What is New?

WHAT IS NEWEST ON THIS BLOG?
August 27 New Post: Some Possible Things to Say to Narcissists (an alternative to the DEEP method)
August 7 New Post: Once Narcissists Try to Hurt You, They Don't Want to Stop. It's One of Many Reasons Why Most Survivors of Narcissistic Abuse Eventually Leave Them. (edited)
July 24 New Post: Is Blatant Favoritism of a Child by a Narcissistic Parent a Sign of Abuse? Comes With a Discussion on Scapegoating (edited for grammatical reasons)
July 20 New Post: Why "Obey Your Elders" Can Be Dangerous or Toxic
June 19 New Post: Why Do Narcissists Hate Their Scapegoat Child?
May 26 New Post: Folie à deux Among Narcissists? Or Sycophants? Or Maybe Not Either?
May 18 New Post: Home-schooled Girl Kept in a Dog Cage From 11 Years Old Among Other Types of Egregious Abuse by Mother and Stepfather, the Brenda Spencer - Branndon Mosely Case
May 11 New Post: Grief or Sadness on Mother's Day for Estranged Scapegoat Children of Narcissistic Families
April 29 New Post: Why Children Do Not Make Good Narcissistic Supply, Raising the Chances of Child Abuse (with a section on how poor listening and poor comprehension contributes to it) - new edit on 6/6
April 10 New Post: The Kimberly Sullivan Case. A Stepmother and Father Allegedly Lock Away a Boy When He Is 12, Underfeeding Him, and Home Schooling Him, and at 32 He Takes a Chance of Being Rescued by Lighting the House on Fire (includes updates since posting)
PERTINENT POST: ** Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does it Work?
PETITION: the first petition I have seen of its kind: Protection for Victims of Narcissistic Sociopath Abuse (such as the laws the UK has, and is being proposed for the USA): story here and here or sign the actual petition here
Note: After seeing my images on social media unattributed, I find it necessary to post some rules about sharing my images
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Showing posts with label forgiveness shaming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forgiveness shaming. Show all posts

Monday, October 16, 2023

Why Shaming Your Children Is Not Effective, How Narcissists Respond to Feelings of Shame, What You Can Do if You Are an Adult Child and Your Narcissistic Parents are Still Playing the Shaming Game, and How to Start Healing from a Lifetime of Parental Shaming



THIS POST IS PART OF SERIES ON SHAMING
the first post isshaming from abusers, narcissists
the second post isHow Shame is the Core Struggle of Most Narcissists. How it Gets Dumped Onto You, and How They Try to Harvest Regrets and Shame From You. Does It Work For Them?
the third post is this one
a fourth post will show how an environment of shaming, blaming, perspecticide and fawning can produce narcissism
a fifth post will follow on the connection between shame and rage in narcissism
and probably a sixth post too, which will focus more on the trauma aspects

Shaming is a type of abuse that narcissists and sociopaths use to get you to do what they want or demand, and when used in a close personal relationship, it is to get you trauma-bonded to them. 

Shaming will cause trauma in children, whether it is used directly against the child, or whether it is observed (a caretaker or parental figure using it on one child in front of another child). 

Most of what narcissists do is to serve their power and control needs through manipulating others and events. They especially do this to spouse, children, and their adult children, putting them in roles which serve their needs. When their desires aren't met in these manipulations, they generally take the road of hurting the spouse or children. 

Children experience shaming as painful, and if used throughout their childhood, they will develop trauma symptoms. People with Narcissistic Personality Disorder have many other traits and tactics which cause trauma to just about everyone, except primary psychopaths who are trauma-resistant, so with the combination of these other traits, it is highly, highly likely that most people will come out scathed if they are in any kind of close personal relationship with a narcissist. 

You may not notice the trauma symptoms right away, but they will start to appear little by little until your system is totally disabled by the symptoms. It is the reason why domestic violence counselors, psychologists who specialize in Cluster B Personality Disorders, and psychiatrists urge patients who are dealing with narcissists to either go "no contact" or "gray rock". Note that the gray rock method is not effective for scapegoat children of narcissists; however, it can be effective if your parent puts you into any other role aside from that one (the scapegoat role means that your parent is out to hurt you and blame you for things that are not your fault - most scapegoats end up without their family of origin, and no, there isn't anything you can do about it yourself ... I explain why later in the post). 

The reason why shaming is so damaging to children has been written about extensively. For one, enough shaming can "wipe out" their budding personalities, their budding interests, drives and ambitions, as well as their self esteem (self esteem is necessary in order to grow into a full functioning adult). It tends to delay emotional and psychological growth as well, and in some cases it can cause brain damage. The child is being pressured to put their attention on the parent first and foremost, and definitely in terms of what the parent wants from you (and the minefields that the parent sets up to hurt or reward a child again and again, often with no other choices than those two choices, however remember that whether you are hurt or rewarded is not your choice; it is in the parent's hands totally). This upbringing causes child neglect at the very least, as it puts more emphasis on denying the needs of the child in favor of the parent's, but most often it is not effective discipline at all. Children get the sense that they aren't liked, loved, cared about, that their existence isn't appreciated, and that they are being forced to supply all of this by other means, so they develop coping strategies that narcissists do not like, and do not care to understand. 

Here are some posts out of many as to why shaming children is not effective (note, my own writing continues after):

Why Shaming Your Kids Isn't Effective Discipline - by Jennifer Wolf and medically reviewed by Carly Snyder, MD for Very Well Family
     This article goes into what shaming does to children, and how it leads to the destruction of the relationship between parent and child. Here is an excerpt:
     ... Not only do you lose considerable relational equity, but shaming kids in public or online also tears down trust and self-esteem. At the same time, it zaps your child's motivation to engage in the very behaviors you're trying to encourage.
     ... What If You've Already Publicly Shamed Your Kids?
     Let's get real. You might be reading this and thinking, "Oh no! I've already done this." Now's your opportunity to apologize. Your kids need to see that you're human and willing to own your mistakes. So even if you're experiencing a degree of remorse that makes it extremely difficult to initiate that conversation, make it happen.

     My note: I agree that apologies go a long way, but if you have apologized for it before, and you keep doing it, your apology will only go so far in mending your relationship. Apologies are difficult for narcissists since they prefer to stick the person they have a conflict with, with "all of the fault". It is more likely to compound the rift. 
     The article also goes into words parents should avoid, how to address your child's behavior without shaming, phrases you should avoid (the following are taken from the article, although the article has explanations for each one of them: "You're such a bad girl", "You're just like your mother (or father)", "I don't know why I even bother with you", "I should ship you off to live with dad (or mom)", "I'm so tired of dealing with you"), how to influence your kids' behavior without shaming (and using these phrases instead: "I'd like you to tell me what happened", "What did that feel like for you?", "What could you have done differently?", "What will you do next time?", and "How can I help?")
     The article is worth reading and studying, especially if you've been shaming your kids, and you see absolutely no improvement from it (it is doubtful you will). 

Some other articles I found along these lines:

Think hard before shaming children - by Claire McCarthy, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing for The Harvard Medical School
excerpt:
     “Do you really want to go out looking like that?”
     “You let your teammates down during that game.”
     “Why can’t you get good grades like your sister?”
     “Why do you hang out at home all the time instead of going out like other kids?”
     “Why are you crying? It’s not that bad.”
     As we blurt out such things, we usually don’t think of them as shaming. We think of them as something that might help our child recognize a problem — and perhaps motivate them to change. We think of them as constructive criticism.

3 Dangers of Shaming (How shame leads to only bad consequences.) - by Dianne Grande Ph.D. for Psychology Today
excerpt:
     ... Research has shown that common problems linked to the shame experience include proneness to anxiety and depression. In particular, studies have shown a link between shame and social anxiety disorder as well as generalized anxiety disorder.
     Another way in which shame has been shown to harm the self is apparent in the association between shame and addiction. For some individuals who are susceptible to addictive behaviors, the addictive substance is used to numb the intense and painful negative feelings, including shame.
According to Internal Family Systems theory, the use of the substance may be the mind’s way of trying to protect itself from intensely painful emotions that might otherwise lead to suicide (Schwartz, 2020). This also may become a self-defeating cycle when the abuse of substances is in itself experienced as shameful behavior, possibly leading to more self-numbing through substance abuse.

     For narcissistic individuals, shaming them goes this way (from the article):
     ... For some individuals, the immediate sense of being flawed or of being unlovable is so painful that it cannot be acknowledged and corrected through rational self-statements. The defensive response is to put the blame on someone else. “It can’t be my fault; it must be your fault.” This pattern was explained in the recent post by Carol Lambert. Clearly, this type of reaction, if habitual, can be very destructive in relationships. ... 
     Violence and shame (from the article):
     ... Possibly the least well-known consequence of shame is its connection to violence. While most of us occasionally react to feelings of shame with either self-directed criticism or other-directed criticism (blaming), the most unstable and emotionally vulnerable among us react to feelings of shame with violence. A violent reaction may be self-directed or outwardly directed. Both are primitive and potentially deadly responses. According to research by Brene Brown, shame is highly correlated with both bullying and suicide, in addition to the consequences noted above.
     When shame leads to violence directed at others, those harmed may be close family members. They may also be complete strangers, as in the case of mass shootings that have tragically become so common in daily news. This is not to suggest that shame is the only motivating factor in mass shooting incidents; rather that it can be one of the factors. ... 
     A note here of my own: studies have shown that many mass shooters have significant narcissistic traits, and narcissism has been associated with feelings of deep shame (my post about narcissistic shame is HERE, the one on mass shootings will be published soon, I hope - or check back HERE for when it is published).
     In the meantime, here is a clue as to why narcissists can become violent if they think you might be unhappy with them or critical of their behavior: 
     This aggressive behavior in response to shame was studied by Donald Nathanson (2008) and labeled the “attack-other response.” Feelings of shame, including low self-esteem and a self-perception of being defective, are so intense that the person feels themself to be in danger. In effect, anger is used as a weapon to hurt the person(s) who triggered the feelings of worthlessness and hopelessness.
     Another note of mine on this part of the article:
     However, the triggers may be real and may not be real. "Triggers" are a PTSD word and concept. A soldier, for instance, can be triggered by a certain look on someone else's face, because the look was one that someone else used when they were being held at gunpoint. PTSD works in such a way as to bring back the memory when they see someone else with that expression. The memory can be so vivid that the PTSD'd individual may feel that they are back in the war again, and react the way he would in war: by hurting, damaging, injuring or killing, and not kidding. If the soldier was trained to kill the enemy so as not to be killed himself, this may be the reaction to the flashback, though exceptionally rare, even if his life is not in danger in any way during the moment. Hurting or killing someone in a PTSD flashback is something most of us have heard. The proliferation of guns without a lot of mental health background checks can create this sort of horrific ending too. So we would say that a soldier who is back home and having an emotional flashback based on how someone looked at him would be an unreal situation: the soldier is not in danger, even if his brain is telling him that he is. 
     What contributes to it is that PTSD keeps you in a hypervigilant state, so you have sleep disturbances: light sleep where any noise or dream can create a startle response where you wake up with your heart beating wildly, plus nightmares through the night. It can be so bad that you only get 2 -3 hours of "disturbed sleep" maximum, or you are up for three days with no sleep, and then crash on the fourth day, then up again for another three days, and so on. 
     Lack of sleep has been known to create hallucinations. So the "facial expression" of someone else can be interpreted by the soldier as "the enemy soldier is about to shoot me! I have to shoot him first!" It would be like having a "waking dream", where the PTSD'd person is going around half asleep and half awake, and in a heightened state of defense and hypervigilance against attacks to take his life. 

This is not to say that people with PTSD have violent or aggressive reactions when they get triggered, but narcissists do, especially the covert brand of narcissist and malignant narcissist. They are fighting a war all of the time against being shamed as a child, something I will be discussing further in the post. 

For most child abuse survivors, they adopted one of the trauma responses: fawn, fight, flight, freeze, or avoid (and a lot of times it is all 5 of them in varying degrees, and depending on the situations they are in). Abusive parents want, and try to mold the child to give the fawn response at all times during bullying and shaming sessions, but it is very dangerous for the child, and creates situations where the child will fawn in just about every situation with any perpetrator and with any predator (until they have a sense of their own power and that they have choices - situations where they can decide not to put up with it). Their very lives are at stake, and if we look at what fawning does to the brain, to the emotions, and how it gives them PTSD and generalized anxiety disorder, it destroys the child little by little emotionally, mentally and physically, especially if they have gotten to the point of suicidal thoughts (suicidal thoughts are extremely common for abused children who have both PTSD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder).

Besides shaming being bad for children physically, mentally, and emotionally, it's not the ethical thing to do to a child by their caretaker by a long shot. Trying to mold them to accept shaming, wipes out their ability to defend themselves adequately in any situation. 

It's kind of like they need to be re-wired when they are fawners. Many seek therapy after going through a couple of disastrous or abusive relationships where they are expected to fawn in those situations too.  Counselors in the domestic violence field, and trauma counseling are the most sought. The re-wiring is necessary to stop the fawning. In the end, it means not having abusers in your life, being able to tell who is likely to be abusive and who is not, which is one reason why, when parents are shaming, humiliating, being abusive or being unethical (like lying about you), it will end the relationship between the parent and child. 

You can't be going to trauma therapy, spending thousands of dollars on it, and getting pressured or threatened by parents to always be fawning, or endure a punishment ... You might as well flush your money down the toilet. 

In counseling with a domestic violence counselor,  you are being trained against fawning when people are disrespectful and aggressive towards you on any level. You learn the channels of self defense, including what laws, and law protection can do for you. 

It's the process of saving your life from any more predation and the continued degrading of your emotional, mental and physical health, or of being attracted to substances like alcohol or cocaine to keep from dealing with the horrible reality of the situation. It means you aren't spending your life being a reactor to abuse any more.

But first, the reactions of narcissists to shaming:

NARCISSISTS REACTIONS TO SHAMING 

When we look at narcissists, they grew up in a situation or situations where there was usually a lot of shaming going on, and usually a lot of "trash talking" about other people too. Possibly there was bullying too. And possibly there were perfection standards that were not reachable, or were weird or unattainable, or they were bullied and taught to treat the bully as a "superior being", or in ways that were hurtful, shameful or humiliating to the child. 

Growing up in an environment with a lot of shaming and trash-talking going on, even if it is not directed towards you, is traumatic for any child. For all intents and purposes, shaming is the emotional equivalent to bombs, arrows, bullets, landmines and invasions. There is rarely a good outcome to it where children either repeat what was modeled to them (i.e. where they can become another narcissist), or they become so overly fawning that they are used by other narcissists, psychopaths and human predators. 

Covert vulnerable narcissists react very similarly to being blamed and shamed as a soldier with PTSD would react, however they tend to "get rid of" (via a discard) of anyone they feel shamed by, again whether it's really happening or whether they are dealing with a PTSD trigger.

Overt grandiose narcissists react to shame as if they are only entitled to praise. Grandiose narcissists tend to grow up more on a pedestal than being bullied, where they are praised constantly, even when it isn't justified, or when they are being cruel or selfish, and where someone else in the family is constantly being disparaged. People who do this - whiten one child's motives, and blacken another child's motives - is called splitting in psychological terms. One child gets the nice Dr. Jekyll part of the parent; the other gets the mean, cruel Mr. Hyde part of the parent.  

Splitting is usually the result of a personality disorder: Borderline Personality Disorder, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and Antisocial Personality Disorder (the cluster B personality disorders). The latter two also put their children into roles most often for life (one golden child and one scapegoat, which exacerbates the splitting in the parent, makes it a stubborn trait of the disorder that is about impossible to dis-lodge by anyone, even by the most trained therapists, even when faced with many tragedies because of it). They just cannot let go of the feeling they have one child who is all good and the another that is all bad, even when presented with a lot of other views. 

It's part of the disorder.

They could even be shamed about splitting by their own parents, and they might act out the part that they love both of their children, but when they are behind closed doors, they go right back to their "all good/all bad" views of their own children. And it presents a real challenge to social workers. There aren't enough foster parents around to re-parent the narcissists' "abused, all bad children". 

And what makes a child look "all bad" to them aside from the dictates of the disorder?

A lot of reasons why scapegoat children are chosen by narcissistic parents is because one child makes them feel ashamed of something, and it can be just because the child exists, and I'm not kidding. 

Narcissists are exceptionally jealous, and if the scapegoat is naturally beautiful (which narcissistic Moms and narcissistic Dads have trouble with, for different reasons), has a lot of empathy (something narcissists lack), a lot of talents (something that narcissists can lack because they are a lot more focused on narcissistic supply, negative workplace gossip, triangulating workers against each other, and competition baiting, money and power grabs, than work, or talent), has a lot of authentic friendships (something else narcissists lack too - their friendships tend to be shams with a lot of lies and arm-twistings such as you might expect from politicians to get "group think" policies going), then it's the jealousy of the parent which keeps the child in a scapegoat role. 

Narcissists are always in competition, even with their own children. 

Both kinds of narcissists go through a shame-rage spiral when they feel criticized (i.e. shamed). But if you notice, covert vulnerable narcissists are "hypersensitive to criticism", whereas grandiose narcissists are just "sensitive to criticism". The rage they experience when feeling criticized or shamed is still off-the-charts for both, and rage, in general, over feeling shamed is part of the disorder. 

The shame-rage spiral is a post I'll be publishing soon, but I thought this post was necessary to understand that post. 

Anyway, narcissists don't deal with shame in healthy ways, and they either rage at, or rage about, or punish people who they think are trying to shame them. But first, they try to give what ever they feel ashamed about to you so that they can feel free of accountability and responsibility. If you refuse to take the blame or the shame, they rage again, and then feel shame again. The shame and rage spiral  down together, one feeding off of the other, and their ethics tend to spiral down with it all too. It is why they tend to get more abusive (escalating), not less so, and more desperate with trying to shame you by proxy once you have let them know that you can't deal with their escalations of abuse: smear campaigns and co-bullies (flying monkeys) are the most common. 

The more unethical they are, the less people want to relate to them. There is nothing to say to them any more at a certain point, which causes them more shame, and more aggression, until they are even further down in the moral dumpster. Then they play the victim once they are in a sorry enough state, which is even more immoral. Then they become ashamed of that. So this gives you a pretty good idea of how the spiral starts and where it goes. 

It has been proposed in psychology circles that covert narcissists may very well have PTSD, which would explain their incredible reactions to being criticized or of feeling shamed by others. The way they deal with their PTSD is to be aggressive unlike most of us (i.e. they develop the "fight" response as the result of feeling ashamed). But for them, they go to war against you. The more aggressive or punishing they are as a result of feeling shame, the more they are on the darker end of narcissism (more Antisocial Personality Disorder traits). And they can be dangerous because they are not in control of their emotions; they are very over-reactive, not just ultra sensitive to criticism, which explains why they rage so much, often discard relationships over it, blackmail over it, insist they dominate over it, and abuse others over it. It is referred to as "the mask falling", i.e. their false self starts disintegrating before your eyes and you are left with Hyde-like reactions and often an evil type of personality as well. 

They do make it very clear that they don't want to be criticized, ever, which makes relating to narcissists tough because they ask you to lie to them by omission if you have an issue with them. Actually, there is no winning this because they will most likely give you a double bind: "Don't lie to me or omit things you want to say to me, but don't bring up any issues you have about me either." Double binds are "no-win" situations and it is a sure recipe for more of their raging. 

So what started out to be one minor criticism of them (activation of shame), or may have only been interpreted as a criticism, they can retaliate by shaming you x 1,000. Getting as many flying monkeys as they can to shame you is one tack they take. Ostracizing or abandoning you is another and is also primarily about shaming you. Comparing you to others (in a negative way) is an extremely common add-on for narcissists too, which is supposed to seize your brain with humiliation and shame also. Then of course, they must criticize you themselves, and weigh you down with guilt for every single issue between you, even if they reframe those issues with false narratives and lies. Gaslighting is also a form of shaming: "You are SO crazy and you are so incapable because of it! In fact you should feel humiliated for being crazy and not seeing reality the way I see it!" - gaslighting is absolutely about shaming every time it is used. 

And of course, there is so much more than this that they add, and keep adding. So maybe it isn't retaliation by shaming x 1,000. Maybe it is a lifetime of shaming you in whatever ways they think will work to their benefit in trouncing you with more shame.

It can get to the point where every interaction with the parent is about that parent humiliating the child in some way. The parent insisting they are superior and the authority over a grown adult child is shaming in and of itself (which is to say that continual infantilizing via lectures are just more shaming). 

In art renditions, the scapegoat is weighed down with a heavy pack on his back (all of the things on his back are representative of the sins of the tribe), and of course, the scapegoat is sent out to the desert to die without food, water, and weighed down with all of the things the tribe finds shameful within themselves. Not being able to take shame, but dishing it out in spades would be one of the sins loaded onto the back of the scapegoat. 

And are we surprised that children walk away from this, that mental health professionals tell these patients not to take the narcissist's shaming tactics seriously (because it means that the narcissist can't take any shame themselves and they have to give it to you instead), that your symptoms are never going to be met with empathy and compassion because all that the narcissist cares about is retaliation and shaming, and that to heal you, you should go "no contact"? 

So what they can't take (criticism or activating their shame in any manner whatsoever, even a tiny amount of it), they do constantly to others and about others, without fail.

Hypocrisy and abuse always go together, fist in a glove with spiked knuckles. And hypocrisy is also the first sign you get that they are unethical. How hypocritical and unethical they go tells the tale of how disordered they are in their narcissism, especially if they go as far as sadism (which shows they probably have the malignant brand of narcissism, and have no remorse in hurting other people - these people can shame and hurt people all day long and sleep well at night). 

Now when they shame, they expect their children to absorb it like a sponge, and even insist on it, and to not act like them (use the trauma response of "fight" at all, and not to be in the least rebellious about being shamed like the way the narcissist acts). They insist that their children be docile, polite little sycophants to the narcissistic parent's out-of-control rages with a lot of impoliteness and abuse. Some narcissistic parents will even insist that their children act like sponges for other abusers too.

Most abused children do end up as fawners or as freezers. That is why they end up with crippling symptoms eventually. And what do narcissistic parents do when their child has crippling symptoms? They pile on more abuse, retaliations for not acting like a perfect sycophant (which children with PTSD and Generalized Anxiety Disorder cannot do anyway - both disorders keep them from doing so). 

THE IMPLICATIONS FOR CHILDREN
LIVING THROUGH THIS

Fawning, more than any other response, will get you terrible symptoms faster and be harder to treat the more you are absorbing shaming and abuse.

The trauma response of freezing is what happens when you get to the point where you either feel totally powerless in the situation, and/or when PTSD symptoms start to manifest. 

Now why would any parent want their child to freeze and get symptoms over them raging at them or shaming them? 

Normal healthy parents don't even get to this stage, and they don't need scapegoats or even want them the way narcissistic and alcoholic parents need and want them. 

The fact that narcissists have no empathy for their children, whether those children are fawning or freezing, is one reason why narcissists who gain ever more power can be so dangerous. Their ways of dealing with people in the world around them is to be aggressive, and to aggress upon, and to be so threatening as to get ever more fawning and freezing out of others, even though they would never do that themselves, even when they are on the world stage, such as a leader of a country.

Most narcissists on the world stage and in politics are invaders, the ultimates in aggression, as well as being triangulators and spouting false narratives. 

And that should tell you what narcissists are about in their ultimate form. 

A parent who has invaded their children and put shame and lots of unfounded unjust blame into them, that child will always manifest with trauma responses, and have trauma symptoms. In order to get those arrows out of the child, the child needs to be placed most often on a diet of "no contact" or "very low contact" with that parent, so that the arrows can be removed, and so that the slow process of healing can begin, and so that no more arrows will be shot into the child. 

Yes, it is a win-lose war for narcissists about who can come out on top in terms of who shoots the most arrows of shame. And therefor a game too, with game plans on how they are going to trash your self esteem even if you are on the sidelines or gone, trying your best to live your life in peace. They don't want you in peace; they want a war based on their terms and even knowing that they have the overwhelming advantage over you. It's the elephant fighting the ant in many of these situations, and most ants will go underground or skittle away. 

Which is to say that fawning is really unnatural, mostly only something human beings do in the animal world. Fawning is the response to kings and queens, to being a slave, to being deemed unimportant unless you are serving. 

Parenting is supposed to be about entrusting the parent to take care of children, their physical needs, intellectual needs via school, but also doing the best by them emotionally and mentally. Getting them to be fawning during times of out-of-control rages, during abuse, during being insulted a lot, during gaslighting, is not good emotional care by a long shot. It is the opposite of good care, and the fact that many fawning abused children get horrific symptoms is proof of it. 

And the other problem is that trying to get you into fawning positions takes place even when you are an adult too, even when you are 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 years of age. It never ends. And to keep you from being independent of their coercive controlling tactic of trying to force you to be submissive and fawning, they will withdraw love, make every attempt to withdraw others' love and attention too, withdraw family belonging, withdraw money and keep you out of the Will, to make every attempt to make it plain that your independence from fawning has no place in their life or the lives of other people you both know.

Yes this tactic is coercive control, and is likely to be illegal in most, if not all, states in the U.S.A. soon. It is now being reviewed in the states of New York and California. It is illegal in almost all of Western Europe. It means that narcissists will have a much more difficult time being who they are and using coercive control than they do now on the most vulnerable members of our society. 

Anyway, good parenting never means becoming a king and queen of your children where you can tell them how to serve you and your entitlements and rages, and how to be good little servants at all times to your needs for narcissistic supply.

Parentifying roles are bad for your relationship with your children as well. The way children become capable full adults able to support themselves is by pursuing their own interests. It doesn't mean you shouldn't be teaching them some practical lessons and assigning chores, but if they are balking a lot, it will not do any good to force them or threaten them, and particularly shame them (for having interests? - trying to make them take on yours? Not a good idea). 

In terms of healing, I think I've made it clear why having rageful abusive parents who can't live by their own standards in terms of shaming is pointless to try to fix or deal with any more, and why your healing should be done without their influence, comments, threats, and voice of disapproval in your head (of course they are going to disapprove of your healing - remember always that their agenda is to have you fawning always and forever, and in more refined ways, to get you to be the "fawniest of fawners" as Richard Grannon likes to say, so getting their voice out of your head any time it appears is necessary for a lot of survivors: telling the voice: "Go away!" - it does work after enough times). 

Also the hypocrisy should create some disgust in you if you have ethics yourself, and if it doesn't, then consider that you have normalized hypocrisy being okay for parents, but not for children. Also consider whether you want to change it to not being normal at all (most parents, as I've said before, do not act this way). 

The problem with fawning as a child to a parent's or caretaker's abuse, hypocrisies, shaming, rage-full-of-projection, and dangers is that a lot of fawners take fawning into other relationships with abusers too. 

There are children who do fawning like narcissists do it, who only fawn to people with more money, more status, more power than they have, but talk about them with derision behind their back, and reveal little about themselves to these higher-on-the-hierarchy people that they want to pretend they are the "fawniest of fawners" to.  

That's what seems to happen: the pretend fawners who are much more likely to become narcissists, and the real fawners who are likely to become victims of narcissistic partners and receive more abuse in marriage as well as in business. If you refuse to be more and more fawning, you will meet the same end as you did in childhood with your narcissistic parent. 

The best way to avoid narcissists is to stay away from people who are overly charming (especially those who charm people to their faces but deride them behind their backs, any Jekyll/Hyde behavior), people who are hypocrites, people who are arrogant and constantly interrupting, and anyone who displays a lack of empathy. Some good people with PTSD get to a point where they don't feel anything, not joy, not sorry, not even empathy, so as with all things, it's important not to be absolute about it, and to keep enough of a distance for up to two years. Most narcissists show their true colors before a year, with the exception of the "I-plan-attacks" kinds of narcissists who can wait for two years to show their true colors. 

However, the lack of empathy is the strongest indicator. To tell if the empathy is real or fake, you can go to THIS POST. But even there, there are no absolutes as you will read, which is why time and not rushing into anything is on your side. 

Also beware of the pro-social narcissist, which Richard Grannon explains nicely in his video, The Nice Guy Narcissist | 14 Traits. I have been around this kind of narcissist myself, and it is extremely, extremely challenging and traumatizing, to say the least. He was a nice guy narcissist with all of the traits that Richard Grannon lays out, plus all of the traits of Malignant Narcissism, plus a significant drinking problem indicative of the middle stage of alcoholism. Awful. If anyone traumatized me the most in my life, it was this individual, and it only took 4 months to happen. If I could put up the biggest warning sign for anyone, it would be this type of individual that Richard Grannon describes. As far as I can see, it means boundaries set by police. I talk further about this at the end of my post. 

Also, if this was me, I would go to domestic violence counseling with a certified domestic violence counselor, one who has experience with perpetrators and victims. Marriage/relationship counseling and mediation counseling is a disaster to go to with anyone who is highly manipulative and abusive behind closed doors, and many survivors end up in worse shape than they did before. Consider that abusive relationships are not really relationships; they are about one person trying to coercively control and hurt another person. It's never been a two-way street, and it never will be, which is why it is not really a relationship. It's one person giving into another, and it's about fawning, or being expected to fawn, to all of the shaming the narcissist does over, and over again without relief and without end. 

If it is a relationship, it is deadly, with way more dangers and symptoms than most people can handle. I do believe, over time, that it can degrade your morals and ethics too (who hasn't lied to a narcissist or a dangerous person just to keep safe, for instance? ... Who hasn't gotten really angry at them after being raged 100 times by them, and being baited?). So it's no good.  

If this was me, I would listen as much as I could to the counselor as I could, and stop listening to the perpetrator as much as I could too. Abusers are extremely manipulative during this period, and you don't want to get talked into things by them any more. In healthy relationships, luring and persuasion is not necessary; relationships feel a lot better without that. Abusive relationships mostly feel bad, and you get symptoms around them. Listen to what therapists say about cognitive dissonance in particular (which is how we put ourselves in danger over and over again), and about triangulation and gaslighting. Know that most abusers will promise things like "I will never do this again" - but they either don't mean it when they say it, or they are incapable of keeping promises (usually both). Again, they can't deal with shame in a healthy way, and most narcissists do not go to therapy to get more healthy, so breaking the promise and raging is likely to come up again if they feel at all shamed again in their life.

A list of domestic violence counselors in your area can usually be found at your local domestic violence center or domestic violence shelter. You can also get, in some instances, some limited free therapy and legal advice at either one. 

Not allowing yourself to be abused and saying no to abuse is only part of the picture because the brain has a way of storing traumatic events that make you feel that you are in continual danger, just like you were when you were with your perpetrator. And some of it is based on reality: stalking, stealing, home invasion, getting other people to attack you is part of the way that offenders keep trying to make you feel you are in danger, and keep adding to it to put you in constant turmoil. Abuse escalates always.

And for all of that, you need police investigations, recording what has happened with police, and police protection, plus a good home security system with cameras, preferably cameras from different kinds of manufacturers (even police will tell you that you should do this). 

You need to do what you can do to keep from being attacked again, and police have the best advice for that.  

Remember that narcissists do everything they can not to be shamed even one more time by you, and so you have the right to protect yourself from the myriad and continued onslaught of attacks and deep betrayals they keep giving you (retaliations x 1,000). They usually want separation from you for not fawning. You can have separation from them, including stringent boundaries to keep safe from attacks on all the tactics and people they use for these ends (and I bet you'll get attacks coming from all kinds of directions - and some of them break the law to attack you, especially the not-too-brilliant people with criminal mindsets). 

PTSD, hypervigilance, a rapid heartbeat, and all of the symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder are normal responses and normal symptoms when you are enduring people attacking you from all the angles narcissists and sociopaths love to use. 

However, if you have all of your protections in place and your home and life is peaceful (at last!), and you still feel a lot of symptoms (PTSD and/or Generalized Anxiety Disorder), and you haven't experienced any danger from attackers for several years, if this was me, and I could afford it, I would also go to a trauma therapist.  

In trauma therapy, you learn that your trauma symptoms are explainable by the events you lived, and how the brain functions in keeping those trauma experiences alive and practically branded into your brain (like a never-ending, if somewhat healed, wound, or nightmare) in your psyche. Vagus Nerve exercises and EMDR are usually highly effective, especially if your PTSD and/or your Generalized Anxiety Disorder are through the roof. How effective they are has to do with how traumatized you are, how bad your PTSD or Generalized Anxiety Disorder is, whether you have disassociation experiences, whether you have substance addictions (common for trauma patients), or whether you have other kinds of addictions not related to substances, and your usual coping mechanisms for dealing with trauma. And I bet anything that hypervigilance, sleep disturbances and nightmares are still part of the picture and the hardest to resolve. 

A lot of the approach of trauma therapy is not focused on what you did (not "Why did you stay in an abusive relationship so long and even go back? Don't you know that abusive relationships escalate? Why would you do something so hair-brained?", but the opposite). The approach is: "What did you live through?" This is even the approach to alcoholism. They aren't going to say, "How could you go to rehab 38 times, spend your parent's money to do so, and not come out with good results?" In fact, all kinds of therapists, not just trauma therapists, have learned that this doesn't work. It increases the shaming. Even alcoholism is treated as: "What kind of environment did you grow up in?" And studies have shown that most alcoholics grow up in environments that are traumatic. There is a direct correlation between alcoholism and trauma, and alcoholism and child abuse environments (another link and another link), even if they weren't the ones who were bullied. 

And I'm pretty sure a number of you will be asking if narcissism is one of those "What have you lived through?" conditions too? Yes. But you cannot treat your attackers. Even showing them empathy opens up a lot of lines for you to be attacked by them again (yes, they even exploit your empathy for continued attacks). The people that they should be going to are therapists - someone who specializes in treating Cluster B Personality Disorders, or who specializes in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, anger management classes, and possibly Schema Therapy (it sometimes helps them), plus a host of other therapies if needed including Dialectic Behavior Therapy and Trauma Therapy.

But it is not for you to suggest or to be at all involved unless you can do a family-wide intervention (a hard thing to pull off with narcissists especially - they are more likely to walk out and say they never liked any of you anyway). Be aware that most of them don't go to therapy because they are happy blaming and dumping all of their problems on to whoever they have adopted as their scapegoats (usually one of their children, an ex, a sibling, and one of the workers in their place of employment).

If they think it is easier for them to always believe someone else is at fault for everything they do that causes them to be angry, rageful, discarding, bullying, envious, depressed and attacking, they reason they don't need any therapy.

If they believe they can talk you into their anger, rages, discards, bullying, competitiveness, depression, broken promises, instability, inability to feel empathy, and attacking fests are always your fault, which they really do believe they can talk you into, then they feel they don't need therapy either. 

They do find out eventually that this won't work, but in the meantime, they live in a fantasy world about this. 

Either way, this is not of your concern. Your concern is to get healthy, to address all of the debilitating symptoms, to figure out who you are and discover all of your talents outside of the narcissists shadow, and to find a peaceful way forward. PTSD does and can get worse, so it is critical to re-wire and get on a healing path. 

For a lot of survivors of narcissistic manipulations, therapy is a god-send. 

As far as a new social group after you go no-contact or the narcissistic parent has discarded you, which many survivors find they want and need, fellow survivors and obvious no-B.S. empaths are also a god-send. For me personally, this is when my life felt like it was being put back together, and put back together in a way that was better than before. I noticed that a lot of my new relationships were with people who were a lot like me, in dress, in hair, in what they lived through, what their interests were (and the arts tended to dominate). A lot of survivors of narcissistic abuse are artists: what a great find and revelation!

I noticed, most of all, that my sleep improved, and it was always disturbed, even as far back as when I was a three year old child living in my first home, an apartment building. I had constant nightmares about being picked at and slowly eaten alive by crows more than once. I remember the nightmares more than I remember specific events, though I do remember how the apartment was laid out, that the stairs were in the center of the building, that there were four apartments in our unit, that our bathroom was long and skinny with the sink closest to the door, that clothes were hung out on a line outside my bedroom window, and that my parents' friends with a girl near my age lived downstairs on the opposite side of the building (kitty corner, via length, not width). 

My nightmares increased afterwards in our new home, to the point where it was often impossible to sleep except in the beginning hours. 

It finally told me what I needed to know: "what I lived through".

Every symptom that I had could be attributed to what I lived through, which didn't diminish the symptoms right away, but at least I knew where they came from and I could name them, and categorize them, and file them away, and not be confused or think about them as much, which, in and of itself, helped in diminishing them (except when they were needed - which I explain in the next chapter). 

For instance, I found that when I was around narcissists who weren't criminals, I always experienced headaches, and sometimes mini flashes of dizziness. Narcissists can be fun, and they can have an acerbic wit, and I did have fun sometimes when I was with them on a jaunt, but I would always come home with a headache, exhaustion, feeling unheard or silenced in one way or another, and those flashes of dizziness. It wasn't a good feeling, no matter how much I laughed, no matter how light-hearted I was, no matter how much I believed I had a good time. 

Around the criminal types of narcissists, I experienced high anxiety and a feeling that my head was buzzing (as if nerves could "buzz" in your head like bees). 

I tend to stay away from people now who give me headaches or where I get that "buzz" anxiety feeling. And usually those symptoms are dead-on accurate in terms of who I find they eventually are. I will not be pushed into relating to people I don't want to relate to either. Because my own experiences and system are way better detectors than anyone else. Most of us are not good detectors of toxicity and toxic people, especially people who are enchanted with any narcissist, and I have been led astray too by all kinds of do-gooders as well as people who liked seeing me being in traumatic situations, but now I have to rely on symptoms to clue me in. I have also tested some flying monkeys of narcissists' I know (ones who I have some respect for) just to see where their detection abilities are: not so good. It convinces me even more that I need to do this on my own terms. 

So symptoms are not always a bad thing: they are our warning systems not to get too close, to keep our guard up, and definitely not to fawn. 

There are other things I have done to heal, and to be on a healing journey in general, and I may share some of those anecdotes in the future. But the ones I have listed here are the major ones.  

I would say that finding out who you are without narcissists' constant comments and shaming is one of the first steps to living a better life. I'd bet you'd find you are a kinder person than you ever thought (narcissists have an agenda to always paint you as unkind, selfish and unhinged which you can't find out is untrue unless you separate from them completely, even when you have other people in your life constantly countering what the narcissist says, which, in my case, I did have - my father, my spouse, and other people who knew me well ... yup, I still wondered whether narcissists were telling the truth about me, and now I don't). You can find you are way more sane and able than the narcissist painted you as too (again, most narcissists will paint you as insane so that you put your decision-making in their hands and so that they can continue their power, control and isolating agendas). And you can find that you are way more talented and ambitious than you thought you were too (narcissists keep trying to make you feel too inept mentally, emotionally and physically to reach career and lifestyle goals). - As so many psychologists say, "Don't take what they have to say personally; take it as their disorder speaking through them." 

Finding out who you are and what you are capable of is one of the joys in life, and if that is being strung up and hobbled, break the chains of the trauma bond to experience what life truly has to offer. 

Most of all, realize what shaming does to children, and don't pass it down to the next generation.  

Shaming Children Is Emotionally Abusive (Children respect those who respect them.) - by Karyl McBride Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Parental Shaming vs. Encouragement (What feels better, works better.) - by Steven Stosny, Ph.D.
excerpt:
     ... Encouragement tends to evoke cooperation, almost as consistently as shaming evokes resistance. ... 

How to Avoid Shaming Your Child – And Keep Strong, Loving Boundaries - by Karen Young, psychologist, for Hey Sigmund

Shaming Children Leaves Scars on the Brain that Adversely Affect Emotional Health - by Jennifer Fraser, PhD. for Emotional Intelligence Magazine

Why Shaming Your Children Doesn’t Change Their Behavior - by Rachel Tomlinson, Registered Psychologist for Baby Chick
excerpt:
     Shaming kids is not a great discipline tool. It can be easy to slip into shaming comments out of frustration. You want to try and get some kind of response or reaction from your child. Or perhaps it was the way you were parented. You might say things like:
     “You’re such a liar. I can’t believe a word that comes out of your mouth.”
     “Why are you crying? It’s not that bad!”
     “All you do is whine and complain. You’re being annoying.”

When Parents Publicly Shame Their Kids - by Susanna Schrobsdorff for Time Magazine 
excerpt:
     The story was so disturbing, it instantly became the latest parable of punishment in the digital age. A dad in Tacoma, Wash., filmed his 13-year-old daughter with her long hair cut off and piled on the floor around her. She was being punished for sending a boy a racy photo. “Man, you lost all that beautiful hair,” says his voice in the background. “Was it worth it?”
     That video went viral–especially after news spread that within days, she had jumped to her death from a highway overpass. Outraged YouTube viewers called for the father to be criminally prosecuted. There were headlines all around the world: Teen commits suicide following father’s public shaming.

The Real Problem With Publicly Shaming Your Kids - by Elizabeth Flora Ross for Yahoo News
excerpt:
     ... Dr. Shefali Tsaberry, author, speaker and clinical psychologist, is not comfortable with the shaming of children in any manner for any reason. She describes shame as toxic. “[Shame] creates disconnection, a betrayal of trust. Shaming never works. Connection is the only way.”
     Katie Hurley, LCSW and author of “The Happy Kid Handbook” agrees.
     “Parenting has never been easy, and parents today are navigating new territory,” Hurley says. “It’s difficult to say what triggers one parent to take to the Internet to shame a child for‘misbehavior’ while another confronts the issue in the safety of the home, but there does appear to be a combination of anger and control beneath the surface of these posts.”
     Children of all ages make mistakes. Trial and error is the business of growing up, and they can’t get it right every single time. Shaming them, online or just in person, causes significant damage to the parent-child relationship. The parent-child relationship should focus on unconditional love and trust.

What’s the Best Way to Discipline My Child? - HealthyChildren.org, The American Academy of Pediatrics
excerpt:
     As a parent, one of your jobs to teach your child to behave. It's a job that takes time and patience. But, it helps to learn the effective and healthy discipline strategies.
     Here are some tips from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) on the best ways to help your child learn acceptable behavior as they grow. ... 
     ... Verbal abuse: How words hurt. Yelling at children and using words to cause emotional pain or shame also has been found to be ineffective and harmful. Harsh verbal discipline, even by parents who are otherwise warm and loving, can lead to more misbehavior and mental health problems in children. Research shows that harsh verbal discipline, which becomes more common as children get older, may lead to more behavior problems and symptoms of depression in teens. ... 

Such a Shame: A Consideration of Shame and Shaming Mechanisms in Families - U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
excerpt:
     This paper focuses on shame in the family context and how the shaming of children is a core component of child abuse and its effects.
     ... Although shaming by a parent toward a child is important for the development of certain positive qualities in a child, toxic shaming occurs when it is performed for the benefit of the parent rather than the child. This occurs when the parent uses shaming toward the child as a regulator of self-esteem in the parent, as a means of managing past suffering, and as a means of controlling the child. The key feature of excessive shaming is emphasis on the failure of the child in the eyes of the parent, accompanied by turning away and conditional love. The most severe consequences of shaming are self-attack, the disowning of the self, and the splitting of the self. ...
     
Child Shaming: How We’re Ruining Our Own Children’s Future - by Swati Reddy for K8 School 

Hidden Damage: Understanding the Toxicity of Shaming Children - from the administrators of Empathetic Parenting Counseling 

"Good" Children - at What Price? (The Secret Cost of Shame) - by Robin Grille and Beth Macgregor for The Natural Child Project (article discusses research on the subject)

Child Shaming Quotes - Google

Break the Shaming Cycle - by Dena Landing for Esme
excerpt:
     ... Shaming can take the form of telling your child that he’s careless because he knocked over a chair, associating a onetime action with a negative character trait. Parents engage in shaming in an attempt to control their children’s behavior, but it can have lifelong negative consequences.
     Why is shaming so damaging?
     Shaming your child creates an environment in which she feels like she can never make a mistake. Because children naturally want to avoid being shamed again, they begin to fear ever doing anything wrong, which could lead them to avoid challenges or new situations.
...

Raising Resilient Kids in a Fat Shaming World - by Judith Matz, LCSW for NationalEatingDisorders.org

Why body shaming children is a strict NO. Read about the adverse physical and mental health consequences (Fat-shaming children and adolescents is becoming a common phenomenon. Worryingly, it can lead to serious psychological consequences. Read on to find out why) - by Team Parent Circle for Parent Circle

Shaming Kids: Good Parenting or Not? - by Ronit Baras for Family Matters, Practical Parenting Guide
excerpt:
     ... Shaming kids is a form of bullying
     Shaming kids is an act of bullying. Bullying is picking on someone else’s weakness. This is what parents are doing by shaming children. They pick on their kids’ greatest weaknesses (e.g. the fear of being ridiculed, or the fear of being disrespected). ... 
     ... The fear of punishment can only go so far
The fear of punishment can only go so far. Nobody misbehaves for the sole purpose of misbehaving. Unaddressed, the real reason for their behavior will make them do it again. For example, no person on earth has stopped speeding after being caught speeding once, because the need to speed has not changed!
     The fear of pain can only last so long. ... 

Shaming Children So Parents Will Pay the School Lunch Bill - by Bettina Elias Siegel for The New York Times 
excerpt:
     ... On the first day of seventh grade last fall, Caitlin Dolan lined up for lunch at her school in Canonsburg, Pa. But when the cashier discovered she had an unpaid food bill from last year, the tray of pizza, cucumber slices, an apple and chocolate milk was thrown in the trash.
     “I was so embarrassed,” said Caitlin, who said other students had stared. “It’s really weird being denied food in front of everyone. They all talk about you.”
     Caitlin’s mother, Merinda Durila, said that her daughter qualified for free lunch, but that a paperwork mix-up had created an outstanding balance. Ms. Durila said her child had come home in tears after being humiliated in front of her friends.
     Holding children publicly accountable for unpaid school lunch bills — by throwing away their food, providing a less desirable alternative lunch or branding them with markers — is often referred to as “lunch shaming.” ... 

10 Reasons Why We Need To Stop Public Shaming Of Kids
- by Fiona Peacock for BellyBelly
excerpt:
     ... Your child needs to be able to trust you, to know that you love her unconditionally, and to know that she can come to you with any problem for help. By shaming your child, you’re burning that bridge. Your child simply isn’t going to seek you out for help, support and guidance again for fear or publicly humiliated. ...

Reduce Shame: 21 Things Your Child Needs To Hear (Is your child stuck in the “I’m a bad kid” cycle? Caregivers can reduce the effects of shame, using these phrases to remind your child that they are seen, known, and loved.) - by Nicole Scwartz, LMFT, for Imperfect Families

Why Shaming Kids For Bad Behavior Doesn’t Work - by Tricia Gross for ABC News, San Diego
     ... Researchers have found that chastising, belittling and punishing children to make them feel bad — shaming them, in other words — might do more harm than good.
     The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has a strong stance on the benefits of effective discipline, which refers to respectful discipline applied in a consistent, firm, and fair way.
     AAP research shows that yelling at or shaming children is minimally effective in the short-term and ineffective in the long-term. The organization states that doing so puts children at a higher risk of adverse behavioral, cognitive, psycho-social and emotional outcomes.
     Similarly, Claire McCarthy, MD, senior faculty editor of Harvard Health Publishing, states that there is a fine line between criticizing and shaming a child. McCarthy notes that shaming kids can cause issues with self-esteem. They might come to believe there is something inherently wrong with who they are or that they are not capable of changing.
...

Why Shaming Kids Doesn’t Work Long-Term - by Heidi Rogers for HeidiRogers.com

Stop Shaming Kids - Sign here! - by Lori Petro, Amy Bryant, & Robbyn Peters Bennett #StopShaming Kids Petition HERE
From the site:
     Child maltreatment constitutes all forms of physical and emotional ill-treatment, sexual abuse, neglect, or exploitation resulting in harm to the child’s health, survival, development, or dignity. Clearly, publicly shaming a minor is an abuse of power and a form of child maltreatment. To protect the basic human rights of children, we ask that Facebook and other social media sites establish parameters which prohibit public shaming of minors via photo/video and allow users to flag “suspected child maltreatment,” and/or “bullying of a minor.” Please help us make Facebook and other social media sites safe for our children.

The Toxic Effects of Shaming Children - by Rebecca Eanes for Creative Child

Are You Teaching Your Kids To Body-shame? - by Ashley Brantley for bcbstnews (News Center of Tennessee)

How To Reduce Your Child's Exposure To Shame - by Rebecca Eanes for Generation Mindful
excerpt:
     Shame eats away at a child’s core emotional need to feel loved and connected, leaving them feeling small, unworthy, flawed, and unacceptable. As we learn to heal our shame wounds, we give our children chances for a healthy and happy emotional life. Here are 3 shame-free discipline tactics. ...

Are you food shaming your child? It’s time to stop! - by Ginny Jones for More-Love.org

10 Ways You're Accidentally Shaming Your Toddler - by Dina Leygerman for Romper.com
excerpt: 
     Toddlers are incredibly complicated humans. After the first year of remarkable milestones, they start growing into their own personalities and focusing on mastering specific capabilities. Toddlerhood is also the time when kids start testing boundaries and learn the power of their actions and words. While it can be exciting for both parents and kids, it can also be frustrating and difficult for both. It’s no wonder so many of us parents don't realize we are shaming our toddlers. In the end, it seems, those of us in charge of toddlers must walk the thin line between teachable moments and losing all of our damn self-control. ... 

For an opposite view on all of this, here is this article:  Danielle Smith: Public shaming of children is sometimes justifiable - by Danielle Smith for Global News 
excerpt:
     A Windsor, Ont. mother who took to social media to publicly shame her misbehaving kids got more than she bargained for.
     She didn’t expect the posting to go viral or for people to misunderstand her intentions. Her post showed a picture of her kids walking seven kilometers and  carrying a sign that said, “being bad and rude to our bus driver, mom is making us walk.”
     She said she had them carry a sign because she lives in the kind of community where people would stop to offer a ride and she wanted her boys to learn a lesson. It went viral, with 28,000 people reposting the image and giving it a thumbs up. But, she also received death threats and was reported to Children’s Services. ...

Another opposing view from most of the experts listed above: What is the Deal With Shaming Parents in Our Society? - by Mercedes Samudio, Shame-Proof Parenting and EMDR for Parents for Shame Proof Parenting
excerpt:
     ... To all the parents and families who chose to hit, yell, or discipline their children the best way they know how this video is for you. ...

FOUND ON FACEBOOK




Tuesday, February 28, 2023

Should you Forgive Abusive People (with a Discussion on Narcissistic Abuse, Forgiveness Shaming, and a personal journey)



(edited on 3/4/23 over grammatical errors) 

First of all, what is "forgiveness shaming"?

It is shaming a victim of abuse or crime because they did not forgive the abuser or criminal. Shahida Arabi, a respected writer on subjects about abuse has one of the best articles I have read on forgiveness shaming. Here are a few:

1. Should We ‘Forgive’ Our Abusers? (2016 article)
2. 7 Spiritual Ideas That Enable Abuse and Shame the Victim (2017 article)
3. 5 Victim-Shaming Myths That Harm Abuse and Trauma Survivors and Encourage Spiritual Bypassing (2019)
the five include (from her article): 
* "MYTH #1: You are not a victim! Get out of a victim mindset."
* "MYTH #2: You must forgive an abuser in order to heal. Don’t be bitter or angry."
* "MYTH # 3: Abusers just need love, understanding and more hugs."
* "MYTH # 4: What about the abuser? They had it so rough! We are all interconnected, so we have to help each other."
* "MYTH #5: Everything is a mirror. Send positive energy to this person and situation and it will be reflected back to you!"
     Note: the reasons that these are all myths is written about in the same article. Some psychologists have done enough research into how these attitudes effect perpetrators (not much, and not in a good way, and not in a way that will keep a victim safe from more abuse).
     The myths are worth reading. The fact is that perpetrators are often hard wired from childhood to have attitudes and beliefs about certain people, and they most often have the fixed attitude that abuse, domination and control of certain types of people are warranted.
     How abuse and trauma recovery works is that when the pressure is relieved to forgive an abuser, the victim can relax enough to start to heal. 

related: “What Abuse Survivors Don’t Know: 10 Life-Changing Truths” - from Surviving Therapist Abuse
and "How To Forgive Yourself For Something You Shouldn’t Have To Forgive Yourself For: Healing Self-Blame After Abuse And Assault" - from the Thought Catalog

In another post I will discuss why complex trauma survivors are often encouraged NOT to forgive their abusers, and how forgiveness can negatively impact trauma therapy.  

Anyway, hopefully, you can see right away what the problem is when it comes to pressuring a victim into forgiving abusers. It's just another way to shame victims for what they endured and for what they are continuing to endure in the way of trauma, trauma symptoms, of losing a piece of their lives, or still being threatened and/or stalked by their abusers. 

It's also a form of telling victims what to do, what to think and what to feel, something their abusers do plenty of, sometimes multiple times a day with rage in their hearts, so to hear how they should be relating to someone who hurt them, is just so triggering and short-sighted. 

The other thing it does is to normalize abuse in society. If abuse is always forgivable then it will always be acceptable to some degree. Some folks want it to be acceptable because they are abusive themselves, and if they can get away with abuse by putting fault on their victims for not being forgiving, then they can keep doing it. 

I mean, really; why is there so much focus on victims and how they behave? And how much they are forgiving, or not forgiving, as if that should be the main focus in any violent or abusive situation.

So here is where this attitude probably started:  it is done to make sure that people keep their marriage vows? To make sure the family unit stays together as a whole? But if there is a person being abused in either of these situations, the unity is a sham: there is no empathy inside it and most victims can't starve themselves of empathy for the agenda of getting along with an abuser forever. In other words, the unit isn't really a unit, though it may look like one from outside to strangers. And that's the issue: it becomes about presenting a false image to outsiders which is disgusting to any member enduring abuse, and to many in the society at large once they find out what is really going on. 

And this is one reason why scapegoating of victims happen. They discard the victim for complaining and making the rest of the family members and the family unit "look bad". To the victim they say, "You are at fault for not forgiving (insert name here - the abuser)!" And a lot of victims are rejected for not forgiving the family abuser. To the outside they tell others that their victim is crazy, unstable, evil, addicted, a whore, and abusive, or anything they want to say that vilifies the victim instead of vilifying the problem of abuse.

It is often why scapegoats are no longer part of the family. Normalizing abuse inside the family is somehow easier than throwing a victim away. Many of these "normalize the abuse" type families even try to falsify evidence or characteristics, or give one side of a story to make the victim look bad. The whole family can be arm-twisted to go along with false narratives, and they do try hard. 

All of this is highly unethical and immoral, and the one thing that victims can keep track of is how far certain family members go, and are willing to go, in the ethics and morality department to blame and disparage victims of abuse. In my mind that should be the deciding factor in whether victims should be part of the family, or forgive the abuser(s) or leave the family behind.   

While it is true that victims get angry about the way they are treated, the family tries to use the victim's reactions to abuse to paint the victim as a perpetrator of abuse just because the victim got angry. So that means there is pressure on the victim to take the abuse lying down, and not to say a word about it. Highly unethical too.

It is hard to just leave without saying things like "But you don't understand!", "No, I didn't do that!", "No, that act belongs to so-and-so (the abuser)!" 

Or let us say that one parent is trying to protect a child from the abuse of the other parent. The parent who is trying to force the child into forgiving, divorces the spouse (the protector) so that the child is forced to forgive the family abuser. What this means is that one member is willing to divorce over "forgiveness shaming". 

Or an older brother is trying to protect his younger sister from abuse in the family. Because forgiveness is expected of the victim, they punish him for trying to protect the scapegoat by ostracizing him from the family. They may even try to cover the reason for the ostracism and "act the part" that they are "super nice to the victim after all" by being as kind as they think they have to be for awhile. But abuse tends to be cyclical, going from a honeymoon period, to devaluing the victim, to rage and abuse of the victim. This is highly immoral too.

Eventually, most families realize their scapegoat isn't so fawning any more when the scapegoat gets enough of these cycles, which most scapegoats do get exhausted from, and also find themselves sick and unable to cope.

Just about any other situation in life is preferable to being stuck in a cycle of abuse, so scapegoats start dreaming of a way to escape. So then the scapegoat is confiding in others (because after all, most people have empathy even if the family does not), which makes the family really uncomfortable. "Oh, no! We are being exposed for who we are! We must STOP this behavior in our scapegoat before we are shamed by the world! What will our friends think of us!? Maybe other family members will think badly of us and not support us or visit us if they think we are bad people!" So then they must punish the victim and throw them out of the family. As you can see, they keep going lower and lower in the ethics department just to save their sorry asses and to keep up an image that they are upstanding people ...  Maybe they go to church as a way to help with their image (other people won't suspect church-going people to be abusive, will they?) ... Or they flaunt their successes and money ... ("Other people won't suspect successful wealthy people are abusive, will they?" Actually, yes. Abuse tends to happen most in poor families and in wealthy families). Or perhaps they are college professors ("People don't expect college professors to be unethical, do they? Well, we're so smart, we can talk our way out of anything!"). Or maybe they are politicians ("People don't suspect politicians because we are working on behalf of other people, our constituents, day in and day out! No one would ever suspect a politician of being abusive and of trying to cover anything up!"). Or they just try to grab any old "holier-than-thou" role that looks convenient in terms of keeping shame at bay. 

These kinds of situations are very common in abusive narcissistic families. Image comes first, always. End of story.     

And this is also an ignorant and unenlightened way to handle abuse in a family. Most families do not do that. They know a victim and a perpetrator should not be in the same room, the same house, the same vicinity. They know they have to separate them. 

Not alcoholic families. And definitely not narcissistic families. 

While they may not need the scapegoated family member to be a part of the family, they are probably paranoid enough to keep false narratives circulating about the scapegoat. If they feel their image might be getting a hit, they graduate to manufacturing evermore false narratives, especially if they see a scapegoat in a role they don't want or like, that is making them feel uncomfortable (note: most families who scapegoat want their scapegoats suffering, being addicted, getting in trouble with the law, and becoming homeless can be on that list too for what they want ... and why do they want it? So they will not be seen as "at fault"). Then they try to tell outsiders that their scapegoat is trying to manufacture things about them instead (the DARVO tactic). What they really want is to keep the scapegoat in a perpetual role of being abused and blamed within the family secrecies and delegate certain family members to hide the evidence and to scheme more ways to keep the shame at bay.

Again, the more they have to manufacture, the more unethical they are.  

I personally think it is very unhealthy for scapegoats to give into the pressure of forgiving family abusers. If you forgive an abuser, the abuse against the victim usually escalates. It doesn't just go away because that's the nature of abuse: it always escalates. This is especially true when family members truly believe they are not accountable at all for the scapegoat's fate, which most likely they won't be, even if the scapegoat is murdered by one of their own, or dies by suicide. If they are always going in the direction of false narratives and false gossip, there is your proof that they would rather make their scapegoat out to be a monster instead of risking their own image.

Once they start going down the rabbit hole of escalating immoral behavior, they usually don't stop. And you can see from the paragraphs above that they get much worse. They get to a point where they can't stop: being immoral is a run-away train where they have to keep it up just because they have told so many lies and it becomes a situation where they have to live in their own lies (like living in their own sh*t). "Got an image problem? Just p##p out some more sh*t about the victim."   

Anyway, let's get real here as to why it is so hard to get on this forgiveness path that other people want for us or for themselves, especially when there is still a significant amount of danger for that member, or partner, and especially as it can make victims vulnerable to more abuse. I hope I can explain why further in the post.  

Let's just say that you are living in Ukraine in the current Russia-Ukraine war. Some atrocities have happened to your family members; your house has been bombed and is uninhabitable; in the process, your beloved cats died and you lost all of your worldly possessions except for a few items you stored in a water-tight safe underground, and you are now trying to flee to Kiev to live with a sister. The overwhelming emotions you are most likely to feel are anger, trauma, and fear. Right now you probably hate the Russians for what they have done to your life and to your entire country.

It's easy for someone in another country to say, "You need to forgive the Russians for what they've done to you!"  And some people who might insist on you making the first gesture of forgiveness, rather than the perpetrator making the first move of being accountable for the war they committed, might even say things like, "Maybe Ukraine just needs to give away some land to Russia to stop the violence." 

What?! That's just not realistic because once you've given invaders a prize for their aggression, they are going to keep invading. Escalation of abuse, of atrocities, of invasiveness, of bombing citizens is actually more likely to happen than that it will stop (unless they get a new leader or there is no army left). Hopefully my underlined links to the post on escalation will help you see that it is more likely than less likely.  

And just as aggressive nations keep pushing forward with their aggressions, so too does a domestic abuse offender or domestic violence offender, usually. They overwhelmingly do not give up on trying to hurt their victims. If anything, they want to prove to themselves that they can keep hurting their victims, over and over again, and that they have the power to keep making their victims absorb it. Many of them are making plans to have even more control over their victims than they had before. If it seems too gnarly for them to try to keep up their aggressive behavior (like too much danger in being caught), they search for new victims instead, people who don't have as much inner strength, confidence, and intelligence to discern what the perpetrator's main motivations are. 

What is more likely to happen is that Ukrainian citizens will probably avoid Russians (unless they are in the army with full combat gear) just as a domestic violence victims will eventually try to avoid a domestic violence perpetrator. 

Not only that, but relationships will switch and change. Ukrainians are pretty likely not to want to see their Russian relatives. Likewise, limited contact with the closest people to the perpetrator will probably be a part of what happens to victims of domestic violence as well. 

While it may be a tenet of Christianity to forgive all kinds of criminals, murderers, aggressors, sex offenders and invasive types of individuals, it doesn't feel all that natural to forgive when you are in the middle of it, does it? So maybe the founders of Christianity meant that forgiveness can come at any time, when the perpetrator has died, or when the Russians have retreated, or maybe even for generations down the road. 

We know Jesus forgave the people who tortured him because "they know not what they do."

In other words, his torturers had a lot of blind spots. Most abusive people have an incredible number of  blind spots, even if they willingly do. For instance: they think they know their victims, but if you talk to survivors, most of the abusers either did not spend enough time with them to get to know them, or tried to impose their negative views about them constantly. It's one thing to criticize a person a few times over your life, but the constant criticism usually points to abuse and abusers, and to narcissism especially. This is especially true if they can't handle any criticism themselves. 

Most of them do not know their victims, especially the inner strength of their victims. Most of them make huge blunders on how victims will react to abuse, as one example. That is because they are too focused on being torturers or robbers or what ever crime or unethical act they are trying to commit to see or care what is really happening in the situation they are in, or who their victims really are - most have wild fantasies about their victims; that is why they practice perspecticide so much. If they had empathy, they'd be able to tell more of who their victims were, but if they had empathy, they wouldn't be able to torture either. This is their double-bind: no empathy, no knowledge, but want to torture anyway, but they want enough knowledge to understand what the outcome will be for them, which will put them in the position of having to have empathy to get to the bottom of what their victims are about, which will make them feel and understand the pain of their victims way too much for their comfort (they are dying of shame inside for adding to the victim's pain), and they can't have that much of an understanding, so they go back to stabbing at their victims in the dark again. ... (that sentence is kind of like a logic question on a law school entrance exam - hope you can follow it). 

In other words, they live in the squalor of their own unethical behaviors, the poverty of not having the "authentic" respect and grandiosity that they crave (they have to create more lies and postures to get there, they think). In discarding victims, they discard their own ethics and morality as well. Which of course, will create more shame in them, and down they go into a more paranoid mindset, needing to seek other sources of narcissistic supply or another victim, which creates a more criminal mindset, totally obsessed with revenge fantasies, which when realized will create even more shame about their ethics, more paranoia, more need to hide many, many more dirty deeds, down, down, down. 

When scapegoats can see that, it actually boosts their healing journey. They stop thinking about their abusers altogether because they are immoral people, especially if they can be outside of the terrible abusive family matrix. When the abuser(s) show no empathy and have a criminal mindset it does not exactly motivate a victim to want to go back.   

I do think many victims eventually come to a place of contentment, joy and happiness in their lives, but I don't think forgiving is part of that equation unless you are in a good part of your life where you are healed and not weighed down by trauma symptoms. You can let me know in the comments section if you feel this way too.

I think victims actually experience more "radical acceptance" than forgiveness, which I explain in the next chapter in more detail. Radical acceptance is like forgiveness in that it sets you free, but it doesn't leave you as vulnerable to continued abuse as "forgiving". From everything I have gleaned from forums, when forgiveness is pushed upon survivors by oneself or others it can create more trauma, more feelings of helplessness, and more feelings of grief and isolation. Victims need to get over their perpetrators in their own time, and the acceleration of the healing process comes from not having to forgive their perpetrators until they are ready to do so, if ever. In other words, it should come naturally, because like any emotion, it is either genuinely felt or not. It cannot be pushed or expected.  And if it is expected, ask the question why. Is it because they want to get off the hook when they abuse? Is it because they want to control you and how you react? Is it because they have to believe in a certain dogma, and if you aren't aligned in your thinking with theirs, they can't accept it?

Even then, when people expect victims to forgive their abusers, many people think the victim should take the abuser back. It is defeating the purpose of healing from them in the first place. Abusive people trigger survivors. It just sends the survivor back into traumatic reactions they have to recover from again. So forgiving does not mean taking an abuser back into your life.

Trying to forget they were abused is even worse in terms of healing. Repressing memories has terrible effects on the mind. This is even true when the only thing abusers can do is to keep spiraling down and out of control into more lies, more false narratives, more crimes, more hiding their dirty deeds, more revenge fantasies, more and more unethical behavior, more desires to hurt others, It is just not wise to stuff memories and compartmentalize them. You'll usually have lots of nightmares and lack sleep instead.

Once an abuser hurts you, that's who they are: they hurt other people because they get something out of it. It is purposeful to them. In all likelihood, if they never apologize for hurting you, they get enjoyment out of it too (unless it's a totally compulsive unaware thing they are doing  - but if they are trying to hide it, and explain it away, and blame-shift, it is not compulsive: they are doing it with full awareness). As long as they continue to be abusive, and continue to spiral down into unethical behaviors, they will continue to escalate the abuse if you are still communicating with them. There is no getting around it for a victim of abuse. 

But I do think it is possible to forgive abusers, but not necessary, especially if the victim is not called upon to take the perpetrator(s) back. In the act of forgiving, however, we usually do not forget the abuse (it's important to remember what happened to us so that it doesn't happen again, of course, or continue to happen). It's okay to forget about them as people, in the same way that Ukrainians who are living in another country forget about Russians in their day-to-day lives.

MY OWN JOURNEY IN TERMS OF FORGIVENESS

intro

I think it is always good to tell personal stories of how we get to the point of forgiving our abusers, what we are capable of when it comes to forgiveness and what we are not capable of, and what this actually means.

So I started out this project by writing this blog post from 2013. I talked about why I wanted to study alcoholism (which I still haven't done adequately enough) and narcissistic abuse. Largely the latter research was more compelling, and is done except for some minor new developments. I haven't posted everything yet because posts still need editing.

But one of the new developments I wrote about in the last post is that narcissists prefer other narcissists; however I always sensed that to be true anyway ... It just now means there is research to back it up.

I mean how can you bully someone unless you are in a gang and delegating different types of bullying to others so that you don't take the full rap? And we know that narcissists do not like to bully on their own, and they definitely do not like being held accountable for anything, and that they will pass the buck to anyone, even their co-bullies! ... And since they are in a gang, and most likely it's only a single person or two they are bullying, they probably don't care whose fault is whose, unless one of them commits a crime, and even there they cover up for one another or make excuses. 

We know the bully gang mentality especially if we attended public schools before the 2000s. We've seen this at work on playgrounds, in hallways and in classrooms despite the adult monitors. 

And that's the thing ... to be a full adult means monitoring the bullying, making sure it doesn't happen, not being a join-in-on-the-perpetrators kind of person. But a child-like entitled narcissistic adult will join in on the bullying. If they bully a lot or if it is on-going or severe, they are likely to be very high in narcissistic traits (listed in the right column of this blog and continuing to another page).

So narcissism is a disorder that starts in childhood. The person hasn't grown out of six year old narcissism. Most children who are six years old are naturally narcissistic; they have to emit emotions and care about their own well-being first and foremost to let their caretakers know that they need emotional comforting and responses, or food, or their clothes washed. Babies and small children emote a lot to get their caretakers attention. The more helpless they are to supply their own needs, the more narcissistic they will act in early childhood. However, if they rarely get their needs met, or the parent is turning away from the emoting of the child, the child tends to shut down emotionally, realizing that no one will come to take care of their needs. They also become flat emotionally (have trouble emitting emotions or understanding the emotions of others) and the brain development isn't happening at a normal pace either. This was studied where babies and children were abandoned in orphanages, and where there weren't enough caretakers in the facility (another link). So narcissistic adults either grew up this way, unattended, their emotions never mirrored and rarely addressed in a compassionate way.

Or they were over-coddled, put on a pedestal, taught they were better than others, that they were never accountable for any hurtful actions they took against other individuals. Both are drastically different, but both adverse childhood situations can build a path to Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Covert narcissism is probably a result of the former (like in the paragraph above), and overt grandiose narcissism is probably a result of being the latter (the golden child). 

Covert narcissists tend to express their abuse by abandoning you, giving you the silent treatment, neglecting you in all kinds of ways, ignoring what you have to say, and other passive aggressive forms of abuse, just like they experienced at some level when they were a child. However if they are malignant covert narcissists, that adds another element where they have little to no remorse for how they treat or abuse others. These narcissists actually get pleasure out of abandoning their victims, even their own children, whereas run-of-the-mill narcissists cannot do it without remorse (they still do it, but they aren't as willing to take as many chances at sullying their own reputation the way a malignant narcissist is; sadism comes first, in other words ... malignant narcissists spend a lot of time scheming ways to keep hurting their victims too). For victims, they wonder why the abuser can't just leave them alone once the narcissist has abandoned them. Why the need for smear campaigns and so many false narratives if the narcissist simply does not want the victim, and does not care about the victim?  Isn't leaving you alone what abandonment is all about? The answer is that these kinds of narcissists often give you double messages: that they are better off without you, but why didn't you come back? It's confusing, and most victims feel they can't do anything right because covert narcissists use double binds like this all of the time. In this instance, you are a terrible person if you don't come back, and you are a terrible person for not getting the message that they wanted you to go away.

Covert narcissists try to either destroy you from the inside out, or get you to be a mind-slave. They mostly target your self esteem, continually, and gaslight you like crazy (in almost every conversation). If they feel confident enough that they've gaslighted you enough, they can turn you into their mind slave (if they sense that you listen to their constant advice). They will be trying to force you to believe you are totally inept at running any of your own affairs, and that you need their help to run your life, which is another form of gaslighting. They will try to break your self esteem too. If you are resisting being a mind slave and insist that you have a right to make some or all of your own adult decisions, they ramp up more attacks on your self esteem, abandon you and use other passive aggressive types of abuse, and keep up the attacks with made up stories about you that make you look bad to others (smear campaigns).   

Overt grandiose narcissists tend to express their abuse in arrogant ways by interrupting you when you are speaking, not listening to what you have to say (and making themselves the authority on speech and who should be listened to), telling you what to do and how to do it even when you are trying to tell them that you are a free autonomous adult - they will insist on lecturing you and infantilizing you instead. Overt narcissists are more overt in their abuse too: raging at you in your face, hitting, pushing or pulling you around, throwing things at you, spitting at you. They feel entitled to be waited on, to come first in almost every situation they are in, to be heard at the expense of others, to get what ever they want at the expense of others too, and they expect "followers" and admirers, just as they were treated in childhood. Talking things out is never really possible. They feel they have to dominate every conversation so that things go their way. When they are malignant overt narcissists, they will get pleasure out of denying you the same rights, justice, and privileges they give themselves. These narcissists often like to steal, and plan out ways of taking from others that are highly immoral and criminal. The lack of empathy that they have is also very overt, which means that it is a great deal more obvious than the way covert narcissists try to fake empathyThese narcissists even brag about hurting others, and taking from others.

The goals of both kinds of narcissists are totally different. In the covert narcissist the goal is to make you believe they have empathy for you, and to take over your mind and decisions, and therefor your actions. 

With the overt narcissist, it isn't so much about taking over your mind and decisions, but to get you to do what they tell you to do with brute force, intimidation, threats, violence, and extremely loud raging. If they can't get you to do what they tell you to do, they work on other people they believe are completely loyal to them, to side up with them, so that they feel fully backed in raging at you without consequence.  

Overt narcissists try to destroy you from the outside in. They are invested in being frightening enough that if you don't do what they tell you to do, they will smash up things you love, steal from you, divide you from loved ones, frighten you with their temper, give you bruises or kill you. They do make threats of murder: "I'll kill you unless you do x, y and z!" You aren't supposed to believe they would ever go that far, but from all I have seen, some really do go that far. 

Normal people won't talk about killing you, or your murder, or even hoping something bad will happen to you. They will simply leave you alone in peace without complaint if they don't like you. And they won't be on the attack. Starting or continuing with attacks once you have separated is a huge sign of narcissism. 

Whether they were abandoned a lot or whether they were spoiled too much in childhood is not anything you can heal or do anything about. They took the adverse situations of their childhood and decided to go in a certain direction with it. They either took the road of trying to control other people's minds, or control what they did by constantly being a tyrant who gives orders, and if you aren't doing things the way they want, to lecture and threaten you. It was their decision to be an abuser, and in the overwhelming majority, it is a totally conscious decision, otherwise they would never try to hide it from public view, the police, or lie about it, or try to do a DARVO

For those very few who do show the abusive side of themselves in public, and where other people can hear what they say and see what they are doing, and who grew up in situations where abuse was so normalized that they are brainwashed into thinking that it is always acceptable, even in public, then it is obviously not conscious. They think they have a right to hurt other people when they aren't getting what they want in all kinds of situations, public and private. So to some extent, victims can probably get around to forgiving abusers who really don't understand that legally, culturally, and ethically, abuse is not condoned, and the perpetrator could get arrested for it at some point.

The immediate consequence is that the victim might not trust them again. As for forgiving, it can depend upon a lot of factors: whether a perpetrator is willing to go to therapy for an overhaul. Most abusers are not; they keep justifying abuse and keep making excuses for their motives.

In terms of victims forgiving "the child part of these perpetrators", that they weren't raised the right way, I've seen that victims, by and large, overwhelmingly forgive that part of their abusers. You don't have a choice in the parenting styles of your early caretakers. Obviously a child who is ignored, not picked up and soothed when they are crying, where the caretaker is at most, minimally invested in care-giving, is adverse parenting. Obviously a child who is over-valued at the expense of other children in the family is bad parenting too. These actions are not a direct wounding to victims, and they can forgive the bad parenting. 

However, most abusers use their parents' mistakes to advantage too, to get more attention, to excuse their own behaviors, to get people to pity them and try to fix them by waiting on them, and most of all for entitlements: "I had a bad childhood, and you need to take care of me and forgive all of the abuses I've done to you, and you need to do all of the work in fixing this because I'm still a helpless little child who never knew how to take care of relationships because my caretaker was a terrible, terrible role model!" They've got a point except it's just another excuse, and except abuse escalates. For most survivors, taking care of abusers never works, even when the bad childhood keeps coming up, because of that one fact: the escalation process.

So it can be a "forgiveness trap", where you keep trying to help them while they keep abusing you. Not a good trap to be in. 

how forgiveness works and doesn't work
 (my own story, part one)

In this part I discuss my own situation, and what I went through as far as forgiveness is concerned. 

I decided to use my own situation because I couldn't find others that were as extensive as mine and where feelings are talked about along the way. I did look through a lot of domestic violence survivor stories too.

So I decided to settle on my own, so that I could tell you what my thoughts, actions and feelings were at each stage. Hopefully, readers who wonder why victims have such a hard time with forgiving can see why - and my examples show why I had a hard time with it.  

Anyway, in my first post I wrote about Johnny (a made up name). It's a typical domestic violence story. I explain a little more about what happened in this post to give you a clearer picture of how domestic abuse starts out and how it graduates to domestic violence. I don't think it got to the point where my life was in definite danger (?), but I think you could tell how it could get there easily. I also tell what domestic violence counselors were warning along the way, and what they were advising. 

In the second section, I talk about "Ellen" (another made up name). She eventually became part of what I went through with Johnny. That story tells how other people got involved in the domestic violence situations, and the decisions they made. However, that particular part of my story is not typical, but it is not unheard of in the realm of domestic violence situations either. I tell a little bit about how people generally react to domestic violence (note: most people who know both parties minimize it, but also accept a victim's decisions).  

The way I wrote both stories is that I stop and talk about whether I forgave, and if I didn't forgive, what did I do. Those parts are in green. I think you'll find that my reactions are pretty standard survivor reactions, especially for the types of survivors who are getting help from domestic violence counselors or social workers trained in domestic violence, and therapists trained in healing trauma. 

But to get to part one. It's been a decade since I saw Johnny. And did I forgive him?

Here's how it went for me:

Johnny grew up as a super pampered spoiled golden child, very obviously favored. It was well known in his extended family. He also grew up in a family where a lot daughters were often derided and ostracized, and where women in general were denigrated, sometimes insulted and gossiped about.

His mother was neglectful of the girl, especially throughout childhood (couldn't tell she was being abused outside the family; couldn't tell that she was being abused inside the family either; couldn't tell that she was awake for long hours most every night; couldn't tell that she was traumatized; and a host of other issues). And where did this come from? Johnny's grandmother also put her boy in the golden child role and neglected her daughters. So it was a family theme and tradition. Not his fault. That's easy enough to forgive because he didn't choose that role; the parent did. 

However, he didn't decide to do altruistic or even ethical things with that role. He terrorized his sister. As an adult, he became a domestic violence offender as well as a victim/offender (typically referred to as bully victim in professional articles). He grew cocky and became an alcoholic and a rage-a-holic. He became obsessed with getting rich. He grew to despise most women (nice to their faces, cruel behind their backs). 

I'm a woman, so that already put me in a bad position with him. 

When we got reacquainted many years ago, right off the bat, he was bossy. Note: he was not my boss. At first I took it in stride. This was my first mistake. I should have put a boundary up right away, made it ironclad that I am in charge of what I do, how I do things, and I'm an adult. I should have said "no" the first time I was being treated as a child, as a slave, as someone to be delegated to jobs he didn't want to do. In other words, I should have made it plain that "I'm fine with who I am; I am not looking for a boss; I am not a child and I don't need lectures; I am not looking for input at all unless I directly ask for it."

Because once he got the idea that he could be bossy, he ran with it and fast. Note: if I even asked him for some small thing, he would go into a rage. So it was totally hypocritical and lopsided.

From being a boss he graduated into a tyrant who micromanaged my every little move. He had constant comments and irate lectures for everything I did, every micro-move I made minute to minute and hour to hour. For all intents and purposes, this was insane, something out of the movie, "Sleeping With the Enemy" except it was a whole lot more than just cans and towels. 

In retrospect, I should have walked out every time he opened his mouth. So my fault was not putting up really strong boundaries right away so that the relationship would not devolve into this. My soft boundaries also has something to do with my childhood too, but I don't make excuses for it. I have actually tried really hard after that experience to make my boundaries much stronger and when situations devolve, to get out of them right away.

So when someone with soft boundaries meets a tyrant, the tyrant is going rage and try to get his own way.   

I wasn't the only one who was the target of his rage. My husband became a target too. A poet was also a target. Then a sixteen year old girl. And workers of all kinds. And even some family members. His wife was sending him baked sweet goods, and he turned up his nose at them, and threw most of them away. Which prompted me to ask him how his wife dealt with him and his rages, and he answered, yelling, "She does what I tell her to do!"

In fact, he was either raging about people all day long, or denigrating them: workers, all kinds of people, he was critical of just about everyone (this or that was not good enough for him). Almost every sentence had the "F" word in it too. When people showed up, his vocabulary and his rage instantly went away, and he was so friendly, too friendly. And then they'd go away and he'd dismiss them, denigrate them again. Just awful to be around.  

The combination of the on-going verbal abuse, the very obvious signs that he was trying to control me, and the expectation that I would follow all orders from him, seemed to seal the tone of all of our transactions afterwards.  

I began to be disgusted and kept quiet, and just dealt with the job at hand. My husband kept telling him to leave me alone and to "stop picking on her!" meaning stop delegating, stop reprimanding about every little thing I did or didn't do. "Just leave her alone!" my husband shouted.  

So then Johnny tried another tack: triangulating. He was denigrating me to my own husband a lot (to put doubts in his head about me - and it didn't work). Johnny and I lived too far from each other and we weren't close; we talked briefly via phone calls every 6 months or so, and it was either chit-chat, or he was irate about something in his life when I called, and in those times I got off the phone rather quickly. So he didn't understand me - that is what was clear to my husband.

Then Johnny tried to denigrate my husband to get me to side up with him (Johnny): "What the Hell is wrong with him anyway?" he'd ask me about my own husband, trying to break through where the loyalty lines were and weren't. That didn't work either. 

Then he called one of my father's friends on the phone. I was waiting by Johnny's side to talk to that same friend because I had something important to say to that friend. When I was finished with my part of the phone call, Johnny started yelling at me and telling everyone in the room that I was constantly grabbing at the phone, and then threw chairs around the room. The way he told it was very dramatic, and he took a chair to dramatize a total fiction about how I threw it. 

"Bulls&^t! She doesn't act that way!" my husband yelled back at him. "I know her better than anyone, and that's not how she acts!"

Then they had a competition of who knew me better. 

Johnny's story didn't really work that time either, even with two other people in the room (two people who he had to gain something from, of course). But it showed me how far he'd go. The one problem with his story is that the room where the phone had been taken did not have any chairs. It had two stools, and one was quite heavy and would have made a big thud had I thrown it. The other stool was far away from where the phone call was taking place. 

He seemed quite frustrated that he didn't have an ally in terms of being bossy, so then he'd spend hours on the phone with his wife complaining about my husband and me.  

So do I feel forgiving of all of this? I didn't feel forgiving. Forgiveness seems to be more of a non-issue than "the real issue" that was going on.  As far as I'm concerned, the "real issue" is that Johnny and I don't get along at all. He wants to complain about, and dominate most people 24/7, unless they have the potential to offer him a great deal. I don't want to be dominated,  especially by someone like that. That's the natural feeling. Being pressured to feel something else (like forgiving) is not occurring "naturally". I feel free to experience my authentic feelings just as they are, and not wanting to be dominated by Johnny was the main "authentic feeling" at the time.

My attitude has changed a tiny bit since then, but not in a significant way that would add up to forgiveness and renewing the relationship. The change has gone from "I don't want to be dominated" to "I'm not dominated by him and I feel much better."
   

But the story gets worse. 

There were several times I overheard him talking to his wife. At that time, I was trying to get away from him as much as possible, so I was unusually quiet, often for the entire day. I might say, "Pass the salt", or "I'm going out for a walk". If he raged I'd just find a way out: "I have to go to the bathroom", "I have to make a phone call", "I need some exercise",  "I don't feel well", and I didn't feel well. I was actually sick, but I didn't tell him because I sensed he'd be even worse, knowing I was vulnerable in that way too. I knew enough about bullying to know that bullies pick on people who they deem to be weak in some way. 

Also, when my husband had surgery he was under strict doctor's orders not to lift anything over five pounds and not to stretch. Johnny wanted some things moved and expected my husband to be the one to lift things and help out. Even when he said, "I'm under doctor's orders not to lift. Sorry about that." Johnny got enraged about that too, and told anyone who would listen that my husband was lazy and "useless". So much for empathy - Johnny didn't show any concern about my husband's state.

Anyway, several times he was on the phone, I heard him talking to his wife. And in every one of those calls he was fabricating things I was saying, even making up conversations, using tones I never used. And this was going on during the days I was silent. He was even making up entire scenes to turn her against me. Not only that but he said, "She's just like (my ex)!"  

I was shocked. Of course, I had been led to believe certain things about his ex. Now I was wondering, "Who is she actually?" Maybe stories had been made up about her too. 

As for the made up stories I felt nauseous. It also frightened me. The most awful thing about it was I couldn't tell if he was delusional, or if he was simply manipulative to get his wife's total unwavering support. I knew enough to know that truly delusional people who are aggressive to the extent that Johnny was, can act on impulse and on what ever delusions they are experiencing. Manipulative behavior (enlisting co-bullies) and delusional states are both dangerous, but delusions are much more of a critical issue because perpetrators can act on the delusions without notice. There is not necessarily an escalation at play to see where you are are in the process. If they are manipulative, the escalation process can be seen, and you can make plans based on that. With delusionary abusers, you can't do that. 

Both of them are safety concerns. I had trouble sleeping, and entered into a kind of hypervigilant state where all of the symptoms of trauma started emerging.

What would he do next to me?

The story he liked to tell about his ex was that she was this horrifically insane woman who perpetrated all kinds of violence towards him, and that she would do anything, even hurt her own children to get close to him enough that she would abuse him. And a lot of people believed him when he told stories about her. He would tell people to hang up on her, and they did. So he had a lot of power to get people to do things against other people. 

My husband was urging me to get out of the situation at this time, but there are actually good reasons why I felt I couldn't. I don't feel comfortable about telling what they were because it would expose who the people are in my story, and at this point the only thing I want is to be safe and to be left alone by him.

Anyway, I decided I wanted to call up his ex considering this new development. But I didn't know if it was the right thing to do at the right time because it seemed like it could be a safety issue. It might inflame him even more, and he was already in so many crazy-making all-day rages over the smallest issues, and drinking every day too, all day. I knew enough to know that violence is more of a possibility when someone who is prone to rage is drinking to the extent that he was, and calling her would be just one more excuse to terrorize. 

Anyway, I called up a domestic violence counselor and asked what he thought of the idea. "In my opinion, it should be done" he answered. "But ask her to keep the calls confidential. What happened to her might be helpful in discerning what he is capable of in terms of getting the kind of safety that you need, so you should call and ask for confidentiality in my opinion," he said. 

He also thought, from everything that was going on, that I needed to get out of the situation or call other people in for help. The more people were around, the less likely he would commit violence. 

I got on the phone with the ex, and just said one thing: "Okay, I'm ready to hear your story. What was the issue between you when you broke up?" 

And her first words were, "If you don't do exactly what he tells you to do in exactly the way he wants it done, he terrorizes you!" I thought, "This is incredible. It's describing my situation. And we haven't even begun to talk about anything else."  

"So was it like the movie, 'Sleeping with the Enemy'?" I asked her.  

"Yes, but worse. I needed to put an ocean between us."

And then she told me about the physical violence she endured from him. It didn't surprise me.

Shortly afterward, he got violent with me, and not because he found out about the phone call I made to her. His excuse for getting violent was something else altogether. While it didn't take me by surprise (after talking to her), I told a lot of influential people what had happened immediately afterward, including two social workers, and they knew why it was difficult for me to just abandon the situation, so they sent over people constantly so that I would rarely be alone with him. It also worked in keeping it from escalating. 

Close to that time, there was another witness at the scene who knew both Johnny and me, and she told me to bring my husband back into the situation, especially when she heard that Johnny's wife was arriving. "These two gang up on you like a couple of bullies!" she said. Apparently she had gone through that herself.    

So, to break away from my story ... Would I feel healed and would the relationship heal if I forgave him for all of this? What do you think? It keeps escalating, right? The only thing holding it at bay is bringing other people in.

So my own thought at the time was "Why do people expect you to forgive in situations like this? It seems like it would give him a green light to escalate."

My lack of boundaries (trying to figure out what was going on when he did not show politeness or respect, helped to create this situation surely, but from my perspective, forgiveness would have made it so much worse). My other thoughts: He's not going to change into a moral person just because I'm forgiving. I don't believe he is capable of change and I haven't heard anything to the effect that he has changed at all. And this goes for ten years later. I'm pretty sure he has the attitude that other people have to change to suit him, but he doesn't have to change, not even in a direction of authentic politeness. Another hypocrisy. He's not much different in his relationship with me than he was with his ex, and he was with his ex decades ago. If he can't change over decades, and even get worse, he is simply not capable of change. 

People who change also have to have empathy. He doesn't have any. While I saw two faced empathy of other people (fake overly "sweet drippy" empathy followed by derision, disgust, and hatred of the other person shortly afterward), that is hardly anything to put faith in, or even admire. Insincerity is pretty disgusting in my book.  


Around me, he was Mr. Hyde all of the time unless there were workers, professionals, helpers coming into the situation. A lot of abusers give you a break, and are nice to you for a spell (the cycle of abuse), but he was Mr. Hyde all day long, day after day. And I caught him in the act of being two-faced too many times over too many people, and he knew that I knew. A woman told me once that he didn't like anyone. Until this situation happened, I wasn't sure I believed her.

He would say to my husband and me that he wished this woman who said this was dead, but then act like he valued her greatly to her face. My husband and I were even more disgusted at seeing this, and I think Johnny sensed my husband's shift in respect for him. 

Many years later, I became interested in the Gabby Petito case (a beautiful woman killed by her fiancé, Brian Laundrie). The stand-out quality that he had was raging about and to others (the Mary Piglets Restaurant incident where Laundrie raged at some waitresses will be forever ingrained in the minds of people who became interested in this case). He was also raging at Gabby quite a bit. It was clear that the verbal abuse was "over-the-top" as well.

In that situation, a woman police officer tried to get Petito to understand that she was in a dangerous situation, mainly based on the verbal abuse and that he had attacked her face with his hands as he was trying to drive off with her van without her, digging his fingernails into her face as he tried to get away. 

The "Johnny situation" had almost the same elements. The one difference is that he wasn't attacking my face. But when he raged at me, he was no farther away than two feet from my face, his spit often landing on my face, and if I stepped back from him, he moved forward - very aggressive, in other words. That sent up red flags to counselors and social workers I was contacting. I tended to diminish it (I figured if he wasn't slugging me, it wasn't serious). But they assured me that it was. So, here's the warning to other people who are going through it: don't think he won't be violent just because he's raging without touching you (yet).

Another warning sign: he was also aggressively touching my head - when I was sitting, he would sometimes go by, put his considerably large hand over the top of my head and squeeze rather hard. He did it to my husband once too. At the time, I thought it was a bizarre act, like why would he be doing that? It's not exactly an act of affection. It had some aggression behind it, otherwise why the hard squeeze. However, I learned around that time that it was a sign of danger too (any aggressive touch to the face, head and neck is a danger sign that has to be taken seriously), especially in light of the fact that he is exceptionally controlling, rageful, and verbally abusive. 

Okay, so would I feel better if I forgave him in the privacy of my own mind or at home, and not have any contact with him again? The thing is, again, I don't think we can force ourselves to feel anything. We either feel something or we don't. So what I went through is more like the stages of grief: shock, followed by disbelief, followed by sorrow, etc, and ending up with acceptance. Not acceptance of him as a part of my life, but acceptance that was who he was. My grief was over the fact that he wasn't who I thought he was.  

Besides not seeing integrity, "real empathy", respect for others, or authentic conviviality, there were other things that pointed to unethical behavior. He was scheming. He was always pretty focused on winning at something (a lot of it was about "getting more" than another person). He schemes ways to make things happen for himself to the point of entering into criminal thought and activity.

Violence against others is criminal, so it is not a big leap to go into criminal activity about material things too. And I learned at that time that it is pretty common with abusers.
|
In other words, controlling other people is about taking more than you are giving back in terms of demands (I didn't make demands on him, but he did constantly). Likewise stealing, or insisting on taking more than you deserve is in the same ballpark.  

Do I forgive him for the crimes he commits? Absolutely not. I don't care what he learned in childhood or how he justifies this behavior. The fact is that he likes to steal. And not only that, but he accuses others of committing crimes against him. A car window was busted out in the place he lived the year that he and I separated, and he blamed it on someone who was visiting him at the time. Again, no investigation, a belief taking over. 

Abusers project, and they get paranoid that they will be stolen from or that someone is out to get them because they are that way. It is one reason they do a DARVO. But the other reason they like the DARVO tactic is to get out of crimes they commit. 
 

So, when his wife showed up, was she co-bullying? 

Note: I didn't know her. I have spent less than 48 hours in her company over my lifetime. So any kind of bullying of someone you don't know is completely unethical in my book. 

Anyway, she was not bullying right away. And that let my guard down. And Johnny made it known early on that she was more ethical than he was, another reason I let my guard down. At first I felt relieved that she was there because I doubted that he would get violent with her around (he wanted to make an impression) and with all of the other people coming and going.

One of the ways he made an impression is that I wanted something and he told me I could have it. Before then, he was fighting me tooth and nail on nearly everything. 

I made a few mistakes in the beginning, thinking that she was "one of us", that she was bullied the same way that I was, and that Johnny's ex was, and I confided in her in ways that I shouldn't have. Big mistake. I should have tried to figure out her intentions towards me first. Because it was clear that she didn't have the same experience that I had and the ex had with Johnny. After many years, I also understood that many people had drastically different relationships with Johnny. I also heard later that this is typical of abusive men, that their treatment of others has everything to do with what other people do for them, or what other people have the potential to do for them. It is also based on the fact that they need people who can vouch for them when they are accused of abuse, violence or crimes.

So the "She does what I tell her to do!" statement is probably true, and it may very well be how they keep the peace in their relationship. 

It's not a marriage I would ever want, and my marriage is very peaceful without that, but I understand some women are perfectly happy and willing to be submissive at all times to male authority. Even to the point of bullying others they barely know for their man. 

Anyway, the way she co-bullied was to state that Johnny's intentions were to get me and another person Johnny and I both knew separated (the "Ellen" person I bring up in the next section). She also made it clear that she was going to be instrumental in helping him to make that happen. She said it the day before my birthday. I thought 1. that it was cruel, and 2. that this wouldn't work, that people would not just "automatically" side with Johnny. 

I was practically in tears at the thought of it, and also in denial, and didn't say anything. I was at the dinner table eating. On my birthday, they were planning an overnight in the north, but Johnny came down with a headache. His wife made me a birthday dinner which I appreciated. However, it didn't stop her from supporting Johnny while he tried to divide all of my relationships, just as he had with my husband and me. 

So, do I forgive a co-bully? Again, I didn't feel forgiving naturally, and she had no part in my life. When you don't know someone, even if you wanted to forgive, you don't know what you are forgiving. Was she a good person or a bad person? She both cooked me a birthday dinner and told me they were going to influence Ellen enough to separate us, but did she really mean that? Why would she cook me a dinner when she was hostile? This is the cognitive dissonance I was experiencing.

Was she always a co-bully? Or just when he wanted her to bully someone?

Was she just a co-bully in this situation? Would she really go through with it? 

When I talked to others, no, she bullied others too. It was the main complaint when there were issues: they would brow-beat a lone person. But I didn't know that at the time. And allegedly she said that she would kill a person for not behaving. Anyway, I got the overall sense that she may have been more ethical than Johnny, but not ethical when he called upon her to break her ethics ... I learned this much later.

The main thing I felt was that the situation she wanted to enact against me was hostile, unethical, blindly loyal, and off the wall. Do you forgive someone who is acting blindly on the will of someone else, like the Russians do on Putin's behalf? 

Is bullying other people a good thing to do when you haven't shown any sign of aggression yourself? 

Are going through with the intentions and demands of another person forgivable?  

And again, the fact that he had this co-bully, even if she was his wife, put me in more danger. Do you forgive someone who puts you in more danger just so that they can prove that they are a loyal servant to their husband? 

(my own story, part two)

The person they wanted to separate me from I'll call "Ellen". The main takeaway that readers may want to know about Ellen is that she was always much closer to Johnny than to me. They spent a great deal more time together, had a closer relationship, shared a lot more experiences and had many more conversations than I had with her. I was under the impression that I was close to her for about a decade, but not anything close to what they had. By then I had also been told that for safety reasons that I needed to separate from Johnny (i.e. to never be in the same room with him again alone, to avoid meeting with him in private, and so on). 

So my main intention after Johnny left was to tell Ellen that I needed to separate from Johnny. But she seemed to be in denial that I told her that. She thought the rift was temporary, that I didn't really mean it; that with a little bit of time and talking things out, I wouldn't take such a hard line "against him". She thought of it as an act of aggression on my part. She was acting like a lot of people in these situations act: that abuse is a "relationship problem" that can be worked out by talking. Not when the perpetrator is never talking things out (and is always lecturing and interrupting instead), not when he is constantly dominating, raging, never in "a respectful listening position", etc. 

So is the fact that she is naïve and ignorant about how abusive relationships go, forgivable? I mean, she really doesn't understand that abusive relationships can't be "worked out".  It's a blind spot, right? 

And then she wanted to know why. I didn't want to get into it with her, but she insisted. And even after hearing my story, she took the tack that things could be worked out. I disagreed. I told her that I was  listening to domestic violence counselors when it came to this situation because they knew a lot more than she did.

One of the counselors who was "visiting" at the place Johnny and I were, told me that Ellen and I should go to therapy together, so that she would understand a little more about why a domestic violence counselor would want Johnny and me separated, and what was going on. 

Then it finally became clear to Ellen that when I sent a registered letter to Johnny, my intention was to separate from him. She couldn't be in denial about it any longer, or expect a make-up between us. She wasn't going to influence my decision just because she had a very different experience with him than I did.  

I'm sure she didn't like this very much (probably thought it was too harsh), but to my mind, it was my adult decision to make, and I was scared. While it was heavily based on what counselors were saying, it still wasn't her decision to make. And I'm glad I made that decision, then and now. My life is much, much better without Johnny in it. As is clear, he was a meddler, and not just between my husband and me, and Ellen and me: nearly everyone we both knew. Not seeing him any more meant that the meddling would go away. He could meddle and try to divide me from people we both knew, and they would go one way or another, or just see each of us separately, but I knew an awful lot of people he would never meet and I intended to keep it that way. 

For all intents and purposes, what existed between Johnny and me was never a relationship to begin with. It was just experiences of "endurance" for me until I could get away, and for him someone he found frustrating to control and dominate in the way he wanted to, and was used to. There was little else between us except that. We didn't see eye to eye on anything, and real relationships have at least a little of that.  

I was aware that my decision about Johnny might cause some issues between Ellen and me, and at the very least that my relationship with Ellen might be uncomfortable for me (and maybe for her too), and not be as close as it had been. Of course, she would have to see us separately, and at separate times, and there was a whole lot of that going on anyway. Beyond a dinner here and there, and with the distance Johnny lived, I didn't think it was much of an issue.

But to her it was, apparently. She refused to go to therapy with me. The overall message was: "I don't want to understand at all why the break with him was necessary." Instead of the separate relationships with both of us, she decided to side with Johnny completely. She parroted back all of his perspectives, all of his words, all of the false narratives he liked to spout.

So, again, I'll break away from this story. Let's just say that she was brainwashed. It could have been any reason she went for Johnny's perspectives, but for the purpose of this discussion, we'll explore brainwashing.

Wouldn't brainwashing be an automatic forgivable offense?

Here's the problem. Usually when you are brainwashed, you are loyal to someone's perspectives. It's engaging in a pretty drastic form of confirmation bias too. You aren't researching anything. You just believe in what you are being told by a perpetrator. And she believed pretty quickly.

This isn't uncommon for people who only see the nicer Dr. Jekyll side. She's probably never witnessed him swearing like a sailor, or acting like a slave owner. So she believes that what she sees is who he is. 

Now is that innocent? 

So let me explain two situations:

The first is about Ukraine. So we know that Putin is on a campaign to brainwash Russians that Ukrainians are Nazis (Nazis from Germany invaded Russia in World War II, so it stirs up fear when Russians are told that the neighboring country of Ukraine is Nazi too). It helps Putin's countrymen get into a fighting spirit even though it's a lie that Ukrainians are Nazis.

Ukrainians also have a Jewish president, but it is lost on many Russians.

As in domestic violence situations, the brainwashing has to do with dividing a hitherto peaceful relationship between two countries. It galvanizes Russian soldiers to want to torture Ukrainians since Nazis tortured them at one point in history. 

Anyway, the brainwashed soldiers are the ones throwing the bombs, missiles, and landmines into Ukraine. The leader is telling them to do it, but the army is the one who is actively doing it. 

Are Ukrainians forgiving Russians for being brainwashed? Are they saying, "Oh, you're brainwashed, so we'll excuse you for doing this to our lives and our country"? 

Pretty doubtful. It may happen at some future date if there is some kind recompense eventually, some sort of awareness that Ukrainians weren't the Nazis they were made out to be, that Ukraine should never have been invaded, but that forgiveness might come generations down the road. Right now, torture is not excusable.

Also, forgiveness is not what Ukrainians are thinking about. They want these brainwashed bearers of death out of their country. 

Here's another situation: 

You are on the road and there are two cars in back of you. The one directly in back of you wants to pass, but he passes you on a double line and when he sees another car coming, he swerves into you and your car goes off the road and lands in a ditch. 

The car behind the passing car is occupied by a family who are friends with the occupants who hit your car. So you've got the one car you are in, and two other cars whose occupants are really good friends with one another.

The cops show up, trying to determine whose fault the accident is. To you, it is obvious that the car who swerved into you caused the accident.

But the occupants of the two other cars say it is your fault, even totally your fault. You swerved into him (the passing car) and didn't look to see that he was passing you. 

Again, they are loyal to one another because they are such good friends. We should understand loyalty right? And is loyalty always supposed to come before ethics and justice? 

Because if it does, you can see why Ukraine was invaded. You are just as much of a mind-slave to loyalty as the Russians are. 

These days, police can tell who hit who by the markings on the cars. The car swerving into you would have left streaks that were running up towards the front end of the car. But let's say that the police made judgements on biases alone. They just want to believe that you caused the accident, and so they give you a ticket. 

It would allow aggressive driving to go unchecked, right? You could get away with sending any old car off the road on any double lined highway. There would be no such thing as vehicular manslaughter. 

Likewise, when we give free passes and side up with domestic violence offenders, we are making it possible for him to continue with his actions, either with the victim he has been torturing in the present, or another one down the road, no pun intended.

In fact, he can get away with just about any form of violence or dividing up people that he wants to, right?

So do we forgive any of this? 

Maybe when there is this much injustice, the best we can do eventually is radical acceptance that this is how it played out, and we are moving beyond it, the kind of acceptance that comes after grief.   

Here's another thing I know about Ellen. One hot day with all the windows open in a neighborhood I was visiting (a place where buildings were mostly all joined together) and before people adopted air conditioners en masse, I heard a couple fighting, and I could hear a woman screaming and crying, lots of thumping, and things breaking, lots of swearing, lots of insults. I was really concerned by what was happening. When I told the story to Ellen, she immediately responded, "Don't get involved."

Don't get involved?
 

I was no more than 18 years old. So I took her advice, even though I wanted to call the police. And guess what? The woman was murdered the next night in that same apartment by that same guy. 

So obviously I felt, and still feel really, really guilty about not intervening and calling the police. I don't blame Ellen for this; I blame myself for taking the advice of others too readily.

I have not made that mistake again. I called in other situations where I saw domestic violence. If someone hadn't called in to report what Brian Laundrie was doing to Gabby Petito's face, then police might not have stopped them on their road trip and warned Gabby that she was in a dangerous situation. In that situation, she didn't heed the advice, and was murdered. But calls do save lives. 

It also comes down to: What if I was that woman and no one called?  

So let's just surmise that Ellen's real reason for why she sided with Johnny was: non-involvement.  

Do we forgive people who don't want to get involved, at least as involved in making a call to police? Do we just let murders happen because you have to talk to police, even when it can be an anonymous phone call?

Do we forgive people who run away when they know that a crime was committed?

Do we forgive when we hear a woman getting beaten and either we don't do anything, or no one does anything?

Do we forgive people who side up with perpetrators of domestic violence? 

Do we forgive a person who doesn't want to hear what we went through, because they wanted to be like Switzerland and not get involved? Except she sided up with Johnny, so the "non-involvement" argument does not hold water. 

Is forgiveness more important than changing your ways, and calling the cops? Or getting involved enough so that your relationships aren't ripped to shreds by other people who want to isolate you and call you theirs? 

So here's another possible reason for why Ellen might have sided up with Johnny. Let's say she sided up with him because she didn't want to be bullied, and felt safer on Johnny's side than on my side. A lot of people do this too. They have to pledge loyalty to an abuser, so that they aren't abused too.  

Maybe she didn't want her relationships tampered with by Johnny the way he was tampering with mine. Maybe she couldn't handle the opposition and rage he might launch if she went against him. Maybe he was just more valuable to her, so she went along with what he demanded. Maybe he was so insistent that she give me up that it frightened her, and she gave into him under some kind of tremendous pressure that he launched. Maybe he threatened her: "If you keep her in your life, or contact her in any way, don't expect any contact from me ever again! Choose!"  

So do we forgive people who give up their relationships with us because they think that is the safest thing they can do?

Do we forgive people who cave into someone else under pressure? Or do we just think of them as turncoats, as people without backbones, as wimps?

Do we forgive people who decide to save their own ass at the expense of ours?

Do we forgive them enough to break bread with us again, or do we take the stance that we can't trust them again because they sacrificed us to be in an exclusive relationship with our abuser? 

Certainly, if you wanted to forgive, these excuses by Ellen might have gotten you there more quickly if that is all she did, but they may not be healthy reasons to be in an actual relationship because of all of the reasons I have brought up. 

But still, that's not all there was to it. 

I received e-mails and letters from Ellen's husband, a man who I don't have a relationship with outside of dinners and events with Ellen. There were rarely any significant conversations between us either except for the usual dinner conversations like gardening, traveling, cooking, healthy eating, books, photography, etc. He was never respectful, however, about my vegetarianism, and constantly needled me about it. But mostly, the topics were usual dinnertime topics.

However, he always seemed irritated when I visited Ellen, as though talking to her was impinging on his time with her. I got the sense he did not want me around, and I was always uncomfortable in their house. But, I didn't think our superficial relationship was on shaky ground until I received his e-mails and letters. 

Anyway the e-mails and letters he sent me were full of insults and threats. One of the threats was the same as Johnny's threats: to break Ellen and me apart, another Johnny-type move. It was as though he was parroting Johnny every step of the way, and by then I had had enough, and needed to put up the kind of boundaries I should have put up with Johnny at the very beginning. I wasn't going right into another Johnny type-situation after Johnny left, and I told Ellen's husband to stop contacting me. He wouldn't stop. So I called the police to intervene. By the way, when a person keeps contacting you when you ask them to stop, it is called harassment (which is illegal). It's also an aggressive move, and like all aggression, it tends to escalate. It was necessary to put an end to the aggression right away.

Then he contacted police himself and asked how he could get me to stop talking to him (a DARVO move), trying to paint me as the aggressor. The police knew that it was a DARVO move too, and so did counselors, and pegged him through his own writing, and with that tactic, as someone whose writings and tactic were typical of someone with Antisocial Personality Disorder. 

I have no idea why he did it, except to parrot Johnny, deciding that separating Ellen and me was a cool idea from Johnny. It's like he thought, "Great idea, Johnny! I think I'll try that too! I don't like her either in my wife's life! And I hate that she's a vegetarian! So let's both get rid of her!"

Then he sent me a message through someone else that he wanted me to apologize to Johnny.  

He was also a professor - it's depressing to think of someone like that in that position. What are schools thinking?!

And also, he was estranged from a daughter. And divorced. I don't know if he has the same attitudes that Johnny has about women, but I suspect he might. 

Also, like Johnny, he owned guns and he was a drinker, and may be an alcoholic. And most people know if you put verbal and emotional abuse together with drinking and guns, the prognosis for safety is pretty dire. 

As for my relationship with Ellen, it ended (probably loyalty to husband and Johnny). I tried to talk to her, but she shut me down. 
I sent Ellen birthday cards for a couple of years, and while she didn't send them back to me unopened or tell me not to send them any more, she never responded, not even to thank me, and I gave up. She was the one who believed things could always be worked out, but apparently not this time. 

Johnny did some more meddling to divide.

My husband and I were invited to a wedding. Johnny and his wife were invited to the wedding too. And so were Ellen and her husband. I contacted a counselor and asked how I could go to the wedding, and be supportive to the couple, without being attacked by Johnny. He said to bring a video camera and to make sure that my husband was always with me. We had a good video camera then, and I liked the idea of being the videographer. I am an artist, and I knew I could edit a good and fun synopsis of what went on. "What a perfect idea!" I thought. So we both RSVP'd that we would be there. 

Then, Johnny, his wife, and Ellen's husband intervened to get my husband and me dis-invited. Again, the people who invited us to their wedding really did not know us that well. But we were always on good terms and I took care of the groom at one time in his life. So, now Johnny had succeeded in splitting that relationship apart, with even more help than he had before. 

Then Johnny and his wife sent out a letter to a bunch of people about what bad people my husband and I were - it was filled with denigrations and insults about us. Some people reacted to it by saying, "Work out your own relationships! Don't bother us!" and some people reacted to it by siding up with him based on loyalty. 

Obviously there was a campaign against us, with Johnny and his wife determined to split as many of our relationships with others apart. This is how prejudice gets rolling. 

There wasn't anything I could do about any of it. If people believe things without looking into anything, that's who they are; they are belief-oriented, the end. People who are belief oriented are even more tethered to confirmation bias than others, meaning that you can't convince them of anything other than their own beliefs. 

So, I let a lot of people go based on that. I went through a considerable amount of grief, but I was also made aware that this happens a lot when there is domestic violence going on: people take sides. I had been warned of this ahead of time. And I also had been warned never to be around Johnny again in anything but a very large group ("and take your video camera with you if you have to go somewhere - even to the bathroom"). 

When counselors are that concerned about your life, you don't just ignore it. 

But not everyone drops away, no matter how hard they are worked on by the aggressors, no matter how much brainwashing, threats, pleas for loyalty there are. People of integrity seem to be the ones who resist these things, and those are the people you want around you anyway. 

However, it's not always easy. Where it got really sticky is that I had to work with a mother-daughter team on a kind of "business project" I'll call it. In the process, I had to let Johnny know what was happening by reporting to him. It was part of the "contract", so to speak. It was obvious he was meddling in this situation too, trying to get as much out of the situation as he could, and again, trying to prejudice the team against me so that the outcome would go in his favor: that he would get the advantage over me. But that's not the way it worked out.

This mother-daughter team took advantage of it, and were doing things for their benefit, knowing that Johnny and I were not aligned or a team ourselves. I tried to tell him what was going on, but he was more interested and determined to drive a wedge between me and the mother-daughter team, and risk losing some of what he was entitled to get. He was also flattering them a great deal which I knew was not at all sincere. It never had been. 

In my frustration at this next triangulation he was mounting, I showed some e-mails I had received from Johnny's wife that they were not so enamored with the mother-daughter team after all, that the sweetness and flatteries were about pretending, and that the motive was about being preferred over us so that they would get more out of the deal than we would. 

Then the mother-daughter team was disgusted by both of us. They made fun of both of us a lot, laughed about how we both threw each other under the bus, felt way more superior and upstanding compared to us, took the story to their friends and had a laugh there as well, and continued to take advantage of the rift between Johnny and me to get as much for themselves as they could at Johnny's and my expense. 

As far as further meddling, I'm sure that Johnny is still at it, trying to split people apart, still triangulating, or he's reveling in how easy it was to do in one situation or another, and will be easy to do in all situations. He laughs sadistically about his "wins". 

I took this long test from a psychologist when I was still trying to grapple with Johnny's agenda. There were all kinds of questions like number of insults, kinds of insults, how I responded to the insults. There were questions about what he said to other people about me. Questions to do with triangulation. Questions to do with ways he touched me. What kinds of demands he was making on me. It was a pretty thorough break-down of his actions towards me, and against me. It was determined that he was probably a malignant narcissist. And the dangers of relating to malignant narcissists were relayed to me. The gist of it was: I shouldn't even try the gray rock method on this kind of narcissist, as you could try with a run-of-the-mill narcissist. Malignant narcissists are quite a bit more dangerous, and the best thing to do is to make sure he was never in my presence or life again.

And my own test turned up "echoist", not nearly enough self preservation skills, terrible boundaries, responses that were largely ineffectual in terms of self preservation, not enough empaths in my life, not correcting people when they made assumptions about me, not resisting enough to domination and control, body language predators pick up on as being fair game, not defining myself first before others judged me, feeling undefined in a lot of ways, and all of the things that create an "echoist state", and that create a host of problems with making and keeping boundaries of respect. I was much lower than the general population on all of the tests I received to decipher narcissism (some of which I didn't even know were a measure of narcissism).

So in other words, my job was to learn how to end any conversation where I was not treated with dignity, respect and ethics. I actually had to get lessons in that.   

The only thing that put me closer to the normal end of the spectrum than most echoists is not letting people define me (my internal voice did not match their voice inside my head, in other words) and so my self esteem was not blown apart, where for most echoists it is (and I thank my father, husband, all of my cherished long term relationships, and teachers for that). 

Then after these tests, some things were stolen from me long after Johnny and I parted, that he would have wanted. 
Being stolen from is a sign of criminality, no resolution skills, an entitlement to break into other people's houses, extremely low empathy (especially if you know the perpetrator) and most likely a Cluster B personality disorder, especially if it is not over food, shelter and basic necessities.     

So, how did I react to "It was so easy for Johnny to split my relationships." I didn't like it, that's for sure, and even when I tried to do something about it, I was ineffectual. The trauma symptoms were sky high, and I dealt with depression and feelings of helplessness for many years. But it also showed me a lot about human nature and where we are in our present evolution. 

More than half of the population can be manipulated pretty easily. It's what I'm finding out in terms of politics too. It aligns with that. 

When bad characters are on soap-boxes and telling people what they want to hear, or that there is some reason to avoid a group of people, or a person, roughly half of them will follow the person on the soapbox who is trying to prejudice them. It's the old story of the salesman who tries to sell you your dreams, but it's just snake oil (it's the story of the two-faced snake oil salesman). We're either going to buy the story or not. And it's up to all of us to decide.  

You can't change the minds of prejudiced people, who are bound by their own belief systems, and who like their beliefs just as they are, and who may even think their belief system is the best one around (arrogance).

Some people just want to join a certain belief system or cult, or follow a certain leader or person.

Jesus's statement, "They know not what they do" is appropriate here.

Also, a lot of people like tyrants. A lot of people like to be followers of tyrants (they think that the tyrants will keep them safe because tyrants show aggression and are willing to show might, and go to war much more readily than other types of leaders). If the followers are tyrants too, or follow one, they believe they will be able to get the upper hand, and the riches, and influence people in selfish ways, and beat out the competition, just like the leader is able to do it, or just like Johnny did.

A lot of people like violence and aggressive acts as a way to get what they want out of others too. Some people like narcissists (look at who gets adored in elections). A lot of people like bullying behaviors, invasions into other people's relationships, lives, personal resources. A lot of people like sitting around and gossiping, deriding people, talking in an arrogant style, building a prejudice against others. A lot of people like narcissists who keep their eyes peeled on how to get more money and the things money can buy at the expense of more important things. A lot of people think being two-faced is brilliant. They like invasions and maneuvers. They adore people who hate certain parts of a population.

So I haven't exactly forgiven, but what I have done is to go through a realization process of that kind of darkness. Before I was plunged into darkness, I was so naïve, so in denial. I just did not want to see evil, until evil played hard ball with me. But once I knew exactly how dark some human beings can be (mainly through studying narcissism and psychopathy), I also understood much more clearly about what I wanted for my life.  

"The door" of radical acceptance of some of these facts has led me to a new life. I have accepted that Johnny is narcissistic, probably high on the scale, a person who will never change his ways (malignant narcissists are very, very resistant to change). He will always be unempathetic; he will always be in competition for riches and resources; he will always play head games with other people. He will always play dirty to get what he wants; he will always try to break people apart to get what he wants; he will always be thinking of ways to create false narratives about other people; he will always be two-faced and inauthentic; and he will always try to get people to "do as he says." Those are the tenets of malignant narcissism.

And beyond that I don't know much about him because we did not and do not have normal conversations. There is always an agenda that he has behind every discourse. He's also an alcoholic (drinks an excessive amount every day, the sign). 

The only way to curb malignant narcissism in society is to educate parents on how to bring up their children. Good luck with that, right? Also what if the parents are narcissists themselves? What if the parents are substance addicted? It would have to take an extreme amount of societal effort. 

So the only way to really stop it is to educate people what the signs of narcissism and psychopathy are so that they can resist and traverse them. I tend to see them as the black holes of the human race. The more out of orbit you are, the better off you will be. That's the path I have decided to take. 

Radical acceptance and saying no to any more exposure to malignant narcissists and all of the people who follow them is what healing is all about. That is assuming that the gravity of the black holes hasn't become inescapable and you have a way out without being disabled or killed, or on the verge of either one. 

I think all survivors of domestic violence come to a place of radical acceptance rather than forgiveness (in most cases). 

When you are surrounded by evil, you can't live a quality life, have good health, and in some severe cases, you can't even concentrate on anything. In the severe cases, you are just dealing with trauma and its symptoms, day in and day out. 

All of my relationships are with empaths now. I like my humble life, the beauty that surrounds us, the ability to detect good and evil much more than I ever have, the ability to set boundaries with more conviction, the ability to put my energies into more noble causes instead of worrying where the next attack is coming from. All survivors worry, naturally, but you adopt the best ways of protecting yourself, and talking to people who are invested in your safety and healing, and letting go of those who just want to judge. The ability to detect the intentions of others has advanced in leaps and bounds for me too, and the ability to heal, and to help in healing others is better now too. Healing yourself and those around you cannot take place when your body and brain are filled with trauma symptoms. 

So part of the journey is not just staying out of abusive relationships, but healing from trauma too. And for that I also suggest trauma therapy. 

We all deserve to live in peace. Whether we get there through forgiveness or radical acceptance does not make a difference, really.   


ADDENDUM
(why it was hard to write this post)
 
Writing this blog was hard for me because it brought these memories back at a time when I'm in a new phase. I would rather have not revisited the past. But I wrote it in part because my father suffered from the actions of the same people. He wouldn't have liked or wanted to be around any of them, knowing who they are, and I realized, to a large extent, that he shielded me from them much more than I ever knew. His presence may have even hid me from them even looking at me as a source. 

The other reason I went through with this post, and even started to research and write this blog, is because he never understood that he was dealing with other people's narcissism. He thought all human beings sought redemption. No, they do not. Evil exists and is much more stubborn and fixed and becomes evermore hellish once it infects certain minds of human beings. If there are ever any more Robert Winnes who are born into the world who are living through what my father lived through, I have left this blog for them. If I had known what I know now, I think he could have healed. 

I have largely healed because I searched in ways that neither of us knew how to do at the time. I won't be on my death-bed looking to someone for the answers the way he was. I know enough now that I don't need to research and write for my own sake any more, just for the sake of others. 

If truth be known, I'd rather put my energy into healing arts, music and art, and spend my free time walking woods, fields and ocean paths, dancing in the moonlight on a snowy night, listening to the Sons of Serendip, watching Jonna Jinton videos, falling in love with the harp, living in Lothlorien types of environments, being enlightened, and living in a better world than in the past, full of empathy, compassion, wisdom and beauty, and full of people much like my father, only healed and leading the way. 

FURTHER READING

5 Reasons Why Trauma Survivors Shouldn’t Forgive (Forgiveness can be psychologically and physically harmful to trauma survivors.) - by Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC for Psychology Today

Why Forgiveness Isn’t Required in Trauma Recovery (Imposing forgiveness can be problematic in trauma treatment.) - Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC for Psychology Today

Forgiveness is the Wrong Response to Trauma (We must encourage healing, not forgiveness.) - by Rosennab for Medium.com

Is Forgiveness Necessary for Trauma Recovery? Part 1 - by Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC, EMDR Certified Therapist for Symmetry Counseling

Is Forgiveness Necessary for Trauma Recovery? Part 2 - by Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC, EMDR Certified Therapist for Symmetry Counseling

35 Scripts for Trauma Survivors to Set Family Boundaries (A comprehensive cheat sheet.) - by Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC for Psychology Today

10 Things Not to Say to Trauma Survivors - by Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC


Why Family Members Take Sides in Sexual Abuse - by Hilary I. Lebow, and medically reviewed by Janet Brito, Ph.D., LCSW, CST for Psych Central 
(note: this article tells how common it is to side with the abuser ... this one focuses on sexual abuse, but in all forms of abuse, it is not uncommon for people to side with abusers over victims, but I couldn't find any more convenient on-line articles. For those kinds of articles, you should look in periodicals)

Why Do People Often Take the Side of the Abuser? - by Caroline Abbott, a ministry counselor, for her own website

Case Dismissed: Why domestic violence offenders often get away with it - by Sarah Buduson and Mark Ackerman for News Five, Cleveland, OH

RECOMMENDED: FOR PEOPLE WHO WANT TO KNOW HOW INTERPERSONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BLEEDS OVER INTO OTHER CRIMES: Understanding intimate partner violence in context: social and community correlates of special and general victimization - by Maiju Tanskanen and Janne Kivivuori for Nordic Journal of Criminology and Taylor Francis Online (professional paper)

8 Tips for Forgiving Someone Who Hurt You (Forgiveness is the ability to regain peace when part of your life didn’t work out the way you wanted. Who doesn’t want that?) - by Charity Ferreira for Stanford Alumni Magazine  

Forgiveness: Letting go of grudges and bitterness (When someone you care about hurts you, you can hold on to anger and resentment — or embrace forgiveness and move forward.) - by the Mayo Clinic Staff

How to Forgive Someone (Even If They Really Screwed Up) - by Crystal Raypole, Medically reviewed by Jennifer Litner, PhD, LMFT, CST for Healthline

Should You Forgive a Friend Who Has Hurt You Deeply? - by Sonya Matejko, medically reviewed by Janet Brito, Ph.D., LCSW, CST for Psych Central  

Forgiveness: Your Health Depends on It - John Hopkins Medicine

How To Forgive Someone Who Has Hurt You: In 15 Steps - by Dr. Wayne W. Dyer for his own website

How to Forgive Someone Who Has Hurt You - a Wiki How article 

When Is It OK Not to Forgive Someone? - by Brittany Loggins, fact checked by Aaron Johnson for Very Well Mind

The Power of Forgiveness: Why Revenge Hurts You More - by Wendy Hooker

The Difference Between Forgiveness vs. Acceptance - by Beth Elkassih for Made You Smile Back

6 Reasons Not to Forgive, Not Yet (When we advise people to forgive and move on, we may make things worse.) - by David Bedrick J.D., Dipl. PW for Psychology Today

How Do You Forgive Even When It Feels Impossible? (Part 1) (Forgiveness isn't something you do for the other person.) - by Andrea Brandt Ph.D. M.F.T. for Psychology Today

What It Takes to Fix a Broken Relationship (Co-rumination, moral repair, and forgiveness.) - by Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD, ABPP for Psychology Today

How Do You Forgive Someone Who Abused You? (Forgiveness has many positive effects. But forgiving someone who abused you is a personal decision and one you make for your health — not your abuser’s.) - by Kurt Smith, PsyD, LMFT, LPCC, AFC, medically reviewed by Kendra Kubala, PsyD for Psychology Today 

Forgiving an Abuser – Should I? And if so, How? - Criminal Injuries Helpline

Is It Possible to Forgive Child Sexual Abuse? - by María Prieto-Ursúa for Department of Psychology, Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid, Madrid, Spain and for Frontiers in Psychology

Forgiveness for intimate partner violence: The influence of victim and offender variables - by Jo-Ann Tsang and Matthew S. Stanford for Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX and Science Direct (professional paper)

 
19 Traits of Highly Toxic Mothers - by Qasim Adam for Qasim Adam website

Forgiveness Takes Time Where There’s Marital Abuse or Betrayal - by gbaskerville for Life Saving Divorce