What is New?

WHAT IS NEWEST ON THIS BLOG?
July 30 New Post: Is It Possible that Gen Z and Millennials Having to Work 2 - 3 Jobs Is Contributing to the Nationwide Trend of Estrangement With Parents in the USA?
July 21 New Post: Don't Narcissists Care About Hurting You?
July 14 New Post: Reviews of "Narcissistic Rehab", "Narcissistic Detox" and "No More Narcissists" on Facebook
June 23 New Post: How I Came to Forgive the Narcissists in My Life (and it may not be what you think)
June 6 New Post: Why Do Sycophants Feel They Need to Follow Someone Who is So Unethical, Power Hungry, Cruel and Narcissistic? Comes with Personal Stories and a Deep Dive Into the Subject.
May 18 New Post: Family Obligation and the Scapegoat. Do You Owe Your Narcissistic Family Anything?
April 26 New Post: An Update: New Studies on Scapegoats of Narcissistic Families, Wills and Narcissistic Parents, Dissociation, and Some Other Topics of Note
April 6 New Post: Why Scapegoats of Narcissistic Families Are Unlikely To Turn Into Sycophants. Part II.
March 29 New Post: A Domestic Violence Situation and Tale - from a well known Canadian Musician.
March 9 New Post: Why Scapegoats of Narcissistic Families Find It Impossible to Turn Themselves Into Sycophants. Comes with a Discussion on Largely Involuntary Independent Thinking, C-PTSD and Healing.
February 28 New Post: Don't Get Narcissism Mixed Up With Alzheimer's Disease. How Similar Are They? Comes With a Discussion on Brain Science in Narcissistic Families and in Alzheimer's Disease
February 16 New Post: Perspecticide and Being Invalidated Often Feels Unsafe and Even Downright Dangerous On the Receiving End. Comes With a Discussion on Narcissism.
PERTINENT POST: ** Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does it Work?
PETITION: the first petition I have seen of its kind: Protection for Victims of Narcissistic Sociopath Abuse (such as the laws the UK has, and is being proposed for the USA): story here and here or sign the actual petition here
Note: After seeing my images on social media unattributed, I find it necessary to post some rules about sharing my images
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Showing posts with label pitting family members against each other. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pitting family members against each other. Show all posts

Thursday, March 10, 2016

favoritism: fostering abuse for everyone in the family, and why a narcissistic parent favors and loves the golden child most, and what it does to the whole family

name of cartoon: "Favoritism"
image is © Lise Winne
cartoon, 2016
inspired by a conversation with Robert Davis, LCSW
(for questions regarding use of images or contract an image for your next article
contact: LilacGroveGraphics (att) yahoo.com)

As a Mandated Reporter for the State of New York, I am required by law to report signs of child abuse and when a child tells me that a sibling is being favored in his home, I take it seriously.

While some children merely perceive there is favoritism of a sibling, there are signs to look for in case it is abuse. Some of the things I hear from children that are red flags that need to be reported are:

"When my brother and I fight, I'm always the one to be punished."
"My mom always does fun things with my sister, but she thinks I'm bad, so I have to stay in my room most of the time."
"When my sister and I fight, my mother always listens to her and takes her side. She never listens to me."
"I keep getting hit by my brother, but my mother never does anything about it. She tells me to fight my own battles even though I'm smaller than him."
"I can't tell you what is going on because my brother is mean. Please don't tell my mother either. But I got really hurt last night and I couldn't do my homework."
"I wish my mother loved me, but she doesn't. She only seems to love my sister. It's like I don't exist."
"I wish I weren't so sad. My mom told me that if I wasn't sad all of the time, she would spend as much time with me as my brother."
"Every time I fight with my sister, my parents say I'm ungrateful."
"My brother can do anything he wants to me, but I always have to be polite to him. Mom says he's not in charge, but he is."
"I just can't talk to my parents about what my sister does to me. I just have to hide."

There are many more, but you get the idea! All of these are warning signs of an abusive narcissistic parent at the helm.

The worst part of favoring a child is that it seems to overwhelmingly foster narcissism in a child (typically referred to as a "golden child" in dysfunctional families). Narcissists tend to be abusive. In fact, the abuse tends to develop first in the home (as sibling abuse).

According to Brad Bushman of Ohio State University (link here from an article entitled How Parents Create Narcissistic Children), narcissism can start its development as early as eight years old. Here is an excerpt:

The results are quite clear: Parents who "overvalue" children during this developmental stage, telling them they are superior to others and entitled to special treatment, are more likely to produce narcissistic children -- who can grow up to become narcissistic adults, unless something is done about it.

"When children are seen by their parents as being more special and more entitled than other children, they may internalize the view that they are superior individuals, a view that is at the core of narcissism," the researchers wrote in a study released online Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "But when children are treated by their parents with affection and appreciation, they may internalize the view that they are valuable individuals, a view that is at the core of self-esteem." ...


... (Authors Brad Bushman and Eddie Brummelman) also wanted to determine what differentiated narcissists -- who tend to be more aggressive and even violent than other people, and are at higher risk for depression, anxiety and drug addiction ...

Favoritism effects everyone in a narcissistic family negatively. It is a nasty family scourge that appears to have winners and losers, but the trends bear out that everyone loses as you will see!

The narcissistic personality disordered parent really does not love the favored golden child more. He (or she) uses the golden child just as he uses all of his children: for an agenda.

It has been said that narcissists feel jealousy more intensely than those of us who make up the rest of the 99 percent of the population.

They also feel that jealousy is being leveraged upon them as a provoking measure than is actually the case. Since jealousy is such a painful emotion for them, and since they feel that most people use it against them, the urge to use it against others becomes great, a pastime that can become full time, especially for a narcissist who has a life of leisure.

This is why they try to use jealousy as a retaliatory measure against relatively innocent people who mean them no harm. The narcissist sees goading in everyone and everything!

In the family it is no different. They act out their jealousy fantasies by having a favored golden child who they can parade around with in front of the other children with the intent of provoking those other children so that the other children will feel jealousy. The other children, meanwhile, are usually facing some degree of punishment from light to severe. Narcissists are in punishing mode most of their lives; they are always trying to hurt someone (if they can)! They cannot take a hint of criticism, even how a child looks at them (which they can interpret as a heartbreaking criticism). This is why narcissistic parents are notorious for using erroneous blaming and punishments.

Besides jealousy, there seems to be another part to the puzzle at work.

Narcissists believe they are special and deserve special treatment. It is what is written into most basic descriptions of narcissists in many articles and blogs. Special treatment refers to the following (not a complete list):

* believes he should be held to different legal and moral standards than others
* believes he has a right to criticize and insult others, but that they have no right to criticize and insult him
* believes that he should not be accountable for what happens in his relationships, but that others have to take the entire responsibility for how the narcissist feels and what happens in the relationship between you
* believes that he is better than others, and that others are inferior
* believes he should be able to rage at others, but that others should always be thoughtful and polite
* believes he should always be apologized to, but will never apologize to others
* feels that others should forgive him for his "human flaws", but feels he is entitled to carry around a grudge forever over "imperfections" in others and use it to punish others when things aren't going his way

The list goes on, but you get the idea.

So, when a narcissist has children, he projects this kind of thinking onto one child. The narcissist decides which child has to be better than the other children based on how that child is acting. Which child is mirroring the parent? Which of the children seems most self centered? Who seems clever and conniving? Who seems less emotional? Who seems most like the narcissist parent? Who boasts the most? The favored child also tends to be male (for both female and male narcissist parents). And that is how the golden child is chosen.

In order to make the golden child a mirror to the parent, the golden gets rewarded in ways that the other children don't. This reinforces that the golden is also better than the others and deserves special treatment. If the child has a fight with a sibling, he has rights and privileges that his sibling does not have. This is enforced by the parent who continually protects and defends the golden child and punishes any sibling who challenges the golden.

According to psychologist Ramani Durvasula, most consistently favored golden children end up being another abusive narcissist. It is not always the case, but it is mostly the case.

The children on the receiving end of being disfavored are usually crippled with low self esteem. Narcissistic parents are notorious for gaslighting disfavored children. This enables the parent to weed out the competition for the scapegoat role. The role is given to the child who is acting more sensitively to the narcissist's manipulations. The narc parent can label this child as "the crazy one", "the failure", "the bad child," "the difficult child." The injustices and erroneous punishments further the agenda of labeling the child as "over-emotional", as a child not capable of "controlling his or her temper" (thus "creating drama", a favorite phrase among narcissists), even when the child is provoked. All of the emotional outbursts of the child are used by the narc parent to point at the child and say, "look how emotional that child is; he's insane!" and other derogatory terms. Aside from provoking and laying blame, scapegoats are otherwise ignored. If they act up or protest, they are isolated from the family and punished for being emotional. The only time they are not ignored is when they have a notable achievement (this becomes a big concern for the narc parent, which I discuss later).  

Still, the golden child is actually not loved any more than the rest of the children, because narcissists cannot love. The golden is used for an agenda: he's as manipulated as the rest of the children. The narcissistic parent lavishes gifts, they take the golden out to dinner and on trips; he is treated like royalty at every turn while the scapegoat is expected to be a Cinderella for the family. Cinderella may take on most of the household chores while the golden focuses on a job or his education, or she may be expected to do babysitting of the golden's children at every request, so that he is free to do important work. The narcissist wants the scapegoats to feel subservient at all times, indebted, like it is their duty to serve, and to prove they are martyred saints. In effect they are disabled by the narcissist emotionally and financially compared to the golden. They are treated as "left behinds", out of favor, unattractive drudges, while the narcissistic parent gallivants around with the spoiled golden. The point is to send a subtle message to all of the other remaining children: "If you don't do as I say, you will end up like the scapegoat" and "If you do as I say, you may end up like the golden."

The narcissist hopes that his other children will pine: "Why am I not treated this way? Why am I always second fiddle?"

The real reason for the narcissists actions is to get children competing: "If only you did this like so and so, then we might --" "If only you entertained us like --" "If only you did what we wanted we would --" "If only you were as grateful as --" "If only you worked as hard for our love as --- we would --" "If you were just a little more like --" "I'm sorry. I just like your brother more than I love you. If you weren't so ---, then I might treat you better." "You need to learn your place --" "Girls aren't treated as well as boys! Get used to that fact! If you act like a girl and are pleasing then we might --" "If you are going to act like that, the consequence is that you won't get the privileges that --- has" "If you agree to doing (what is immoral or dangerous) then we might bestow upon you the same gifts that --- gets" "Pay attention! If you learn the lessons you are supposed to learn, then you might enjoy what he has ---" "You are lucky to get what you have. We don't reward bad children who criticize us --" "If you're going to be bad, you deserve what we give you, and don't complain -- "

Anything and everything is used for the agenda of making a child feel that if he competes with his elevated-to-god-like-status sibling, then he'll receive better treatment (and yet this rarely is the case -- see my post on triangulation in abusive families).

The narcissist enjoys rubbing the other children's noses in how much more he adores his golden.

It is the first clue of narcissistic parenting: a child complaining of a parent's favoritism. And in fact, narcissistic parents enjoy the suffering look on their children's faces at being left out, tortured and manipulated in this way. In fact, the more a child feels worthless and inconsequential, the more this kind of parent gets off on it. It is a sign to the narc that the manipulations are working!

Normal parents do not want to see their child suffer. They try to make everything as even as possible between their children. Normal children also prefer parents who treat siblings with an even hand. They want a fair referee. They want to be loved equally. A normal child's brain is not built for constant narcissistic abuse; that is why most children of abusive homes have C-PTSD.

Comforting a suffering child is a normal parental reaction. Comfort calms the child, and trust is established in the parent.

Narcissists, however, keep putting their children through misery and punishments indefinitely. The parent hopes that his already-suffering children will ask for mercy, promising that relief is achieved only through total and absolute compliance with the narcissist's triangulation games, that the child must give up his will to please the parent. At the very least, the parent hopes that the child's self esteem is so shot, that he will take the parent back and excuse all of the abuse, in case things don't work out with the golden.

The favoritism is used for one purpose: total control of all of the children. Since the scapegoat is the child deemed by the narcissist as the least likely to be controllable (they show lack of control by showing their pain, after all), the scapegoat is used for constant blame and retaliations. These punishments generally become more severe, more frequent and more long lasting as the child grows.

The point is to make the children always feel a bit love-starved, so that they will work for approval and a chance at the privileged spot.

As studies have shown, however, the pain of being forsaken in the nasty game of favoritism tends to bring out more resentment and distance than competition, especially in children over 10 and adult children. So what the narc parent often ends up with are resentful, distant, estranged children who do not trust them and do not want any part of the narcissistic triangulation game. Narcissism tends to breed contempt and disgust in victims, not adulation and compliance (though narcs have been known to be blind to this fact, so beware!).

Expecting children to compete very rarely works out for the narcissist. Children eventually catch on that they are all being played for fools, or they become aware of what constitutes abuse. Note: many children are being taught what constitutes abuse in school anti-bullying seminars, and favoritism is on the same list as the silent treatment, isolation for long periods, slander, mocking, denigrating, shaming and other forms of emotional abuse. Favoritism is emotional abuse because most of the time it is used to purposely hurt and control (the definition of abuse). In school bullying, favoritism is used to gain followers and co-bullies, to wear down a victim's defenses before escalating to other forms of abuse. Other forms of abuse can be mobbing, unwanted touch, threats, physical abuse, destruction of property, violence. It is not so different in the toxic family.

So how does the golden child keep his position? By being agreeable to the parent, by being able to hold his feelings in, by being able to command attention through his speech (the parent grooms the child to sound unemotional and authoritative), by being a sycophant to the narcissistic parent. He is also often groomed to be an authority figure in the family, to discipline the other children (which most often equates to bullying the other children). Being successful financially so that the parent can "keep up appearances" is sometimes one of the prerequisites too. All of these personality traits seem to win the heart of the narc parent (or lose, depending on whether you feel it is at all desirable to be used as a tool by drama-provoking abusers).

The golden's position isn't necessarily permanent. No child can be a perfect mirror, and even the parent can feel disappointed by this fact. Also, if the parent isn't always first place in the golden's life, or if the golden puts up any resistance to the narc's agenda, they can be discarded and punished like all previous victims of the family. Punishments of goldens can be more severe than punishments for their siblings because so much more is given to the golden, therefore expected from the golden. They are the narc's right hand man, after all. The narc also expects complete enmeshment with his golden child, which means, at the very least, disclosure of all experiences, dreams, ambitions and feelings, if not total co-dependency. The narcissist parent often feigns concern and caring for the golden in exchange for these disclosures. The parent uses the disclosures to advise the golden. The golden must follow the instructions/advice (or else!).

Autonomy, over time, is less and less allowed or tolerated by the narc. When the golden needs to make an autonomous decision, the narc can feel absolutely shattered and betrayed. The narc, in reaction to his golden's seemingly wayward decision, will tend to retreat, become more silent, sulking, threatening and distant, until a full-out silent treatment is used on the offending golden. The child, not wanting to lose position and the constant stream of gifts and favoritism that his parent bestows upon him, will work extra hard to retain the parent's approval by allowing his parent to take away more and more of his autonomy. But often a golden child will accept this, if only for the rewards, which can be great, but also come with a huge price. He will also have to endure the narc triangulating all of his relationships (i.e. allowing his narc parent to divide and conquer his children, spouse, siblings, inlaws, co-workers, anyone, in order to gain total control of him and them). This can sometimes mean the golden must sacrifice his spouse for the parent. He must, at the very least, look less favorably on his spouse than on the parent, and do what is expected of him (or else!).

Spouses of goldens are often criticized, insulted, lectured at, and made to feel uncomfortable in the narc family system. The spouse's opinions are not particularly appreciated, their own ways of doing things not respected; in fact, the spouses of goldens can end up with the same sort of derision as a scapegoat. For the spouse of a golden, it can turn from happy times into in-laws from hell. The golden may try to keep the peace by trying to make light of his parent's bad behavior, that it is all a joke, meant only in fun, something to be tolerated and accepted with hugs all around, that it is just chiding and part of the family fun games, but many spouses of goldens feel there is always a nefarious motive underneath the surface (remember that chiding and jokes usually lead to abuse later on).

For elder narcissists, the inlaws of a golden are most often viewed as a complete nuisance, an inconvenience and waste of time, and the opinions and needs of these people consume too much energy from the golden. If the inlaws are high status people with a lot to offer who can be used in some manner, then the narc will tolerate them. But for the most part they are in the way: a narc parent wants and demands full attention from her golden.

The parent always wants to recreate the kind of idolatry they experienced when their child was still a child, looking for its parent's approval and love at all times. It was also a time when the parent could influence who the golden played with. The fact that the golden is so intimate with his spouse is not something a narc parent finds agreeable or tolerates all that well.

Usually there comes a time when the golden will be expected to sacrifice his spouse or partner. The elder narcissist can sometimes do this surreptitiously: he will lie about the spouse, make up stories, try to sway opinions, roll eyes, disapprove, make off-hand comments, argue about politics, anything, and hopefully get the golden to confide in marriage troubles whereby the narc parent can manipulate the situation further.

Goldens typically sacrifice relationships with their siblings as well, with the narc parent's full consent. Goldens do this for several reasons: to keep their so-called coveted position and status, to be able to manipulate and bully the siblings with the parent's help and approval, to keep getting special gifts and consideration, to keep the parent satisfied so that he can keep getting praise and flattery for being the parent's pride and joy. Although the golden can play nice with his siblings, the parent makes a point to his other siblings that he is to be seen as an authority. And indeed eventually the golden believes he has more innate power than his other siblings. He gets away with behaviors the other children would never get away with, even a little. He can say hurtful insulting things to his siblings without punishment, but they never can utter one word of opinion or criticism about him without being punished.

The siblings find they can never fight back. But the golden pays a price in that he doesn't have a relationship with his siblings. Most siblings will not support another sibling who has a higher status than they do, and who takes from them without giving back. So, he must put aside all sibling concerns, feelings and perspectives to win a game that his parent set up for him to play. In effect, the game is ultimately about kissing butt to the narc. Fighting with his siblings for top spot is always encouraged. Since the parent supports the golden in any and all sibling confrontations, no matter who is right or wrong, often the message from the golden to his siblings is that the relationship has no significance.

Everyone is on the sidelines of the great relationship between the narc parent and golden child.

As time goes by, the golden may be free to insult, lie, cheat, rage, denigrate, bully, sexually molest and beat up his siblings. In fact, according to studies done by Dr. John V. Caffaro, sibling abuse is rampant in households that practice favoritism. The more narcissism a parent exhibits, the more the sibling bullying is ignored. In the notorious Kornegay family of Gainesville, Florida, the 16 year old bully golden had free rein to do to his 15 year old sister anything he wanted, including beating her, sexually abusing her, keeping her locked in a bedroom for long intervals (up to seven months), deny her access to a bathroom, with only a blanket and a bucket, all with parental blessing! The parents "discipline" of keeping their daughter in a room locked up with very few privileges where even taking a shower could be denied, was meant to keep their daughter from protesting, criticizing and complaining about how she was treated!

In the book by David Pelzer, entitled A Child Called It, an alcoholic mother plays favorites and scapegoats and isolates David to a basement. This is the Amazon Review:

... a devoted den mother to the Cub Scouts in her care, and somewhat nurturant to her children--but not to David, whom she referred to as "an It." This book is a brief, horrifying account of the bizarre tortures she inflicted on him, told from the point of view of the author as a young boy being starved, stabbed, smashed face-first into mirrors, forced to eat the contents of his sibling's diapers and a spoonful of ammonia, and burned over a gas stove by a maniacal, alcoholic mom. Sometimes she claimed he had violated some rule--no walking on the grass at school!--but mostly it was pure sadism.

Narcissists fantasize that if they lock up their enraged hurt children, it will make their children agreeable and automatically compliant. Obviously in the case of the Kornegay family, the fifteen year old girl dealt with her situation by trying to escape it, killing her golden child brother in the process. The parents were later found guilty of neglect and had to serve time in house arrest as well as sign away any rights to their children; their scapegoated child was absolved of the crime of murder, but convicted of burglary in a plea bargain and put in a foster home.

The reason why a bully-sibling (like the one from the Kornegay family) gets free rein to do anything he pleases to his siblings is because the parent cannot be taken to task for how this bully child treats everyone -- because narcs take it as criticism of their parenting and of their rules and preferences, and in the narc world, no criticism is allowed, only praise. When you are not praising your parent's behavior, even if it is wrong, immoral, illegal and hurtful, you are discarded, isolated and abused. Their rules are simple, but horrific.

Even simple crying, without words to go with it, is taken as an insult, which deserves even more punishment in the narc world. Narcs are notorious for saying to their hurt distressed children, "You want something to cry about!? I'll give you something to cry about!"

The unfavored siblings learn to stuff feelings, not to talk (as talking brings out more abuse from their sibling or the narc parent), and not to trust. "Don't trust, don't feel, don't talk" is the mantra of alcoholic families, but it is also the mantra of narcissistic families. Abuse becomes the dark family secret, never aired until a family member can no longer live with the situation and points the finger at the culprits.

From gleaning forums for adult children of narcissists, it is clear that many narc parents rage at and reject children who even so much as breathe a word about being bullied by their sibling, or their sibling being favored. The reactions from narc parents are extreme, and run the gamut of abuses (again, narcs believe that piling on more abuse will get the other children to shut up about being treated cruelly -- this is a fantasy peculiar to narcs; normal parents never think a tactic like this would work, plus they would never want to hurt their children)Abuses I have seen include outright rejection, erroneous arrests, stalking, physical abuse and all manner of threats. It is clear that favoritism and golden child bullying is a dangerous subject to bring up with a narcissistic parent, and should only be aired when you are in a safe place, with protective people around you. I would advise never bringing up the subject in the narc's home, for instance. Even if you feel you are on good-enough standing with your narc parent, this can be the subject that causes the narc to go wild with retaliation.

If you know of a child who complains about being locked up continually in a room and kept from the family, and of his sibling being favored, please call Child Protective Services! You could save a child from the fate of cruel escalating narcissistic abuse.

I want to make it clear that not all goldens become bullies, but the impetus to compete with siblings, and the signal from the parent to everyone in the family that this is a child who has authority, who can do no wrong ("special"), means that a door is wide open for the golden to take full advantage of the power that comes with that status.

Narcs continue to fantasize that favoritism and pitting children against each other will create a situation where they will be able to control everyone in the home, and even when it is clear this is not happening, they do not want to believe it isn't at least possible. So the narc parent will escalate abuse, or adopt new ways to hurt his child, just to bring about the outcome that he wants.

Very small children can be manipulated (for awhile). But the vast majority of children do NOT keep quiet, and they do NOT compete (except the golden). They usually plan on escapes, or they have already escaped. The reason why they usually escape is that very few people can live, or want to live, with being abused. As the abuse escalates, the symptoms of PTSD escalate too, make being in a cruel environment totally unpalatable (see my post on the silent treatment and C-PTSD).

This narc fantasy of abusing children to totally dominate them does not take into consideration normal human reaction. (I will discuss intelligence and empathy in another post; but for purposes here, I will just say that one of the reasons narcissists and sociopaths like Hitler, Napoleon and Saddam Hussein fail to win the war, is because they completely lack an understanding of normal behavior).

The narc parent also fantasizes that the unfavored children and the scapegoat will come to his or her senses and at least try to do as well as the golden. The parent lets them know that service and praising the parent are required in order for unfavor-eds to ameliorate their suffering, the parent's opinion of them and escape the escalating punishments.

If a golden has become a bully golden, the fact that any of the other children might be congratulated for services rendered, particularly a scapegoat, is threatening to the golden's prestige and position.

So, the golden will manipulate situations to make sure the goodies keep going in one direction: the golden's coffers. In order to make sure the other children are always down in stature and continually blamed, he will purposely minimize their completed work, or he will lie and state that he, the golden, did everything, while they did nothing. The golden also purposely starts fights with whomever he can. When the parent comes running to see what the fight is about, the golden points at the scapegoat, and the scapegoat is again punished and isolated. The scapegoat's perspectives on the situation are ignored and are unflattering to the parent besides, so the scapegoat gets nowhere; it is a hopeless situation. This is why it is impossible to escape the scapegoat role once it has been thrust on a child, except to leave the family entirely.  

Once one scapegoat has left the family, the abusive parent invariably chooses another scapegoat to pick on (I discuss why in this post and this post). In the narc world, there always has to be a scapegoat!

When all scapegoats have left, the golden bully is usually the only one left who will deal with his disordered narc parent. He becomes satisfied, even if on guard, that he was able to co-bully with his parent to get his competitions out of the way.

Assuming he is sure he can keep his siblings away, the golden eventually finds he is pitted against the parent narc, an unexpected situation for him. He has been groomed to be above others, but often sees that his status is tenuous, and dependent on keeping the narc parent happy at all times, a situation many goldens find will be impossible. The narcissism can be much more pronounced in the adult child than in the parent, especially if he has rarely been opposed by his parent, and where bullying and lying have been condoned and excused. Knowing that his position may be hanging by the thread of convincing acting, lying and pretend-fawning, the narc golden will wait to make his move when the parent is weakened enough to totally rely on him, and then go in for the kill. That's what narcissists do: they are predators who constantly game opportunities and gauge times and places to be opportunistic. The parent is usually oblivious to the narcissism in the child because an overwhelming number of bullies expect their co-bullies will be kind to them, a folly peculiar to narcs (and a lot of people remark at how smart narcs are! ... Not in this area!). This blind trust is a quality that is particular to scapegoating narcs especially; however there is a brand of narc who doesn't favoritize much at all, but divides and conquers just the same. I discuss that other brand of narc here.

At any rate, the narc parent is often so swept away by the constant flattery of the golden (narcissists are flattery addicts). The narc parent sees that his golden seems always willing to please with constant crocodile hugs, proposing status-lifting experiences, concerns via phone calls and texts, gifts, money, dinners, plus the enmeshment. Indeed, narcissism is easy to hide unless there is a lot of behind-the-scenes examination and interviewing.  

Even then, if the golden uses threats and coercion, people may not speak up for safety reasons or because they have moved on with their own lives and don't want to stir up the rage. Narc bully goldens have been known to be unusually servile if they think there is great reward in it for them. However, they usually rage, scream, terrorize, swear at and abuse most others: children, siblings, workers, co-workers, spouses, lovers. They only present themselves to the parent as completely soft, gentle and capitulating for one purpose: to get all of the goodies and to convince the parent that only they (the golden) deserves them all too. Often a narc parent isn't aware of the golden's motivations until it is too late.

Since many goldens become narcissists, like all narcs they are plagued with jealousies. They have to work really, really hard for the parent, shouldering all responsibility when the narc ages: all care, everything.

The scapegoats often seem fine outside the family; they may even be doing better than the golden because they don't waste their time investing in relationships where they they can be rejected at a moment's notice. They are free of the triangulations, threats, abuse, ultimatums, silent treatments ... they are out in the world free of it all. Because of this, they are also free to do as they please, to do important work.

So, many goldens eventually feel they are too shackled to the overly demanding parent. Many become jealous of the scapegoats. The autonomy the scapegoats exhibit can seem like a superior life than the one the golden is "saddled with." Goldens have been brought up to think they are better than the scapegoats, and the parent has to constantly try to prove to the golden that the scapegoats are indeed, inferior. The parent isn't so successful at convincing if the scapegoats have learned to become totally autonomous of the parent, and their careers are flying high (scapegoats tend to be over-achievers if their self esteem isn't totally shot). But narcissism means being jealous of what you don't have, and the thing the golden doesn't have is his own life, his own decisions, his own direction, his own identity away from the parent.

The lone golden has no scapegoat to blame if his parent doesn't like something. He can't push the responsibility off of himself onto his sibling, or lie about a sibling's actions. His is totally hanging out there in the breeze, responsible for what goes wrong. And in narcissistic households, a lot can go wrong. It doesn't take much for things to shift.

The narcissistic parent is generally not a generous parent, even with a golden (and especially if there is no competition going between siblings). So the golden can find that he is getting into financial hot water or that so much is expected of him that he's losing too much from his life: opportunities, relationships, direction. He might find that he is being expected to sacrifice his own dire health issues to take care of minor aches and pains of his parent. In other families, siblings share the responsibility for the aging parent; in a narcissistic family, the golden gets saddled with ALL of the responsibility, and he can become resentful of this, especially as his parent keeps trying to divide and conquer all of his other relationships. Even with the promise of all of the goodies, these goodies may not be enough to sustain him, or he may find that he really doesn't want to take on the responsibility of his swindling, lying, bullying parent (and yes, even goldens know their narc parent is disordered, and many goldens do not have any more respect for their parent than the daring scapegoats do, even though they may dance like marionettes, for awhile).

One of the reasons narc parents often become stalker parents when one of their scapegoats is doing well, and attaining success, is because the goldens become insecure. Narc parents have spent their lives trying to disable their scapegoats and make sure their goldens are ahead. If the golden gets jealous of a scapegoat, and wants what the scapegoat has, then the narc parent can lose the only child he has left.

This is when a narc parent is most likely to stalk a scapegoat, with apologies, pronouncements that they have changed and seen the light, with promises and enormous pressures to make up (which may include the help of other family members). It can sometimes mean the scapegoats will let their narc parent back into their lives ... but not all of the time, especially if a scapegoat has gotten burned too many times in this way and knows that it is a ruse. Many scapegoats get to the point where they can't believe anything their parent has to say, and will reject the parent no matter what the circumstance.

Anyway, the narc's agenda of getting back into the scapegoat's life again, is not necessarily to love the scapegoat; it is to find a way to disable the scapegoat again, to get the scapegoat in role once more as the punching bag for the family, the derided failure. This is not clear right away to many scapegoats, especially if the parent is crooning how much they love that scapegoat child: "I made such a big mistake!", "I'm so sorry I didn't see value in you!", "I can't believe I could sacrifice such a wonderful child such as you!", "You mean so much more to me than you can ever imagine!", blah, blah, blah. What scapegoat wouldn't want to hear it? At least for the first time after a life of endless punishments?

Unfortunately, it seems that a majority of scapegoats fall for the new pronouncements of love  ... at least once. Scapegoats have also been known to have the perspective that the parent is finally mellowing out, perhaps less likely to rage and abuse. But be aware that the narcissist rarely mellows out, and in fact, gets continually worse and more manipulative.

But it becomes clear of what the narc's intentions are when and if the scapegoat falters or has a tragedy. This is when the narc parent attacks or abandons, trying to bring destruction and devastation into the scapegoat's life again. (for further reading go to my post on the timing of abuse)

The betrayal of the scapegoat is huge, and the golden watches on the sidelines as his parent takes his sibling down. A lot of it is done for the golden, after all, as a way to say "You see? That scapegoat is nothing after all" and also to say, "If you ever dare to cross me, this could happen to you too!"

The narc parent will not always have the ability to disable the successes of a scapegoat, however. Scapegoats have been known to put restraining orders on parents they can no longer trust.

In this case, the narcissistic golden can lose the ambition to be with the parent. Why? Because a prize only seems to be a prize if he is fighting someone else for it. He begins to wonder if he likes his "prize" after all, especially if no one else wants it. He knows his prize parent has little integrity, has a past that is dubious and duplicitous, that the flow of money and gifts can be tenuous and dependent on a golden "acting perfect". There are so many strings attached in being rewarded. At some point the parent may be socially reviled, and being associated with this parent may be too risky for the golden's reputation.

A narc golden can feel very insecure of the successes of siblings who were supposed to be inferior to him. When it becomes clear to the golden that their status can be taken away at any time, especially if their parent is paying attention to the status and success of a scapegoat, they begin to wonder if the parent will break away from them, that they won't get the highest priority and all of the other goodies they have been promised. Most goldens realize how tenuous their position is, that it comes with overwhelming requirements, and can be taken away over trifles (as narcs are known to reject over issues that most people would find inconsequential: a perception by the narc that he is being made fun of, criticized, slighted over a preference for someone else, the golden putting his spouse above his parent in a situation, anything that can make a narc parent insecure about status and rage over it -- even a clever, conniving golden knows he can mess up so that the narc parent cannot be consoled or talked out of punishing). So, goldens often live with a lot of anxiety and paranoia unless they can self-medicate the feelings away.

Cinderella is a story about a narc stepmother who favors her oldest child, and treats her stepdaughter like a servant. Her oldest child is kind of an entitled biatch, so totally devoid of self awareness that she can't quite control her temper in order to appear normal and mannered in society. After Cinderella wins the man and becomes a princess, she throws her stepsister in with the narc stepmother, banished to a life of doing laundry.

Although narc goldens aren't always as unaware as the evil stepsister in the Cinderella story, many do understand if they become too associated with their disreputable narc parent, they may, like the evil stepsister, befall the same fate by association with their derided parent.

In fact narc goldens are always aware of the pitfalls, dangers, potential rewards and potential abuses that come with having an enmeshed relationship with a co-narcissist, and will abandon a narc parent should their own reputations suffer. They have been known to throw their parent under the bus if it doesn't suit them. They are also always assessing the situation for their own benefit. They may retreat a little if they want to make their parent insecure, especially if it is certain that the scapegoats are totally out of the picture. If the narc parent is appearing to wail and cry over what a scapegoat did, then the golden will get temporary relief and satisfaction that he is being preferred, and the go-to person for condolence.

Goldens who are saddled with all of the responsibilities of the narc parent can think the pasture is greener where the scapegoats are and abandon their narc parent, especially if it seems the goodies are not a guarantee ... which he knows they aren't (all bullies are known for not keeping promises or telling the truth).

Most bully goldens, however, stay with their narc parent. Goldens who have any empathy at all, however, can be overwhelmingly disgusted by how the parent conducts himself. If the golden is hopelessly narcissistic, the lies and betrayals won't bother the golden all that much because he is that way too, and plans his revenges and opportunistic strategies accordingly.

The overwhelming trend for narc parents is that if they find they no longer have access to one of their scapegoat children, the parent usually alternately scapegoats and coronates his golden. The golden can find that his life is constantly being controlled and micro-managed. He is expected to reveal all details of his life. He is chided (for reaction, information-gathering and narcissistic supply); his words, beliefs and ambitions may be mocked. He may be humiliated or other buttons pressed. He is constantly being demanded of. His career and work is often sabotaged or micro-managed in a way that is highly annoying and detrimental (a narc parent may no longer want a golden to be successful, especially if the scapegoats have made it clear they are no longer available to the narc parent). His spouse especially is known to get scapegoated in order to drive them away (unless the spouse has some status the narc can use). He is constantly being put in his place by the parent narc.

The problem for the golden is that he was always looked upon as someone who could do no wrong. Now he is expected to fulfill the role of scapegoat too!? To take up all of the burdens of the parent? "No way!" he thinks.

In real-life Cinderella stories, when Cinderella leaves, someone from the remaining children are expected to take on the job that Cinderella originally fulfilled. And in fact, Cinderella was supported minimally, because she could fulfill the role of being subservient to the others. The two golden children were happy so long as they could keep Cinderella in her role. So goldens have a lot to lose when the Cinderellas leave, even though they want it all, even the little bit that Cinderella receives. Remember, they tried to keep Cinderella from going to a ball to meet a prince who could raise Cinderella's status higher than all of them.

Since narc goldens have been raised to feel entitled, they will not stand for being scapegoated easily. If the parent scapegoats or complains about the golden, a weakening parent will find out that no unflattering comment toward the golden is allowed! The parent finds that he will have to dance to the golden's tune, and who better to enforce it than the golden's support network.

The golden will feign tolerance for his parent's flip-flopping ... but only for awhile! He waits until he knows he is secure and that the parent has no other support system. But he will carry around a lot of hidden rage to be used later on (just as his parent did).

So what happens later on is that there is a power struggle. Both narcs are used to getting their own way, all of the time, no matter what, using threats, bullying, charm, subterfuge, divide and conquer strategies and malevolent advice. It becomes a "battle royal" between the two narcs. The stronger narc will win, but protests and threats will usually be unleashed between both of them. The golden, knowing he has no siblings who will come to the parent's rescue or defense, can feel entitled to do anything he wants to do to the parent. If the parent protests, he may neglect and isolate the parent, just as he saw the discipline in his childhood home.

Do you think this can't happen? Remember the golden child from the Kornegay family that I wrote about above: he was beating, sexually abusing and locking up his 15 year old sister -- he was only 16 years old! If a 16 year old boy can learn to abuse like that, imagine what a 50 year old who has been bullying his whole life is capable of!

Many bully goldens make it their life-long ambition to be in charge at all times and in all situations. They may manipulate the parent in such a way as to appear fawning (learning this tactic from the parent), but in the end, when they feel secure, go in for the kill.

With the tables turned, the parent must praise and sublimate power to his golden child or the golden will rage and threaten. The golden bully will use everything he has learned and everything he has become to control the parent at all times. He will delegate to his spouse and/or children the unwanted jobs. If anyone protests about how the parent is treated, they too are threatened and shown the door.

Goldens were taught to mimic narcissistic bullying behavior at an early age, and they saw that they were rewarded for it. Mimic-ing was once the highest form of flattery for the narc parent, now it becomes the nightmare!

The scapegoats are still used as examples between the narc parent and the narc golden, even when the scapegoats have left.

The parent will threaten the golden: "If you don't do as I want, you will end up like the scapegoats!"

And the golden will threaten the narc parent: "If you don't do what I want, I will abandon you like the scapegoats did!"

Each of them expects the other to bend under the will of the other. Since neither of them ever learned team-playing, compromising, discussing, being fair, or self reflecting, threats are volleyed back and forth with impunity. Narcissism means putting oneself before others. Isolating, degrading, vilifying and rejecting others who are no longer serving the narcissist's needs and agendas is what narcissism is all about!

In bad western movies where a bunch of thieves work together to get the gold and divvy it up, and then spend the rest of the movie stealing from each other, and abandoning each other to get the entire bundle, it is the weakened or stupid thieves who are stolen from first. Their bullet-wounded compatriots are left to die. All of the bullies in the family who rely on each other, end up sort of like this: trying to take advantage of each other in the end.

In another post I will talk more about the aging narcissist, but suffice it to say that if you are hanging on to an abusive relationship with a narcissist because you want to be considered in their Last Will and Testament, forget about it because narcissists often change their will every month, or every six months, depending on who is pissing them off at the moment (and sometimes you don't even know who is pissing them off, or making them jealous, or if they are hiding their narcissistic rage over something someone said inadvertently). Most narc parents really don't want to leave their money to anyone: they want to take it to the grave if only they could. They rarely, if ever, have a "share and share alike" kind of will. While many narcs leave the bulk of their estates to a golden child, the narc parent can turn on them at the last minute too. You never know where you stand, and narcs lie about their wills anyway, so it isn't worth giving a single thought to their will.

I personally knew a woman who gave up everything to care for her elderly mother full time. There were no complaints from her mother for five years. Then she, the daughter, got Stage 4 cancer and had to leave her mother temporarily in an assisted living home while she pursued cancer treatments out of state. Her selfish mother changed the will, barred her daughter from the house they shared together ... The daughter had to go to a homeless shelter. This should be a warning to anyone that a narcissistic elder cannot be counted on for ANYTHING: not extenuating circumstances, a major health crisis, fairness, compassion, understanding, logic, promises or reason.
 
Anyway, many bully goldens will hang in until the parent signs and dots the Power of Attorney (because most goldens know how tenuous wills, and power of attorney can be). So once papers are signed and the golden has complete control without any interference, the narc parent is often abandoned anyway. Why? Because narcissists, even favored spoiled golden ones, feel they are entitled to a special privileged life without unflattering remarks from an elder, inconvenient truths, stress and worry. Self indulgence is their highest priority.

However, even if the golden never takes his rage out on an elderly dying parent, waiting patiently for his reward, seemingly almost flawless to his narc parent, the parent can still betray the golden in the end. Why? Because narcs are often completely overwhelmed with jealousy to the point where it is like a pressure cooker in their systems. They might be jealous of the fact that the golden gets to live, whereas they are looking at death in the face. They are jealous of their golden getting all of their money, money which they still want, money that they still want to control, money that they don't want spent for the golden's leisure activities, agendas and interests. So, they are sometimes known to leave their entire estates to charity. The golden can feel very betrayed and bitter, especially if he has spent years holding his tongue, taking care of his parent, doing everything the parent asked. Again, I have direct witness to a case like this.

As for the golden narcs who turn the tables on the elder narcs: as I stated before, the parent, beforehand, will usually try to pit the golden against the golden's spouse (just as the narc parent's offspring were pitted against each other). But unbeknownst to the narc parent, it is a two-against-one affair. This is the point where the golden gets the upper hand over his parent. The spouse enjoys higher status over his parent, and often is put in charge of his parent as well! Why? Because the spousal relationship is always stronger than the parent-child relationship. It isn't like the sibling relationship, where parental approval is needed for survival. Many narc parents fail to see that because they are so enthralled with the idea and possibility of ever more people fighting over them that they fantasize that they can triangulate with the golden's spouse too.

Most bully goldens have spouses who fully support them. Remember: narcs require either sycophants or co-bullies! The perfect spouse has both qualities!

A bully golden has been taught how to abandon when it suits him, and if the couple's lives become at all stressful by hearing anything remotely unflattering, they abandon just as their narc parent did. Narcs aren't naturally imbued with care, concern and compassionate responses (except what they can fake); they are used to taking from others, exploiting the services of others, leaving others high and dry in deplorable emotional states often over inconsequentials (not enough flattery, not enough praising, not enough pining, "that look on your face", anything insubordinate) and stealing if they can get away with it. They get off on the suffering of others to win what they want, they get off on delegating the hard work to others in the family (power trip), they get off on the threats and what it does to their victims. Being fair, gracious, good, honest and caring doesn't mean much to them, only insipid pastimes do: leisure, pampering, flattery, status, power trips, gambling of some sort, arrogance, keeping up appearances, and continually comparing themselves to others.

The narc parent has spent their life threatening and punishing others, so the tables are turned by the very child who should have been grateful for having been so adored, favored and spared the punishments. But unfortunately, that is usually not how it works: the bigger lesson the golden took away was not how to be grateful, but how to bully and exploit others to get what you want. Their whole lives are built around it, they have used it most of their lives, and they pass it on to their golden child, and he with his golden child, and so on and so on ... down through the generations ...

Being grateful is actually a compassionate response, not a narcissistic response. You actually have to feel what someone else is going through. When you are narcissistic, you aren't understanding anyone or reflecting on what they do or how they feel. You are only ingratiating yourself to get narcissistic supply. Therefore, a fellow narcissist who has been chosen to be a golden is not going to be focused on parental sacrifice, even if he might briefly say "Thank you" as a societal obligation.

(note: please be aware that "you're ungrateful" is one of the most common phrases among abusers. It doesn't mean you are ungrateful; it probably means they either want you to be distracted from their abuse by putting a guilt trip on you, or they want to use it as an excuse to abuse).

Ending up with a whole family of victims of abuse because of favoritism isn't always what happens, but it seems to be the overwhelming trend. So far, in most cases of narcissistic families, the trend is more powerful than what any member wants or plans. As long as there are disfavored family scapegoats and favored golden children in households with a narcissistic parent, the trend will keep going and going and going, throughout time, and generation after generation, until there is enlightenment and a movement afoot in the family, or in society, to stop it.

It is like a nasty disease which effects every last member of the family, from the scapegoats who have left with emotional scars and PTSD, to the ones who are still left in the game battling it out with each other ... all with the next generation looking in on the sidelines and taking notes ...

An inter-generational real story:

I am a member of a number of forums on narcissistic abuse. One member is a single mother who brought up a daughter and son in her narc mother's home. This is what happened (names changed to protect the innocent):

The narc grandmother (Gertrude) treated her daughter (Connie) deplorably, like a doormat, and with a lot of verbal abuse and commands, as narcs will do. Meanwhile, the children (Karen and Doug) were looking at how grandma Gertrude related to their mom, Connie.

The grand daughter, Karen, started treating mother Connie badly too, around the age of 11 (she is 15 now), leaving notes for her mother like: "Clean up your damn mess, Mom! I am not your maid!" and "If you can't stop being an emotional cry baby, you will no longer have a family" and "There is a reason you are not appreciated. You are a nutcase and you need help. See a psychologist, and then get back to us after you have been adequately treated." And so on.

Obviously this sounds like a teen age daughter who is out of control, who is disrespectful and has learned parentification and bullying from her grandmother. In fact, both grandmother and granddaughter gang up on Connie constantly. To make everything worse, Grandma Gertrude approves of the way granddaughter Karen is acting in all altercations between them, meaning that Karen feels free to escalate the abuse of her mother.

When mother Connie tells grandmother Gertrude not to interfere because they are her children, Gertrude won't respect it and gives her opinion anyway, throwing barbs and insults at Connie in the process.

Obviously, Grandma has made a golden child out of her grand daughter, Karen, all the while condoning the orders, the insults, the notes and the abuse (remember I said that narcs like it when you mirror their personality as the highest form of flattery? -- Well, Gertrude is loving it!).

In fact, Connie was wearing herself out trying to do the best she could for both of them, and the abuse only got worse.

Anyway, after awhile, Connie couldn't take it any more. So, she moved out of her mother Gertrude's house with her son, Doug.

One reason Connie came to the forums is that she fears she is favoring her son, Doug, and treating him like a golden child (he is the only one of her children who shows respect for his mother, Connie, who genuinely seems concerned for Connie and her state of mind -- she was beginning to close down). He was the only one in the household who was consoling towards Connie, who tried to reach compromises and talk things out. But Connie feels that it perpetuates narcissism to be neglecting her daughter Karen, leaving her to the "wolf " (her mother, Gertrude). She fears that she has condoned abuse by bringing her children up in a narcissistic household where insults and demanding, manipulative, disrespectful, abusive behavior is condoned.

For sure this is a toxic dysfunctional family, not much healthier than the family in the movie, August, Osage County, and in fact, it may be a lot worse.

Any time you are around narcs, or have your children and grandchildren exposed to narcs, there is always a danger of someone adopting abusive narcissistic tendencies. Narcs will enlist anyone they can to help them beat up their targets (scapegoats), even if it means enlisting the scapegoat's own children. No one is immune to being favored for the purpose of co-bullying a scapegoat. It is why many scapegoats feel they have no other choice than to leave and give up on close familial ties. In this case, Connie had to give up on her own mother and daughter: how heartbreaking! The family is splintered, like so many narcissistic families.

Meanwhile, her daughter only gets narcissistic lessons now since the "normals" have left. She is learning how to be an imperious bully in the family, just like her grandmother. She is feeling special and entitled because her grandmother adores everything she says and does. She is flattered constantly, that is, until her grandmother decides she is "not good enough" either -- the narcissistic tendency.

Karen will probably blame her mother for playing favorites with Doug at some point too, for neglecting her and leaving her with her mean grandmother. Since favoritism is a form of abuse, she may say, "You are an abusive parent and I want nothing more to do with you. You abandoned me. How was I to know what I was doing at 15? I had no role models other than you and Grandma! You are the mother: you are supposed to teach me and protect me. Instead you brought us up around Grandma who you knew you would never be able to get along with, and left me there to fester and learn more of her bullying crap, while you went off to live with Doug. You don't care about me. All you care about is making life easier for yourself! You are a sorry excuse for a mother!" -- all of this blaming and guilting is part of narcissistic families too. All of it began with favoritism and grew into bullying from there.

Sad.

In another post, I will talk about abuse as an inter-generational and multi-generational problem.

Some cartoons I made on the subject (with more reading and videos by others following):

cartoon image is © Lise Winne
2016

Further reading:

The Scapegoating Narcissist -- recommended excellent post by Gail Meyers
Excerpt:
     The very existence of a scapegoat in the family signals a problem because a scapegoat is only required in a family when someone chronically refuses to take responsibility for their own actions.

Narcissism in children has many causes, but it can be addressed by Gail Gross. She also states that if a parent waits too long to administer therapy to a narcissistic child, the child will eventually refuse therapy (a typical narcissistic trait) and be unwilling to self reflect and understand the perspectives of others.


How not to raise a narcissist by Rebecca Jacobson

Narcissistic kid? Blame the parents, study says by Deborah Netburn.
Excerpt from the article: 
     ... here's one more thing to consider: A person doesn't have to stay a narcissist forever.
   "Although narcissism is often seen as a deeply ingrained personality trait, it can certainly change," Brummelman said. "When you are narcissistic at one time in life, you're not destined to be narcissistic decades later."

excerpt and quote from therapist, Shannon Thomas in the article:
"It's very hard to foster any authentic sibling connection in that environment because they're being used as pawns by the parents," Thomas said. "When the scapegoated child tries to talk about what their life is like with the narcissistic parent, the favourite child won't see it at all."
... This creates tension and "camps" within families, Thomas explained, because the favoured child may simply see their sibling as jealous of their attention ...
... Thomas said she believes what narcissistic parents experience is not love. There will be moments of perceived affection, like Christmases with extravagant gifts, or expensive summer holidays. But at some point, the mask will inevitably fall and the kindness will fade.

Do you have a favorite child? by Shobha Bhaskar, M.D.


Discussion of Favoritism on the Sons of Narcissistic Mothers blog 

Selfishness and Narcissism in Family Relationships by Lynne Namka, Ed, D

Raised By A Narcissist by Jonice Webb PhD

You Discovered Narcissistic Parent’s Destructive Family Secret by Linda Martinez-Lewi, Ph.D.

6 Signs You Were Raised By A Narcissist by Anna Almendrala


Teaching empathy: What kind of parent are you? by Amy Joyce. One of the issues many people have with people with narcissistic personality disorder (and/or abusers in general) is that they are hypocrites. If you don't model caring behavior for your child, and insist that your child has a caring nature, while you are cruel and abandoning, it won't work.


These videos talk about what I have discussed in this post
(and I agree with the message):
© Narcissism Survivor (screen name)

This next video is about whether a narcissistic parent will swap out
the golden child for the scapegoat. It is rare, especially for any length of time.
It happens when (and if) the golden child is not dancing to every parental demand. 
It happens if the scapegoat has never experienced hoovering before and is vulnerable to it. 
When the golden child wants to re-establish his "preferred" status with the parent 
and give into the demand, the scapegoat goes back to being discarded 
(and also vilified, insulted, degraded, dismissed, mocked, lectured at,  
erroneously blamed and punished, and reviled yet again by the narc parent):
© Narcissism Survivor (screen name)

This next video is about a woman telling her story. 
She tells her story about how an older brother scapegoat left the family at 14.
Remember I mentioned that when one scapegoat leaves the family, that the narc parent
always replaces one scapegoat with another one from her remaining family?
This is what happened to this young woman:
From Golden Child to Scapegoat:
© Escape from Narcissism (screen name)
Her story is interesting and personal. She became an expatriate and moved to Spain and learned another language to get away from her narcissistic family (moving away and becoming as anonymous as possible by getting a PO box is what happens in an overwhelming number of cases where the scapegoating has become unbearable). To watch more of her tell her story click here.
These aren't great videos, and there are distractions in them (cat using a box, wind), but they are like listening to a friend. They may make you feel connected to the person. By the way, if you are a scapegoat, hearing others tell their stories is a way to heal. Listening to someone in person is always preferable to a video because you can establish a relationship with that person. However these kinds of videos can help when you are tossing and turning in bed all night, wondering what to do with your family situation, and feel an urgency to get a sense of how someone else is dealing with it all.



I found this one on Pinterest here
(originally from a facebook page that appears to have been taken down),
but worthy of being out on the internet:

I found this Peanuts cartoon on this blog, another good blog about dealing with a narcissistic family
(it should speak to those scapegoats who have been given the silent treatment
or have been ostracized):

Monday, November 30, 2015

abusive families who triangulate (love triangles) -- narcissists, children, lovers, et al

name of cartoon: "The Bully Won the Love Triangle!"
image is © Lise Winne
cartoon, 2015
(for questions regarding use of images or to contract an image for your next article
contact: LilacGroveGraphics (att) yahoo.com)

Abusive families are full of triangulation and love triangles. Usually an authority figure of the family leads the way in triangulating everyone in the family (if they can!).

For those new to domestic abuse issues, domestic abuse is primarily perpetrated by those with Borderline Personality Disorder, Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder. Additionally, active alcoholism can mimic Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder. In addition, people with Borderline Personality Disorder, Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder are more prone to alcoholism. If you need to know more please see my post about what domestic abuse is, and who perpetrates abuse HERE.

As a mandated reporter for the State of New York, triangulation can count as abuse if the triangulation is being used to purposely hurt another person. For instance:

1. person A doesn't want to be responsible for hurting person B, so she sends person C to do the bullying or to be a conduit between A and B
2. person A has a relationship with person B where a lot of interpersonal issues need discussing. Instead of A sticking with a discussion, she has an affair with person C, and rubs person B's nose in it, perhaps also threatening divorce
3. child A is having an issue with the mother. Instead of dealing with the issues and trying to work them out with child A, she instead runs to child B, telling child A that she loves child B so much more than she loves child A. Also in these cases, child A tends to be abandoned; while the mother spends most of her time with child B. This is called "child neglect". Alternatively, children can be triangulated with lies and false stories about each other, so that it keeps the children fighting for the parent's love.

There are more instances, but hopefully you get the idea. If you see any signs of this kind of triangulation where there are children involved, and there is obvious emotional or physical abuse, you can always call Child Protective Services.

Triangulation is big in households with narcissists and sociopaths at the helm.

According to this article in Your Tango by Brenda Della Casa, narcissists use triangulation as much as they possibly can:

They're big on threesomes.

No, not those kinds. Narcissists love to set up "triangles" where their partners feel "at odds" with someone else, and jealousy and fighting for love and attention can ensue (ah, the supply!).

This could be with an ex, a mother, or a friend, but the point is to make sure they're at the center of attention and desire. This is known as triangulation and it's meant to make you feel insecure, undesirable, and keep you anxious and "on your toes."


If you grew up in a household with a narcissistic parent, it is impossible to miss. They love pitting their own children against one another. If the narcissist is not "traditional" in his or her belief systems, they pit their spouse against a lover too. As the family grows and children become adults, the narcissist will continue to try to make love triangles with inlaws: son-in-law against his wife, grandaughter against her own mother, cousin against cousin, and so on ... Everyone in the family is sacrificed for triangulation, which helps the narcissist get his or her "narcissistic supply", i.e. being the center of attention, being the head of command headquarters, making sure everyone knows there will be winners and losers. Lies, slander, money, rewards and punishments can all be added to the triangulation: they see it as the best way to keep people apart and complying, serving narcissistic needs and desires.

While the narcissist's children grew up with triangulation rules and roles and unconsciously think of it as normal, when they grow up they often find that people they marry (inlaws) won't have any part of it. In fact, most families do not practice triangulation.

It has been established that narcissists use triangulation in most of their relationships. In fact, all members of an abusive family use it to some degree or other, even victims. For instance, I'll demonstrate a few situations of triangulation:

* Mom is abusing her child. She tells her husband why the child is bad to get the husband's support. Child cannot talk to the mother about the abuse without getting more abuse (which is typical for narcissistic personality disordered abusers: they want their children to accept the abuse without questions, comments, complaining, evaluating etc, or to feel anything about being abused -- unless the mother wants the child to feel certain feelings, in which case she will try to manipulate these feelings out of the child by not letting up on the abuse until she has seen the feeling she desires). Anyway, the child goes to the father to get the father to intervene. Now the father is being asked by his wife for support, to present a united front against the child. Then the father is also being asked by his child for support and intervention against the abuse of his wife. Triangulation at its most nightmarish!


What often ends up happening:

name of cartoon: "Triangulation Nightmare"
image is © Lise Winne
cartoon, 2015

So let us just say that this mother divorced her husband, and got married to someone else. Here is where triangulation becomes a huge family affair:

* Mom is abusing her daughter. In this situation, she is divorced from her daughter's natural father, an empath. The daughter's new stepfather is a malignant narcissist.
   The mother delegates most of the abuse, punishments and discipline of her daughter to the new husband, the stepfather. The stepfather, however, is a nightmarish abuser: he is rarely not abusive. He insults, chides, isolates, threatens, gives constant ultimatums, rejects, makes her a laughing stock in family situations by trying to humiliate her, he degrades her views and beliefs, he lies about her intentions (blackens them), calls her unflattering names, makes her out to be a devil, displays not a single sign of empathy or remorse for how he treats her, feels the daughter is continuously deserving of on-going, severe punishments. He is also nefarious in his motives: he doesn't want the stepdaughter in his life anyway. By making life so miserable for his stepdaughter, it will ensure that the daughter will leave (hopefully for good! ... at least for him). By getting his stepdaughter out the picture in this way, he can get more control over his wife and have her all to himself. This is the goal of all bullies and narcissists, after all: to control everyone like pieces on a chessboard. While many maternal narcissistic abusers are fine with delegating the bullying and abuse of her children to a stepfather out of lazy dis-concern, she also knows that he has has no significant bonding or caretaking experience with her child. So she back-seat drives the abuse and reprimands him when he isn't doing exactly as she wants.
   In this situation, the stepfather argues that his abuse is not too harsh, that it is totally deserved.
   So, the daughter goes to live with the natural father to get away from the abuse. The stepfather assures his wife that the daughter will come back to the mother some day. When will the daughter come back? "After she has learned her lesson," the stepfather curtly replies.
   The mother is angry and jealous that her daughter chose to live with the natural father and is initially rejecting towards the daughter. But the daughter is thriving in the situation with the natural father. The daughter shows no signs of returning.
   The mother tries a number of ways to lure her daughter back, without success. The daughter tells her mother that it is because of the abuse of the stepfather that she will never return. So the mother, who thought that having a bully who would defend her in every situation, sees that it can be a liability. She tells her husband to be a little nicer to her child. The child isn't all bad (just a little crazy -- being crazy is not something the child can help after all, and that is primarily why the child is "bad"). So she tries to get the stepfather to feel a little more empathetic, that insanity deserves discipline, but not harsh discipline. What she wants is for her husband to still support her unquestioningly, to feel sorry for her, to do her battles for her.
   But the problem is, the stepfather cannot genuinely show concern for the child, so even though the stepfather makes an effort, it is minimal, not sincere, and the child doesn't believe it anyway.
  In the meantime, he tells his wife that the child is not insane, but is truly a bad child. He reminds his wife that she has conveyed the message that her child is "all bad"and "a bad child does not need to be around us, causing us trouble."
  The mother notices that her new husband is also starting to verbally abuse her remaining child and that this child, too, is exhibiting signs of retreat from her.
  What is the end result of all of this triangulation?
   Often more triangulation!
   For instance:
   The mother confides in the daughter (secretly) that her new husband is sometimes too harsh in his discipline. If push comes to shove, the mother might voice her disapproval of her husband. She might excuse him: he is just learning to be a good father, for instance. She might focus on the fact that he can sometimes have terrible manners, that he is more opinionated than she would like on certain subjects, but is a good man underneath it all. The mother puts tremendous pressure on her daughter to accept her new husband and to forgive and forget the abuse. She hopes to achieve this by telling her daughter how her husband grew up, how he was taught lessons, how hard he had it, how difficult his life has been, how much he truly and lovingly cares about his stepchildren, blah, blah, blah. I call it "the empathy swindle." The basic message is: "Understand and excuse the abuse unquestioningly, and show some concern because he's suffered so much."
   The daughter is in a triangle too, because she gets out of dealing with her abusive stepfather by going to her natural father and talking to her natural father about the abuse. It is a natural response to run away from abuse and to talk to others if you are not allowed to talk about it with the people who are instigating the abuse, but the end result is another triangle.
   The mother and stepfather get out of having to deal with the abuse because the daughter finds refuge with her natural father.
   The excuse given to other family members (aunts, uncles, cousins) for why the daughter is living with the natural father: "She was causing a lot of trouble, causing drama and being bad, and not following house rules and procedures, so we thought it best that she live with her father instead. She will have to deal with the consequences of a father who does not love her as much as we do." -- a lie of course, but a lot of narcissists use gaslighting in conjunction with triangulating.
   The mother's other child (a boy), hears that his sibling is crazy. He hears that his sibling had to go live with the father for the same reason as the other relatives do. So the son becomes prejudiced against his sibling by the parents. He might get the feeling that he is "the sane one" while his sibling is "the crazy one". He gets an "attitude" about it in the sense of "I'm better because I'm sane" and "I get to make the decisions because she is crazy." If his sibling doesn't follow his orders, he goes to his parent to solve all of the problems of sibling rivalry and discord. This is a narcissist's dream-come-true because then the narcissist can manipulate both children into hating each other enough so that they never join forces against the parent. More triangulation!
   Some day this boy grows up to be a man, and uses his wife to triangulate with all of his children, his parents and his siblings. More triangulation and abuse!
   In fact, everyone in an abusive household somehow ends up in one of these super sick toxic love triangles, often punishing or retreating from each other and switching sides when things don't go their way (although sometimes ultra-rejected scapegoats escape the whole messy dynamic altogether).
   If some issue is festering in the family, since no one can talk directly to one another, and since complaints are not allowed (except in confidence to the head narcissist), all members learn that the only way for an issue to be noticed at all is to run away to better love; i.e. to run away to another person or relationship.
   The mother narcissist usually starts the whole house of cards by having a love triangle going between two of her children, between a husband and lover, between her husband and child, and sometimes between her two parents. Narcissists have been known to collect as many love triangles as they can, to have many love affairs and to use men to compete for her, to alternate wildly between abandonment and enmeshment. She is known for favoritism and scapegoating of her children. She is also known to triangulate between her two parents (starting in childhood, often to get protection from abuse). All of it is used to side-step dire relationship issues.
   All of the triangulation gets unwieldy, however, as more members marry in, and as children are born. It is hard for a narcissist to control and gaslight so many people. There are also a lot of family members who have been scapegoated and rejected, making it even harder to control people through the usual channels of lying and triangulation.  

A victim triangulates to find refuge (retreat) from abuse. If Mom is abusing, Dad can become the conduit between mother and daughter, and can also go between being a perpetrator to support the mother, and a victim to support the daughter.

To make the dynamic more confusing, the mother can chastise the father for being too harsh in his punishment, so then Mom becomes the new rescuer and Dad is both reprimanded by his wife for being too much of a perpetrator while at the same time groomed to be a perpetrator. Again for a better understanding of the complexities of triangulation, go to my first post about triangulation.

A perpetrator triangulates to control others. It is a form of aggression. While victims use triangulation for protection and retreat, abusers try to manipulate the situation by triangulating with the person offering the protection. If abusers cannot manipulate, they will usually crash through the boundaries of both the victim and victim's protector.

Some victims can carry some of the traits of perpetrators, particularly unsolicited advice and lectures, the hallmarks of abusive families. Some of the other hallmarks include:
* triangulating to be noticed, to be heard, to obtain help and justice
* talking over others
* a lot of debating
* can be guilty of not listening to other viewpoints as much as the perpetrators
* can have a rigid view and stance on familial matters -- can be similar to perpetrators black and white thinking if they are not self-aware
* criticizing their tormentors just as much as their tormentors criticize them
* comparing others

These are the areas where victims can act like the rest of their family, though many of them seem to grow out of it once they are in therapy with a domestic abuse counselor and away from their families.

Sometimes members of a family can become both victims and perpetrators, though usually they are in one role or another (for life). While some victims of abuse go ballistic (like the perpetrators of school shootings), overwhelmingly the violence is pointed inward (suicide, self mutilation, self sabotage). Victims can break out of the victim role through interventions, setting up good boundaries and leaving their toxic families.

THREE KINDS OF NARCISSISTS WHO TRIANGULATE

There seem to be two distinct kinds of narcissists who triangulate (with the third kind of narcissist, the malignant narcissist, having qualities of the two others). One narcissist I'll term as a scapegoating narcissist, and another I'll term as a fake-benevolent narcissist. There are differences in how the abuse and destruction are carried out, differences in preferences in terms of getting others to do their dirty work, and the types of resistance victims have to the manipulations of their predators. Basically, scapegoating narcissists are the cold rejecting kinds of narcissists who use other bullies to help them carry out their dirty deeds, whereas the fake-benevolent narcissists are the popular pillars who use empaths to carry out their dirty deeds.

THE SCAPEGOATING NARCISSIST

These narcissists often practice passive-aggressive forms of threats with other family members (using rewards and punishments to get them to comply with triangulation). They become offensive and demeaning to those members who are not going along with the agenda of control, triangulation, gaslighting and abuse. They are always comparing others: "So and so member is willing to do --- and you aren't." "If you acted more like --- then you would be more appreciated." "Do you see how that daughter treats her mother? I wish I had a daughter like that!" "We prefer the company of your brother because he's funny and you aren't. He can entertain and you can't. You're always a downer." "If you can't act more like your sister, you know where the door is!" "I love him more than I love you right now. He doesn't complain the way you do. You have no right to complain! After all we have done for you! So ungrateful!!"

These narcissists abandon one relationship for another in search of the ultimate love sycophant. Their abandonments usually come with large doses of cruelty and betrayal too (and often when a victim is going through a success, a tragedy or a special time or event, so it is extremely shocking -- see my post on the timing of abuse). Because of the cruelty that perpetrators use when abandoning, the abandon-er can also become abandoned.

A lot of perpetrators started out as child victims first. They learned to triangulate to protect themselves from abuse. The difference is that they eventually decided to mimic their abusers. This can be a way to protect yourself from abuse too: by raising your hand in the classroom of life and signing up for the job of being the abuser's right hand bully-man, to be willing to help them slay the complainers, the rebels, the scapegoats, the freaks of nature and empaths in the family. We all make choices, and they decided to be a perpetrator of abuse.

Deciding on being a perpetrator makes them weak-willed, so they decide to compensate for it by acting haughty and important (after all they are the parent's little helper). They learn from the parent to deride empathy and to humiliate empaths.

Many of these perpetrators keep triangulating until their dying days. But they definitely begin to falter in terms of it being an effective tool for them the older they get. Here is how it sometimes happens:

I have briefly mentioned in other posts that most tyrannical leaders lose wars because they cannot understand normal human responses. Narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths have been known not to think of long term consequences, only of short-term gain. They are certainly capable of scheming elaborate ways to hurt others, how they are going to get away with it, or to escape prison and other consequences of their behavior, but they often don't think beyond that.  

Narcissists believe that if they set up a love triangle (a competition) it will mean that the competitors will continue to battle it out with one another indefinitely all to obtain privileged status in the narcissist's world. However, they don't realize how most people actually behave in love triangles.

If one of the "competitors" is showing signs that he is not going to play "the triangle game", the scapegoating narcissist tends to react by abusing the person who is unwilling to play. Like: "You know what the privileges are and you know what the consequences are. If you will not fight for me, then I'll humiliate you, hurt you and destroy you to make you comply with my game."

Any normal person reading this post is going to know how they would react to that ultimatum! But, believe it or not, many narcissists really don't have a clue of normal human reaction at all. So, most narcissists keep trying this game over and over again with different players believing that the results will be different next time around. Why? Because their egos keep telling them that they are better than others and therefore, people will fight over them no matter how abusive they are. Don't forget: narcissists live in fantasy land. 

Their fantasies equate to thinking of themselves along the lines of slave owners, with "their subjects" being the slaves. The objective? Reward the slave minimally so he will not run away, and beat him if he ever revolts, complains, or tries to run away ... and always threaten and torture him just a little so that he knows the consequences. The problem with this thinking is that a huge majority of us (in this country, at least), are hard wired for justice, diplomacy, team thinking and democracy.

We went to school learning that we could be anything we wanted to be, that we could rise out of our situation with determination and hard work. Additionally, if you were getting bullied in school, the drill was to call school authorities. If there was injustice, seek justice. If you were in pain, seek relief. If you weren't happy with your job, seek another one. Salute the system of democracy: salute the fact that we all have equal weight in terms of deciding, salute the fact that we all have a voice, salute the fact that we have liberty and justice for all. Additionally, our teachers, who we spent more time with than our families, drilled into us that every pupil is equal, that all children have strengths and weaknesses, that each of us are contributors to the classroom and learning experience, and potential contributors to society. School teachers are generally empaths, so we learn that empathy and fairness is a good thing, something to aspire to (and children generally feel some shame when they are being too selfish and it is pointed out by their teacher). Opinions are welcomed and talked about it in the classroom (analytical and critical thinking is worked into each course of study in the public school these days). Slavery is looked at with derision, as throw-back, primitive.

So, almost no one thinks like a slave any more, but many narcissist's fantasy thoughts really can't seem to let go of this fact. In fact, they can't seem to handle the possibility that most people aren't willing to be enslaved at all. So they keep trying to pressure, and threaten, and abuse, and reward, and punish, to push the slave mentality onto as many people as they can. There are unspoken messages such as these: "I'll reward you if you are a 100 percent sycophant", "If you show that you disagree with me even slightly, that you show autonomy or independence, that you show disloyalty in any way, you WILL be punished, and you will be punished severely! Do you understand me?", "You WILL be loyal to me, no matter what I do or how I act, and if you EVER show signs contrary, or complain about it one bit, you WILL be tortured, do you understand what I am saying?"

So, overwhelmingly what ends up happening in love triangles is that the empaths refuse to play, or quickly give up, and the bullies win.

So, rather than the narcissist really understand what happened in their love triangle game, they usually decide they will continue to torture the "losers" of the game and reward the "winners". Narcissists are known to parade around with the winners too, as though the winner of their game deserves a metal or trophy.

But they are no smarter than the rest of us when it comes to being sweet-talked, romanced (mirrored), and empathy-played by another co-bully narcissist, otherwise they'd see that this game is flawed -- for them.

But, no: their head is somewhere else (like on getting high off the "loser's" grief and shock). Flaunting their new love all the while believing that the loser is pining for them and jealous of them is another narcissistic fantasy. Narcissists are very jealousy-oriented in their behaviors, both ruled by intense jealousy (or so I have read and been told by a number of therapists), all the while trying to get rid of this intense jealousy that they feel burdened by with trying to provoke others to feel as much jealousy as they do.

Again: they don't understand normal human reaction. Most of us think more "autonomously" than competitively. If we want to be in competitions (sports, board games, intellectual games like Jeopardy, war strategies, etc), we mostly compete against our own abilities first, and against each other secondarily.

For instance, the way normal minds and behaviors work is that they are usually inspired by competitor's work.

So the way that normal competition works is that person B looks at what person A has made or accomplished. So person B takes some of the ideas of person A and tries to make it better, to expound on the ideas and creativity or refine it.

If person A is of normal mindset (i.e. not the narcissistically jealous type), he will see that person B's ideas and accomplishments are commendable, that it is a more polished version, a better solution.

As person A looks at what person B has accomplished, he is also aware of how the design could be better yet. So person A uses elements of his own design, and also looks at what person B has accomplished, and then comes up with something altogether new. It is a culmination of person A's past try and new try, plus some elements of B's ideas.

This new version is a better solution than the past solutions. It is evolving, and the competition pushes the evolution.

This is still autonomous thinking.

No one is being rewarded or punished, or trained like a dog against their own autonomous desires, directions, decisions or creative solutions. The motivation is still inner-driven rather than outer-driven. Each party uses his own ideas, sometimes inspired by someone else's ideas. The point is that autonomy is retained throughout the process, and throughout the competition.

Very few narcissists, sociopaths and psychopaths operate on inspiration when it comes to competition; they operate on jealousy. If someone is perceived to be doing something better, or feeling better, or living better, the personality disordered person will often try to attack the person in some way instead of attacking the problem. The attack may be verbal, intellectual, emotional or physical. It may be covert, behind someone's back, or overt, right at the target.

A physical attack might be like the Tania Harding and Nancy Kerrigan altercation at the 1994 Olympic Figure Skating Trials, for instance (whereby Tanya's then-husband hired someone to break Nancy Kerrigan's leg to keep Kerrigan from competing in the Olympic Games; Tanya was then stripped of her medals, fined and barred from the US team). This sounds like narcissistic triangulation to me, whether Tanya instigated the attack, or whether the husband did.

The point is that narcissists often attack when they aren't getting what they want: they either attack their competitor, or the person who refuses to play their "love triangle" games.

"Normal people" innately understand that "winning" the narcissist's manufactured love triangles means winning a booby prize. The prize entails enslavement to the narcissist's agenda: they will never compromise on a single matter, no sharing the power, no discussing or solving relationship issues and problems, no empathy, walking on eggshells (unable to complain), superficiality, and expecting complete loyalty from you while never giving loyalty in return. Winning the prize is also tenuous and short-lived because in order to get more narcissistic supply, you will be used in more love triangles.

Also, don't forget: these kinds of narcissists usually play the love triangle game as if it were a life and death duel, i.e. as an all or nothing contest where winner takes "all" and loser takes "nothing". In fact, "the loser" often continues to be attacked by the narcissist even after walking away from the game! Why? Because the narcissist demands the game be played (or else); they feel entitled to it! But this demand and expectation only drives "the normal" person away further.

"Normal" people will usually feel disgusted by obvious narcissistic love triangles.

The reason why bullies win love triangle games set up by scapegoating narcissists is that they don't care whether the narcissist has integrity. They do not care if the narcissist is dishonest, hypocritical or will use force for compliance. They do not care if the narcissist is a cheater, a liar, or uses them again in another love triangle. The reason why they don't care is because they operate under the same premise and feel that they can "one up them". They are as likely to be secretive, phony, manipulative, mirroring and love bombing as their fellow narcissist. Most of these kinds of relationships become mutually destructive co-dependencies, with bullies working their own agendas even while pretending to do another narcissist's bidding (narcissistic bidding is when one bully bullies another bully's victim).

They will all eventually try to "out-threaten", "out-abandon", and "out-triangulate" each other (more on the co-bully relationship in another post).

At any rate, love triangles among family mean that the narcissist will not have relationships with the two people he started out with; he will only end up with one.

Narcissistic mothers (especially malignant narcissists) have been known to go through one child after another in this way, hoping against hope that each child will stay in the triangle boxing it out, that there will somehow be a different outcome than estrangement. They can have two children or seven, and often they end up with only one child.

THE FAKE-BENEVOLENT NARCISSIST 

The clever, smarter, more devious narcissists however, triangulate so that no child gets to be the bully; they are all programmed to be bullies to each other, AND also to be empaths to each other (taught to excuse abuse by being empathetic). They are like equal weight fighters in a boxing ring, fighting each other endlessly for scraps of parental approval and parental reward (thus providing endless narcissistic supply).

To add to it, the parent throws all the children off guard by handing out awards that are arbitrary: sometimes there is justice and sometimes there isn't, for instance. Why will a narcissist do this? Because confusing the children often keeps the power in the narcissist's hands; it keeps the children from joining forces against the parent. Everyone gets confused about who said what, why they were treated a certain way, why Child B was set to go to the ice cream parlor with Mom when it seemed like Child A was chosen in the first place, but then Mom chose Child C at the last moment, creating more confusion. This takes all of the focus off of the maneuvers, manipulations and controlling tactics of the narcissist. If the narcissist is confronted by the children for any reason, which is doubtful (since the children have been manipulated to hate each other), the narcissist will feign even more confusion by playing dumb, putting on the indignant tears and rage that her children are ganging up on her, thus keeping all children separate and off guard.

The way this works is that Child A will be told how bad Child B is. Child A will also be told that B said "all of these horrible things about you which I can't believe are slightly true or justified!" (most of it manufactured by the narcissist, of course). "You deserve much, much better treatment than this! I'll talk to him and see if he'll change his mind and treat you better" (and then, of course, never talk to Child B, but lie about transactions anyway, even moods and bad behavior, darkening Child B's reputation with Child A). The narcissist continues to manipulate the situation between siblings with false gossip, pretending to be on Child A's side, with fake sympathy for Child A's plight, at how badly Child B is treating Child A, mirroring all of Child A's fears and concerns.

But then, behind Child A's back, the parent will treat Child B exactly in the same way: manufacture what Child A said about Child B, and so on.

In these kinds of narcissistic families, the children hate each other so much that they can barely speak to one another while the parent goes between them, thereby controlling all of the information, all of the feelings, all of the correspondence, all of the fights, indeed every action between them, and beyond. Adult children will sometimes let their parent continue to control their life because they have been brought up to believe "Parent knows best. Parent is always rooting for me. Parent is composed" without suspecting they are triangulated, and that the parent set it up. But not always, as you will see ...

In this system of narcissistic parenting, each child is underhandedly taught that he is better than his sibling, more reasonable, more lovable, and that the parent is helpless to do anything about the sibling rivalry and animosity, because they are family, even if incredibly unreasonable. If child A starts to weary of playing the love triangle game, then parent rushes in to give them a gift under the table. In fact, they can tell any child just about anything and it will be believed. All of the fake sympathy, commiserating, the fake tries at reconciling the siblings go a long way towards children believing in the parent's lies, and keeping the child under the parent's thumb at all times. This is in contrast to the more impulsive simplistically-minded scapegoating narcissists who assign children to be a family punching bag, where the abuse is so obvious, over-the-top, inexcusable and evil that most scapegoats leave in disgust. When every child is a golden child and a scapegoat all-in-one, it is rarer for children to leave (even though they do when their lives and relationships are becoming so completely sabotaged and unraveled, they feel they have no other choice).

The hatred between siblings can be life-long because children get this training when they are very young. The parent is often painted by the children (and spouse) as this wonderful upstanding seemingly fair-minded benevolent truth-teller, and because the parent seems so above everyone else (i.e. not stooping to the highly charged emotional atmosphere in the family, and the same kinds of animosities her children are displaying), the parent sounds reasonable comparatively, and is allowed to be the authority and sound like the authority in the family. Unlike other kinds of narcissists who primarily triangulate with a scapegoat and a golden child (and where the three people in the triangle know what is going on and what is expected), sometimes it is very hard to catch on to what is happening in this type of triangle. The siblings are too busy throwing barbs at each other! The reputation of the parent can often be kept intact because it is much harder to see the evil behind the mask when all of the children are being rewarded, purposely confused and all of their relationships purposely sabotaged through triangulation.

In this system, the narcissist will use indignant crying spells with rage, more than a flippant discard, for compliance (which actually is more of a Borderline trait -- many narcissists have some traits of other cluster B personality disorders, thus the reason for the Borderline reaction in this case).

"I'll talk to him" is used more than rejection. And, in fact, silent treatments are sometimes saved for when the narcissist has been caught in a lie. And used in this way: "I couldn't talk to you because I was so upset and hurt that you would think this way about me! I've always supported you in every way! I have always put you first above everyone else! You have hurt me so much with this that I don't know if I could ever forgive you! You're so ungrateful!" (this act would not be convincing to an unfavored thrown-away scapegoat, for instance, so it takes deviousness to a whole other level).

The pressure for compliance is done by the other siblings: "Look what you've done to *parent* now! You are so bad to hurt *parent* that way!" The children scapegoat the sibling while the parent watches on the sidelines, keeping his or her hands clean of it by appearing to always be above it all, perfect, composed and caring. The pressure to conform because the parent is so "nice", sweeps all of the parent's lying under the rug ... and it excuses and enables the parent to get away with more lies and triangulation.

These kinds of parents are more like the cult leaders who go around with compassionate voices at all times, who achieve loyalty from their followers by appearing sacrificing, sweet and commiserating (non-selfish, non-punishing), all the while sleeping with as many married women and children in their ministry as they possibly can, with those married women often defending the leader from every attack, even their own husbands' resistance, because the leader acts so "god-like". These leaders don't need to feed their followers koolaide laced with cyanide, because so many defenders are around them at all times, explaining away and justifying everything the great leader does. If someone can't stand the cult, the follower is allowed to leave the love triangle of his own accord (i.e. no one tries to force him to stay in the triangle, at least that is how it is "played", and they are even sweet to him when he leaves, blessing him on his way out). This kind of narcissist knows enough to implement self-control at all times: how to contain narcissistic rage so that the rest of his followers will admire him for taking the higher road, and so that the person abandoning the cult will seem hot-headed and foolish by comparison. In fact, the leader always tries to make sure that the follower looks more immature: that all of the anger, wrangling, jealousy and rebellion are primitive and unattractive. The god-like composure, rationality, unselfishness and sympathizing of the leader is retained by keeping the mask on at all times, through all trials, whereas their other narcissist brethren (the scapegoaters) become so flustered and bothered that they lose their masks and temper, and amp up the terrorizing when they have been found out. By keeping his hands free of scapegoating, and letting others do it, it ensures that the fake-benevolent narcissist leader can always use this old supply again if the supply should decide to come back (to fight for his wife, for instance, thus entering the triangle yet again).

In these kinds of families, all family members are part of trying to get the member who wants to leave back into the fold.

MALIGNANT NARCISSISTS

These narcissists have qualities of both kinds of narcissists, as well as characteristics of Borderline Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder. Antisocial Personality Disorder is also referred to as a Sociopath.

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SCAPEGOATING NARCISSISTS AND FAKE-BENEVOLENT NARCISSISTS

Neither kind of narcissist can take criticism. The scapegoating narcissist is overtly rageful whereas the fake-benevolent narcissist is covertly rageful (i.e. more political and secretive). The former prides himself on making an instant devastating impact, whereas the latter prides himself at keeping his cool and appearing loving, perfect and composed at all times, even though he is constantly striking with an underhanded agenda.

The use of triangulation for scapegoating narcissists is limited; it is part of an arsenal of other abuses and weapons. For fake-benevolent narcissists it is the primary weapon of choice, followed by gaslighting.

Sibling abuse can still run rampant with both kinds of narcissists. The scapegoating narcissist grooms one child to be a bully, to overpower and terrorize an empathetic scapegoat sibling who is being disabled in some manner by the narcissist whether materially, socially or through gaslighting, whereas the fake-benevolent parent takes a more hands-off approach except to manipulate each child to keep the match going, ensuring that everyone will put the narcissistic parent first, and continue to fight over them (endless narcissistic supply).

Advice, lectures and lessons which are infantisizing (i.e. not "normal": as if they are talking to a young unruly child) are used by both kinds of narcissists. When scapegoating narcissists teach lessons, even to adult children, there is always reward, threats and punishment tied to the lessons. When fake-benevolent narcissists teach lessons, rewards are arbitrary and confusing, so that each child will be devoted to continue fighting it out with their siblings for parental approval.

Both families are enmeshed. In scapegoating families, however, there are usually quite a few members living outside of the core enmeshment. For scapegoating families, the core of the family is usually occupied by bullies, while at the core of the fake-benevolent narcissist's family are brainwashed do-gooders who worship the narcissist and will do just about anything for them. In scapegoating families, if you refuse to be enmeshed, you are thrown out, rejected and punished for it (which is an odd way to respond because it is the direct opposite of enmeshment). Children in these families are seen as expendable whereas in the fake-benevolent narcissist's family no children are expendable; they are all needed for narcissistic supply, so they tend to be super-enmeshed, loyal large families who always welcome births and expect everyone to leave their doors open. The fake-benevolent narcissist knows everyone else's business at all times, and is in everyone else's business, and if denied information, will try to attain it in some way. They are ultra-meddling (perhaps resembling a bigger Everybody Loves Raymond kind of family more than the scapegoating families who have a lot of irrationally hated, disposed Jane Eyres living on the sidelines).

Scapegoating narcissistic mothers see children as troublesome, and dragging their goals down, as if they can't attain their selfish desires with kids in the picture (unless those children can offer status), whereas fake-benevolent narcissists view children as essential to getting their selfish desires fulfilled as the all-powerful head of the family.

Both kinds of narcissists aspire to be constantly flattered, highly admired, highly sought after, the go-to person for advice and sympathy, but the difference is that the scapegoating narcissist punishes by being rejecting and cold towards a child who does not act in this way. The fake-benevolent narcissist has such a large brainwashed entourage who worships what ever that narcissist does that the narcissist doesn't have to do anything: the minions take care of the "failure to worship problem" as a "disgrace to the entire family".  

The point of triangulation for fake-benevolent narcissists is to build an ever larger entourage to exploit for more and more narcissistic supply, power and control. The point of triangulation for scapegoating narcissists is to put their victims through mobbing (gang bullying), and then discard them.

The fake-benevolent narcissists will always try to put on an act of empathy, even when they are failing to convince, even after they've been caught at being un-empathetic too many times for it to be believable. The scapegoating narcissists, however, will revel in their victim's shock and pain when their acting job (of temporary empathy), is revealed: it is funny and fun for them to see the lowly empath feel so hurt by the betrayal, to get so pummeled emotionally!

Both kinds of narcissists enjoy watching how their destruction impacts their childrens' lives. They both enjoy watching how what they do empowers them, and disempowers their children. The big difference is that scapegoating narcissists openly revel in it after they have been caught, and throw more barbs and abuses while they are at it, whereas the fake-benevolents nearly always remain composed and covert: feign innocence, and gather an audience to show present "reconciliations" and martyrdom.

Both narcissist types love to ruin the big life events of their victims. But again, here they also differ. For instance, say the victim is a daughter having a wedding and the narcissist is a mother. The scapegoating narcissist mother will throw a fit, or do a disappearing act, making sure her daughter is upset and minimized on an important day, whereas the fake-benevolent narcissist will show up in a fancy, frilly white gown, seemingly trying to compete, or propose too many embarrassing toasts, or pepper the in-laws with far too many questions; she enjoys big family gatherings as a way to ingratiate, manipulate more sources for narcissistic supply and put focus on herself. Perhaps it is just a difference of introverted narcissist versus extroverted narcissist.

Fake-benevolent narcissists rarely enlist other narcissists or sociopaths into their entourage (unlike the scapegoating narcissists, they probably are more aware of the pitfalls), whereas scapegoating narcissists thrive on taking down a victim with a bunch of other bullies. Fake-benevolent narcissists usually prefer unsuspecting innocent empaths they can manipulate and exploit by appealing to their empathetic natures (used for pressuring truces). Just about all narcissists see empathy as a weakness, but the fake-benevolent narcissist is always scheming at how to use it to his advantage, primarily for evermore triangulations, whereas scapegoating narcissists look to terrorize, scapegoat, and build a bigoted force against an empath.

Both kinds of narcissists are abusive, however fake-benevolents have a definite preference for psychological abuse, whereas scapegoaters prefer verbal and emotional abuse, sometimes escalating to physical abuse. Some instances of psychological abuse include lying, deflecting and excusing with more lies, gaslighting, dodging, false pretense, undermining, sabotage, trickery, splitting, character assassination, slander, brainwashing, projecting, strategizing to "win", conning, scamming, gossiping, acting to elicit certain responses that are of detriment to another person, stealing to confuse, triangulating for power and control, to purposely and constantly confuse so that victims won't suspect being manipulated. The whole idea behind psychological abuse is to play with people's minds and perceptions, to disable them mentally so that their victims will always question themselves, and perhaps feel insane from all of the confusion. If the fake-benevolent escalates to physical abuse, they are more likely to put a tranquilizer or some rotten stuff in the food (or some other method which is underhanded). They rarely hit or beat a person. Some instances of emotional abuse, the prefferred abuse for scapegoating narcissists, include the silent treatment (ostracizing), neglect, objectification, scapegoating, neglecting, bullying, mobbing, brandishing anger, expecting "perfection" at all times, discarding you over complaining about an event or situation, discarding you over a perceived criticism, isolating you from friends or family, intimidation, unwarranted blame, targeted mocking, making you a laughing stock, constant chiding, insults used as a weapon against your self esteem, favoritism, negatively comparing you with another, selling you into sexually slavery, allowing someone to sexually or physically abuse you. The whole idea of emotional abuse is to disable you emotionally so that you are upset, sad, grieving, depressed, in pain, in shock, and in general, suffering emotionally.

Attempting to bypass boundaries is a type of aggression used by perpetrators in triangulation. Scapegoating narcissists sometimes give up on trying to work around boundaries of their abused adult children because they may feel "satisfied enough" with a constant punishing agenda (their adult child shunned for life, for example). However, most of them get restless; they aren't quite satisfied, so like the huge majority of abusers, they tend to escalate. So most of them are known to perpetrate, at the very least, smear campaigns against their victims. The fake-benevolents never entirely give up in trying to get around boundaries. While they may not overtly punish victims who are living on the outside, they try to work on the rest of the victim's social network. Those who support the parent hear mostly smear campaigns, with doses of "Look what I did for this child of mine recently, and I'm still being rejected! She (or he) must be a spawn of the devil!" and those who support the adult child get presents, accolades, drive-bys, sweet talk and statements to garner sympathy for the parent (with just a dash of a smear campaign thrown in). The point of getting chummy with the adult child's support network is to wear the support down and bust it apart: "Your parent isn't so bad! Look what he (or she) did for me! So sweet! You're paranoid about your parent! You need to get a grip!" -- and yes, this happens all the time!     

The scapegoating narcissist will outright refuse to go to therapy (and maybe that is a blessing). The fake-benevolents will go, but try to triangulate the therapist, but when the therapist tries to corner them on their behavior, they are such deflecting, dodging, excusing, sympathetic characters that rail with crocodile tears at how they have been treated that the therapy is sometimes totally useless, with the therapist rolling his eyes or second-guessing himself. The fake-benevolents use their willingness to go to therapy as a sign to the entire family that they care about their relationship(s), and therefore deserve to be in their children's lives. Often these narcissists continue to go to therapy long after their child wearies of it and drops out; they use sessions as a challenge to see if they can get the therapist's sympathy, and slip in some triangulation somewhere (any will do ... as they feel that a crack in the door is an eventual invitation for an open door!). The point of their going, after all, is to see if they can take the therapist away from their child, claiming that relationship as their own too. They work on brainwashing the therapist, just as they have with members of the family (and let's face it, a therapist is just another empath, even if an educated one, just what this kind of narcissist wants to keep collecting). Sometimes the narcissist brings in other brainwashed family members to vouch for them. So the children who have been burned over and over by these kinds of parents can find themselves traumatized by a therapist they looked to for help! Only a therapist who is unusually enlightened and has extensive experience working with these kinds of patients can see through the deviousness. Many of the adult child victims advise never to go through a therapy process with a narcissist just for this reason, to only go on your own for your own healing and to gain mental and emotional strength in order to be autonomous from the narcissist.

In many forums I witness many daughters complaining of how their fake-benevolent narcissistic mothers are trying to triangulate their own children. Many of these adult child victims of these mothers must go no-contact just to preserve their relationships with their own children and husband, and to protect the sibling relationships between their children as well. The narcissistic mothers seem to have no shame, no boundaries, no respect. They keep trying to insert themselves, to manipulate, even if they have to do it more subtly, bypassing boundaries through other methods of triangulation. For instance: a father will call his daughter and say that the situation is breaking his heart, to "please forgive your mother, and give her another chance, just forgive and forget. Please!" (see my post on Forgiving Abusers, the You're Better than That Family Culture that Expects Victims of Familial Abuse to Make Up with Their Abusers).

Nothing phases these mothers. The further the daughter retreats, the more these mothers amp it up, pressuring the rest of the family to take up the mother cause in bringing the daughter back into the fold. The mother might keep appearing out of nowhere, as if it is a coincidence (jack-in-the-box Mom ... or aunt ... or sister). Everyone is used. They count on all of the other empaths to appeal to the daughter's "forgiveness genes".

These mothers can sometimes resemble stalkers. They cannot hear "no" for an answer. They keep trying, and trying, and trying, and trying to get into their daughter's life in some way, through some open slit in the doorway. They might send unsolicited gifts to the grandchildren; nearly anything is used for potential entry. Even when the mother backs off somewhat, and tells the daughter that they respect her boundary, that they understand the maternal instinct to protect children, the daughters often look at these pronouncements as either half-truths or totally insincere. The guilt can become unbearable for the daughter who is looked down upon by the whole family (and sometimes the community too) for "rejecting a mother who is trying so very hard, has no agenda, is just trying to love you and be part of your life."

I have heard so many recordings of these kinds of mothers and they all sound the same, even with the same tone of voice! How does that happen? Not only that, but they overwhelmingly have some "ie" or "y" on their daughter's name: Stephie, Carrie, Nancy, Judy, Joanie, Honey, Sweetie, Baby ... And the messages all seem the same too: "Family always needs to forgive each other. That's what families are for and that's what families are supposed to do" , "You know, it would break your father's heart if he couldn't see those grandchildren" , "You know, I love you. I'm sorry if you cannot accept that, but really, this has gone too far!" , "I'd like to take you out for your birthday. Once you see me, maybe you'll appreciate that you have a mother. Think about whether your little daughter who you gave birth to, who you nursed and held in your arms, did this to you. Everyone loves you and your little babies." They are shamelessly unaffected by the rejections, they don't seem to care that they are being rejected; they feel absolutely entitled to be in their daughters' lives no matter what, even though they are unwilling to make changes to stop triangulating. The best these mothers can seem to do is to make excuses and deflect the guilt away from them, dish out guilt trips, sweeten everything up with constant praises, act innocent to allegations, blame by reciting family etiquette, always putting on the constant pressure.

The pressure these mothers put on their daughters can reach unbearable proportions, so many daughters move clear across the country with their children and spouse, without a word to anyone, and set up a PO box in a separate town.

The scapegoating narcissists, on the other hand, take the opposite tack. They reject, disable, leave their adult daughter and the rest of her family out in the cold. No more family holidays and vacations, no more birthdays, no more presents, no more phone calls or concern about where their daughter is or what she is going through; they are absent from all big events, surgeries, graduations, weddings, everything. They make it clear that the daughter is dead to them. Their correspondences, if there are any, are curt, bullying, uncaring, devoid of feeling and human kindness. They don't pretend to have empathy. These mothers think that punishing with silence will bring about the desired effect.

In the forums the ostracized scapegoated daughters sometimes say they feel jealous of all of the attention that the fake-benevolent narcissists' daughters are getting. And the contrast is pretty stark: icy desert versus hot claustrophobic jungle. It is seen that the stalked daughters at least have mothers who care enough to contact them.

But all the stalked daughters who have spoken up about this (and there are many, many of them), actually feel it is so much worse, that they'd trade places any day. They believe that the scapegoated daughters have it better because they are being left alone to live their lives, rather than being hounded and pressured constantly and followed around by some member of the family with yet another heart string or guilt trip. These daughters also say that their mothers don't care about them any more than a cold, heartless rejecting mother: "What would you rather hear? The truth that your mother hates you and could care less about you? Or the constant lying of a mother telling you she loves you when she actually hates you so much that she wants to turn everything that's good in your life into toxic poison? She hates you so much that she wants to turn your children and husband against you, and get into every relationship you have. At least when you are ostracized you get to have a loving relationship with your husband and children without constant interference! You get to have a work life and friendships that aren't constantly being sabotaged. At least your mothers prove they are craven and selfish. Our mothers are craven and selfish too, but they parade around like selfless martyrs and pillars of society, with these brainwashed zombies who believe everything they say!"

So I have come to see the point. At least when you are ostracized, you still have your own life and aren't thinking about the toxic members of your family every day. You aren't sent into shock and foreboding at hearing their voice pop up on your answering machine, or watching them suddenly appear out of nowhere on a daily, or semi daily basis. You aren't paranoid about their minions showing up at your doorstep or events uninvited. Your self esteem can suffer, but there isn't stalking, coercion, guilt, sabotaging agendas being thrown at you like an endless volley of constant bombs. The dead silence fills up with your own decisions, your own life and interests, with people who you choose to have in your life rather than people who are constantly thrusting themselves into your life; indeed it is a trial-by-fire at being and feeling completely autonomous from them: from their followers, comments, advice, lectures, controlling tactics, insults, thought processes, and interests.  What they do doesn't effect you, and what you do doesn't effect them. A lot of family relationships can still be preserved, because scapegoating parents are most comfortable in the company of other bullies in the family, and most every other family member knows it (bullies are known for pushing people around and out, not pulling people in).

As for the victims of triangulation who are living separate from their families, scapegoats most often feel revulsion, whereas children of the fake-benevolents are often plagued with guilt and fear. Their guilt is much more pronounced than scapegoats because they have to sacrifice nearly everyone in their family, because the atmosphere of the family is so cult-like, that even other members who are aware of what is happening cannot seem to let go. The fear is much more pronounced than scapegoats too, for the very reason that they know that some family member will always be lurking, or trying to hunt them down. They are also used to being so sabotaged that they are hypervigilant of it happening again, as if it might happen through osmosis. Rejected scapegoats, however, get to retain some relationships with family members, particularly other members who have been stung by the bullying and rejecting.

It takes a great deal more forethought and planning to manipulate children in the devious ways that the fake-benevolent narcissists do, so most narcissists fall into the rejecting scapegoating variety: simple-minded, ruled by fantasy, transparent in their destruction and coldness. Their maneuvers to control and triangulate are more simplistic too, where one disfavored abused scapegoat (empath) is always at one end of the triangle. If one scapegoat leaves, another scapegoat replaces the former one in the triangle. This means, of course, that the narcissist has to look for and recruit another scapegoat (new supply), something that is not always easy, and probably something the fake-benevolents forsee as restriction of supply.

Narcissists who scapegoat tend to have a collection of shunned scapegoats they have lost control of, so the narcissist's reputation falters faster, something that the more convincing, conniving fake-benevolent narcissists sometimes never have to face. One is the cold non-parenting parent, who neglects their relationships, often seeking status and affirmation through self indulgences (cruises, spas, house in the Caribbean, servants, etc), while the other is an over-parenting parent, never letting their children have their own lives, admired for being community-oriented, for putting on the altruistic act, while underhandedly dividing, conquering and spreading confusion, lies and destruction.

However, it is also apparent that once the latter narcissist's complex web of lies and divisions are fully exposed, they can find themselves just as alone as the scapegoating narcissists ... however, because they don't outwardly reject, there may always be one or two particularly naive, childlike, innocent brainwashed members who just can never let go of the great benevolent leader fantasy.

Evil is evil, whether it comes with cookies and cream to make it seem more palatable, or whether it is revealed as poison right from the beginning.

Research:

The Drama Triangle, the Three Roles of Victimhood by Lynne Namka, Ed.D -- recommended

Ten Things Never to Do in a Marriage by Michael Tobin, PhD -- which includes triangulation

Getting Involved in a Love Triangle to Avoid Dealing with Problems in your Relationship by Josephine Ferraro, LCSW

Torture by Triangulation -- from the Psychopath Free blog (a very good post, by the way, though it has more to do with romantic relationships than family relationships, yet when I read through the post, most of it applies to family relationships as well)

The Four Most Common Narc-Sadistic Triangulation Tactics by Bree Bonchay, LCSW
Excerpts from the article include these four triangulation tactics (briefly):
1. Killing Two Birds with One Stone
   third-party person is brought in to the relationship to kill two birds with one stone! First, it activates feelings of jealousy and insecurity in their partner and subtlety cues the partner that they can be substituted at any time ... it creates an illusion of popularity and desirability and sets the stage for rivalry, both of which, fill the narcissist with supply ...
2. Recruiting Reinforcements
   One of the ways narcissists use triangulation to manipulate their partners into siding with their point of view or acquiesce to their wants and needs is by recruiting a third-party to validate their opinion which is a form of “ganging up” otherwise known as bullying ...
3. Splitting
   This method of triangulation involves pitting two people against each other, but the narcissist will usually engage in character assassination of one or both individuals behind their backs ... This triangulation tactic also gives the narcissist a lot of power as they control the flow of information and the interpretation of that information ...
4. The Pre-discard and Dump
   ... they will confide in people who hardly even know their partner, if at all. The narcissist will start to tell their partner they have been confiding in other people, and those people agree with him/her that the relationship isn’t good for them. Most likely, one of their “confidents”, will end up being the replacement partner. After the break-up, they will openly boast about how happy they are with their new partner ...

An article on narcissistic "love" triangles and emotional unavailability by Faye Armitage from The Examiner.
Excerpts from The Examiner article:
   One of the key features of a narcissist is their desire to feel like they are in high demand. They like to feel like they have many options and you should be happy they chose you. The narcissist feels an intense euphoria and a sense of power when they can turn people against each other, especially when it’s over a competition for them. Narcissists will manufacture situations to make you jealous and question their fidelity. In a normal relationship, people go out of their way to prove that they are trustworthy—but the narcissist does exactly the opposite. They are constantly suggesting that they might be pursuing other options, or spending time with other people, so that you can never settle down into a feeling of peace. And they will always deny this, calling you crazy for bringing it up ...
   ... What all forms of triangulation have in common is that it makes narcissists emotionally unavailable to their actual life partner which is precisely the intent of the triangulation. Their supposed life partner ends up feeling emotionally betrayed ...
   ... They will do anything in their power to make their "significant other" feel insignificant, to maintain their emotional distance and control while continuing the relationship ...
   ...  There is no apparent intent on working anything out, and if you insist on resolving any issues you might have, you'll most likely be punished with a silent treatment aka disappearing act.
   When they finally re-appear a few days later, they will act like nothing happened. The silent treatment is only one frequently used tool in a whole array of abusive manipulative tools intended to keep you at an emotional distance from them.
   The triangulation only intensifies. They feel justified in treating you poorly.
   Narcissists hate boundaries. They don't want limits of any kind. They want full access to whatever they want, whenever they want it. Rules don't apply to them, and they love to manufacture the illusion of popularity at the expense of their partner. Instead of the affection of their partner, they prefer the adoration of an entourage.





(a very good site to get validation if you have a narcissistic mother):
It is the only graphic I could find on triangulation from the site
(and it is fuzzy), so I am quoting it below:
NARCISSISTIC MOTHERS
DIVIDE AND CONQUER
They use this to divide and conquer, even,
or perhaps especially, among their own
children. The narcissist will  lie to Daughter
about Son, then to Son about Daughter. If
Daughter and Son are not wise to the
tactics of Narcissist Mother, they will each
be angry with or dislike the other based
on the lie. This causes fighting or even
severed relationships between Daughter
and Son - as Narciissist Mother pretends
to be innocent, referee or the pitiful
mother worn out by such bickering kids.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder Mother Facebook Resource Page