What is New?

WHAT IS NEWEST ON THIS BLOG?
August 27 New Post: Some Possible Things to Say to Narcissists (an alternative to the DEEP method)
August 7 New Post: Once Narcissists Try to Hurt You, They Don't Want to Stop. It's One of Many Reasons Why Most Survivors of Narcissistic Abuse Eventually Leave Them. (edited)
July 24 New Post: Is Blatant Favoritism of a Child by a Narcissistic Parent a Sign of Abuse? Comes With a Discussion on Scapegoating (edited for grammatical reasons)
July 20 New Post: Why "Obey Your Elders" Can Be Dangerous or Toxic
June 19 New Post: Why Do Narcissists Hate Their Scapegoat Child?
May 26 New Post: Folie à deux Among Narcissists? Or Sycophants? Or Maybe Not Either?
May 18 New Post: Home-schooled Girl Kept in a Dog Cage From 11 Years Old Among Other Types of Egregious Abuse by Mother and Stepfather, the Brenda Spencer - Branndon Mosely Case
May 11 New Post: Grief or Sadness on Mother's Day for Estranged Scapegoat Children of Narcissistic Families
April 29 New Post: Why Children Do Not Make Good Narcissistic Supply, Raising the Chances of Child Abuse (with a section on how poor listening and poor comprehension contributes to it) - new edit on 6/6
April 10 New Post: The Kimberly Sullivan Case. A Stepmother and Father Allegedly Lock Away a Boy When He Is 12, Underfeeding Him, and Home Schooling Him, and at 32 He Takes a Chance of Being Rescued by Lighting the House on Fire (includes updates since posting)
PERTINENT POST: ** Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does it Work?
PETITION: the first petition I have seen of its kind: Protection for Victims of Narcissistic Sociopath Abuse (such as the laws the UK has, and is being proposed for the USA): story here and here or sign the actual petition here
Note: After seeing my images on social media unattributed, I find it necessary to post some rules about sharing my images
____________________________________________________________________________________________

Thursday, November 3, 2022

The DEEP method for survivors of Narcissistic Abuse


As with every post, I have a "further reading section" below, and a video by psychologist, Dr. Ramani Durvasula. 

Before I get into this method, it is important to know a few things:

* This method can be dangerous under certain circumstances
* Most narcissists want to bully someone in their lives, and usually pick certain victims for certain reasons. The kinds of people they tend to choose are people who are vulnerable or traumatized in some way, people who they feel they can brainwash and fool, people they are already in relationships with who are showing some resistance to their control and domination tactics (who they perceive as recalcitrant or rebellious), people they are jealous of or feel they are in a competition with, people who criticize them (or are perceived to be critical of them). This means that this method may not work in certain circumstances where the narcissist is dead set on bullying you to get one of their agendas met  for power, control and domination, or if they are constantly trying to manage most of your actions and reactions towards them. 
* Narcissists almost always want to escalate abuse, so this method may be ineffectual for those of you in a serious or dangerous escalation process (consult a domestic violence counselor or center before using it). 
* They have very little empathy for others, and the darker narcissists have no remorse if they hurt you, and this technique, unless it is used slowly over time, and is imperceptible to the narcissist, can make them more enraged.
* Narcissists are highly resistant to changing their behavior, so this method will not change them; it is supposed to bring more peace to you however, but that is all.  

One of the first ways that narcissists try to get into our lives is by love bombing us, or trying to charm or flatter us in social spheres. Some start straight in with giving us unsolicited advice (pretending to care about your issues and tragedies -  this gets them into your inner circle, so be careful who you share your most personal hurts and tragedies with: this is how vulnerable traumatized people become their victims). 

They build you up through flattery and idealizing statements. Alternatively, for those who are vulnerable and dealing with tragedies, they attempt to advise and heal you, then they bring you down through devaluation, destruction, and very often through discard. 

Through the flattery, idealizations, and attempts at healing through advice, they expect you to be mesmerized by them, and to feel obligated to them. This is the stage where they over-advise, command, demand and get snippy if you aren't stroking their ego. If you don't spin like a top for them and adopt pleasing behaviors when they are insisting that they are the greatest human being in your life, they rage, devalue you and then do the opposite of what they did before: smash your self esteem and tell you, or show you, that you do not mean that much to them. They can act as though you don't matter to them at all, that you are dead to them (unless you will always be their "pleaser puppet", of course). They try to turn things around so that the relationship between you is 95 percent about them, and what they want, and only five percent about you, if even that. Most often they discard you after they devalue you, but they can also set about trying to destroy you, for not meeting their expectations. Then they smear your reputation and play the victim and move on to someone else they feel will be "easier" to victimize than you were.

Some of them try to get you back. But most often, going back results in worse forms of abuse than the last time. They haven't changed because they "lost you" even if they tell you that. Change takes a long time, and for bullies, a lifetime, but only if they want to change. "They are what they are", as the saying goes. Assuming you don't want to be swallowed back into another round of idealize, devalue discard, this method can work.    

Some exceptions to the trajectory of constant manipulating and bullying with a discard is if they perceive that you may not be as vulnerable to attack as they originally surmised (like if you have more social support or financial hutzpah than they realized), they have been caught being abusive to you by others they wish didn't see it or know about it (where their reputations come under scrutiny), or if they feel you are competition for them but have superior connections or money (like in a workplace and where they might back off). In these cases, they are afraid of how having a bad reputation might effect them. In situations where they are more afraid of you than you are of them, the method works really well. 

Most of us would feel horribly guilty if we exploited people in the ways that they do, but they don't feel guilty because their lack of empathy keeps them from feeling what we would feel. 

Anyone who needs a victim, and anyone who pretends they are a victim (when they actually perpetrate abuse), needs to have special boundaries placed on them. That's where methods and techniques come in (like the DEEP technique). 

It's better to know the beginning signs before we get into any kind of relationship with them, of course, since most narcissists traumatize who they choose to victimize. And there are certainly some signs, and if we are being targeted by them for love bombing, flattery, or unsolicited advice in the beginning, the DEEP technique can put up pretty strong boundaries to keep you safe from their manipulations. In fact, this technique is liable to turn them off, knowing that you aren't impressed by persuasion, and they tend to look elsewhere. 

Beginning signs:

Charm: A great majority of charming people are narcissists. If they are a little too nice to you, and a little too familiar with you (like touch you on the arm, or whisper things in your ear), you may want to back away. People who have been burned by narcissists, put this first on their list as to who to avoid. 

Love Bombing: Coming on too strong, idealizing, too much flattery, too familiar, stands too closely or gazes into your eyes a little too long. They push you to be "swept off your feet" and they are eager to impress you. The best candidates for intimate, long last relationships are actually people who are hesitant, reserved, somewhat shy, not bombastic, and not pushing you to get involved with them or have sex with them. 

They talk about their exes as being crazy.

They often mirror your likes and dislikes. Most often this isn't genuine; it is to pull you in and make you think that you have similar minds, similar perspectives, similar life goals, similar morals, etc. Warning: psychopaths use mirroring even more. 

Arrogant, Haughty, Bombastic: They brag. And they brag in ways that they think will impress you. It can be about how much money they have or travel they have done if they sense that you will be impressed by that, or it can be how many causes they are involved in if they sense that you are an empath. Arrogance is definitely a danger sign. People who are arrogant are usually highly judgmental, unempathetic, and entitled. Watch how they treat waitstaff at a restaurant. They are usually terrible about listening to concerns you raise. If they also start to give you unsolicited advice before they truly know you, or the advice is without considering your feelings, life goals, and the issues that are important to you, consider that they may be narcissistic. 

Competitive Talk: How they were/are better than someone else at the same task. They exaggerate achievements and talents they have, or that they think they have (goes with the above).

Pushy:  Narcissists insist they get their own way most of the time, except in the beginning they are pushy in some ways more than others. Ways that are obvious: pushing you into a relationship with them (trying to go fast), trying to make you believe you are "twin souls" or closer than you really are, getting snippy if you are holding back or reserved over giving them "the right of way" into your psyche or life, pushy about getting you to agree with them. People who aren't narcissists don't push you for information about your personal life, or push you into a close personal relationship. Also, covert narcissists, tend to share very little information about their personal life, but expect you to share everything. Don't share confidences with people who are haughty, arrogant, harshly judgmental, show-offs, pushy, who brag without the evidence to back it up, or anyone who gets angry with you because you aren't sharing everything they demand that you share. 

Secretive: Narcissists tend to be secretive, and have done things they don't want you to know about or to see, but cannot stand being in relationships where others are secretive. They will terrorize you later on if they deem you have secrets from them. If you do find out some unethical things from their past, they tend to diminish them.

If you see a number of these signs in one person, the DEEP method can help you to avoid them, or help to fade out their attention on you. However, as I've said before, there are some dangers, and I state them in one of the aspects of the method below.    

THE METHOD 

The DEEP method is actually spelled D.E.E.P. and stands for "Don't defend, don't explain, don't engage, and don't take it personally".

Basically this technique is for denying the narcissist narcissistic supply and/or getting into arguments with them where they will demean, attack your character, call you names, deny reality, and turn it into a crazy-making conversation to attack, defend and exploit what you have to say to "win" the argument. And then afterwards they usually pretend to be a victim (playing the victim is all about an excuse to get sympathy so that they can attack you some more).

To make it clear, raging can be overt or covert. Covert raging is the silent treatment, interrupting, only considering themselves, gaslighting, stonewalling, punishing and is usually used by covert narcissists, although overt narcissists can use both. 

However, if they are physical abusers, or they have threatened to hurt you (includes hurting you emotionally, socially, psychologically, and via blackmail, not just physically), or they are breaking laws, or touching you aggressively or roughly anywhere on your head or neck, or they rage in your face, or  have sadistic characteristics, the DEEP technique could enrage them more, and you could be faced with a life threatening situation. In the video below, Dr. Ramani does not make mention of that, but from a domestic violence perspective, it is important to know this.

It is always best to go to a domestic violence center or therapist to help you assess the dangers, and ask them if this technique is best for you and your circumstances.

Also psychopathic abusers and abusers who have malignant narcissism have the same traits as the narcissists I talk about in this post, but unlike plain-envelope narcissists, if they hurt you, they will have no remorse. And they often get satisfaction out of being spiteful, vindictive, sadistic and breaking the law without getting caught. Often you can't tell whether they are psychopaths or malignant narcissists unless you know them really, really well (including all of the tactics they use to dominate and control you and hurt you).

The issue of why this can turn dangerous is that part of obtaining narcissistic supply is getting a negative reaction out of you. This can be crying, anger, shock at what they are doing or have done, fear, defending yourself, or pleading. If you don't give them the narcissistic supply they demand, or don't respond to them at all, they can get dangerous. This is why it is always good to know who you are dealing with and professionals who work with domestic violence victims will usually know more about the signs of danger than victims do (victims can also downplay what they are going through for a number of reasons: hope, cognitive dissonance, unaware of the love bombing tactic, and so on). 

I personally prefer Dr. Carter's methods for dealing with the "defend" part of this method, which I go into in the next chapter.

So to get down to why the DEEP technique can be effective, depending on who you are dealing with, here are some of the reasons:

don't defend

If you don't defend yourself, which is what they expect to keep the argument and the trashing of your self esteem going, they feel frustrated. And some of them get nervous. When they get frustrated, they may keep trying to hurt you in other ways that they hadn't thought of just to see if you'll react to that instead, and you just stand there unaffected.

Some narcissists who are lower on the scale (i.e. who don't possess all of the traits of Narcissistic Personality Disorder) may feel embarrassed that they attacked you and lead the conversation away from the direction of more attacks, especially if you have some clout socially, but others may escalate. If they escalate, you can always leave. 

One reason why your defenses lead to more of their attacks is that they don't really understand how most conflicts are settled: by talking things out, by being thoughtful about each other's needs, feelings and desires and finding a way between yourselves to please both parties, by talking about resolutions to the conflict which often includes compromise (they hate compromise, or even the suggestion of it!).

Instead they view conflicts as "attack fests" (on your decisions, your character, your mind, your differences from them, your behaviors, and your self esteem). They also think that conflicts mean that they have to "win". Win what? Win you totally over to their perspective, win at controlling what you do (power, domination and control), winning at what their desires are and what role you will fulfill in making their desires come true for their life. So the DEEP technique is to bypass all of that, and by not defending yourself, you are not giving them ammunition to use your defenses for more attacks. 

It is easier said than done. Attacks are pretty unpleasant, and you are going against the grain of defending yourself by letting them tear you to shreds as if you are an onlooker to it. In public this can be pretty unnerving, and in private it can be scary and denies you emotions by giving them free reign to have all of the unregulated emotions that they want to express, while you get to express none. It is a type of suppression which can cause trauma. The more oppression you receive, and the more suppressive your responses are, the more trauma symptoms you will have. So, that is the drawback to this particular part of the DEEP technique.

However, people who have tried this method say that they just go inside their own minds and dream of pretty pictures or something more than the unpleasant situation. Or they observe as a parent would: "My child is having a temper tantrum and I'm just going to wait it out until they calm down." Some people decide their perpetrators are "crazy" or "funny" for going off the rails over so much B.S. 

So it depends on your countenance too. 

Again, if you have PTSD, letting them go off the rails about your character and not defending yourself can be extremely triggering. Consider that this might not be the best relationship to put your energy towards instead. Or perhaps only see them in big crowds, talk about the weather and greatly limit your contact. 

So it takes a person who is calm, cool and collected, someone without PTSD, like a comedian who is playing "the straight" role to the character playing the rage-a-holic gone off the deep end with over-dramatic displays and ridiculous reasons to become so unhinged. Even the silent treatment, the covert version of rage, is quite over-dramatic as it is usually over things that tend to be silly, or small, or just to drum up attention, like they don't feel they have enough power over you, and many of the reasons can even be more inconsequential than that, in the grand scheme of things. The silent treatment is easier to deal with, however, than overt loud raging with pushing, or screaming in your ear, for instance.

Dr. Carter's way is to defend yourself in these ways:
* they try to trash your self esteem or shame you in an angry cruel way: you respond like the adult that you are that you feel fine with the way you are, and that you don't plan on changing. 
* they tell you that you are crazy (the typical gaslighting statement in just about every conflict they have): you tell them that you are perfectly sane and do not plan on continuing this conversation with them.
* they say: "You are so stupid! If you only did it this way then ---": you tell them that you are fine with the decisions you make, period. If they keep goading you about how stupid you are by not taking the road they want you to take, you keep telling them over and over again that you are fine with the decisions you make, with the way you are, and with the way that you conduct yourself.   
and so on ... 

They don't know what to do with that, and every controlling, manipulative tactic they use suddenly becomes "useless" to them. That kind of wall of resistance, and the results afterward, are better, I think,  than being silent. 

In other words, be a person of high ethics and intentions, and not let them teach you "behavior lessons" or talk you into being crazy and stupid (it doesn't make sense anyway when their behavior is often so abusive, threatening, raging, insulting and offensive). 

The defense is always that you are okay with who you are and what you are doing (and if you have ethics, honesty and dignity, you can even be proud of who you are, and their opinions shouldn't effect you). 

If you are strong and confident in what you say, and if you continue to hold the line on it, narcissists are more likely to leave you alone, or lose interest in you. So, in a way, I think Dr. Carter's method can work better to stop the arguments and their baiting you for arguments than not saying anything at all.

Instead of denying them the narcissistic supply by being silent, they know where you stand, and that it won't change. 

The reason why his method may be more effective is because the narcissist can feel challenged by your silence, or egg you on trying to find holes in your armor of silence, whereas if you state good boundaries (that you are not, and will not, be effected by their rages and needs for narcissistic supply), they will quickly leave to find people who are more more willing to give them that supply, who are more vulnerable to being manipulated, who will listen and ponder their words and attacks, and who may even beg them to stop being cruel. Unfortunately we don't wish narcissists to dish out their poison to others, just as we might wish a bright star would not be swallowed up by a black hole, but they are predatory-like in their thinking, and the thing they need to avoid first and foremost, is you.

The rest of the technique makes a lot more sense (and I would prefer it was the "EEP technique", rather than the "DEEP technique"):

don't explain

Trying to explain anything to a narcissist is like this:

Your explanations are going to go through the narcissism mechanisms of their mind, and come out looking totally different, with negative connotations hanging from every part of it, than what you put in. It'll look like a confusing mess. 

On the flip side, if they are idealizing you, anything you put in is also going to look idealized too:

They judge too much on character (and what they think your character might be) way before they look at your words and intentions, so whatever character they think you are, is going to influence what they think of your words to such an extent that it is also likely to come out of their understanding like a confusing mess too. 

This cartoon, found on Facebook, says what I have to say in a pretty succinct way:

 
However, just make that circle of what is understood ten times smaller for narcissists,
and an imperceivably tiny dot for psychopaths!

By not explaining much beyond the usual small talk, you don't have to deal with how they manipulate your explanations to go with what they think your character is. It skips all of that. 


don't engage

 This one makes sense too. 

It should be obvious why you can't reach out to them to engage together to find solutions to the conflicts between you. If you have read my blog, they won't have any part of that, and they will fight tooth and nail from going down that path, and will instead fight dirty to gain superiority over you. They want things "just right for them" even if it means it is not right for you. So, "Let's work out our problems together" is just opening the door to a wolf who has wanted to attack you, and now has the chance to do it. 

The other thing is that if you engage them, it means - to them - that you are weak and a glutton for punishment. Narcissists traumatize people with the exception of psychopaths. Psychopaths can take it because they have different autonomic nervous systems than we do. However one narcissist can even traumatize another narcissist, but it is definitely preferable for them to be in the ring with other narcissists, their heavy-weight equals, rather than with us.

Also they are control freaks, and they like being in the driver's seat making all of the plans about who will see whom, who should talk to which person about which subject, and how so-and-so should "behave", so if they want to see you, they will make it known, believe me. If they are getting narcissistic supply somewhere else, hope that they have met the most attractive seductive co-narcissist on the planet, and they do not come knocking on your door.

If you have tried engaging with them in a good faith effort to work out your differences, and they don't reply, you don't need to keep trying. Let it go unresolved if you can. Most likely it is because they only want things to go their way, including any truces.  

It sets the responsibility of engaging on them. 

It is the best procedure for anyone who is a control freak anyway.   

So not engaging sounds right to me.   

don't personalize

Personalizing what they say to you: all of the negative things they say to you and about you - including insults, all of the controlling things they say to you, all of the micromanaging of your life they try to do, all of the triangulation they try to do to make you feel that you are less than so-and-so (i.e. "You aren't as good as ---"), all of the escalating they do in terms of abuse, and all of the unethical, unlawful things they do aren't your fault. Need convincing? Go here. I'll have a post on why they hate and what they hate about other people in a future post, as this will be another post devoted, in part, to why it isn't your fault, so you can look forward to that. 

Narcissists and sociopaths want badly for you to personalize what they do to you and what they say to you (that it is "all your fault"). So when you don't personalize it, they tend to have a narcissistic collapse (note: the linked article is about "the collapse" as it pertains to public humiliation, however, not getting victims to believe that they, the victims, are at fault, can create a narcissistic collapse too). They haven't been successful in making you their narcissistic supply or scapegoat for rages and bullying. 

If you want to make it clear to a narcissist that they shouldn't go to you for scapegoating and commanding, then not taking what they say personally will get them looking for supply somewhere else. 

Anyway, how can you personalize what they do and say? Look where they are: probably pretty far down on the ethics ladder. Unless they have a lot of integrity, honor and self reflection, how can you take them at all seriously? And by the way, people who are abusive and unethical are usually very, very unsatisfied, grumpy, complaining and punishing about how other people act and behave (but give themselves constant excuses and breaks, of course). 

Instead of taking what they have to say about you personally, why not become aware of just how arrogant, judgmental and prejudiced they are.  Then you can decide whether being as judgmental as they are, as prejudiced and arrogant as they are has any warrant. And make it a years-long study so that you can take a breather from them talking you into things. 

In my view, the only people who are worth listening to about "how you act" are high in morality, honesty and ethics, high in self reflection and understanding nuances of behavioral issues, are kind, patient and truly understand your point of view. They are not controlling, dominating, hypocritical, or have relationships where agendas are the primary focus.

I'm all for "not personalizing" when it comes to narcissists, and finding your true authentic self instead. Not being splashed with their views of you all of the time helps you find your authentic self too.  

Dr. Ramani Durvasula, a psychologist and university professor has this video on the technique:

So, how do people like the D.E.E.P. technique?
Some of the comments below her video
(or if you want to see them yourself on her You Tube channel:
click on video or see my choices below)
Note: each one is a different person:

* Don't Defend. Don't Explain. Don't Engage. Don't Personalize. Being Authentic is hard when you know people are using it against you. But its not forever! Others will see you and the difference in communication and the ability to be you will be night and day! Don't ignore the red flags.

* I think the narcissist must feel very humiliated when they can't rattle you or get you to react anymore. What else do they have when they lose that power over you.

* My therapist told me, "When he starts with his disruption, don't defend yourself. Just look at him and think, this is who he is." It took me a while, but now I get it. Thank you Dr. Ramani for supporting me. I couldn't do it without you. You've changed my life for the better!

* They're so textbook, so, we start a world wide search for someone who 'has not' been called crazy by their narc?

* As I watch dr. Ramani’s videos I realize I made so many mistakes and wasted so much energy while going nuts trying to explain and trying to defend myself in my almost 7 year relationship with my ex narcissist . It’s all so clear now...I was not crazy ! 1 month and counting the blessings !

* Living with a narcissist is like "living in an eternal kangaroo court" OMG so brilliant!

* I don't need the deep technique, I need the "don't start laughing" technique. It's just, ever since I've learned about narcissism and what makes it characteristic, I just can't stop myself from bursting into tears from laughing so hard when they go into narc mode. It's like they all follow a manual or a narc skript and they're so stuck in it that I can't help but laugh like an idiot. I was raised thinking that every single one of us is absolutely unique and then they're just all the same, LITERALLY!!!

* My mom is a grandiose narcissist. When I was younger and tired of dealing with her devaluing phases, I’d just stare at her as she was calling me names and accusing me of doing and feeling things I never did. I was grey rocking and didn’t even know. That made her even more furious. She used to tell me to stop staring her with my “snake eyes”

* Yup, I used to defend myself, try to explain so he could understand me and why I was hurt by his behaviours. I used to engage so we could sort out issues and it was personalised because our relationship was so important to me, I wanted us to resolve and learn from our fights. In the end, I was blamed for my reactions. He discarded me because he was “scared of my reactions” and that I “loved to argue”. Better yet, if we could have argued in his language “he would win and not me”. It was never about winning - for me, it was what I thought was for love.

* Nope, every conversation for these people is about winning. Life is a competition for them.

* I wish I knew this as a child. My mother accused me of terrible things on a regular basis and defending myself caused her to harm me emotionally and physically. Was terrible and scary.

* D.E.E.P. Seeing it, hearing it, practicing it, over and over (40 times and above, I think is the number of repetitions needed to make deep changes) will be such a useful tool to remind me over and over again to not play games with a narcissist. This reminds me of the book entitled “Games People Play”. Thanks as always

* Don't Defend, Explain, Engage, Personalise Deep = the authentic person's response to the narc's DARVO encompassing Deny, Attack and Reverse Victim Offender. Thank you Dr Ramani


FURTHER READING

How to Handle a Narcissist - interview with Dr. Ramani for Health Hackers

RECOMMENDED: Narcissistic Personality Disorder - by the administrators of Health Guide.org
the recommendations are similar to the DEEP technique but have some additions and ways of thinking about situations you may encounter with narcissists (such as arguments, their fantasies, and exploits)

How to Survive a Narcissist When You Choose to Stay - by Anne Blythe, Abuse Literacy, Boundaries and Self Care for BTR.org

How to Communicate With a Narcissist - by the editors of UpJourney with Jerisel Jimenez, LMSW

How to Handle a Narcissist - by Kara Mayer Robinson

RECOMMEDED: 8 Essential Strategies to Survive A Narcissist - Mind Well Psychology, NYC (Mind Well Psychology Center based in New York City at 80 8th Avenue, Suite 600, New York, NY) 

found on Facebook:




Thursday, October 27, 2022

Narcissistic Abuse with Parentification and Infantilization

 

Note: I injured my hand, and I couldn't manipulate my computer art programs, so I will be uploading a picture here at a future date ...

This post will primarily cover why and how narcissists parentify minors, and why and how they infantilize adults (both partners and adult children). Another post will cover why and how alcoholics and addicts can behave somewhat similarly, and why, if they have both conditions, it can be a stand-out trait which is difficult to ignore.

PARENTIFICATION OF A MINOR

According to this Wikipedia article, the definition of parentification is:

     Parentification or parent–child role reversal is the process of role reversal whereby a child or adolescent is obliged to act as parent to their own parent or sibling.[1][2]
     Two distinct types of parentification have been identified technically: instrumental parentification and emotional parentification. Instrumental parentification involves the child completing physical tasks for the family, such as looking after a sick relative, paying bills, or providing assistance to younger siblings that would normally be provided by a parent. Emotional parentification occurs when a child or adolescent must take on the role of a confidante or mediator for (or between) parents or family members.[2][3]

In that same Wikipedia article, parentification with narcissistic parents is described as:

Narcissistic parentification occurs when a child is forced to take on the parent's idealised projection, something which encourages a compulsive perfectionism in the child at the expense of their natural development.[21] In a type of pseudo-identification, the child is induced by any and all means to take on the characteristics of the parental ego ideal[22] – a pattern that has been detected in western culture since Homer's description of the character of Achilles.[23]

Negative effects are described as (from the same Wikipedia article):

     Parentification is harmful when it is unfair and significantly burdens the child.[20] As it may be adaptive or maladaptive,[5] it is not always pathological, but its destructive form (termed destructive parentification) is linked to maladaptive parenting, child maladaptation, physical abuse, sexual abuse, behavioral problems, decreased emotionality, and poor social competence.[3][20][24] Parentified children also have a higher risk of depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety, and low self-esteem.[20][24] ...
     ... A significant byproduct of parentification is losing one's own childhood.[26] The child may also drop out of school to assume the parental role.[13] In destructive parentification, the child in question takes on excessive responsibility in the family, without their caretaking being acknowledged and supported by others.[27] By adopting the role of parental caregiver, the child loses their real place in the family unit and is left lonely and unsure.[12] In extreme instances, there may be what has been called a kind of disembodiment, a narcissistic wound that threatens one's basic self-identity.[28] In later life, parentified children often experience anxiety over abandonment and loss, and demonstrate difficulty handling rejection and disappointment within interpersonal relationships.[29]

For literary examples of parentification, look to Agnes Wickfield in the novel, David Copperfield, by Charles Dickens.

Then there are the terms, "emotional incest" and "covert incest" which are often used interchangeably. 

The definition given for emotional incest from GoodTherapy.org (from the article, Emotional Incest: When Parents Make Their Kids Partners by Kathy Hardie-Williams, MEd, MS, NCC, LPC, LMFT):


     Emotional incest, also known as covert incest, is a dynamic that occurs in parenting where the parent seeks emotional support through their child that should be sought through an adult relationship. Although the effects of emotional incest can be similar to those resulting from physical incest, the term does not encompass sexual abuse.

In terms of why it happens (from the same article):

     Most often, emotional incest occurs when an adult marriage or relationship is fragile, a parent is lonely, or there is a broken family dynamic such as infidelity, mental health conditions, or addiction. One or both parents may seek to get their emotional needs met through the child instead of seeking support from adults. Sometimes a parent will undermine the other parent during an argument or separation/divorce proceedings by putting children in the middle or colluding with a child, which increases the level of the parent’s dependency on the child. The child, in turn, may become concerned about having to take sides or protect a parent. ... 
     ... Emotional incest also can impact the family dynamic as a whole. One partner typically experiences being shut out and may be denied opportunities for parent-child bonding. Additionally, other children may be neglected as the parent leans heavily on the “chosen child.”

In another article by GoodTherapy.com, the article, Enmeshment and Blurred Boundaries: Emotional Incest Explained by Fabiana Franco, PhD goes a little further in explaining how enmeshment (another kind of relationship feature that narcissists demand to feel both securely attached to their child, and also in control and in a state of domination with their child) can also lead to parentification. Here are some highlights of the article when it comes to narcissistic abuse:

     Emotional incest, also known as covert incest, has nothing to do with incestuous sexual abuse. Rather, it is an unhealthy emotional relationship between a parent and a child that blurs boundaries in a way that elevates the child into an adult role. The parent looks to the child for emotional support. In some cases, the parent also seeks practical support from the child.
     In an emotionally incestuous relationship, the child is expected to meet the needs of the parent rather than the parent meeting the needs of the child. This type of relationship, which is similar to enmeshment, is inappropriate and can be psychologically damaging for the child. ...
     ... Emotional incest occurs when the child believes they are responsible for their parent’s emotional well-being. This can happen when the parent talks to the child as though the child were an adult. The parent may request advice from the child regarding adult issues and can even place the child in the role of therapist. ...
    ... Elevating a child to the role of supporter and adult can lead to neglect and emotional abuse. A parent who is overly dependent on a child can also be critical and neglectful. Parents who have traversed or inverted parent-child roles can refuse or be unable to provide appropriate support for the child. This can result in a confusing mix of love and abuse (Hosier, 2015).
      When a parent relies on the child, the child’s needs are not being met. Children who are placed in the role of adults often do not know how to ask for help. They understand that their parent is unable or uninterested in providing emotional support, so they deny their own needs. ...
    ... Parents with narcissistic personality (NPD) may lack insight into how their behavior affects their child (Kriesberg, n.d.). They may also justify or deny their behavior and refuse to see that their child may be suffering.
     Narcissistic parents and parents who engage in emotional incest often need praise from their child. Questions such as, “Am I a good mother?” or, “How much do you love me?” can place the child in a precarious position, as the child is not allowed to complain or express their own needs. Instead, the parent is the primary one who needs care. This unspoken understanding that the child’s needs are not as important as the needs of the parent can have lasting effects and can cause difficulties in adult relationships.

There are several aspects at work when narcissists expect enmeshment with parentification with one or more of their children. 

But first, let us get to the definition of enmeshment (also from GoodTherpay.org):

     ... Enmeshment is a psychological term that describes a blurring of boundaries between people, typically family members. Enmeshment often contributes to dysfunction in families and may lead to a lack of autonomy and independence that can become problematic. ...
     ... While many families value closeness and intimacy, enmeshment goes beyond the bonds of a close family. Enmeshment may mean a parent centers their actions or emotions on the child(ren) and their successes or mistakes, attempts to know and direct all of the child’s thoughts or feelings, and relies heavily on the child(ren) for emotional support. ... 
      ... In enmeshed families, children may be brought up with the expectation that they will accede to their parents’ wishes and develop the same belief system and ideals. ...
     ... Most often, enmeshment occurs between a child and parent and may include the following signs:
- Lack of appropriate privacy between parent and child
- A child being “best friends” with a parent
- A parent confiding secrets to a child
- A parent telling one child that they are the favorite
- One child receiving special privileges from a parent
- A parent being overly involved in their child’s activities or achievements

Parentification can also occur in tandem with parental alienation. 

What is parental alienation? According to this Psychology Today article written by its staff members:

     Parental alienation occurs when a child refuses to have a relationship with a parent due to manipulation, such as the conveying of exaggerated or false information, by the other parent. The situation most often arises during a divorce or custody battle but it can happen in intact families as well.

Then there is parental alienation syndrome. According to an article by Amy J.L. Baker, aptly called Parental Alienation Syndrome, it is what can happen when a parent pressures a child to give up their other parent:

     Among the many areas of concern for social workers working with divorced or separated couples with children are two related problems: parental alienation, or the efforts on the part of one parent to turn a child against the other parent, and parental alienation syndrome, or a child’s unwarranted rejection of one parent in response to the attitudes and actions of the other parent.

Besides enmeshment and parentification, the narcissistic parent often expects:

- to dominate and control a child (even way past childhood)
- expect their child to flatter them and agree with their opinions (which is another sign of enmeshment and of exerting power and control)
- expects their child to play a role (the role is given by the parent to the child, and often means a lifelong role that the child cannot break out of unless they leave their parent)
- sometimes expects the child to "take the blame" (or the rap) when the parent commits the wrong, or when the child wants the parent to take some responsibility for the way the parent's relationships or life has worked out
- sometimes expects the child to believe, repeat and justify the known fibs of the parent.
- sometimes expects the parentified child to assist the parent in bullying, disciplining and in expecting perfection (in terms of deeds, looks, and behaviors that the parent wants from the other children in the household, but isn't getting, and looking to the parentified child to get the goal that the parent wants).
- sometimes expects the child to assist in terms of keeping the other children in the household walking on eggshells for the parent and making sure the other children in the household go along with the parent's rages being the fault of these other children in the household ( i.e. never the parent's fault)
- sometimes expects the parentified child to give up one or all of their siblings in order to serve the parent (a toxic combination of power and controltriangulation, rewards, enmeshment, playing favorites and the isolation tactic in order to get the child to submit).

All of it is held together by a kind of blackmail. The blackmail is more extreme and obvious for malignant narcissists and less extreme or obvious for communal narcissists on the whole. The black mail is more or less "You must validate me and follow my wishes at all times, or else you will be attacked like my scapegoat child or like the other children in the household." 

Usually the parentified child is awarded "favorite empathetic golden child status" or "favorite bully golden child status" depending on the parent's proclivities, and what she wants from his or her parentified child. Usually money, gifts and spending a lot more time with the parentified child is part of the mix.

One of the first ways you know that your parent expects emotional nurturing (a type of parentification) is when they look to you to tell them they are a good or great parent. If they don't get the answer they want, they withdraw either in self pity, with the silent treatment, or by overt raging and punishing you in some way. The reason they expect you to validate them as good parents can stem from:

- childhood emotional neglect, emotional or actual abandonment from a parent figure, or "insecure attachment" to a parent, all leading to the desire or entitlement to get emotional nurturance and emotional validation from their child or children instead. 

- they feel that what they want (true enmeshment and control) cannot happen when you don't prop up their ego or their entitlements to feel "grandiose" and "in charge". 

In other words, they expect their underage child to provide the emotional nurturance and supports that they did not get from their own parent or parents, which in turn can stunt the emotional growth of their child. The sad part is that this dependence can continue well into their child's adult years and old age. It can create children who "fail to launch" into true adulthood. It can also manifest as side effects in a child: crippling guilt, crippling "obligation" to serve their parent, and crippling fear (the fear of being abandoned if they do not parentify to the parent's standards). 

Narcissists are often still stuck in childhood and "child behaviors". 

The silent treatment, one of their favorite weapons, has often been described as "childish". Stealing or destroying another person's personal property (one of the favorite pastimes of malignant narcissists) is even more childish. It shows no more maturity than a very small child stealing cookies from the cookie jar and trying to get away with it.

It shows how destructive they get when they don't "get their way". "Getting their way" is very much a childhood dream of being a princess, prince, queen or king where tantrums like rage and threats are supposed to get them good results from their underling pretend-sycophant children. Contrast that with adult behavior and ways of coping: instead of the silent treatment, silent sulking, and playing the victim, the "fully launched adult" talks things out, has the ability to compromise, is capable of negotiating and listening with an open mind, is humble and is self assured enough to know that he doesn't know everything and can be open to new perspectives and experiencing things, has the strength of character and experience to know that he isn't always going to get his way, has the ability to see how he can effect others in a positive or negative way, and is grown up enough not to take opposing views as a personal insult. Instead of stealing, a "fully launched adult" will know why it is illegal and why it is hurtful, selfish, and often spiteful to steal (stealing deprives one person in order to fulfill another person). It's low, but it is also 3 year old behavior: "If Mommy doesn't give me that cookie, I'm going to steal it. If she asks me if I ate it, I'll lie." 

If you've got a genuine seven year old child trying to take care of an adult who has "failed to launch" past four years old, it's a little like the blind leading the blind. Most children are going to fail at being a parent to their parent. At best their emotions and desires will be ignored, and at worst they will be hit over having emotions. These children are likely to be taken for granted, or raged at and abused for not parentifying enough.   

If the four year old acting adult is giving the seven year old real child the silent treatment, the real child isn't going to really understand why: they are more likely to react: either an anxious-ambivalent style or an anxious-avoidant style. That is because most children who receive the silent treatment have been receiving it in similar ways most of their life (through neglect or a parent's resentment of having to raise a child). They have been receiving negative feedback, rather than soothing, since they were tiny babies. 

If the four year old acting parent is stealing or breaking the toys of the seven year old real child, the real child is not going to really understand why this is happening either. They might, in the best of circumstances, realize that it is unjust and that it hurts. 

All in all it creates a co-dependent "mess".

It definitely creates a dysfunctional and toxic family. In toxic families ruled by narcissists, you'll usually find other members who "failed to launch" as full autonomous adults too. Co-dependency is the main priority of toxic families. The other priority is "soothing the parent" rather than soothing the child. In fact, the child's feelings are often ignored in narcissistic families. Children are required to walk on eggshells around their supersensitive can-rage-at-any-moment parent, but if the child feels anything, they are told to squelch their feelings, or that their feelings are selfish and are being "used to get attention." It's normal for children to have trouble regulating their emotions and self soothing, but when the parent is worse at it than the child, it's a disaster.

And many children resent the fact that the only relationship that their parent will accept is an enmeshed, co-dependent one. Even rewarded golden children get sick of the lack of boundaries and triangulation that their parent uses to remain the number one focus. Some golden children will do just about anything for money and rewards, but they sacrifice their own well-being and many, many relationships in the process, even with their own spouse. 

In the end, the resulting co-dependency that happens over this, can create a normalization of the silent treatment, normalization of going ballistic over relatively small mistakes, stealing and breaking other people's personal property, especially if the parent looks the other way, coddles or rewards the real child. And often certain children are rewarded for being co-dependent or accepting a state of "emotional incest", and acting like the parent acts, as long as the parent doesn't have to fix the child's emotional dysregulations or rages themselves, and that the golden's rage or other outbursts go somewhere else for someone else to fix (possibly a sibling in childhood, and possibly a spouse in adulthood). 

But keeping the parent emotionally regulated and soothed isn't the only thing that their parentified child has to perform, usually. They may be called upon to take care of a younger sibling, their other parent, the parent's physical needs, health needs, psychological needs, financial needs, technology needs (like fixing a computer or resetting a home alarm system), nutritional needs and transactional needs (which can include getting on the phone with repairmen, doing grocery and bank transactions, dealing drugs at a young age for a parent's clients, being called upon by their parent to bully other family members -often called being a flying monkey). In some cases, the child may be called on to provide a parent's sexual needs, needs for sadism, or proxy raging.

Although parentification isn't child abuse per se, it often leads to child abuse. 

It also leads to stunting the child's emotional and intellectual growth. 

INFANTILIZATION OF AN ADULT

According to Wikipedia:

Infantilization is the prolonged treatment of one who has a mental capacity greater than that of a child as though they are a child.[1] Studies have shown that an individual, when infantilized, is overwhelmingly likely to feel disrespected. Such individuals may report a sense of transgression akin to dehumanization.[2]

Infantilization can happen in peer and partner relationships. In narcissistically abusive partnerships or marriages, the abuser tells his partner what to do, "how to behave", and assumes authority over them. 

In the article, The Effects & Examples of the Infantilization of Women from Study.com it states:

     The infantilize definition is when someone treats an adult as if they were a child, primarily through the use of demeaning practices. The infantilization of women is when others, usually men, treat adult women as children, most often concerning sexism and misogyny. Some common manifestations of infantilization are linguistic, such as over-simplifying explanations, using demeaning nicknames (e.g., "sweetheart" or "honey"), or suggesting that the infantilized person would not understand a topic without reason. Infantilizing behaviors can also be physical, such as pinching someone's cheek or offering a woman a hug when offering a man a handshake. The infantilization of women often also involves regulating their appearances and which social spheres they can occupy, such as what types of jobs they can hold. From a psychological perspective, someone using infantilizing behaviors conveys a sense of superiority over the other person and can cause psychological damage and is often frustrating to the infantilized person who can internalize feelings of inadequacy. ...
     ... Women have historically been infantilized in western society because their prescribed social role is lesser than a man's, rendering women lesser according to this structure and at a disadvantage to change the situation. Treating women as children is linked to objectification because it establishes an unequal power dynamic, stripping the woman of her autonomy. Often women are infantilized in the workplace because of their historical disadvantage in entering the professional realm. Many feminists have discussed infantilization as a gendered practice to illustrate how it further disenfranchises women, especially in the workplace. A seminal example of this argument is Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex, where she argues that sexist treatments of women (including infantilization) conceptualize women as "other" and men as "normal." Overall, men infantilize women more often than the opposite, but women can also infantilize other women. ...

However, it can also happen to men by their marriage partners too. It is not as common because narcissism is around 75 percent more common in men than women (male privilege or male golden child status helps to exacerbate the problem of men becoming narcissistically and arrogantly inclined), but when men are infantilized, such as when they are not in the dominant race or culture of the society, it can also make them feel as inadequate, invisible, dominated and "used" as any woman in the same position.

In the case of men, narcissistic women "use" men for money more than for sex.

A lot of divorces from narcissistic women are as hellish as divorces from narcissistic men. 

A good example of infantilization in a marriage can be seen in the movie, Sleeping With the Enemy

Then there is infantilization of adult children:

In the article, Causes Of Infantilization by Joy Youell for Better Help, infantilization when it comes to a relationship between someone who is narcissistic and their adult child looks like this:

     Infantilization happens when adults are treated like a child. This can occur, for example, when parents refuse to allow their child to grow up or when adult children treat senior parents as if they can’t make decisions on their own. Infantilization can feel demeaning, and can compromise a person’s mental health. It’s important for parents to recognize the signs of infantilization, so you can appropriately manage it in yourself or other parents. ...
     ... Some experts have closely associated infantilization with narcissism, where parents fear their children becoming adults and therefore their equals. To prevent this from happening, they attempt to stop time. Parents can limit their adult children by treating them like small children, and by treating them like a toddler or juvenile, it keeps them stuck in their youth and therefore is a safeguard for the parent to maintain control. Throughout this article, we’ll discuss some of the causes of infantilization, potential effects of infantilization, and what you can do to recognize and address infantilization if it appears in your life.  ...
     Causes of Infantilization
      The causes of infantilization can vary, but in general a person who treats someone like an infant often feels superior or needs to feel superior. Children who are now adults may find that their parents refuse to see them as such. Instead, these parents feel the need to express superiority in many ways, including micromanaging their adult children’s activities.
     Parents who exhibit narcissistic tendencies are inclined to infantilize their children because they likely see their children as an extension of themselves. A child’s independence is a threat to that relationship. Using infantilization, parents undermine that independence by doing things for their children in inappropriate ways or by trying to make their child feel incompetent when learning something new. ... 

     The article goes on to give examples of infantilization:
     Disapproval
     Interference
     Excessive Criticism
     The effects of it can add up to:
     ... For adult children, it can create a sense of dread around interacting with their parents. If the situation goes on long enough, the child may end up cutting off contact with their parents.
     
In terms of infantilizing seniors the article states:
     ... On the other end of the spectrum, seniors can become dependent on their children for care. These adult children find themselves stepping in and making decisions for their parents, and they may not even consult their parents. In the end, they treat their parents as if they are incapable of making decisions for themselves, despite the fact that they may still have a clear mind. This could make the parent infantilized.
     Parents need to be willing to address these issues with their children, reminding them that they are adults as well. If necessary, legal protections can be put in place to keep adult children from overstepping the boundaries of the relationship. ...
     
My own observation: if you are a senior, making sure you are not infantilized by your own children means not infantilizing them after they become full adults. Remember that you teach more by example than by words, and you don't want to normalize "infantilizing adults" of any age. 

Infantilization of adult children can go hand in hand with narcissistic traits too:
* perspecticide and invalidation: they deem that you are not worth listening to or hearing out because you are still being perceived as a child
* perfectionism: they deem that you are still a child who needs to know how to act perfectly, and to do things perfectly - usually for them. They deem you still need to be a parent-pleaser just like you were when you were six. In other words, they put themselves in the "teacher" position (which is annoying to any adult, even adult children). If they can't get what they want, they usually stoop to erroneous blaming and commanding behaviors to get what they want.   
* gaslighting: they treat you like an inept crazy child because you need someone (usually them) to boss you around and tell you what to do
* physical abuse: they deem that you need to be punished (to go around hurt) because you didn't act the way they wanted you to, or you didn't do what they wanted. The message is: "You need to behave yourself and the only way I know that will happen is if I hurt you!" Note: physical abuse of one adult towards another adult is illegal.
* emotional bullying: they also deem that you need to be punished (to go around hurt), but the hurt is emotional: triangulation, smear campaigns, the silent treatment, having affairs on you (if you are their spouse), only having a relationship with your other siblings (when you are their kid), circular arguments, stonewalling, a lot of attempts at trashing your self esteem. 
* Even their common statements like "You're ungrateful", "You create drama", "You brought this upon yourself" is not indicative of an adult conversation. All of their endless "behavior lessons" (when their own behaviors are hypocritical and dubious at best and incredibly evil and abusive at worst) is also just another round of infantilization.

Note: narcissists do not usually give up infantilizing you. It's how they feel powerful, dominant and in control (their unfortunate addiction). In terms of abuse, it is done by the narcissist so that they can keep assuming a role of power and control over you. It is harder for them to dominate and control you if they can't convince you that you are inept (i.e. childlike or disabled in some way). It is also how they get a grandiosity hit (again "hit" is used in the same way that the drug culture uses "hit" - i.e. taking the drug). If they get arrogant in the process of infantilizing you, you can practically bet that they are narcissists. 

If you ask them to stop with the infantilizing, and they don't, consider that they won't change and that you might want to put your attention elsewhere, on people who will treat you with respect, and as an equal.

As for other kinds of relationships: 
  
Infantilization can also happen in the work place, primarily from bosses or co-workers who are competitive, "bossy" and disparaging - it tends to happen to women more than men. 

It can happen to seniors (as in the article above).

And infantilization can happen to adults with disabilities. This means they will be trying to take away your rights more and more. They may insist on making all of the decisions for you. In order to avoid being exploited, it is important to see a lawyer.  

It can happen in a sibling relationship, especially if the narcissistic abuser is or was the golden child of your common parent and you were the scapegoat. In that case, you are infantilized in the same way that your sibling saw the parent do it to you. However, it can be quite a bit worse, and also a lot more dangerous because the parent does not see themselves as a rival to their child necessarily, as much as a sibling sees his other sibling as a rival.
     In sibling rivalry, the golden child may try to dominate you and lie about you to the parent to keep his or her status up (and to keep getting rewarded), and for your status to drop. So many of them put rewards from the parent absolutely first before any relationship with you, so that can make them dangerous as well. 
     Infantilizing can also be used by itself: to keep their status high and yours low by appearing to be ultra-competent, and you disabled and inept. 
     If your parent is heavily narcissistic, they will have created the hellish "sibling rivalry" themselves to make their children fight for their love (many children don't even realize this is going on until they are in therapy and when you begin to evaluate how your parent treated your siblings). But by the time they put your sibling first in almost all situations and transactions, usually by early childhood, and you last, it is fixed that way for life usually. If you are the parent's scapegoat, or the family scapegoat, then they are extremely unlikely to change (being able to hear anything other than their golden child's perspectives). They can be extremely cruel unless you repeat, puppet-like, that their golden child is all wonderful, all competent, all altruistic, while you are expected to self-flagellate and portray yourself as all inept and all wrong - not likely over the long term, even when your parent expects it and blackmails for it. It means that you are expected to lie about how great the golden child is even if and when they are a bully. 
     In those cases, there is nothing you can do to change their minds that you don't deserve the abuse of your sibling. They turned off your voice a long, long time ago. 
     Note: if your parent neglects that you are abused, or if your parent expects you to apologize to your abuser, you are a scapegoat of your family. Scapegoating is usually extremely dangerous because you have no advocates, no one to keep the abuse from escalating. And it can escalate very, very fast, especially if the sibling is scapegoating (treating you abusively while being nice to other people), and if they are physically abusive.  
     Also note: a parent expecting you to apologize to an abusive sibling, or arm-twisting you to do so, is also a form of infantilization and very, very common in toxic narcissistic families. Co-adults respect your decisions to separate from your sibling, no matter how uncomfortable it is for your parent. In most of these situations, holidays are split: Thanksgiving with one child, and Christmas with the other, for instance. If they insist on infantilizing you about your decisions to cut ties with the golden child sibling, and you are the family scapegoat, infantilization can mean dangerous situations coming from many directions.
     Most scapegoats leave their families because of escalating abuse, or have extremely limited contact (usually restricted to very large family gatherings, if that). 

Realize that infantilization can go hand-in-hand with parentification, and often does, causing you to feel confused and being prone to cognitive dissonance. 

If you are being "punished" in a marriage by your partner, or if you are being punished as an adult by your parents, that is almost always a sign that you are being infantilized and abused. Most domestic violence scenes have to do with both as well. 

I bet you'll be able to relate to the articles above as well as articles having to do with gaslighting, invalidation of your feelings and thoughts, walking on eggshells around your abusers rages, and other articles having to do with narcissistic abuse (found on the right column in this blog).

HOW INFANTILIZATION AND PARENTIFICATION
IS RELATED TO GASLIGHTING

In gaslighting, the main objective of the abuser is to dominate you, to obtain evermore power and control over you by trying to convince you that you are too crazy (and therefor inept) at being an adult, that you need to be told what to do, that you need to be reprimanded when you aren't doing things to their exact standards, and that you need to be punished if you act like an autonomous adult making your own decisions. 

But before they get to that point, they need to convince you that you are crazy first. And that's where the invalidation of your thoughts, feelings and experiences come in

They need to convince you that your thoughts aren't right. Phrases such as "That's not the way it happened", "You need to see a psychiatrist", "You've never been able to decipher reality from fiction", "That's conspiratorial thinking", "You can never get things right", "I'm not interested in what your thoughts are" are some common phrases.

Your feelings are also negated: "You're too sensitive", "You make a mountain out of a molehill", "If you had just done what I told you to do, you wouldn't be in pain now", "You're such a drama queen", "You really need to get a grip", "If you're going to cry, you'll get it!", "I can't stand you when you're upset", "You brought this upon yourself", "You don't feel that way! The way you really feel is -", "Oh, here we go again!" when you are upset, or when you try to bring up their abuse and, of course, "I'm not interested in what you feel".  

Your experiences are also negated: "It didn't happen that way", "Poor thing! You can't get a grip on reality", "The way it happened was - ", "If you can't agree with me on this, then I guess the relationship is over", "I don't want to hear what your experiences are" followed by "They are so boring!" or "This isn't relevant" or "Why would you think I want to hear about this?"

The reason why this is going on is that narcissists have very little empathy, and it is a power play to put themselves, their concerns, their emotions, their trials, their experiences ahead of yours. They want the attention going their way, and the inconvenience of dealing with your emotions, thoughts and experiences is irritating to a lot of them. 

They tend to be liars too. And the reason they lie is to get their own way, especially in the perspectives department. They reason that their "so-called", "lie-filled" reality needs to come before yours.

If they are being called upon to deal with your emotions, thoughts and experiences, they can discard you or at least shut your voice down. 

The reason for grooming you in this way is to get you infantilized, and hopefully parentified too: dealing with their rages by listening to why they rage: for you to take care of the issue they are raging at you about. Some of them advance to rages with threats. Often it is a blackmail maneuver, and also it is an assumption that you have empathy for them, which you probably do. The way rages relate to gaslighting is that if you don't agree to do something for them to get them emotionally regulated again, they are likely to call you crazy, and sometimes stupid as well, or at the very worst, beat you up, or run smear campaigns on you, or end the relationship with you completely.

They are all pretty predictable in this way. 

Dealing with their rages is a parentifying move. If they say they can't help but rage because you "are so --" (trying to convince you that you are the cause of their rages), watch them in public with some of the same issues. I bet they don't rage there. 

The infantilizing move, is to get you feeling incompetent enough that you will take orders from them. Infantilizing can also mean they will try to sabotage your adult dreams and ambitions, or at least try to control the details or give you lots of unsolicited advice about your career. They talk to you like you are a child who needs to learn lessons from them and to be lectured at. The worst of them try to micro-manage everything you do and say, even when it comes to your career. It is inappropriate to adult relationships. 

CONCLUSION

If you are being physically abused in addition to being infantilized, you can call a domestic violence hotline or check into a domestic violence center to assess the dangers, discuss safety plans, keeping your documents in a safe place, etc.

In another post, I will be covering parental alienation, something that often happens in conjunction with parentification and sometimes with infantilization too. 

FURTHER READING

Sons of Narcissistic Mothers (How narcissistic mothers manipulate and damage their sons.) - by 

Darlene Lancer, JD, LMFT for Psychology Today
excerpt:

     All children of narcissists suffer. Sons of narcissistic mothers suffer damage to their autonomy, self-worth, and future relationships with women.
     Narcissists lack empathy and the ability to nurture their children. They don’t see them as individuals, but as extensions of themselves. Their children’s feelings and needs are neglected and criticized, while their own take precedence. Narcissists feel entitled and insist on getting their way. They exact compliance through control, manipulation, guilt, and shame. It’s "their way or the highway,” and if you don’t oblige, they punish you with attacks, coldness, or withholding. Insecurity drives their insatiable, unrealistic needs for high regard and admiration. They take offense easily, triggering contempt and rage. Because they lack boundaries, they project—they shame and blame others for their own emotional discomfort, which they can’t tolerate. ...
     ... Just as daughters of narcissistic mothers experience their mother’s envy and competition, a narcissistic mother may be jealous of her son’s girlfriends and compete with his wife. No one will be good enough, because no one will measure up to her inflated self-image and standards. She must remain number one in his life. She may try to control and undermine his intimate relationships, criticize or disrespect his partner, or do so subtly with innuendo and manipulation. (See the movie Queen Bee.) Her son will feel hopelessly guilt-ridden and caught in the middle, trying to avoid hurting and angering his mother and partner (who may also be a narcissist or otherwise mentally unstable.) He feels guilty, is unaware of appropriate boundaries and unable to set them. ...
     ... Some sons of narcissists may develop a narcissistic personality disorder. Sons of narcissistic mothers have higher rates of narcissism. This may be because she’s more likely to idealize and aggrandize him rather than compete, as she would with a daughter.

Parentification: The Role of the Parentified Child in Narcissistic Families - by Carla Corelli for her own website
Note: this website also has other helpful articles

The Narcissist Parent’s Psychological Warfare: Parentifying, Idealizing, and Scapegoating - by Julie L. Hall, Contributor for the Huffington Post

The Real Effect of Narcissistic Parenting on Children (Narcissists raise children who suffer from crippling self-doubt.) - by Karyl McBride, PhD for Psychology Today

What is Infantilization? - by Brittany Loggins, medically reviewed by Ivy Kwong, fact checked by Aaron Johnson for Very Well Mind
excerpt:
     Infantilization is when an adult is being treated like a child, even though nothing about their mental, physical, social, or intellectual wellbeing requires such treatment.
     Oftentimes, parents are guilty of this to some degree as their children are growing up, particularly when they are teenagers and trying to forge their own path.
     That said, infantilization can also happen in both friendships and romantic relationships, especially if someone is trying to demonstrate superiority. Verywell Mind spoke with Dr. Sherry Benton, a practicing therapist and founder of digital the mental health platform TAO Connect, to find out more about what infantilization looks like and what impacts it can have.
     "Infantilizing is treating someone as less than they are," says Benton. "It is treating them as a child, a victim, and so forth."


The Infantilization of Women in Mainstream Media and Society
- by Tavisha Sood for The Verdict Online

Why Narcissistic Parents Infantilize Their Adult Children - by Kaitlyn Vogel (medically reviewed by Nathan Greene, PsyD)

Please Stop Infantilizing Me — Especially In The Workplace - by Danielle Corcione for Ravishly

Parentification and the Codependent Four-Year-Old -- by Lenora Thompson for Psych Central
excerpt:
     ... "Over thirty years later, I realized that it’s unnatural for a four-year-old to be worried about their parents’ moods. A four-year-old should be coloring pictures, dressing dollies and making mud pies. Not worrying about whether their parent is too moody to laugh or not! ...
     ... I was a mature, responsible, down-to-earth, prematurely old carbon copy of my parents. There was no 'Lenora,' per se. I was too busy taking care of them, keeping them happy, not making any waves, trying to be inaudible and invisible, playing the clown to manipulate Dad into laughter. It wasn’t really safe to become an authentic, unique, opinionated person in my own right. That came later. I finished growing up in my thirties and no longer feel incomplete, un-grown-up ...
     ... I was always around, a paying, serving, shopping, helping personal assistant ...
     ... When you finally break from 'needy' parents, they will do everything in their power to make that transition hard for you. At the very least, they’ll ruin your joy in your new life." ...

found on Facebook: