get older, may lead to more behavior problems and symptoms of depression in teens. ... 

Such a Shame: A Consideration of Shame and Shaming Mechanisms in Families - U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
excerpt:
     This paper focuses on shame in the family context and how the shaming of children is a core component of child abuse and its effects.
     ... Although shaming by a parent toward a child is important for the development of certain positive qualities in a child, toxic shaming occurs when it is performed for the benefit of the parent rather than the child. This occurs when the parent uses shaming toward the child as a regulator of self-esteem in the parent, as a means of managing past suffering, and as a means of controlling the child. The key feature of excessive shaming is emphasis on the failure of the child in the eyes of the parent, accompanied by turning away and conditional love. The most severe consequences of shaming are self-attack, the disowning of the self, and the splitting of the self. ...
     
Child Shaming: How We’re Ruining Our Own Children’s Future - by Swati Reddy for K8 School 

Hidden Damage: Understanding the Toxicity of Shaming Children - from the administrators of Empathetic Parenting Counseling 

"Good" Children - at What Price? (The Secret Cost of Shame) - by Robin Grille and Beth Macgregor for The Natural Child Project (article discusses research on the subject)

Child Shaming Quotes - Google

Break the Shaming Cycle - by Dena Landing for Esme
excerpt:
     ... Shaming can take the form of telling your child that he’s careless because he knocked over a chair, associating a onetime action with a negative character trait. Parents engage in shaming in an attempt to control their children’s behavior, but it can have lifelong negative consequences.
     Why is shaming so damaging?
     Shaming your child creates an environment in which she feels like she can never make a mistake. Because children naturally want to avoid being shamed again, they begin to fear ever doing anything wrong, which could lead them to avoid challenges or new situations.
...

Raising Resilient Kids in a Fat Shaming World - by Judith Matz, LCSW for NationalEatingDisorders.org

Why body shaming children is a strict NO. Read about the adverse physical and mental health consequences (Fat-shaming children and adolescents is becoming a common phenomenon. Worryingly, it can lead to serious psychological consequences. Read on to find out why) - by Team Parent Circle for Parent Circle

Shaming Kids: Good Parenting or Not? - by Ronit Baras for Family Matters, Practical Parenting Guide
excerpt:
     ... Shaming kids is a form of bullying
     Shaming kids is an act of bullying. Bullying is picking on someone else’s weakness. This is what parents are doing by shaming children. They pick on their kids’ greatest weaknesses (e.g. the fear of being ridiculed, or the fear of being disrespected). ... 
     ... The fear of punishment can only go so far
The fear of punishment can only go so far. Nobody misbehaves for the sole purpose of misbehaving. Unaddressed, the real reason for their behavior will make them do it again. For example, no person on earth has stopped speeding after being caught speeding once, because the need to speed has not changed!
     The fear of pain can only last so long. ... 

Shaming Children So Parents Will Pay the School Lunch Bill - by Bettina Elias Siegel for The New York Times 
excerpt:
     ... On the first day of seventh grade last fall, Caitlin Dolan lined up for lunch at her school in Canonsburg, Pa. But when the cashier discovered she had an unpaid food bill from last year, the tray of pizza, cucumber slices, an apple and chocolate milk was thrown in the trash.
     “I was so embarrassed,” said Caitlin, who said other students had stared. “It’s really weird being denied food in front of everyone. They all talk about you.”
     Caitlin’s mother, Merinda Durila, said that her daughter qualified for free lunch, but that a paperwork mix-up had created an outstanding balance. Ms. Durila said her child had come home in tears after being humiliated in front of her friends.
     Holding children publicly accountable for unpaid school lunch bills — by throwing away their food, providing a less desirable alternative lunch or branding them with markers — is often referred to as “lunch shaming.” ... 

10 Reasons Why We Need To Stop Public Shaming Of Kids
- by Fiona Peacock for BellyBelly
excerpt:
     ... Your child needs to be able to trust you, to know that you love her unconditionally, and to know that she can come to you with any problem for help. By shaming your child, you’re burning that bridge. Your child simply isn’t going to seek you out for help, support and guidance again for fear or publicly humiliated. ...

Reduce Shame: 21 Things Your Child Needs To Hear (Is your child stuck in the “I’m a bad kid” cycle? Caregivers can reduce the effects of shame, using these phrases to remind your child that they are seen, known, and loved.) - by Nicole Scwartz, LMFT, for Imperfect Families

Why Shaming Kids For Bad Behavior Doesn’t Work - by Tricia Gross for ABC News, San Diego
     ... Researchers have found that chastising, belittling and punishing children to make them feel bad — shaming them, in other words — might do more harm than good.
     The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has a strong stance on the benefits of effective discipline, which refers to respectful discipline applied in a consistent, firm, and fair way.
     AAP research shows that yelling at or shaming children is minimally effective in the short-term and ineffective in the long-term. The organization states that doing so puts children at a higher risk of adverse behavioral, cognitive, psycho-social and emotional outcomes.
     Similarly, Claire McCarthy, MD, senior faculty editor of Harvard Health Publishing, states that there is a fine line between criticizing and shaming a child. McCarthy notes that shaming kids can cause issues with self-esteem. They might come to believe there is something inherently wrong with who they are or that they are not capable of changing.
...

Why Shaming Kids Doesn’t Work Long-Term - by Heidi Rogers for HeidiRogers.com

Stop Shaming Kids - Sign here! - by Lori Petro, Amy Bryant, & Robbyn Peters Bennett #StopShaming Kids Petition HERE
From the site:
     Child maltreatment constitutes all forms of physical and emotional ill-treatment, sexual abuse, neglect, or exploitation resulting in harm to the child’s health, survival, development, or dignity. Clearly, publicly shaming a minor is an abuse of power and a form of child maltreatment. To protect the basic human rights of children, we ask that Facebook and other social media sites establish parameters which prohibit public shaming of minors via photo/video and allow users to flag “suspected child maltreatment,” and/or “bullying of a minor.” Please help us make Facebook and other social media sites safe for our children.

The Toxic Effects of Shaming Children - by Rebecca Eanes for Creative Child

Are You Teaching Your Kids To Body-shame? - by Ashley Brantley for bcbstnews (News Center of Tennessee)

How To Reduce Your Child's Exposure To Shame - by Rebecca Eanes for Generation Mindful
excerpt:
     Shame eats away at a child’s core emotional need to feel loved and connected, leaving them feeling small, unworthy, flawed, and unacceptable. As we learn to heal our shame wounds, we give our children chances for a healthy and happy emotional life. Here are 3 shame-free discipline tactics. ...

Are you food shaming your child? It’s time to stop! - by Ginny Jones for More-Love.org

10 Ways You're Accidentally Shaming Your Toddler - by Dina Leygerman for Romper.com
excerpt: 
     Toddlers are incredibly complicated humans. After the first year of remarkable milestones, they start growing into their own personalities and focusing on mastering specific capabilities. Toddlerhood is also the time when kids start testing boundaries and learn the power of their actions and words. While it can be exciting for both parents and kids, it can also be frustrating and difficult for both. It’s no wonder so many of us parents don't realize we are shaming our toddlers. In the end, it seems, those of us in charge of toddlers must walk the thin line between teachable moments and losing all of our damn self-control. ... 

For an opposite view on all of this, here is this article:  Danielle Smith: Public shaming of children is sometimes justifiable - by Danielle Smith for Global News 
excerpt:
     A Windsor, Ont. mother who took to social media to publicly shame her misbehaving kids got more than she bargained for.
     She didn’t expect the posting to go viral or for people to misunderstand her intentions. Her post showed a picture of her kids walking seven kilometers and  carrying a sign that said, “being bad and rude to our bus driver, mom is making us walk.”
     She said she had them carry a sign because she lives in the kind of community where people would stop to offer a ride and she wanted her boys to learn a lesson. It went viral, with 28,000 people reposting the image and giving it a thumbs up. But, she also received death threats and was reported to Children’s Services. ...

Another opposing view from most of the experts listed above: What is the Deal With Shaming Parents in Our Society? - by Mercedes Samudio, Shame-Proof Parenting and EMDR for Parents for Shame Proof Parenting
excerpt:
     ... To all the parents and families who chose to hit, yell, or discipline their children the best way they know how this video is for you. ...

FOUND ON FACEBOOK




Thursday, March 30, 2023

Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does It Work?

This post isn't necessarily like other posts I have written for this blog, but it does foray into a discussion about abuse eventually so that you can see what can happen when people try to hurt others to teach them a lesson. This means I will also be discussing who perpetrates abuse (mostly people with personality disorders in the Cluster B realm).

And it is quite obvious that abusive people like to hurt others in order to get people to change their behavior (often with very little luck - and it will become obvious as to why). 

But even if you are not abusive, and don't want to hurt the other person to get them to change, will that work?  

The research says: Not too likely unless there are certain components in your pleas for change. 

TRYING TO GET ADULTS TO CHANGE
WITHOUT HURTING THEM
AND WITH HURTING THEM

introduction

Here is an excellent psychology article that describes why it is so hard and frustrating to get people to change behaviors so that a more healthy relationship can emerge (I suggest reading the whole article): 

How to Teach Someone a Lesson (Warning: What they learn might disappoint you.) - by Tina Gilbertson LPC for Psychology Today.

The main takeaway from that article is that you have to be the change that you want to see. Shaming someone does not work, especially if you can't practice what you preach. 

At the very least, the person you are shaming has to see you as a benevolent teacher, someone who has their best interests at heart, someone who is living and behaving in the way that they are touting as the best way for you to behave too.

And the person who is going to think of you as a good advisor or teacher already clearly respects you, has a good relationship and rapport with you, senses that you are compassionate, steady and reasonable, and probably already takes your advice to heart.

If you don't have a good trusting relationship with someone you are trying to teach, they will not listen to you.

Most adults do not want people who insert themselves into a "teacher position" in our lives without our consent to have them in that position. We must welcome it, and we most likely won't welcome it unless we know they care about us a great deal. If they are doing it on behalf of themselves, or another person (as pressure to get us to move in a certain direction), it will most likely backfire - because it is an aggressive act. And like most unwanted aggressive acts, we are likely to balk and step back. If they step forward and get more irate with judgements and criticism, we are likely to step back even further. 

If you are being critical in a number of different ways of the person you are trying to teach, the best take-away you are going to get is that you are "a highly critical and judgmental person". 

Being judgmental has its issues because judgmental people aren't seeing you as a whole person, your good points, your bad points, what goes on in your mind, your life and ambitions, your morality, how you live, how you treat lots of other people in your life, what your life story is, and everything in-between. 

When a person is highly critical and judgmental about us, what we will see are their blind spots about us, their inability to see others as they truly are, that they can't see us for what we are either, and their ego-driven audacity to criticize us when they are so flawed themselves (even in the way they are criticizing us). This is usually the stand-out thing we will focus on and walk away with. 

And if the critical judgmental person is more immoral and unethical than we are, we are going to scoff at what they have to say. Either it is: "Ppppptttt! Look at who you are! Like you are better in that department than I am? If anything you look worse in that department than I do! How dare you try to teach me a lesson!" or  "Pppptttt! Look at them! They did x, y and z and they are going to criticize me and lecture me for something they do all of the time?! Not going to happen!"

Even if the judgmental critical people in our lives aren't hypocrites, most of us are still going to search far and wide for hypocrisy to make sure your intentions are pure. This is one area where empathy and compassion can't be faked. The person giving us advice or criticism has to have a vested interest in, and compassion, for us, where their ego isn't involved, and we have to believe in it whole-heartedly, otherwise the advice or criticism is just not going to stir us to change.

It is especially hard to do for those of us who have gotten burned by fake empathy or a person whose empathy seemed to shut down instantly when we were vulnerable so that they could get more power, control and domination for themselves over us in our weakened state. We aren't going to hand over trust to you just so you can do that to us again, or like the last person did to us. 

A teacher is someone you believe has greater knowledge than you do, who you endow confidence in to bring you into a higher state of knowledge. If you don't feel that way about them, they are not your teacher. A teacher is a "special position" to be in, and requires special social and personal skills and considerations on their part. If the teacher is insulting, judgmental, arrogant, highly critical, insolent, boorish, or abusive, they are not a good teacher. They need to be fired right away. It is my observation that they get fired from someone's mind first (the insults the offender spews boomerang off of a person's natural defenses) before they realize they are an unwanted teacher themselves. Unwanted teaching is a form of  harassment, especially if it is hostile, bullying, insulting, denigrating, judgmental and unwelcome.

It is very difficult to shame adults anyway. Unless we are ruining our lives with criminal acts, lots of lies, lots of false narratives, unethical acts that normally bring social derision, living with lots of paranoia that all of our acts will be exposed, addictions, abusing others, having second thoughts, and being rattled with shame or toxic secrets, we are most likely happy with who we are. The more ethical we try to be, the more at peace with ourselves we will be too.

Who we are isn't likely to be rattled by someone who is less understanding or less ethical than we are. It might be if their ethics are noticeably higher than our own, but even there, most of us have to be sure enough that they are, indeed higher in ethics, and that takes a lot of time and investment in the relationship. We also have to want to make the positive changes in ourselves.  

For highly unethical people, shaming is even less likely to work. Shame-ers tend to only be known for their shaming.

And if they are shaming us too much, and too loudly, and for too many pointless issues and  extraneous reasons, or if there is hypocrisy involved, they tend to be narcissists or sociopaths who DARVO situations so that they don't feel at fault for the dirty acts that they commit and put the fault on us. That is not going to shame us. We are going to be looking at the tactic first and foremost. They just pretend the dirty acts belong to you instead. They are happy with the DARVO tactic if they are using it. If they aren't happy with it, they'd stop it. It's that simple, and they do have a choice. 

If you are an ethical person and you are dealing with someone who DARVOs you all of the time, their ways of teaching you a lesson will not work unless your self esteem and boundaries for respect are so low that you allow them to make you into a doormat. Being a doormat is a trauma response, and most of us don't feel well enough after awhile to stay in it (being a doormat for any length of time will start to give you trauma symptoms). So perhaps the best thing to do in those situations is to find relationships where ethics and morality match. We all need to be in relationships where people care about us, and DARVO-ing us shows us that they don't care about us at all. Really: they don't care about us at all if they are using this tactic. It's a criminal-type mind that does this (criminals use the DARVO tactic a whole lot). 

If the people giving us judgments, lectures, advice and criticisms aren't close to us, or don't know us, the same results will happen. What ever they say will be taken with a grain of salt because no relationship of trust or empathy has ever been established. So why do they do it? 

Here is something I went through: 

I remember someone who I had barely spent more than two days with in my whole life, giving me advice as to whether I should get married. She had a lot of opinions too, not just a few. And there was some coercion in her delivery. My first thought was: "That's so jacked up! Where does she get off!?" I didn't even look at her, and probably rolled my eyes. I don't even understand people who think that it's okay to do that, or even think that way.

All that it shows are these possibilities: that they think they know me after two days (no, they do not), that personal decisions like this can be influenced by them (no, they can't be), that they think their own opinions are so valuable and noteworthy that other people will listen to them (no, I won't, and I doubt other people would either), that they are so high on the ethics scale that I would actually take what she had to say seriously (no, she wasn't high on the ethics scale by the company she kept, by her highly critical, judgmental, and biased nature in the short time I saw her in action, by being a blind follower of someone I do not respect). I knew she had no interest what so ever in anything to do with me unless it benefited her and her husband. People who don't know you and think they can make such a highly personal decision for you and your life are probably either delusional, have a very high opinion of themselves, think your intelligence is so below par that you would actually consider what they have to say, or are highly aggressive (or maybe all of those things). These don't make for qualities that are trustworthy, or even "listen-able", for other people.  

The choice of a mate, the choice of whether to get married, the choice of who to allow into a discussion about it, are filled with many moments of deep thought and consideration by the person who is making those decisions, and they have a right to make those decisions by themselves, without input. I never said, "I want input from you." The only person I listened to in my life, was someone I had known and spent a great deal of time with for over a decade, and also knew my husband in a profound way too. 

My main concern with anyone entering into my life is, "Will they try to hurt me? Are we equals, and will I be treated as an equal?" 

If those things aren't present, I lose interest right away. 

And with people who want to give me advice it is: Are they selfish and self-serving, lying, back-stabbing, hypocritical, aggressive or passive aggressive, judgmental, dis-respectful, punishing people? Do they have arrogance, do think they are superior; do they want me serving their needs and wants and giving up my own; are they interested in listening to me?" Obviously I wouldn't want their advice or to learn any of their lessons. That's normal.

It can take time to know who people are, where they are coming from and what their agenda is. And it's normal not to want advice or criticism from these kinds of people either. 

what kinds of personalities want to hurt other people

Now in terms of people who want to hurt you in order to teach you a lesson, this is always categorized as abuse. Right now some states make an exception: some laws in some states allow parents to hurt children under the age of 16 years old (but with a lot of counter laws so that it doesn't turn into abuse, which it tends to if they are hurting you a lot). However, most psychologists do not agree with these laws, and there is evidence that if a parent is purposely hurting a child or children to teach them lessons, that it tends to escalate to child abuse. The laws remain, however, because parents still want rights to hurt their children, within reason (no marks on the body).

In Great Britain, you are not allowed to emotionally hurt your children and you can be arrested for child abuse. The United States has yet to catch up on the research that hurting children often leads to child abuse, including escalating into physical abuse. 

The reason why countries consider taking measures against the emotional abuse of children is that it has a huge impact on society, and in producing productive forward thinking adults. That will become clear as your read further into the post. 

As for administering pain in other parts of society, if you are a judge or jury in a criminal matter, there are allowances to hurt criminals, and also rules, laws and standards as to how much you can hurt someone who has been convicted of a crime. But even in these incidences, the focus is going more and more in the direction of rehabilitation, precisely because hurting others does not produce much remorse or guilt. If anything, the verbal and emotional defensive walls tend to go up to protect themselves from more pain, even if they are criminals. This comes from all of the professional studies and literature on what hurting others produces. Some of those articles are listed below.  

For the purposes of this discussion, any adult sixteen and over, and any adult in a close personal relationship who is experiencing a punishment or a lesson that involves hurting you (from a partner or spouse, a parent, an adult child, a sibling, a close friend, a grandparent, in-laws, step-family, for instance) then it is always categorized as abuse. To get the skinny on how much you are being abused and what tactics they are using to get you into a state of pain, go to this post

As for who does this, and who are the masters of abuse, it tends to be individuals with Cluster B personality disorders: Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Histrionic Personality Disorder, and some individuals, but not all, with Borderline Personality Disorder. It is a spectrum disorder, so many of the Cluster B personality disorders can over-lap in one individual. Most of the Cluster B personality disorders are associated with abusive behavior, but not necessarily Borderline Personality Disorder, unless the individuals who have it feel they are being taunted in some way, or abandoned by a person, or they have some narcissistic traits in addition to the Borderline traits. In other words, it's complicated. If you are being abused, reading about the disorders will give you a better understanding of what is going on, and why. 

People with Borderline Personality Disorder, if they abuse at all, tend to reactively abuse. In other words, something sets them off and they react. 

People with Narcissism tend to reactively abuse and proactively abuse. Proactive abuse is what it sounds like: they abuse when there is no threat; they abuse when they think there may be a threat; they abuse as an assurance that they will come out on top (i.e. have superiority over their victim); they abuse if they think they may lose a competition (narcissists tend to have pronounced levels of jealousy and they spend an inordinate amount of time competing). Overt Grandiose Narcissists tend to be a little more reactive than proactive, Covert Vulnerable Narcissists tend to be a little more proactive than reactive, and Malignant Narcissists (who tend to have a conglomerate of all of the Cluster B personality disorders) tend to be quite a bit more proactive than reactive including elaborate plans of attack, revenge planning and revenge fantasies, tit-for-tat responses, an addiction to some forms of sadism, fantasies that they are in control of their victims' lives and other people's lives much more than they actually are, pronounced grandiose delusions and ambitions, a criminal mind ... but they can be reactive too: mostly when they feel power, control and domination is slipping away from them; they can react with rage and violence.

People with Antisocial Personality Disorder tend to be proactively abusive, and even prefer it so they are not detected until they can make the most devastating impact on their victims. In other words, they wait to attack at the most opportune moment. They have no remorse for hurting others and often feel their victims deserved every part of it. This is even true for innocent victims or child victims: "They shouldn't have been so stupid to trust me" is their common response when they hurt others who never provoked them. A lot of them tend to be loners. Males show contempt for animals early on and females destroy, give away or steal other people's property. Most do not follow laws or codes of conduct and have criminal minds and criminal thinking (i.e. what can they get out of each situation). The lack of empathy is pronounced, and most of them have delusions that they are superior precisely because they have no empathy and get away with a lot of unethical behavior. More than half of the prison population are made up of folks with Antisocial Personality Disorder. 

Then there is the Dark Triad which is an individual with malignant narcissism with pronounced Machiavellian traits, and the Dark Tetrad, which is an individual with malignant narcissism with pronounced sadism traits plus Machiavellian traits. 

Borderlines have remorse for the state their victims are in when they hurt them, and for the state they are in (in terms of reputation, trustworthiness, feeling shame about their emotional dysregulation). Many Borderlines are willing to change their behavior, and to regulate their rage to get along better with others, unless they have pronounced arrogance. 

Narcissists have little or no remorse for the state their victims are in when they hurt them in terms of empathy, but do have remorse for what it does to their reputation, whether people will trust them again, and whether their emotional outbursts will bring them shame. They have very little desire to change, preferring to blame their victims instead. They don't do well in therapy because narcissists tend to rage when they feel criticized and their behaviors are being judged, and they don't like to be taught. They want to be in the superior position, teaching, lecturing, criticizing others, so they overwhelmingly quit therapy. 

Some people with Antisocial Personality Disorder care that hurting others might mean they will be held accountable, and some hurt others without worrying about whether they will be held accountable. Most have no remorse for hurting other people and can have the attitude that they can talk themselves out of anything. Therapy often doesn't work because they look at it as a "cat and mouse game", a game where they can or can't manipulate the therapist, so rehabilitation is very difficult. If they are incarcerated, therapy is usually part of the incarceration, and they may be less resistant to therapy, and to teaching, in order to leave prison in good standing. Because sociopaths can be charming, and try to talk their way out of consequences, the therapist has to be "charm-resistant".  

do they succeed in hurting other adults?
and do they teach other adults an effective lesson on how to behave?

People who want to hurt others can succeed at it. And sometimes that is all they want, to prove to themselves that they can hurt another person, and perhaps how much they can get away with it too. 

But the bigger question is, what are the ramifications of succeeding at hurting other people? 

Let's just focus on the topic of this post, which is about whether they can succeed at teaching another person a lesson by hurting them. Can they do that? 

Probably not, and certainly not in the way they were hoping for, or what they thought would be the outcome. Some articles follow this section of the post as to why. 

The problem here is that hurting another adult is abuse. The perpetrator knows it is abuse unless they are living under a rock, and their victims know it is abuse too, unless they too are living under a rock. 

Abuse brings out trauma symptoms. Unless a perpetrator is well educated as to what trauma symptoms will do to his victim, and has a keen Machiavellian approach way beforehand of what he will do once his victim starts having symptoms, he is not going to know what to do. The victim has failed to learn the lesson in the way the perpetrator wanted.

Most often abusers just keep trying to hurt the victim, as if kicking a broken toy to see if kicking it will make it work better, and learn better. And, of course, that produces more trauma symptoms. And it doesn't make the victim "work better in the way that he wants it to work", so he usually kicks the victim "to the curb" instead ("abuse and abandon", or "abuse and kill"). - He will blame the victim for this failure: "Terrible defective toy!" 

Abusers tend not to know what trauma symptoms will do to their plans. They tend to be very low in emotional intelligence. If they knew that hurting others would do to their plans, they probably wouldn't abuse, but they don't know. They act on impulse or plan, and do it anyway, hoping that things will go their way. And they expect their impulsive actions to give them great rewards (because most abusers have an "arrogance problem" too: the arrogance keeps them blind). And it makes so many of them so blind that they think it's not their plan that went awry, but some faulty part in their victim. They think victims should act in some preconceived way.  

The other issue is that most abusers have a "self reflection" problem too. If they could put themselves in their victims' shoes, and think about how they would react if someone treated them the way they treat others, then they would see that they, themselves, would not react the way they expect their victims to react. In fact, they might be even more resistant to abuse others.

They might think before they indulge in impulsive or planned retaliation too (because abusers tend to dwindle downwards into retaliation instead of thinking of other ways to cope with interpersonal issues). But unfortunately, most of them don't get to the self reflection part: they don't even think to attempt to look at how victims might feel, and what they might be going through. They just think if they abuse, then their victims will automatically do what they expect. Not too bright. Lack of self reflection makes them blind too. 

Another issue is that most abusers don't change their own behavior themselves. In fact, if they are narcissists or sociopaths, they are extremely resistant to change. How is a person who can't change their behavior going to teach another person how to change their behavior? Teaching someone else something means that they are experts in the subject of "how to change your personality so that other people will approve of you." Being abusive is not a way to get approval. You wonder what their logic is. Not very bright. You might as well be getting "behavior lessons" from a three year old who is having a tantrum.  

Another problem is that most abusers want either an infantilized person they can shout orders to (as though the victim is a child who needs to be told what to do, how to do it, and gets its self esteem from being an abusive authoritarian) or a parentified person who takes care of the perpetrator's every need (as though the victim is a parent who should be providing all of the perpetrators needs, and as though the perpetrator is a child who needs to be soothed out of tantrums), or both. These are sick roles that either lead to co-dependency or trauma bonding and don't end up in behavioral changes that either party will be grateful for in the end. 

Another issue is that most abusers show that they are exploitive once they start abusing. It's the first thing victims see: "They want something from me and are intimidating me and blackmailing me to try to get it. They think abusing me is their ticket to get it. This is outrageous!" Victims will either try to go lateral ("Let's talk this out like adults and get rid of this power trip you are trying to pull on me", "Let's share the power and come to an understanding rather than me taking commands from you", "I don't do submission. You need to get a grip") or they walk ("I'm not playing that power game with that abuser", "I'm not going to be intimidated! Find some other victim to play head games with!", "They have got to be kidding! I can see their dirty motives and blackmail schemes a mile away!"), or they are going to be trauma bonded (they will get symptoms, work like a broken toy that can't do anything right for the abuser). If abusers were as smart as their arrogance tells them that they are, then they'd know their victims could see their unethical uncaring horrific motives and not want to play, given the chance.

Also a note on the previous chapter ... When victims are abused, they tend to look at abuse as "the perpetrator hates me, and therefor does not have good motivations towards me." It is why victims never learn what perpetrators want them to learn. It produces either the flight response in victims, or trauma symptoms. Take your choice. 

One other issue: they have very low ethics. How are they going to teach another person how to behave better when they can't even begin to do it themselves? How are they going to teach people to have empathy for them when they have very little or no empathy themselves and just want to go around poking people where it hurts just to get an emotional reaction out of them (narcissistic supply), more submission, and more power and control for themselves? We're supposed to learn how to behave from them? From people who have lower ethics than we have? From people who like to indulge in revenges, lies, smear campaigns, sadism, or other diabolical acts? From people who are so blind that they don't know what their abuses do? What planet are they living on? And why are they so arrogant when they are like this? You would think that their arrogance would fail them at this juncture. But no! It's kind of like a flea trying to teach a human how to behave. Fleas are annoying; they are exploitive, they leave welts that itch and hurt. No. They are not going to teach us lessons beyond what kind of person they are showing us that they are. That's not going to change our behavior in ways that they want or like. Again, not too bright. 

I will be talking about emotional intelligence in another post, but you can tell that abusers have very low amounts of it. They really know very little about human behavior, and human reactions to being controlled, trauma bonded, intimidated, or even teaching people lessons on how to behave. 

Need some more professional articles that basically say the same thing as the Psychology Today article above? Note: this is not the end of this post - in the next chapter I talk about hurting under-age children in order to teach them a lesson)

What It Means to Teach People How to Treat You - Medically reviewed by Karin Gepp, PsyD — By Margarita Tartakovsky, MS — Updated on August 12, 2022 for Psych Central

Should I Go To Couples Therapy With My Abusive Partner? - by National Domestic Hotline
excerpt:
     We at The Hotline do not encourage anyone in an abusive relationship to seek counseling with their partner. Abuse is not a relationship problem. ...

Abusive Relationship Therapy: Is It Helpful? (Couples therapy isn’t often recommended for abusive relationships, but individual counseling and other strategies may help.) - The Administrators of Psych Central

Why Couples Therapy Doesn’t Work For People In Abusive Relationships With Narcissists - by Shahida Arabi for Psych Central (re-published for Malahide Counseling and Psychotherapy)

That Will Teach You! Why Punishment Damages Relationships - by Dr. Ari Hahn, LCSW, Ph.D. Clinical Social Worker/Therapist for Choose Help

Is it Okay to Punish Your Spouse? -  The Marriage Counseling Blog

What Couples Should Know About the Silent Treatment (How to Know When Silence Is Abusive) - by Sheri Stritof, Medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Mind

Giving your partner the silent treatment isn't harmless — it can be devastating - by Kellie Scott for ABC Everyday

13 Reasons Why A Punishment Of Your Husband Isn’t A Good Idea (2023) - by Bijan Kholghi for Coaching Online
     Note: this article talks about women who punish their partner, but his advice and insights can be applied to any relationship, especially any of your close personal relationships

The silent treatment devastated me as a child. Then I used it as an adult - by Kellie Scott for ABC Everyday

Infidelity: Consequences of Punishing the Offending Partner - by Jim Hutt, PhD for Good Therapy

Unacceptable Relationship Behaviors (Unacceptable Behaviors That Will Destroy Your Relationship Real Fast) - by Beth McColl for Ask Men

Punishing - by Susan Felsch for Central Coast Counselling

Boyfriend punishes partner by criticizing her when she cries - by Neil Rosenthal for The Denver Post


CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN
(HURTING CHILDREN PHYSICALLY AS A WAY OF TEACHING THEM A LESSON)
DOES IT WORK?

Not really. 

Read: an article from the World Health Organization on corporal punishment: Corporal Punishment and Health

Some take-aways from the article:

Evidence shows corporal punishment increases children’s behavioural problems over time and has no positive outcomes.

All corporal punishment, however mild or light, carries an inbuilt risk of escalation. Studies suggest that parents who used corporal punishment are at heightened risk of perpetrating severe maltreatment. 
My note: in other words it is a gateway to child abuse. Once abuse is introduced by a parent to hurt a child, it almost always escalates.  

Corporal punishment is linked to a range of negative outcomes for children across countries and cultures, including physical and mental ill-health, impaired cognitive and socio-emotional development, poor educational outcomes, increased aggression and perpetration of violence.

Corporal punishment is a violation of children’s rights to respect for physical integrity and human dignity, health, development, education and freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 

Consequences
Corporal punishment triggers harmful psychological and physiological responses. Children not only experience pain, sadness, fear, anger, shame and guilt, but feeling threatened also leads to physiological stress and the activation of neural pathways that support dealing with danger. Children who have been physically punished tend to exhibit high hormonal reactivity to stress, overloaded biological systems, including the nervous, cardiovascular and nutritional systems, and changes in brain structure and function.

Despite its widespread acceptability, spanking is also linked to atypical brain function like that of more severe abuse, thereby undermining the frequently cited argument that less severe forms of physical punishment are not harmful.

The whole article is worth reading. 

The American Academy of Pediatrics has also taken a firm stance against corporal punishment. 

Read: Facts About Corporal Punishment - by Amy Morin, LCSW, fact checked by Adah Chung for Very Well Family

excerpts from the article (underlined are the most crucial parts of the article):

     The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has taken a firm stance against any type of corporal punishment. Its policy on corporal punishment, published in 2018, encourages parents and caregivers to use healthy forms of discipline when correcting their children and to refrain from using corporal punishment.

      The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends healthy forms of discipline, such as positive reinforcement of appropriate behaviors, limit setting, redirecting, and setting future expectations. The AAP recommends that parents do not use spanking, hitting, slapping, threatening, insulting, humiliating, or shaming. 

     The AAP policy also indicates that corporal punishment is ineffective over the long-term and leads to negative outcomes.

     In 2006, the Committee on the Rights of the Child released a statement declaring that corporal punishment is a form of violence that should be banned in all contexts.3 Other human rights organizations have issued similar warnings about spanking.

     Research has shown that children who are subjected to corporal punishment, such as spanking, pushing, grabbing, and paddling, are more likely to develop mental health disorders. One study reported that harsh physical punishment was associated with increased odds of mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and personality disorders.7

In my own generation, corporal punishment was all of the rage in terms of parents disciplining children.

My husband remembers a time when most of the children in his school had signs of physical abuse, from parental abuse to peer bullying: whip lashes, cuts, scabs, bruises, and infected wounds were most visible. 

There was a huge generation gap when he finally reached adulthood too. Many from his generation did not respect their parents, especially those who received corporal punishment. Most who received corporal punishment past five years old were also recipients of child abuse. Most who were recipients of child abuse also experienced the silent treatment, lots of insults, the parents rarely, if ever, listened to their children and their concerns, there was way too much infantilization or parentification, a parent lashed out over so many things that were never their child's fault (unjust blaming), and so many "You are -" statements that the adult children could no longer remember all of them.

In my generation and in his generation, so many of us have experienced estrangement in adulthood from the parent as well. I know many artist friends who were and some who still are, estranged. It was either initiated by a parent, or by us over disrespect or abuse (for many of us it was initiated by the parent, but the parent told the family and/or their friends or wrote on-line that it was initiated by us - in other words, the blame-shifting tactic and the DARVO tactic were put to use by these parents, which furthered the lack of respect that we had for them). Most of us who were recipients of corporal punishment or child abuse thought our parent was "out of control", dysregulated emotionally, terrible teachers, saboteurs, terrible influences on our own children, terrible parents, with terrible respect for our boundaries as adults. Also "the bad years" of relating to our parent far outweighed "the good years". What a sad legacy. 

So, I have to say that at least corporal punishment is increasingly being taken off the table for parents.  Some parents will probably resort to other methods of hurting their children, but at least that one is getting more and more outlawed in the western world. 

For those of us adults who never hit a child, and never thought of hitting a child, we can be proud that we are ending this scourge. Hopefully it also pushes us into an era of more world peace, and peaceful resolutions as well. 

OTHER FORMS OF PUNISHMENT ON CHILDREN
(AS A WAY OF TEACHING THEM A LESSON)
DOES IT WORK?

No. Anything that hurts children, especially if hurting them is a habit, will mean trauma symptoms. Children are much more vulnerable to getting PTSD (or C-PTSD) than adults. Most of them don't have the wherewithal to know why they are being hurt, or how to stop it. While behavioral lessons are important, the best teaching method is to model the behavior that you want to see in your children. 

Most psychologists say that modeling empathy, ethics, morality, forgiveness, adult ways of regulating emotions, showing how to resolve relationship issues, showing how to forgive, showing children respect for their feelings, thoughts and experiences are also a much better teacher than punishment.

If you feel you must punish your children, check yourself first for transgressions so that you aren't giving them mixed messages (i.e. "It's okay for me to insult you, but it's not okay for you to insult me" will never be a good lesson, and will at best confuse a child, and at worse, he will resent you and your lessons). Some psychologists suggest small "time-outs" no longer in minutes than a child's age, but even that practice is being studied as counter-productive since it is most used when a parent is angry. It teaches children that when the parent is angry, that the child is invisible to them. 

But if you make it a bad habit, time-outs can also seem punitive and unfair unless you state clear reasons why it is good for them and good for you, and listen to their responses with empathy.  

Most of us don't want to hurt our children because we are aware that it diminishes their trust in us as a safe place to go, as a reasonable source of learning, as a good sounding board for what ails us. If we hurt them, it will wound the relationship itself. 

However, parents that make a habit out of hurting their kids probably do not entirely realize this. Or if they do realize it, they make an impulsive decision to use their baser instincts instead. They will have a very hard time keeping and enjoying a healthy attachment and re-establishing trust. 

Here are just a few non-physical punishments that should not be used on children, and what these punishments do to children (when I could find links):

What Shaming Teaches
and What it Does to Children

Shaming can be so subtle that you are not aware of it (some of the articles I feature explain subtle forms of shaming that a lot of us take for granted), and shaming can be really abusive too, especially if it is accompanied by a lot of insults and other forms of punishment.

Most of the research that has been done on shaming children has shown it to be an ineffective way of disciplining a child. It doesn't work, and even tends to backfire. 

When I taught in public schools, shaming by teachers and other school authorities was not allowed, and was grounds for being fired. 

Habitual or over-the-top abusive shaming can produce trauma symptoms just like any form of abuse.

You can't be a good teacher of behavior and be shaming at the same time. Too much shaming will mean your child eventually won't want to hear what you have to say. All that it does in the end is cause hurt to your child, and make them disappear emotionally, and disrespect the lessons you are trying to teach because you are defining him in a bad way rather than teaching him a lesson that he will determine is beneficial to him.

So, what I'm saying here is that a child's mind always has to be going in the direction of: "My parents care about me; they are invested in helping me become all that I can be; my parents care about my behavior because my behavior and my ethics will help me to survive in the world; my parents ethics are better than mine and I have something to learn from them; my parents know how to regulate their emotions and how to get along better with others better than I do, and they are worth listening to for those reasons." 

If, for instance, the parents have worse morals and ethics, when their behavior is worse than their child's, when there's more hurt to the lesson than there is modeling and teaching, when you don't show that you care about how he will survive or how he is surviving, you may end up with an emotionally distant, non-trusting, and even an estranged child.  

Why Shaming Your Kids Isn't Effective Discipline - Jennifer Wolf, medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Family

Think hard before shaming children - by Claire McCarthy, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard, for Harvard Health Publishing, Harvard Medical School


What Blaming Teaches
and its Effect on Children


Blaming a child a lot has similar effects to shaming. Where assigning blame can get tricky is if the child is not actually a culprit of the blame. This can cause him to blame his parents later on for being blind, punitive, unjust, unloving, unfair, terrible parents. 

Getting a child to feel culpable for actions he actually does commit takes a lot of thought, and perhaps even education. Usually where you find unacceptable behavior, that behavior has been modeled somewhere in the child's life, and it can even be modeled by the parent. So adopting ethics when you are a parent is necessary if you want your children to tell the truth, to treat you with respect, and to be ethical and willingly accountable when they are culpable, themselves. 

There is also a lot that can go on between siblings. Let us say that sibling A accuses sibling B of a transgression (like stealing). But actually sibling A  did the stealing, not sibling B. This is very common for siblings to do up to age 8 years old. They get scared that the parent will punish them for stealing, so they stick their sibling with the fault instead.

It is before 8 years old, and even much earlier that parents need to nip this activity in the bud. Left unchecked, it can lead to a sibling using it in many other situations. The sibling relationship won't be close. If it goes past the age of 8, a continuation of these acts can lead to sibling abuse. I have heard many stories where it goes all the way to a sibling hijacking the parent's Will and Trust by planting false narratives and accusations into a parent's mind about the intentions of their siblings. There is an article in this section below that covers how to get siblings to stop blaming each other early on for things they did themselves. If it is not addressed early, it can turn children into liars, two-faced individuals and blame-shifters. 

If the parent is a blame-shifter themselves, children won't respect what a parent has to say about blame-shifting, so that part of a parent's behavior needs to be cleaned up in order for them to teach a child or children why blame-shifting is not acceptable behavior. 

Again, if you are going to be an effective teacher, you can't expect your students to do things that you don't do, can't do, make excuses not to do, or refuse to do. It becomes a completely ineffectual lesson, just as a bus driver teaching civil engineering who has never studied or practiced it, cannot and will not make a bridge.  

Blaming can also be a slippery slope, where, if you use too much of it on one child and not on another, your child will see that he is being singled out for blame. The lesson he will learn is not going to be about what you are blaming him for: it will be about how you love his sibling more than you love him.

If he is being singled out for punishments too, then he is also likely to experience escalating trauma symptoms as well. 

Again that doesn't teach him anything other than that his parent is unfair, unloving, unusually punitive and ethically wrong. 

Most children cannot deal with the injustice of being "the blamed one" in the family. Usually when a child is blamed to this extent the parent cannot handle blame themselves, or they want to protect the reputation of another child or family member, so they give the one child all of the blame for family incidences that crop up. 

This is called scapegoating. Scapegoating is basically blaming in the extreme. Most scapegoats cannot count the number of times they were blamed because it was just too constant, a painful way of life they had to endure. This isn't teaching a lesson, obviously. 

Scapegoating is basically constant blaming where you have the realization that you aren't ever going to be be able to please your parent. You are an outcast, a virtual stranger where no one sees your good qualities.

Let's say that you are the truth-teller in the family, which many scapegoats are. If you are from a family of liars, and deniers, blame-shifting schemers, or criminals, they aren't going to appreciate your truth-telling. They are going to hurt you or ostracize you in order to get you to shut down your truth-telling, and probably even your talking. Definitely your insights. At the very least, they won't be interested in what you have to say. They'll interrupt, tell you to stop talking, tell you that you are crazy, give you the silent treatment or tell you that you are no longer welcome. 

So what is the lesson here for a child? "Lie a lot and be like us"? "Truth-tellers are bad people"? "Insights and intelligence are no good"? "Believing in liars is what is good for this family, and for society"? What's the main point of the lesson here, especially if the child is going to school and learning that "Truth is good; you should not lie; you should have insights and intelligence if you want to get the most out of school and get into a profession that you'll love" and so on. 

Scapegoating is always categorized as child abuse. Usually where you find a scapegoat child, you also find that the parent has a favorite golden child too who he or she keeps shielded from any blame, even if that favorite child is at fault in many incidences. The incidences are seen as excusable, even when they are not. 

Usually where you find scapegoating you find mob bullying, shaming, lots of verbal abuse, lots of emotional abuse, ostracizing, the silent treatment, lots of gaslighting, blame-shifting, lots of invalidation, many smear campaigns, even physical abuse, and you also find parents who are either narcissists, sociopaths or psychopaths. Some Borderlines can scapegoat too, but usually are enlisted by narcissists, sociopaths or psychopaths to do so. If they are part of a bullying mob, they can also go in the direction of scapegoating. If they grew up seeing scapegoating or prejudice, they can, in some instances go in the direction of scapegoating too, however most Borderlines have empathy, and feel terrible when they hurt others, so it is not very likely they will take this path on their own. The area where it becomes problematic: Borderlines are often attracted to narcissists and narcissists are often attracted to Borderlines, and this is how a Borderline can join in on mob bullying, even if it doesn't feel right to them (Borderlines also have a poor sense of who they are, and narcissists come in and have no trouble assigning roles as to who they are, and can convince them that they need to join the mob). 

Just as in society, where scapegoats are often of a different race, religion, or cultural background, and are being prejudiced against, conspiracy theories will usually be the main mode of how a scapegoat is viewed in the family as well. If a number of members are using the DARVO tactic, you can pretty much guarantee that there will be many, many conspiracy theories and smear campaigns with a lot of conspiratorial thinking swirling around the scapegoated child too.

Since scapegoating is mob bullying with each person in the mob having their own agendas and reasons for being part of the mob, the abuse will escalateAbuse always escalates, but it will escalate much faster and more egregiously if there is a mob involved. 

Scapegoating will always have additional prejudices and conspiracy theories, and be initiated primarily by narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths (who overwhelmingly tend to be abusive, and who like to abuse others). 

Therefor scapegoating is very, very dangerous for the scapegoat

If something happens to the scapegoat, specifically crimes against them, the people in the mob will most likely side up with each other the way they always have. 

What kind of possible positive lesson is available to the child with this kind of outcome? 

Let's get real here. Conspiracy theories, gaslighting and smear campaigns are no longer about the child. They are about the bullying mob's intentions, projections, aggressions and group-think, period. 

A scapegoated child will learn:
"Abuse escalates."
"Mobbing is about prejudice and conspiracy theories."
"Conspiracy theories get so far out, like a hallucinatory trip."
"The mob is dangerous."
"I better find a way out." 
"I better buy home and auto security systems." - if they are an adult child
"I better call the police." - if they are an adult child

That's what we want to teach our children, to protect themselves from us parents? 

I hope I have proved why and how a trauma-bonded scapegoat can die.   

Scapegoated members usually are ostracized from the family or quit themselves. And the mental health community encourages scapegoats to quit too.    

Blaming can turn into scapegoating. Therefor, parents are encouraged to find other ways of dealing with issues so that blaming does not get out of hand, out of control, and escalate to this degree. And: if you can't take blame yourself, or have issues around being blamed, you should not expect your children to handle it any better than you handle it. That just makes sense. 

A parenting expert shares the common mistake that psychologically damages kids—and what to do instead - by Hunter Clarke-Fields, Contributor, CNBC
excerpt:
     Blaming is a put-down, and it can easily cause children to feel guilty, unloved and rejected. Even worse, it prevents you from developing a positive relationship with them.

The Blame Game - by Bonnie Harris for Connective Parenting

When Parents Blame Their Children (Does it really take a village to raise a child?) - by Ugo Uche, reviewed by Abigail Fagan for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     One of the most difficult things I find myself doing as a psychotherapist is holding parents accountable. Typically when you have a teen engaging in unhealthy behavior, you have a parent who makes it his or her own priority to set the teen on the right path. However, there seems to be a caveat.
     “Please help me help my kid, but don't you dare tell me I am at fault.” ... 
     ... children and teens with bad tempers usually have at least one parent (in their lives) who has a bad temper. The teen goes to school and displays a bad temper and gets penalized, then comes homes and displays the bad temper and gets penalized, all the while witnessing one of his parents periodically display episodes of bad tempers with no consequences. ...

3 Reasons Your Adult Child Treats You Like Dirt (Many well-intentioned parents express their concerns in off-putting ways.) - by Jeffrey Bernstein Ph.D. for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     3. Expressing Criticism and Invalidation
     ... When adult children sense criticism and invalidation, they can develop feelings of abandonment or rejection. Using guilt, shame, or other manipulative tactics to control an adult child's behavior can cause significant emotional harm. This can make the child feel like they are not in control of their own life and lead to feelings of resentment and anger. Lastly, parents who do not respect their adult child's boundaries and independence can run the risk of having their adult children alienate them. This is because your adult child likely feels like they cannot escape your influence or control. ...

How Can I Get My Son to Stop Blaming His Younger Sibling for His Own Bad Behavior? - by Emily Edlynn, Ph.D. for Parents

What Does It Mean to Be the Family Scapegoat? - by Nadra Nittle, Medically reviewed by
Yolanda Renteria, LPC
excerpts:
     ... Commonplace in families with unhealthy dynamics, scapegoating tends to start in childhood when children are blamed for all of the problems in dysfunctional households. ...
     ... When children are assigned this role, the impact can be detrimental to their mental health and emotional well-being for a lifetime. ...
     ... In addition, it results in an upbringing in which the scapegoated child’s inherent worth, goodness, and lovableness are ignored. Instead, insults, bullying, neglect, and abuse are deemed appropriate for the child forced into this position. ...
     ... Why a parent decides to scapegoat a child tends not to make any sense because this behavior is rooted in dysfunction. For example, a child who is sensitive, inquisitive, attractive, and smart might be perceived as a threat and scapegoated by a parent who lacks these qualities. ...
     ... Being a scapegoat or a favorite is never about a child’s inherent worth as a human being. ...
     ... Being a scapegoat is a lonely, heartbreaking experience for a child, but it may also yield a more desirable outcome in some cases. For example, the maltreatment scapegoats endure in families is often the impetus that drives them to leave the dysfunctional, high-conflict home. ...
     ... Moreover, scapegoats very often decide to end the generational cycle of abuse when they start their own families. ...

3 Ways To Exit The Role Of ‘Family Scapegoat,’ According To A Psychologist - by Mark Travers for Forbes
excerpt:
     Many people come to therapy when they feel underappreciated by their family. They may say things like:
1. “Someone is constantly making accusations against me for no fault of my own.”
2. “My parents keep blaming me for one thing or another as if it is always my responsibility to ensure everything goes right.”
3. “I am never praised for my achievements. Instead, I get belittled in front of everyone.”
It is no secret that families can be complicated. All too often, a single family member becomes the ‘scapegoat’ for the family’s problems.
     A family scapegoat is a person who takes on the role of ‘black sheep’ or ‘problem child’ in their family and gets shamed, blamed, and criticized for things that go wrong within the family unit, even when these things are entirely outside of their control.
     Scapegoating parents often have fragile, needy, and narcissistic personalities. They unnecessarily project hostility onto the scapegoated child.
     ... Parents/family authority figures maintain control by attacking and forming alliances that isolate the victim. ...
     ... Parenting figures distort reality to deny the target child’s legitimate needs and to act as if the victim child is the cause of not only the family’s problems but also the parent figure’s dissatisfaction. ...

What the Silent Treatment Teaches Children
and What It Does to Them

The silent treatment is most always defined as a form of abuse when given to children (and even when it is done to adult children and partners). It is a favorite form of punishment by narcissists. Narcissists tend to be abusive in order to get power, control and dominance in their relationships. 

If it is not being used as a form of punishment, it can be used as a way for someone who does not have good emotional coping skills, or as way for them not to hurt the other person any more than they have. However, if the silent treatment is accompanied by other abuses, or threats, it is pretty much guaranteed to be a punishment, especially when the target is a child.

Because it is a form of abuse, trauma symptoms in the child are likely to emerge too. It is quite a bit more egregious than shaming in most situations if the silent treatment is used habitually or goes on for a long period of time. 

The silent treatment is also known to cause chronic pain, similar to physical pain. It activates the anterior cingulate cortex part of the brain that senses physical pain. Even so, real physical pain can also be experienced in terms of generalized anxiety disorder, which often goes hand-in-hand with being abused and experiencing PTSD or C-PTSD. To children (and even adult children), the pain starts out as the PTSD symptom of hypervigilance. This keeps your mind in "fight or flight" mode. 

When children experience hypervigilance, especially if they live with their parents, they are mainly going to feel it as a "flight response". Most underage abused children know they can't fight with their parents and get a good outcome, thus the flight response is usually activated: trying to figure out the best way to get out of the situation they are in. It can mean the child will eventually fawn to the parent's demands, but it is never going to be an authentic response because the parent has activated the PTSD symptom of hypervigilance. 

And even when the parent is satisfied with what they got out of the deal (a fawning child), the child is still going to be experiencing a hypervigilant state, even if it is relaxed somewhat to the point where he can get more sleep even if he isn't getting enough sleep. The reason why it is still activated is because the brain is still on high alert that it will happen again.

And there is a good reason why it is on high alert that it will happen again: because usually it does happen again. As I've mentioned many times, abuse escalates, and that means the silent treatment will escalate too

The way the silent treatment escalates is that it certainly happens again and again, but more importantly it goes on for longer and longer periods of time the more it is used. Some silent treatments go on for a decade or more, and some go on, and on, and on, to the point of estrangement. And of course, a child is never going to be able to fix a parent's use of this destructive abuse tactic. Parents will give excuses for using it over and over again, and increasing the level of pain, just like a batterer will give excuses for putting his partner in the hospital with an escalation of bruises and cuts. It is up to the abuser to give up on the abusive tactic. 

Since the point of abuse is to get more power, control and domination for the parent, the main focus that the parent will be to manipulate the child to be submissive to every command. The need for the parent to get more power, control and domination is working against biology; parents should be loosening the power, control and domination as the child becomes more adult, not the other way around. Also the child will be wanting more and more autonomy from his parent, at least in terms of making his own decisions, with the parent helping him along the way to be the best that he can be in terms of his own decisions - which is what teaching is about. The purpose is to get a student to be able to figure out problems on his own. If this isn't going on, you'll get a student like the ones every public school teacher sees: the ones who sit in the back of the classroom, un-interested, rolling their eyes, dismissing what you have to say. They are letting you know that they no longer want to be forced into lessons. 

There are a lot of very good reasons why abuse is not a good way to get submission; it is a very, very bad idea (for the society at large, and even for family dynamics). 

Anyway, when the silent treatment goes on for days, or weeks, this keeps the brain on high alert for any more attacks. And usually people who indulge in the silent treatment of their children, do attack them in other ways: taking toys or other possessions away, insults, degrading comments, shaming, unfounded blaming, false imprisonment like locking in them in their room for much longer than is healthy, a lot of gaslighting is also usually present, more threats of ostracism, smear campaigns, prejudice and conspiratorial attacks.

What hypervigilance also does is to keep the child's brain on such high alert that the child can't sleep, or they don't sleep very well (constantly waking up upset). If they do sleep, they are prone to nightmares which reflect the state they are in, that mimic his real life situation to a large degree. So it is like being haunted: he is haunted by the silent treatment night and day. Dreams don't even give him a respite.

So it is very upsetting, and the pain tends to be constant the longer it goes on. If they cry a lot from the nightmares and inability to relax enough to go to sleep, they may do so in private, especially when the parent or parents punish him for crying or feeling hurt in addition to the silent treatment. Narcissistic parents usually punish the child for having feelings about how they are being treated because narcissists have very little empathy, so they will not soothe a child who is crying over the silent treatment. They won't want to rescue him from it, or say "I've punished you enough." In fact, a child who is crying and pleading for it to stop will more likely set off a narcissistic parent's rage (in the way of the shame-rage spiral). This means that when they see the child's pain, they see it as a criticism of them, the parent. Unlike the rest of us who experience pain when we are criticized, narcissists react to criticism with rage, and for children, the rage is usually accompanied by more punishment.  

Therefor, many children who receive the silent treatment bottle it up, and then the bottling up creates more symptoms. 

The worry, the bottling up, being on high alert, the continued pain (even when the silent treatment has been temporarily relieved by the parent), can and does create Generalized Anxiety Disorder (typically referred to as GAD). About three quarters of the survivors I talked to who were given the silent treatment as children and beyond into adulthood experienced a lot of muscle pain (part of the anxiety disorder), headaches (also part of the disorder), and even significant heart pain (the heart is also a muscle, which would explain the pain there). Some of them experienced chronic stomach aches as well. The most common symptom started out as muscle aches all over the body, as though they had the flu.

For children and adult children who experienced the silent treatment for more than a year from a parent, most of them experienced Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms in addition to PTSD symptoms. The reason it wasn't 100 percent is because some children who started the emotional separation from their parent early on, when they were still a child - they withdrew so much by the time they were adults, that their parent had very little-to-no effect on them (in other words, the silent treatment was no longer hurting them because they didn't look to the parent for any  parenting - that kind of relationship was emotionally severed early on). They were estranged to the point where they didn't feel any connection or intimacy with their parent. It was as though the parent was just an irritating stranger.  

The adult children of child abuse who I have known, numbering in the hundreds, usually gave up on their parent at the point when the silent treatment went on longer than a year, and when the physical symptoms showed up to this extent, and especially the body/muscle aches. To experience those symptoms day in and day out, and night after night without let-up and with very little sleep, is torture.

The lesson here is that they are captives to torture, and that is it. 

However, you can get medication for Generalized Anxiety Disorder these days. So some survivors take it, their symptoms let up, and they go right back to their abusers because they feel better. So I'm not necessarily a proponent of medicating yourself for symptoms like this, and the medications themselves have some issues and side effects. And if you return and the escalation of abuse continues, which it will, the medication will cease to work very well, which can cause a dependency. 

The fact that your body is going through the symptoms in the first place is a sign that you cannot take any more abuse. That's a good message to get, not a bad message. Toxic families are called toxic for a reason. Abuse is a toxin when you are a child, and if the abuser uses a lot of lines of attacks, and if it keeps going on through adulthood, which it usually does, you are probably going to be receiving a lot of GAD symptoms. That's actually healthy compared to covering it up with meds, however, if you are pretty darned sure that you are not going to go back to abuse, medications can be a helpful way to move ahead, but always with some concerns (I hope to cover why in another post). 

The GAD symptoms are likely to subside eventually without medication, especially with time and continued distance, to the point where you can forget about them by focusing as much as you can on the present. There are also exercises you can do to bring your focus more into the present day so that you can stop ruminating about your victimhood and your parent (shifting focus is part of trauma therapy with a licensed therapist).

If you can find relationships that are fulfilling and mutually respectful, empathetic and reasonable, then that tends to relieve symptoms too. 

The survivors who had their self esteem totally blown out by the parent, who felt like empty vessels of themselves, who felt and who had other extreme issues going on in their lives, contemplated suicide a lot during parental silent treatments.  

For underage children (talked about by adult children), they felt trapped, under siege, like hostages to abuse, and thought about suicide a lot, sometimes every day. It took all of the strength they could muster to get them to adulthood to escape their situation. 

The silent treatment has been written about so much, and I have not read one professional article that touted any benefit to a child.   

The way that a parent sees the silent treatment as a lesson to a child, is that the punisher expects their victim to writhe in pain over the silent treatment and do anything for the narcissist in order for the silent treatment to end. While it can get the parent of an underage child what they want, temporarily at least, the fact that it was used at all makes a child feel anxious, fearful, distrustful, inwardly upset and traumatized, resentful, invisible, not worth anything to the parent outside of fulfilling commands and demands ... and if used into a child's teenage years or adulthood, it will probably eventually lead to full blown estrangement.

And as we know, the parent-child relationship is such that if it doesn't benefit the child too, the relationship will either be a shell of its former self, very very shallow and insignificant, or be a total estrangement. 

Abuse can be generational. Some children will adopt the silent treatment themselves as an adult and use it on their own children, or on the parent who used it on them, or on other members of a family. If there is a lot of estrangement in one extended family, I'd bet it had a lot to do with not knowing how to resolve issues beyond the unhealthy ways: silent treatments and other forms of abuse, stonewalling, blaming and shaming. This is where a child modeling the bad behavior of his parent can boomerang back on the parent or go down the generations as a family practice, sometimes with catastrophic effect. The silent treatment can and does produce suicide ideation and suicides, and I have been around enough survivor forums to know that it happens way more than it should - one therapist told me that one quarter of all children who get a long silent treatment lasting a year or more from a parent commit suicide (I am trying to find that source). Here is one source for now. But even so, there is a lot of talk in survivor forums about a sibling who died from suicide during their teenage years and twenties where a parent was ostracizing them or giving them the silent treatment at the time of death.

Again, that's not a good lesson: "Consider suicide because I don't care at all about you except what I can get out of you." 

I also notice that for every one male suicide, there are about 10 female suicides (again, not a statistic, just something I notice for those of you who are studying this branch of psychology who want to get statistics on the silent treatment). Anyway, to me it says that girls are given the silent treatment by a parent so much more than a boy is. It is similar to the statistics on childhood sexual abuse: girls are targeted much more than boys are. It also seems that girls are overwhemingly chosen for the scapegoat role in their families as well. It would be interesting to know why. Is it the same prejudice that's been going on for centuries that males are more worthwhile and useful to a family than a female is? Or is it the same kind of trend in terms of sexual abuse where girls are a lot more sexually abused than boys? I suspect that both have something to do with why.

In a later post, I will discuss why girls are, in general, much more subject to abuse than boys are. 

In a generational sense, the silent treatment when given to children, can also perpetuate the idea that this form of abuse should be used on the weak and vulnerable (like children, people undergoing tragedies, people who are disabled, and so on): perhaps you were given the silent treatment during a time when your own personal power was challenged. So you give the silent treatment when someone is going through a bad time!? That's supposed to teach what lesson now?

Again, children learn from parental modeling, especially if there are no repercussions for doing so or that they see right away. The child learns if he wants more power in a relationship, and to dominate someone, to attack that person in their most vulnerable, weakened state, a person who needs help. That's not a good lesson to be teaching. Plus it's even more trauma symptoms than the silent treatment during calm times. 

Children who have been taught to normalize abuse and estrangement, may not realize this tactic is so dangerous until one of their own children commits suicide or becomes totally estranged from them, unwilling to put up with any more silent treatments. Thus, since there is too much of a danger in it becoming generational, it should be abolished.   

There is not enough empathy behind the silent treatment to make it a useful tool to get a person to change their behavior. In fact it shows the child what their parents behavior is like more than their own. It is gross emotional negligence, and if anything, your child will eventually double down on resisting what you want, knowing it is about your need for more power, control and domination in your mutual relationship. Most teenage and adult children believe their parent has enough power, control and domination to begin with, and they don't want to give them any more of it, especially if the parent is going to be using it in this kind of bullying way.

The silent treatment rarely works as a learning lesson because the child will focus on how unempathetic the parent is, how long the parent used it and in what situations. If the parent used it when their child was down on their luck or otherwise vulnerable, don't expect a relationship with your child ever again. The trust that your child had in you to act on his behalf (to parent, to love you, to keep you safe, to be there for you in tragic times, to teach good helpful lessons) can never be re-established.  

Some material on the silent treatment and how it effects victims, including child victims (and why it is mostly attributed to narcissists):     

general:

THE SILENT TREATMENT: WHEN THE NARCISSIST GOES PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE - Dr. Les Carter, Psychologist, for Surviving Narcissism (You Tube)

Narcissists and the Silent Treatment - by Dr. Ramani Durvasula (You Tube) 


Silent treatment from parents: The psychological implications on kids and why it should be avoided - by the administrators of Times of India

What Does Gaslighting Teach Children?
and What Are the Effects on Them?


Gaslighting is rare for normal parents who feel empathy for their children. However, it can still happen, but maybe only a couple of times in the child's entire life, and in perhaps in the heat of a moment when your child's behavior has exasperated you to the extreme. However, I'm mainly talking about calling your child crazy, and not the whole campaign of gaslighting that abusive parents are known for. 

I'd bet you don't go around and tell all your friends and family that your child is crazy either, like abusive parents are known for. 

Which is to say there are several parts to gaslighting, and one of them is calling your child crazy. This basically does what shaming a child does (which I discuss in the section above), and will have many of the same effects on your child. 

Part of gaslighting is also a lot of attempts to deny his reality, deny the feelings that he has (and insist that he has other feelings instead), and deny the thoughts that he has (and insist that he has other thoughts instead). This part of gaslighting is called perspecticide - also referred to as invalidating

Even normal parents can slip up on this occasionally, especially when they are accusing a child of something that they feel has ironclad proof behind it (where their child might be denying he did it). But, again, normal parents are not doing it for an agenda. 

But it will probably be useful to know how abusive parents take it to an extreme, so that the rest of us don't go down the slippery slope of accusing our children of doing things, thinking things, and feeling things that they may not be experiencing, thinking or feeling. And getting these things wrong can build a really fast rift with your child. Which means that you have to develop an intelligent approach to accusations. 

As I made clear in the post above, blaming is not the panacea of family harmony anyway, even if you do get it right. But, blaming can put you at some amount of risk for getting it wrong. Fortunately, most of us know that. 

However, most narcissists and sociopaths do not know that, or if they are manipulative, they pretend not to know it. Most of them are so filled with arrogance and many play mind reader as well, that they consistently tell you what you experience, think and feel to the point where they will not even accept any other interpretation. They stonewall you instead (meaning that they stop the conversation), so that they don't hear your explanations. If their child persists in telling the parent they are wrong, they usually respond to the child with the silent treatment (because, again, they can't take criticism without raging).  

So for abusive parents, gaslighting usually goes hand-in-hand with the silent treatment, another type of abuse that I talked about in the preceding section. 

With the silent treatment the message is: "You are irrelevant unless you are submissive and doing everything I demand and command of you." With gaslighting, they add in: "All of your experiences, your feelings and thoughts are irrelevant too."

And by the way, I don't think they are faking this message. When people are almost entirely focused on how much power, control and domination that they want and are getting over others, it is an aggression that does not take into account what you feel and think about it. It is an onslaught to take you over, and turn you into a puppet without a brain or feelings (you are only supposed to be manipulated into being submissive for them, or else!). 

So the child learns, "I'm supposed to be an empty vessel that other people decide who I am? And how am I supposed to do that? What if they tell me I don't have the feelings I say I'm having? What if I still feel the feelings that they say doesn't exist? Are they supposed to be telling me how I feel, think and behave, or am I supposed to be telling them how I actually feel, think and behave even when they don't listen to me?" 

And if they do press the parent to accept that what they experience, and the way they feel and think is different than what the parent believes, the parent is going to see it as a criticism of their mind-reading. And what happens to narcissists and sociopaths when they feel criticized? They rage, and sometimes punish. 

Over not being mind readers? 

Yes. Most scapegoat abused children have been through this. 

The message is: "How dare you challenge my mind reading abilities!" 

And let me tell you, they are the least able to mind-read. The lack of empathy coupled with their lack of self reflection makes it impossible for them to do it.

This leads children to be silent, and letting other people define them. 

That's a good lesson? Hopefully you can see why this is a horrific thing to do to a child.

If you add in the silent treatment to the empty vessel that you've made your kid out to be where you pour in his mind what he's about, and what he thinks, and what he feels all of the time without listening to him, you have poured poison in (or at least that is how the child's brain interprets it: symptoms). And for abusive parents they are going to do this most of the time. Plus they are either going to say he's entirely wonderful and faultless, or entirely terrible and always at fault, the result of splitting) - this is definitely child abuse.

So the child is going to be experiencing trauma symptoms in addition to the trauma symptoms of being stonewalled and getting the silent treatment. Horrible. 

So what this teaches children is not to define themselves. Just let other people do it. 

And it teaches: don't defend yourself when others judge you, otherwise endure a rage and a lecture. 

And it teaches: let other people tell you what you think, feel and what you are experiencing, otherwise endure a rage and a lecture about that too. 

And it teaches: soft boundaries: let everyone walk all over your real feelings and wipe their dirty feet/thoughts on your clean thoughts; let everyone else define you; let people accuse you of things you didn't do (because again, you don't know your own mind; only other people do); let other people hate you and be prejudiced against you for unreasonable reasons; just be an empty old vessel for anyone's rage and judgements.   

And it teaches: don't talk, don't trust, don't feel, the hallmark of dysfunctional families. My own post about that is HERE. (Note: I'd suggest the link to the prior article rather than my own ... the link to my own article is mainly about an art piece I did on the subject). 

Or conversely, it teaches children not to trust people who criticize them (even if it is helpful), to rage when they are criticized (so that the other person will stop; they won't feel any criticism is warranted anyway, so they'll just act scary and rage to throw off the idea that anyone can criticize them); to not trust anyone (they've been brought up not to trust what people say about them because those people who brought them up always got it wrong); and to not care about ethics (because their primary caregivers didn't care about ethics when they made up stories about how the child thought, how he felt and what he experienced, so he'll be damned if he has ethics too). This is basically how you make another narcissist or sociopath for the world to endure. 

So the lesson here is to either make another narcissist or sociopath, or to make a child into a garbage can to dump rage and projections into. 

Children who experience heavy doses of gaslighting with rage, where they are continuously told they are crazy, especially when they are upset about being raged at or abused (common), are going to have a hard time making any decisions for themselves, even on school tests. 

We did a little survey in one survivor forum and the question was: "In school, did you have so much anxiety when given a 'multiple question test' of getting the wrong answer, that you simply froze and couldn't complete it?" Overwhelmingly the answer was "yes." Some survivors were so unnerved by tests like that, that they either handed in their tests a quarter done, half done, not at all done, or just filled in random blanks to say they did it and not be told by a teacher that they had to fill in all of it, or re-take it. A lot of them said they had terrible "shakes" (a sign of PTSD), and so much anxiety that they could barely read what the questions were (another sign of PTSD - also called an "amygdala hijack").

Meanwhile, the parents at home were expecting their children to be so "perfect" in the marionette department, that when they came home with bad grades they were told they were stupid and crazy (also very common for abused kids). 

How are you going to have a perfect marionette child, when the child is constantly in this hypervigilant state to the point where he can't concentrate? He can't concentrate in school and he can't concentrate at home. He goes right into the freeze response. 

A lot of abusive parents punish a child who has gone into a freeze response because the freeze response is not the marionette submissive response that the parent wants. 

And the child gets sicker, and sicker, and sicker, and it would seem from all of what I've read and put forward is that many of these children develop life threatening auto-immune disorders ... that is, unless another parent, or adult, is fighting for the child's survival, and for the legitimacy of his mind and feelings. Dr. Ramani Durvasula also mentions seeing abused patients with a lot more auto-immune diseases than usual. 

And we know that narcissists can't tolerate a marriage partner who challenges them. So they are likely to divorce over not being able to gaslight, by being challenged about the gaslighting. What does a narcissist do when they are challenged by their partner not to gaslight? They rage about being criticized.

Which puts the child in more danger unless the loving, protective parent can get custody. 

However, many survivors were able to write papers. They preferred tests that were not multiple choice tests with right and wrong answers. And they did much better on those tests. It does limit the kinds of professions they can enter, but at least there are some ways that children saddled with PTSD symptoms can succeed. 

Anyway, for the underage child it can get worse ... 

Many children who live in a perpetual freeze response, are gaslighted so much that they can't tell you how many times they were gaslighted in childhood, and never had a good sense of who they were. Everything they felt they were, was invalidated by the parent. It may also be invalidated by a favorite golden child sibling who is trying to mimic the parent to get brownie points. 

It's like a parent has put a worm in their abused child's brain, and in their ear, and is even becoming part of what they feel. They echo what the parent has told them. Their own voice, ambitions and dreams get so diminished and lost, purposely by the narcissist, that it is the narcissist's voice that speaks in their child's mind. 

It's like the robot has been completed, much like in the Stepford wives, except the trauma symptoms are still there, even though the child tries as hard as he can to split off the trauma symptom part of himself from the functional-to-his-parent part of himself. 

In extreme cases, all of these splits that the parent sees and is not tolerating very well in their ambition to hurt the child, and continually gain more domination over the child, can add up to Dissociative Identity Disorder. And even though a child might try to show only the functional side to the parent, and try to forget each and stash away the hurt and trauma to another part of himself that the parent inflicted, is not entirely possible.  

A lot has been written about how Borderline Personality Disorder develops too.

Almost every "symptom" of the Borderline can be attributed to being brought up by a narcissist too. 

Borderlines feel terrified that they will be abandoned. That is because narcissists abandon them repeatedly, through stonewalling, the silent treatment, the invalidation of their feelings and thoughts, and sometimes even abandon them altogether ("I want nothing to do with you any more"). 

Borderlines have a hard time defining who they are. They often can't tell you. And their dress and constant changing of careers reflects that: in one day, they can go from dressing Goth, to dressing like a secretary, to dressing like a dowdy maid, to experiencing the highest joy in the morning, to experiencing the depths of depression by the afternoon, to working as a waitress during the day to working as a research expert in the evening. One guy I have known for a good part of my life, looks drastically different from one day to the next, and has many, many outfits and styles of glasses to reflect it. He was egregiously abused too, a sign.

Anyway, Borderlines can even have 5 or 6 careers all going on at once, with at least one of them art-related. Some people label Borderlines as manic depressive, however, this is wrong. Manic depressives take days or weeks to change a mood. Many borderlines change from hour to hour or at the least one day to the next. Their moods are constantly shifting. That is because they survived by splitting themselves off into other sections, and one of them was tailor made for the narcissist. 

Borderlines feel emotions much more strongly than other people do. They can wail when they cry, and they can laugh more heartily than others do too. This has to do with a myriad of different reasons:

Narcissists get narcissistic supply by goading and baiting their victims into a negative response by arguing with them, insulting them and stonewalling them. Then they use the emotional response of their victims to judge the victims as crazy and out-of-control emotionally.

But there is also a double bind to this. Narcissists also teach people, including children, to stuff emotions (i.e. "If you weren't so sensitive and emotional, people might listen to you more." - this is an extremely likely gaslighting phrase by narcissists). The emotional energy that the victim is being expected to stuff has to go somewhere, so it tends to come out in extremes. Also narcissists tend to be cold, uncaring, unempathetic, the opposite of the Borderline. So kids, who need dire help, practically have to scream and cry and carry on to get the narcissist's attention - this means the emotions are going to be over the top. Narcissistic parents may still not care (they tend towards child neglect). Sometimes they'll say, "If you cry like that, you aren't going to get anywhere with me!" even if the issue is dire. And of course, that just perpetuates them getting hurt, where they have to bottle up some more pain, and where it is likely to create even more extremity of expression. Either way, the bottled up emotions are going to have to go somewhere, even if the narcissist shuts them down again and again and again. And it can be partly a brain issue: generally abused kids feel emotions much more than other kinds of people because there are actually changes in the brain due to the abuse and the stuffing of emotions. 

In Borderlines, suicide attempts, suicide ideation and cutting oneself can also be the result of having been abused. Suicide and suicidal thoughts come about because of the chronic pain the parent is putting the child through. Suicide is a relief of the chronic pain the parent is inflicting on the child. Whereas cutting is the way to echo your abuser and how much they hate you. You decide to hate yourself too so that the abuser will be happy and so they don't have to keep doing the abusing.

Narcissists tend to become calm and satisfied when their Borderline children are going through pain and tragedies, as long as the pain and tragedies aren't taking the child's attention away from the parent.  So in a way, cutting is just another way to serve the narcissist. 

A lot of Borderlines are also substance addicted. Substance addiction and being brought up by an abusive parent has been linked for a long time, and the studies on it keep showing more and more links. You can google it and a lot of professional articles show up. Again, substance addiction, especially if you are a scapegoat child in addition to being a Borderline, is a way to serve the narcissist with what they want. It also keeps the narcissist from hurting you if you are hurting yourself. 

Borderline Personality Disorder usually co-exists with PTSD or C-PTSD.

Then there is the Echoist who is past the point of splintering himself off into different sections. He has been drained so much of any personality or identity by a narcissist or narcissists, or lived through so much brutality, that he basically is only a survivor (no personality was able to develop). The echoist has usually been drained of humanity too (meaning that he faces prejudice). He has no boundaries or so few boundaries that just about any one can show up and tell him who is and he goes along with what ever the person happens to say about him. In fact, who he is, and how he is defined, can so drastically differ from person to person that it doesn't matter any more: he isn't anyone in particular. He is just who the next person decides he is, kind of like a chameleon, except he changes according to what the next person wants him to be.

This is the state that a gardener, Chance Gardner is in, in the book and movie, Being There (a brilliant movie about a true echoist state). The book was written by Jerzy Kosinski, a Jew who barely survived a brutal existence as a survivor of The Holocaust and wrote books afterwards. To write a book about an Echoist, and another book about the brutalities through the eyes of a boy, and later commit suicide, is not lost on me. This is what can happen. 

So, what does this teach children? That with enough abuse, a person can have PTSD, get Borderline Personality Disorder, get Dissociative Identity Disorder, be an Echoist, and die from suicide? That is what we want to teach children? 

But to get back to gaslighting. It gets worse.

Most narcissists and sociopaths tell their friends and family that their child is insane. There are a number of things this does:
* If the child complains about abuse, no one listens (because they are deemed to be insane, to not know what they are talking about)
* Isolates the child with the parent (people don't generally want to be close to a person who can't think straight) - isolating people from each (triangulation is huge in narcissistic abuse)
* People allow the parent leeway in all kinds of unethical ways (including total abandonment) because they have a crazy child to deal with
* Makes the child vulnerable to other human predators (they can tell everyone that the child is insane too, that their abuse of the victim never happened either)

It becomes the go-to way for a parent to get rid of the evidence. So it allows one evil occurrence to happen after the other. It allows a parent to continually be allowed to harshly judge and punish a child. It allows a lot more erroneous punishing (punishing over sadist reasons) than might otherwise happen. 

This is what we want for children? For children to be the garbage cans for a parent's rage (turning into everyone else's garbage can for rage too)? For children to be the garbage cans for abandonments and sadism? Because this is what we get when we have continuously gaslighted children.  

And yet, it still can get worse ... 

Gaslighting is often used in every situation where the parent is frustrated with the amount of attention, power, control, and domination they already have, which is just about always. There is never enough for them. Sam Vaknin, who I feature below at the bottom of the further reading section, has said in a number of videos that this lust for more power and the manipulation to get more of it lives in the mind of narcissists all of the time. All they can think of is how to be the authoritarian in what ever situation they are in. He also said that this lust, coupled with rage and jealousy are about the only emotions they feel too. 

They use gaslighting to discard and abandon their own children (and they do discard way more than they let on). Here is how it tends to happen:

The parent and adult child reach a point where the adult child is hurt way too much by the actions of the parent. Of course, all narcissists want their child to fix all relational problems. But the adult child can't. Perhaps the narcissist's henchmen have threatened him or abused him. So the adult child insists that the issues between them have to be worked out in therapy. The parent has touted therapy to be the big solution to all problems and that the child must go in order to make the child fit for family life. But the adult child sees that this was only done to get the parent's friends and family to look at the child as insane. The fact that the child would suggest therapy for both of them creates a narcissistic injury in the narcissist. The parent, feeling criticized by the suggestion that they both go to therapy, gives their adult child the silent treatment. The adult child attempts to re-connect. But the parent pushes him away and punishes him by continuing with the silent treatment and telling him he needs to learn a lesson. When the parent does reconnect, he blames, criticizes, shames, insults the adult child, trying to make him entirely responsible for what happened. But the adult child doesn't see it that way, and the silent treatment continues. Then the parent tells his friends and the family that the adult child has rejected them instead. You can see that this is highly unethical and immoral. And the parent keeps grasping at trying to teach the adult child through the same highly unethical behavior. When a child is more ethical than the parent, the parent can no longer teach a lesson. Trying to hurt him through the silent treatment and gaslighting has achieved what? And most adult children will want to back away from a parent who is this unethical. So then it is an estrangement that goes on and on, and the parent still insists that was his child's fault. This is extremely common when it comes to how narcissistic parents treat their own offspring. 

The very common DARVO tactic among narcissists and sociopaths is a type of gaslighting too, as well as all blame-shifting maneuvers. How is a parent supposed to teach a child anything good using this tactic?

Lying about what a child is about and how they act is a type of gaslighting as well.  Lying is second nature to most narcissists and is constant for sociopaths. Again, what is a parent teaching using this tactic, especially for children who go off to school and learn that most teachers, classmates, and school officials want the truth to be spoken. Either the child is going to deny, reject, play dumb, or lecture a parent who is lying so much. 

Gaslighting is also used by a parent to get a child to believe that the truth is a lie, and that a lie is the truth. And if the child doesn't go along with it, they get punished. Now what is that supposed to teach? 

And narcissistic parents also try to get children to believe that they, the parent, is the great sage of how to work out problems in relationships. They may lecture a child about the latest articles on how to make relationships work. That is laughable. They can't practice what they preach. So when they are doing the opposite of what all of these articles suggest (like throwing constant barbs and insults at their child - which is a type of grievous disrespect), they will talk about how the child needs to show respect. It's not too bright, but it is also about gaslighting. 

The end result is that the child is not likely to respect the parent or want to hear them talk about lessons ever again. 

A lot of survivors are estranged from their parent because there is nothing to talk to their parent about. They don't want to hear what their parent has to say any more because it's just about a bunch of blame-shifting, gaslighting, pointless drivel. A survivor might try to dumb-down the conversations to weather, cooking, and gray rock subjects to stop the crazy-making, hurtful, nonsensical lessons, but then a lot of parents get narcissistically injured by their child stonewalling all conversation except those subjects, and decide to continue the silent treatment over that (often after taunting and goading their children to respond to subjects other than the gray rock subjects).

A lot of therapists attempt to teach "gray rock" to their patients, and tell them to be patient, and that it will work over the long haul, but what is that teaching children? Don't talk, don't trust, don't feel, just like the parent teaches them to do all of the time? It's just another denial of self to placate a narcissist. I'd bet for Borderlines, Echoists and those with Dissociative Identity Disorder, it's the worst thing you could teach them. So I'm not a big proponent of that method unless it's a work situation. There's got to be a better way. 

The sad thing is that gaslighting a child is pretty much a given when it comes to narcissistic and sociopathic parents. It is incredibly common. And the rate of narcissistic and sociopathic individuals is growing (it accounts for the upswing in school and mass shootings as well - I'm working on a piece about that). Narcissistic parents may make up about 8 percent of parents (this accounts for the fact that many narcissists aren't diagnosed - they generally don't go to therapy). So this constant drumming for parents to teach children lessons that matter for society, like peaceful resolutions, respecting your fellow human beings, telling the truth, being kind, may be lost. While parents gaslight to get continually more power, control and domination over their children (and adult children for as long as the parent is alive), with very few laws or societal pressures to stop it, it does have a huge impact on society. And narcissists are consistently going to be teaching lessons that hurt people without any upside. 

Jealous, rageful, power hungry, unethical narcissists should not be teachers of children, period. And eventually some of the children they are trying to teach realize that too.  

My own feeling is that gaslighting will hold our evolution back in a big way, and for a long time. To have society full of amygdala hijacked PTSD'd adult children who can't talk to their parent and get reasonable responses, and the narcissists that prey upon them for their own selfish, self serving purposes, will create a culture that is not sustainable. Narcissists and sociopaths will never care about this fact (they don't even care about other people much), so it is up to the rest of us to care about this. 

Assuming that Putin may be a malignant narcissist, how is the lesson he is trying to teach the Ukrainian population working out? How are the torture lessons, in particular, working out? I bet you most of them are not learning that submission is a good idea. No, they are learning that Russians are dangerous, unreasonable, un-negotiable, impulsively destructive and terrorizing, that they don't have good intentions, and that they must be driven out. I bet that is the main lesson they are learning. I think even children learn the same lessons from malignant narcissistic parents (or any other family member). 

Dictators who invade other countries are usually arrogant Malignant Narcissists who tell people what to think, how to behave, what kind of decision-making they have a right to, and what to believe. They imprison people who make minor infractions while they have criminal intentions every day, have people murdered for instance. Their populations are lied to about the intentions of other countries on purpose. They are taught to be prejudiced. The dictators expect complete submission and loyalty to the dictator while he shows his loyalty to no one. This is the Hellish world we want for the human race going forward, for dictators to tell people what to do, how to think, and how to feel? 

And how do they do this? By gaslighting their population. Wars would be very hard to wage without lots of gaslighting and trying to turn people into full time echoists and submissive marionettes.   

Are You Gaslighting Your Kids? - by Sherri Gordon, medically reviewed by Ann-Louise T. Lockhart, PsyD, ABPP for Very Well Family

The Danger of Parents Gaslighting Their Children (They deserve respect, at every age.) - by Daniel S. Lobel Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Gaslighting: How a Parent Can Drive a Kid Crazy - Medically reviewed by Scientific Advisory Board — By Christine Hammond, MS, LMHC for Psych Central

The Top 5 Gaslighting Phrases of Struggling Adult Children (Shut down gaslighting by not getting sucked into it.) - by Jeffrey Bernstein Ph.D. for Psychology Today

27 Signs Your Parent Is Gaslighting You & What To Do About It - by Abby Moore, expert review by Chamin Ajjan, LCSW, A-CBT, CST

I also talk about how gaslighting can make children vulnerable to predatory relationships: Setting Boundaries (for Victims of Narcissistic or Psychopathic Abuse)

Are Gaslighters Aware of What They Do? (Do gaslighters know they're manipulative, or do they do it without realizing it?) - by Stephanie A. Sarkis Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Gaslighting in Families: Signs of Gaslighting Parents - by Stacey Colino, medically reviewed by Jean Kim, MD for Psycom

Gaslighting Parents: Signs & How to Respond - by Silvi Saxena MBA, MSW, LSW, CCTP, OSW-C, medically reviewed by Rajy Abulhosn MD for Choosing Therapy

WHAT THE ESCALATION OF ABUSE
HAS TO DO WITH THIS TOPIC

Most abusers don't stop to think, "Escalating abuse and keeping it going isn't working. They don't seem to be learning what I want them to learn. They don't seem to be changing in the way that I want them to change. They aren't trusting me or looking at me as a teacher. They aren't doing what I tell them to do. They don't even think my lessons are worth listening to." - no they don't think that way!

Most abusers live in fantasies: 
1. fantasies that people can change more than they actually can (if they looked at themselves, they'd notice they are highly resistant to change - so how are other people supposed to change to the drastic levels they expect?)
2. fantasies that they will keep gaining power, control and domination in relationships
3. fantasies that they are in control of others when they really aren't
4. fantasies that they are much more magnetic, persuasive, intelligent, wealthy, powerful and deceptive than they really are - a lot of us can see through this posturing, more than they'd be comfortable with, in fact.
5. fantasies of others submitting to their every wish and whim
6. fantasies that others will submit to being infantilized and/or parentified at the whims and commands of the abuser 

But the biggest fantasy of all is that if they keep increasing the pain on their victim, the victim will, after enough torture, change the way the abuser wants them to change. As I've pointed out before, they don't understand any of the research that has been done on personal change, otherwise they might take a second look at their methods and attitudes. Some of why they "just don't get it" comes from having such a profound lack of empathy - they can't even understand people on that level, so, of course, they don't understand people enough to know that growing their sadism is not a good choice for them

 What they really tend to think is this: "This isn't working. Apparently, I've got to increase the pain and keep increasing the pain until they come to their senses! Wow, are they stupid for not giving into me!" 

I hope I have proved above why they are the ones with the blind spots, not their victims. 

FURTHER READING
general

Abandoned child syndrome - Wikipedia

FEAR OF ABANDONMENT: THE LASTING EFFECTS OF TRAUMA - by Dr. Alison Block for her own website (Health Psychology Center)

Tips to Heal After Growing Up with a Dismissive Mother - by Sandra Silva Casabianca, Medically reviewed by Cydney Ortiz, PsyD for Psych Central 

19 Lasting Effects of Abandoning or Emotionally Unavailable Parents - by Audrey Sherman, Ph.D. for Psych Central

How To Overcome Abandonment Issues From Childhood - by Dr. Jonice Webb for her own website


Here's what spanking does to kids. None of it is good, doctors say. ("Discipline older children by temporarily removing favorite privileges, such as sports activities or playing with friends.") - by Maggie Fox for NBC News

The Problem with Time-Outs (Time-outs delivered in anger may have damaging effects.) - by Jessica Grogan Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Why Time-Out Is Out (Six experts explain why one of the most popular discipline tactics is also one of the most misused.) - from the Editors of Parents

5 Alternatives To Time-out That Actually Work - by the Editors of Our Little Play Nest

The Confusing Narcissistic Cycle of Abandonment and Return - by Christine Hammond, MS, LMHC, Medically reviewed by Scientific Advisory Board for Psych Central

How to Deal with a Narcissistic Mother - by Giselle Franco for CBT Psychology for Personal Development  

Campaigns against corporal punishment - Wikipedia

Corporal punishment - Wikipedia (history)

Consequences vs Punishment: What’s the Difference? - by Jim and Lynne Jackson for Connected Families 

6 Reasons Some People Hurt the Ones They Love ...and what you can do if you're on the receiving end. - by Claire Jack Ph.D., reviewed by Devon Frye for Psychology Today

Narcissistic parents identify their children as either a favourite or a scapegoat, and they pit them against each other - by Lindsay Dodgson for Insider.com 

Dealing With a Partner Who Doesn't Want Change - by Sheri Stritof, Medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Mind 

50 signs of Emotional Abuse: Meaning & Causes - by by Sylvia Smith, Approved by Paula Cookson, Registered Psychotherapist

There's no such thing as a 'mutually abusive' relationship, therapists say. With abuse, one partner is always in power. - by Julia Naftulin and Keyaira Kelly for Insider.com

When There Is No Getting Away: The Grief of Sibling Bullying - by Sarah Swenson, MA, LMHC 

Did anyone else have a golden child sibling and you were punished for their bad behaviour? - Reddit question (RaisedByNarcissists)

10 Ways to Deal with a Toxic Sibling - by Psych To Go
    
From Psychopaths to 'everyday sadists': why do humans harm the harmless? - by Simon McCarthy-Jones, Trinity College, Dublin for The University of Dublin

What It Takes to Fix a Broken Relationship (Co-rumination, moral repair, and forgiveness.) - by Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD, ABPP for Psychology Today

Its Okay to Cut Ties with Toxic Family Members (Would your life be happier, healthier, and more peaceful without certain people in it?) - by Sharon Martin, LCSW for Psych Central

Narcissistic Gaslighting: What It Is, Signs, & How Cope - by Hailey Shafir, LPCS, LCAS, CCS, Reviewed by: Benjamin Troy, MD for Choosing Therapy

Examples of Narcissist Gaslighting and Ways to Deal with It - by Chidi Mills for Overcomers Counseling

6 Common Traits of Narcissists and Gaslighters (How narcissists and gaslighters emotionally manipulate and exploit victims.) - by Preston Ni M.S.B.A., Reviewed by Lybi Ma for Psychology Today

The Narcissist and Their Children - by Supriya McKenna for The Life Doctor

The Hidden Trauma of Neglect in the Narcissistic Family (Neglect is the most common form of abuse.)
- by Julie L. Hall,  for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     Key Points:
     * Narcissists often cultivate the idea that they are “perfect” parents, but neglect is common in narcissistic families.
     * Narcissistic parents may neglect kids' emotional, physical, safety, medical, and/or educational needs.
     * Neglected children pay a high price in their physical, emotional, and psychological development.

How Narcissists Gain Emotional Control With Micro-Abandonments (Love bombing, and then sudden devaluation.) - by Erin Leonard Ph.D. for Psychology Today


3 Ways Narcissistic Parents Can Abuse Children 1. Viewing children as an extension of themselves. - by Imi Lo for Psychology Today

What Are Typical Behaviours of Narcissistic Abuse Survivors? Five things they have in common. - by Mariette Jansen Ph.D.

5 Manipulation Tactics Narcissistic Parents Use To Control Their Adult Children - by Shahida Arabi, MA for Psych Central
excerpt:
     Adult children of narcissists go through a lifetime’s worth of abuse. Narcissistic parents lack empathy, exploit their children for their own agendas, and are unlikely to seek treatment or change their destructive behaviors long-term (Kacel, Ennis, & Pereira, 2017). Their children often endure severe psychological maltreatment, as their parents employ behaviors like bullying, terrorizing, coercive control, insults, demands, and threats to keep them compliant (Spinazzola et al., 2014). This form of trauma places children of narcissists at risk for suicidality, low self-esteem, depression, self-harm, substance abuse, attachment disorders, and complex PTSD, leading to symptoms similar to children who were physically or sexually abused (Gibson, 2016; Schwartz, 2016; Spinazzola et al., 2014, Walker, 2013).
     If children of narcissists choose to remain in contact with their abusive parents, they will continue to encounter manipulation even as adults. The same tactics which were employed to control them as children can still be powerful even when they are adults – perhaps even more so because these methods cause them to regress back into childhood states of fear, shame, and terror.

Narcissistic Parents Are Literally Incapable Of Loving Their Children - by JOANNA MCCLANAHAN for The Scary Mommy website
excerpt:
     Narcissistic parents see their children’s independence as a direct threat to the control they want or need over their lives.
     Out of desperation to retain control, narcissists will try to deliberately sabotage their child’s sense of self-worth.

Tips to Heal After Growing Up with a Dismissive Mother (Dismissive parenting can impact the way you see yourself, others, and the world in general. Identifying the signs may help you heal.) - by Sandra Silva Casabianca, Medically reviewed by Cydney Ortiz, PsyD  for Psych Central

UNLOVED IN CHILDHOOD: 10 COMMON EFFECTS ON YOUR ADULT SELF - by Peg Streep for B.C. Construction Industry, Rehabilitation Plan

35 Common Gaslighting Phrases in Relationships and How To Respond, According to Therapists

(The lies that are told to create confusion.) - by Renee Hanlon for Parade Magazine

Mother-Daughter Jealousy: Why It Happens and How to Cope - by Fiona Thomas for Greatist
excerpt: 
     Broadly speaking, when a mother exhibits jealousy toward one or more of her offspring, she falls within the signifier of being a “narcissistic mother.”
     Senior therapist Sally Baker elaborates. “This is when a mother puts her own emotional needs above those of her children. It generally starts when the child is young, and growing up in a household headed by a narcissistic mother can be very damaging to a child’s development.”

Mothers Who Are Jealous of Their Daughters (A mother’s jealousy distorts a daughter’s normal development.) - by Karyl McBride Ph.D. for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     * A narcissistic mother may perceive her daughter as a threat.
     * When a mother envies and then criticizes and devalues her daughter, she diminishes the threat to her own fragile self-esteem.
     * As a daughter analyzes what her mother appears to be jealous about, she comes to feel unworthy.

Next up is a Richard Grannon video. His role is usually to help victims of narcissistic abuse, but in this video he acts the role of a narcissist who is intent on gaslighting and dominating his victim through erroneously blaming, and the reactions the victim has in being gaslighted. I'm not sure how I feel about him "acting the part of a narcissist", but this is exactly how it happens (especially for children and the vulnerable under the narcissist's "care"): Narcissist Speaking About Gaslighting

Narcissist Pays Heavy Price for Betrayal Fantasy - by Professor Sam Vaknin (You Tube) 
     Note: Sam Vaknin is a self described narcissist who educates others about Narcissistic Personality Disorder. He got a PhD in Psychology and is now a psychology professor

Why Narcissist Never Says “I am Sorry” - by Professor Sam Vaknin (You Tube)


FOUND ON FACEBOOK: