Misadventures with Angry Alcoholics, Bullies and Narcissists: abusive partners

Showing posts with label abusive partners. Show all posts

Saturday, February 12, 2022

Netflix Series Review: Maid

note: all star ratings have to do with whether I think the story told is a realistic portrayal. In fact, all reviews are about covering issues related to abuse, scapegoating, toxic family portrayal, alcoholic family portrayal, substance abuse family portrayal, children from abusive families and their experiences, and how effective that portrayal is, not about how effective the movie-making is, or the set design, or production, directing and acting. I leave those concerns to other writers and reviewers. I don't even cover whether I would recommend the movie to others based on my likes and dislikes; I only recommend movies that I think will open people's eyes as to how survivors of abuse live in the world.

This page contains a review for:

Maid

Spoiler alert!

According to Quincy LeGardye (in an article called What Is Stephanie Land of 'Maid' Doing Now? - The real-life Alex is now a New York Times best-selling author. for the Marie Claire website):

Netflix's newest acclaimed drama, Maid, tells the story of a single mother's resilience and recovery from domestic abuse. It follows Alex, a young woman who leaves her abusive boyfriend and navigates the American welfare system while getting whatever work she can cleaning houses. The heart-wrenching show has captivated fans, who have been asking whether Maid is based on a true story.

The series is based on author Stephanie Land's memoir Maid: Hard Work, Low Pay, and a Mother’s Will to Survive. Though much of the show is fictionalized, adding in new characters and including more of Alex's mother and father, the larger arc and many of the scenes with Alex and her daughter, Maddy, come from Land's real life, when she worked as a maid after leaving an abusive relationship.

Besides landing on the New York Times bestseller list, it also ended up on Barack Obama's 2019 Summer Reading List.

I felt I had to see this ten-episode series because a fairly vocal survivor of domestic violence said that this was "her life too". The fact that this book was on the bestseller list may have something to do with more than a few women relating to the story, yes?

The series is supposed to take place in Washington state, but is actually filmed more in Canada than in Washington.

The two main characters in the series who are mother and daughter, are also mother and daughter in real life.

These are some of the issues that are raised in the film:

ALEX, THE MAIN CHARACTER, IS IN AN EMOTIONALLY ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIP
- THE EMOTIONAL ABUSE SHE ENDURES COUNTS AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

This is one of the first times I have seen emotional abuse (and exclusively emotional abuse) being covered in a moving picture. The series is groundbreaking in this way, and it shows how scary and isolating it can be. It also shows why a person undergoing it might want to escape.

Just because the relationship does not feature hitting, shoving, punching, throwing her around and other kinds of physical abuses, you can see how an emotionally abusive relationship could escalate to physical abuse very fast (it almost gets to that point). At the very least, Alex's boyfriend is raging in her face, clenching his fists, throwing things, and making threats. The fear of the abuse escalating (and it does escalate later in the series from a make-up into the same kind of abuse she endured before) is why she leaves - twice.

The reason given for why Sean, the boyfriend of Alex, and co-parent to Maddy, is abusive is that he is an alcoholic given to terrifying rages and controlling behavior. Although alcoholics can be controlling, more of them are not to the extent that Sean is, so this is a bit misleading. Usually alcoholism with this level of controlling behavior points to a personality disorder with alcoholism. However, this does not take away from the story. Alcoholics can have rage with control issues that can bleed over into momentary behaviors that they wouldn't normally have if they were "sober".

Sean tries to give up alcohol while Alex and Maddy are gone to win them back, but as soon as they are back, he starts drinking again, gets abusive again, and it becomes clear why she left in the first place.

At the domestic violence shelter, she understands that emotional abuse in the context of being admitted to the shelter counts as domestic violence.

A CHILD COMES FIRST

Alex seems to be the most reliable and responsible in the series among all of the major characters. Her mother (expertly played by Andie MacDowell) has bipolar disorder. Like Alex, she endured domestic abuse by Alex's father, and like Alex, moved out and took Alex with her.

These things do tend to run in families, and they can also be multi-generational. It is the big turning point in the story, the discovery that it is being repeated with a new generation.

The mother tries to make a living at craft fairs and on Etsy, is easily exploited by others, and as it turns out, we find that she is as homeless as Alex is.

It is typical for predators to exploit people with emotional, financial or mental issues (human predators often prey on people who they deem to be weak), and this is what happens to the mother. It is also not uncommon for the people who have financial and emotional issues to end up in dire straights. Real people who resemble the mother in this series want to be safe (but safety often equates to being controlled in scary ways) but also to be free (freedom equates to homelessness with Alex's mother's degree of disability to avoid being in a bureaucratic merry-go-round of hospitals and institutions). For the mother, freedom wins out over safety, even though it means she is homeless. In order not to end up without freedom again, she lies to her daughter about being homeless.

Alex doesn't try to challenge it. She knows she risked everything for freedom too.

In the beginning, the mother neither has the financial, mental or emotional wherewithal to babysit her granddaughter so that her daughter can go to work to support the two of them.

The mother's boyfriend is too busy exploiting the mother and wanting her all to himself to be of much use as a babysitter either.

Alex's ex-boyfriend doesn't have the ability to take care of the daughter because he is battling an addiction.

And Alex's father is too chummy with Sean, and Alex remembers too many abusive episodes between him and her mother to trust him with her child.

So there is no one to babysit Maddy until Alex finds solutions. Eventually she finds some, but they are terrible in the beginning, until there is one that Alex approves of, only to find that the bureaucratic situation seems impossible to overcome. Alex overcomes them momentarily, but then everything ends up in disaster again ... which is one reason she ends up back with the ex, Sean.

Even the most responsible person cannot keep the weight of poverty, lack of opportunity, incredible stressful family situation, housing problems, lack of food, and issues with an abusive ex up. It is like the weight of it all plus some seriously bad luck crumbles on top of her and squashes her, so that the only situation left to get her bearings again is with her ex. Then the domestic abuse starts again ...

But the strength she has to overcome all of it and rise again has to do with Maddy. She wants to make sure that Maddy has a better life. She always keeps that in mind, and will sacrifice almost everything for her daughter. Keeping her daughter safe, healthy, eating well, and not scared and traumatized by domestic violence scenes is her first priority, and it keeps her on the path to a better life even though she failed at it before. Not that it was "her failure". It becomes obvious that it is largely about how society treats poor single mothers and fails at it.

From comments by other survivors I have known who lived like Alex, they felt that society cared very little for the plight of poor single Moms, and that the bureaucratic hurdles made it all so much worse, made them feel guilty on every level: guilty for being poor, guilty for being in an abusive relationship, guilty for exposing their child to abuse, guilty for not having adequate housing for their child, guilty for wanting a better life for their child when society tells them in so many words that their "station" in life means they can't dream beyond it, guilty for wanting the things and luxuries that their wealthy clients have, guilty for going back to their abusive ex's.

POVERTY: "FOOD AND SHELTER INSECURE"

In the series, Alex moves from making a home in her car, sleeping in a ferry station, a domestic violence shelter, a friend's house, a low-income housing development, to an abusive environment. The low income housing development, the best place she lives, develops a mold problem where the mold threatens Maddy's health, so she is told she must move out. Then the problems mount again.

I have had some experience with poverty myself from age 18 - 21, when I was desperately trying to go to college (which is part of this story too, to some degree), where I worked as a chambermaid and waitress (which has some similarities to cleaning houses), where I ran into catch-22 bureaucratic "red tape" (similar to what the main character in this story endures) and where I went from 125 pounds down to 106 pounds, weight I could ill afford to lose as a doctor said I was already underweight when I was 125 pounds (lack of food is something that the character in this story endures too). I also had very little support (the character in this series has very little support too, but for different reasons than I had, but were similar in that they were "family oriented", or maybe "family originated" is the right word). And like her, I wrote a lot (a novel even).

So I found all of the issues having to do with poverty, the inability to find adequate food and shelter, and almost no familial support to be totally believable. I have a feeling that most people who live in poverty have the same kinds of multiple overwhelming challenges that this story presented. But like the character in this story, we both overcame it with determination and a lot of hard work. But it is a situation you never forget. It is a situation that requires almost herculean efforts no matter how many times you fall, and often above and beyond most people's schedules, without giving into the pleasures, relaxation and leisure activities that most people have, to make sure it does not happen again. You have to be as responsible as you can to transform a life like this, and even then you sometimes fail because of lack of insights into the business world, and simply from being too young to know what it takes to survive without support.

Being abused is a terrible compromise to obtain food and shelter. It is why I have always been a proponent of a living wage, especially for women. Without a living wage, people are paying their taxes to the poor anyway, for the bureaucracies for the poor first and foremost, and then the subsidized housing, subsidized health insurance, food stamps, subsidized daycare, and then also for all of the endless evaluations you get when you are working full time but dependent on the government too (these "evaluators" have much higher paying jobs than the poor they are evaluating, so in a way, it is an added expense that could be avoided by doing the right thing). Then there are the domestic violence shelters too with their social workers. A lot of battered women who live in these shelters have PTSD from enduring so much abuse - so then there is subsidized mental health care too.

It's amazing that any of us make it out of the threats and scare tactics of abusers (who still seek to act like predators and/or love bombers when you have escaped). We are kept in false imprisonments by domestic violence perpetrators too, a crime that is common in these situations. We are kept in a state that keeps us from advancing out of poverty and danger, and where dependency on a volatile unfit mate seems insurmountable considering that escaping carries even more dangers, at least for an entire year. One can see why some women don't make it. I think this series also shows why some women don't leave their abusers - imagine if the main character, Alex, was enduring so much physical abuse that it made her disabled. That happens frequently in these situations. She has the intelligence to know she has to leave before the physical abuse starts, but many women don't. Many are caught off guard ("He would never hurt me! He said he loves me!" - it is how many women become tricked by entrapment, over the word "love", but it is a vapid word when it is used by someone who only wants to dominate and control their mate, and who abuses to get more power and control for themselves to the point of totally disabling their victim).

Anyway, before I get too far off into that train of thought, there is subsidized health care for her bruises and cut lips too.

There are subsidized legal services to get men like this incarcerated. Incarcerated men also mean your tax dollars. And while they are in jail, they can't pay alimony or child support, so again, these women have to rely on the government for that. In the past, many perpetrators were not incarcerated - so they did it all over again to another woman, so that increases the subsidizing to two women.

And then if they have children, one out of three of their children is likely to perpetrate domestic violence too. And then that cycle will need subsidies in the way of tax dollars too.

Wouldn't it just be better to give women a living wage to begin with, so that she can move out easily when the violence starts, and live in peace with her child? For me, that is what the series asks loud and clear.

NOT ALL RICH PEOPLE ARE SELFISH BAD PEOPLE

For the most part, rich people do not look good in this series. They act entitled, they ignore Alex, they will fire Alex over a "learning issue" (i.e. being new to "the maid business" and not always knowing the protocols).

But one of Alex's most irritating and seemingly most demanding clients, Regina, actually starts to see Alex for what she is, i.e. not just a maid. But it takes a tragedy in Regina's life to make her start treating Alex with more dignity and respect.

Eventually, Regina pours her heart out to Alex, and Alex tells her about some struggles she has too. When the domestic abuse starts again for Alex, Regina is the one who Alex calls. Regina drives her to the domestic violence shelter and also provides much needed legal help.

Every single mother who is living in poverty, whose ex is a domestic abuse offender, who is living with incredibly difficult unresolvable family issues, and custody issues, needs an angel with some financial backing, and this angel comes through for Alex in the way of Regina.

SOME TAKE-AWAYS

The main character in this series has the forethought to realize that her daughter will suffer from the domestic violence perpetrated by her partner. It doesn't always work out that way. Some women stay thinking that a child needs both parents. Or that the child needs the resources and money that the father makes. They deem that life will be more secure financially and in consistency.

However, domestic violence in and of itself means inconsistent love and an inconsistent life for a child. Living with a parent with hair-trigger rage who cannot get past their own shame-rage spiral, usually results in anxiety for the child.

Parental alienation ("talking bad" about their other child's parent) is also extremely common for abusers who have personality disorders. Not only that, but abusers often require their children to choose one parent or the other (they demand loyalty) - increasingly illegal. In areas of the country where it is still being tolerated it means that the abusive parent will be tempted to punish their own child for feeling safer with their other parent, denying them love, resources, good intentions and belonging. In other words, if a woman stays with an abusive partner, it can also mean child abuse down the road.

So, I am glad that the series went in the direction of Alex having the forethought to know that leaving her abuser was also a pre-emptive way of protecting her child from inevitable child abuse.

This is one of the most realistic portrayals of emotional abuse I have seen yet. It explores the family background where abuse and victimization tend to be multigenerational. It explores how a woman can become entrapped by an abuser. It explores how a child can be traumatized in the same multi-generational way. It explores why it is necessary to protect the next generation from generational abuse. It explores the bureaucracies of homelessness, poverty and domestic violence victims. It explores why some women go back to their abusers. It explores attitudes of the rich towards maids, servants and women who are having challenges (and unaware that they may be brilliant writers, and will reach heights in their profession that the wealthy clients will never reach). It explores the personal life of clients. It explores how society's attitudes are changing. It shows how abuse escalates (and it does).

And amidst all of that, the story-telling is often creative, showing how the main character is feeling through visual illustrations, which make it an artsy film, not just a depiction of someone's life.

It helps that the author lived a life like this.

I think most women who have been in an abusive relationship will be able to relate to this series. Thus, I am giving it five stars.

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

invalidation and perspecticide: why narcissists and sociopaths use it and the effects on their victims

In abusive families invalidation and perspecticide are part of a toxic brew of tactics that members have to live with.

Why do narcissists and sociopaths do this to their family members, where did the practice come from (usually their childhoods: an authoritarian family), how it effects their family members, and how it is implemented will be discussed in this post. At the end of the post, there are the usual links to corroborate what I am saying and for further knowledge and reading.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INVALIDATION
AND PERSPECTICIDE IN ABUSIVE FAMILIES

Invalidation in the context of the abusive family is a broader term and encompasses not only invalidating the feelings, thoughts and perspectives of others, but can encompass invalidation of experiences, critical thinking, the need for a member to find the truth, the need for trying to find safety in or out of the family, and even go into the invalidation of responses and interactions with others. In many cases, it even goes as far as to invalidate a person in the family, in whole or in part.

And in fact, when there is so much invalidation of so much, you can almost count on it graduating into invalidating the entire person eventually.

Perspecticide is more specific: invalidation of feelings, thoughts and perspectives. It can be about the invalidation of experiences too, especially in the context of how they are felt, what thoughts they generate and the perspectives that are being generated.

Both perspecticide and emotional and psychological invalidation is considered to be abuse in close personal relationships. When parents do it to children, it falls under two umbrellas: child abuse and child neglect.

The problem for children, especially, is that for many abusive parents, they invalidate one child little by little, like chiseling away at the child, until the whole child is invalidated (rejected). I discuss this later in the post.

WHY NARCISSISTS AND SOCIOPATHS INVALIDATE
(and use perspecticide on) FAMILY MEMBERS AND/OR THEIR PARTNER

On narcissists:

Children, a spouse or other members who are invalidated, tend to be either partially rejected (when they talk, no one listens, or they are "talked over" or "re-interpreted") or rejected in whole (divorced, shunned, ostracized, told to stay away, given the silent treatment, etc.).

One of the reasons why invalidation and perspecticide tend to be a run-away train in abusive families is because of the narcissism itself: "I am right; they are wrong", "My perspectives and beliefs are the truth; theirs aren't", "What I believe should take on the most importance; I don't care what they believe and they should never be important", "I have to have my way in the beliefs and perspectives department; they can never persuade in that way", "What they say doesn't matter, only what I think matters to me", and so on. Their minds are more like pressure cookers where the lid is on so tight that they don't want any other feelings, thoughts and perspectives in there other than their own. This makes them highly prone to projection and discounting what others say to them.

Narcissists and sociopaths who tend to deal with problems and issues in a family through invalidations, tend to also foster an environment of rejection. Children are estranged, sibling relationships aren't close, there are children who are deemed to be "all good" and others who are deemed to be "all bad" and there are reasons the narcissist isn't close to either one of them (though on the outside it would seem the closeness was with who the narcissist or sociopath deemed to be the "all good" child). In general, there isn't a lot of listening going on, and it all tends to get passed down the generations so that the new generations are acting like the older generations in their relationships.

Besides the lack of authentic bonding, suspicions are commonplace among members. Members are afraid of each other and each other's intentions, members show a lot of signs of stress, feeling "unseen" and "unheard", and these families can graduate into alcoholic families, authoritarian families and crime families. "People pleasing" is often a major focus and "an either/or" too: you are going to totally please the narcissist or sociopath or you aren't; you are going to do all that you are told to do or you will be rejected entirely; you are going to become all that the narcissist or sociopath dreamed of in a child (idealized) or you are going to be rejected altogether (scapegoated); you are going to become the ultimate spouse and do what the narcissistic or sociopathic partner tells you to do or to think, or you will be rejected entirely.

Narcissists especially tend to use black and white thinking, "It is all or nothing", "You agree totally with me or you don't agree with me at all", "You are for me or against me", "I am all good and you are all bad", "You are always at fault and I am never at fault" (called splitting in psychology terms).

They are much more prone to divorce, estrangement and dissension than other kinds of people. In other words, the invalidations take on a kind of extreme severity. So it is important to remember that the invalidation and perspecticide of certain family members are not only belief-based and fantasy-based, but most often due to splitting (the psychology term again) as well.

In essence, it is devaluation (from the wheel of abuse: idealize, devalue, destroy). It begins as a devaluation of someone else's feelings, thoughts and perspectives. Then it tends to escalate into: experiences, how they live, how they conduct themselves with others, their interests and ambitions, their spiritual or religious beliefs, their dreams and desires, their businesses and so on.

It starts with criticisms first:
"Why would you want to do it that way. The way it should be done is -"
"I can't believe those are your thoughts! You heard that somewhere else."
"I'm disappointed in you. Why dream about xyz instead of abc?"
"Why would you want to work in that profession?!"
"Your clothes always look terrible on you!"
"Why do you say it that way? Why not say it -"
"I don't envy you. I wouldn't want to live like you do."
"I can't believe you feel that way! You should feel cdfg instead!"
"Why would you put a pie there? It belongs here!"
"Wow, you are stupid! Can't you ever think right about anything?"
"I'm so sorry! You need mental health counseling!" - usually referred to as a faux apology.

In other words there is an on-going nastiness so that they feel they are on top in the stature department and you are on the bottom. In other words stature and getting you to think of their perspectives as better than your own becomes significantly more important than the truth or of seeking for the truth.

When they have ground their subjects down and can no longer hear what their subjects are really going through, thinking and feeling, the last step in the devaluation stage is that the entire person is invalidated. Usually the sum of all of the criticisms and invalidations mean that you have been reduced down to nothing except whether you put their perspectives first as the absolute truth or you don't.

If you do not, you become invisible to them, and they complete the invalidation by rejecting you. This is where the silent treatments come in, the ghosting, the shunning, the ostracizing, the marginalizing, the incredible lack of empathy.

There are exceptions to this, of course, and that is where their paranoia comes in. They actually do not want you to show or to tell anyone that they invalidated you (rejected you) because they have decided what you are feeling, thinking and experiencing, so they have to vilify you with even more lies. Lies pile on top of lies and graduate to smear campaigns:
"(My target) is a liar."
"(My target) is crazy." - called gaslighting.
"(My target) has an agenda."
To you: "I know you better than you know yourself" - common, and a sign of narcissism (and psychopathy).

The other exception is that, say, they want you back, and have to concede that they are not "all knowing" and "all powerful" and "know more than you" - or they feel they have to pretend they are not as grandiose as they are presenting. Wanting to come back to you is not because they find value in you (always remember they have invalidated you and will probably always believe you are expendable). They do it so that they do not have to experience either family or societal disapproval and fall-out.

Many survivors report that they feel picked at and picked apart in every aspect of their lives. When the narcissist starts invalidating their person-hood (their sanity, their intelligence, their feelings and thoughts about events) it has gone too far. Either targets will see their perpetrators as insane for touting themselves as "mind readers", or the targets sometimes feel they have to give in or pretend to keep their narcissist happy (i.e. out of going into a rage, out of hurting them) or they question whether the narcissist is as right about their own character as the narcissist is espousing. In the third situation, what the narcissist says will directly effect the self esteem of the target.

One reason a narcissist keeps trying to toy with your self esteem is so that the narcissist can be in charge of the narrative. But it is no secret that narcissists' narratives are almost always half truths, only part truths, or all lies, take your pick.

While targets are getting picked apart with ever more invalidation of everything that is meaningful to them in their lives, the narcissist on the other hand, can't even take a "perceived criticism" as though they, and only they, have a right to criticize others!

Being continually invalidated by a narcissist can mean that the narcissist is invalidated by others in the end. Some examples of what targets say about narcissists:
"All they care about are their own perspectives."
"They think my feelings are their feelings."
"Only their feelings are important in the relationship while mine aren't!"
"I'm exhausted from all of the profound hypocrisies over criticisms."
"Why are they always trying to replace my perspectives with their own and then try to convince me that their perspectives are mine? As if theirs are some ultimate truth sent down by God!"
"I can't deal with a person who has to be right all of the time and who thinks everyone else is wrong."
"They tout themselves as more important and smarter than anyone else! I'm not seeing it. Frankly I think the arrogance is a huge blind spot and a big sham of theirs to get us to bend to their every whim."
"You notice when you disagree, they always get into a rage, or a snippy silent treatment or play the victim. They are so incapable of hearing any other perspective than their own. I just can't work with that kind of narcissism."

Part of the problem is that narcissists are not known to grow. They stay fixed in their way of seeing and operating and it tends to breed exhaustion, depression, anxiety and disgust in their targets. If you are a child or a spouse, it is likely to breed a good deal of pain too, at least in the beginning until you figure out what you are dealing with - either through therapy, or googling phrases they are known for, or through a friend or self help group, or through trying to understand their "Dr Jekyll Mr. Hyde personality", and "pathological lying". The phrase narcissism keeps coming up over and over again. Once you are educated and on to them, this is when the divorces and child/parent estrangements come in.

If you stay, the profound lack of self reflection in the narcissist often means a one sided relationship where you will be giving up who you are for their narcissistic supply needs. Narcissistic supply can mean them having affairs on you, or stealing something, as much as demanding accolades and degrading "services".

After so much time of being pressured to see events, situations and people the narcissist's way, most targets are accustomed to good listening and seeing other people's perspectives in other relationships because they have been required to do that by the narcissist.

That is where a narcissist's desire to have dominance in the perspectives department has serious shortcomings. It stunts the ability to have intelligence and enlightenment, keeps your mind in your own environment of filtering people through agreeing with you or not agreeing with you, believing in what you believe and don't believe, and so on. When narcissists lie about events and people (which most of them do), it stunts them even more (at some point I will go into this further in another post, because it stunts brain functioning in them). When they invalidate others with black and white thinking, incrementally it creates more stunting of their growth. It can escalate to the point where only one or two aspects of a person are visible to a narcissist (and most often based upon the narcissist's needs).

A lot of people report that they feel like they are talking to a child when they talk to a narcissist. Might this be a reason why?

Narcissists tend to practice the cycle of abuse more than sociopaths or narcissists who have sociopathic traits. So they tend to come back to their targets after awhile unless they are totally engaged with a new source of supply: "I got you all wrong! What have I done?!" or anything they think of in terms of overtures.

Invalidation and persecticide has everything to do with why narcissists put their own children into toxic roles too, not just other people in their lives, including why they have a favorite child and an unfavorite marginalized child. I will be discussing why further in the post.

On malignant narcissists (narcissists who have antisocial personality traits) and sociopaths (antipersonality disorder):

With sociopaths (and malignant narcissists), it is not black and white thinking per se as to why invalidation and perspecticide are used, although they can and do have splitting tendencies too. It has more to do with "they want what they want" and will use anything to get it, including manipulating you into the extremes of "all bad" or "all good" and hoping that your self esteem will take a hit in the process.

The reason why malignant narcissists (and sociopaths) like it when you have a compromised self esteem, is that they think that you will feel that you can't do any better than your relationship with them, that you are "stuck" with them. Believe it or not, a lot of targets get sucked into a lot of "I'm not good enough for anyone better than them, I don't deserve (add your own insecurity), I have to settle, I must have done something really bad in a past life to deserve all of this, I am probably lucky even though I am in a state of absolute misery with this person." I think I can train you to get out of this thinking, but it takes us out of the scope of this post. But realize it is common, since abusers try to work very, very hard at getting you to tie your own identity to their opinions of you. Also realize that narcissists and sociopaths are constantly manipulating you to have this kind of internal dialogue with yourself so that they can get power and control over you (i.e. dominate you).

The main difference between how run of the mill narcissists use invalidation and perspecticide and how malignant narcissists and sociopaths is that sometimes the target will be punished, depending on how enraged the malignant narcissist or sociopath is.

Targets will be punished for the way the malignant narcissist (or sociopath) sees things. And ... targets will be punished for not seeing events and expressions the way the malignant narcissist or sociopath sees them.

The differences:
With run of the mill narcissists: "Don't think you can fool me! I know what you were feeling! I can read you like a book!"
With malignant narcissists and sociopaths: "Don't think you can fool me! I know what you were feeling! I can read you like a book! And you are in so much trouble now! How dare you! Just for that, I'll ---" - and then the threats and punishments come in to play.

If you are dealing with your average narcissist, there will be very little reasoning. You won't be able to tell them it is not reasonable for them to tell you what you are feeling. They won't want to hear it. But you can still get away with rolling your eyes to some degree, for instance. They will take your rolling of eyes as criticism of them, and they may predictably respond to any perceived criticism with anger or rage. They may even argue as to why they are right and you are wrong.

Contrast that with the malignant narcissist and sociopath: there will be no reasoning. They are so sure of their opinions and positions that you won't be able to talk them out of it. It's not that they don't want to hear it; they won't hear it. They are that full of themselves. In fact, if you try to talk them out of being petty and unreasonable, the rage will escalate because they are really insistent that their narrative is the only narrative. They actually do not like arguments with people they deem inferior to themselves: they want you to comply. And the way they try to get you to comply is to hurt you. There is also the sociopathic stare.

NARCISSISTS AND SOCIOPATHS WHO PUT THEIR CHILDREN INTO ROLES:

HOW EACH CHILD IN EACH ROLE EXPERIENCES PERSPECTICIDE

AND/OR INVALIDATION
(this has something to do with how they ended up being so invalidating
which I cover in the section afterwards)

Children who come from abusive homes will notice that the parent tries to control the narrative of what goes on in the family. If events start popping up that the narcissist doesn't like, they handle perspecticide and invalidation in these ways (examples):

* a child complains of incestuous experiences she or he is experiencing. Reaction: "Incest is not part of this family and any child who speaks of it will be ostracized." Alternatives to ostracism: punishment via isolating the child from interacting with other family members or from having friends (can mean false imprisonment or homeschooling too). Other alternatives: "My child is a liar or crazy or evil or doesn't understand, etc ..." The more egregious abusers will be sadistically punishing.

* a child complains of sibling abuse. Reaction: "Sibling abuse is not part of this family and any child who speaks of it will be ostracized." The alternatives are the same as above.

* a child who sees his parent cheating: "You didn't see that." "It isn't what you think it is." "How dare you accuse me of cheating!" "You are not to tell anyone else of this or you will get it from me! Do you hear what I am saying? As far as you are concerned, this never happened. Do you hear me loud and clear?"

* a child announces he is gay: "We are good Christians and we don't accept homosexuality in this family. If you are going to live like that, live on your own. We will never condone your lifestyle!" "This family is not a gay family. And you aren't either. You have just been talked into it." "Why would you want to be gay? You were much more in love with (a girl you dated) than this man!" - this one is a perfect example of perspecticide in that the parent is not asking the adult child how he feels, but is instead stating his child's feelings as facts.

* a child lets it leak that his parents are alcoholics, and that they drink in the morning, at lunch and every night too: several martinis, a bottle of wine at dinner, and then chase it down with after-dinner drinks afterwards. He complains that his parents neglect him and his siblings because they focus their lives around drinking: "We aren't alcoholics! A few drinks every day does not make us alcoholics!" "Who told you that! Who do you think you are, disrespecting your parents and spreading rumors!" "Why are you lying?" "I have nothing to say to you for the position you have put us in! And now CPS is knocking on our door! How dare you spread such lies!"

* a child announces he is going to college, even though the parents have told him that he is going to stay in the family trade business: "You aren't college material. You are not smart enough. Who told you that you are smart?" "We brought you up to be in the family business. We did not bring you up to defy us. And now you want to defy us and let us die alone! You meant to hurt us! Okay, so how much money do you want?" "You don't need a college degree to work in the business. We did not give you permission to go into another field. And now you think you are smart, I suppose. You think you are hot shit!" "You knew this would hurt us and that's why you did it! Don't defy us or we will let you go forever."

Besides replacing the truth with a lie (to protect their image or their family's image), notice how controlling this all sounds too.

So narratives become about power and control, creating a false image rather than about the truth. Or asking questions of their children to gain better understanding. In fact the truth, especially in authoritarian families, can be some kind of amorphous slippery slope that changes shape depending on what the narcissist(s) or sociopath(s) want it to be.

Also when you lie a lot yourself, you expect other people around you to be lying - narcissists and sociopaths use projection because they really aren't thinking about their child: their child's words, their child's perspectives, their child's dreams, their child's autonomy. Their child, instead, is someone that is an extension of themselves, someone to control, and if it means applying false narratives (like lying) and threats to keep the underage as well as the adult child in the "controlled state" that the narcissist or sociopath wants, then so be it!

The roles:

Scapegoat:
When an abusive parent who is narcissistic or sociopathic has a scapegoat child, which most of them do if they decide to be a parent at all, they invalidate any good, honest and empathetic qualities in their scapegoat. Since scapegoats aren't heard (talked over, diminished, ignored, etc), and the narcissist tries to program a false narrative into the scapegoat with their own projections, it looks like this: you are deemed to be all bad even if what you think, feel or do does not comply with their false narrative. A lot of scapegoats say that they work very, very hard to please without much, if any, reward from the parent. There is a reason for this, and again, I'll be touching on it in another post. Anyway, the parent deems the scapegoat to be deserving of ridicule, shame, blame, derision, insulted, gang bullied, to be the "fault-bearer", to be ignored, to be stonewalled, and to be dominated and talked down to by family members.
The invalidation here is much more insidious than other family members. The abusive parent always invalidates the scapegoat's sanity (called gaslighting). That is a given. They invalidate the child's experiences. Then they invalidate the child's feelings, thoughts and perspectives. And finally they often invalidate the scapegoat altogether, as a person. Shunning, the silent treatment, stonewalling, isolation from familial belonging, false imprisonment and telling other family members not to talk to the scapegoat are common among narcissists.
The scapegoat gets the most egregious abuse, but they often feel free to live life on their own terms as adults.

Golden Child:
When an abusive parent who is narcissistic or sociopathic has a golden child, which most of them do if they decide to be a parent at all, the golden child is the abusive parent's way of setting up an agent that has all of the qualities of the parent, both good and bad. The golden child is groomed to please the parent at all times, and to be enmeshed with the abusive parent. The enmeshment will be rewarded with flattery, gifts, idealizing and praise. If the golden child fails at pleasing the parent, then the parent will shut off the rewards and display extreme disappointment instead.
The golden child is both parentified and infantilized. It is not uncommon to hear baby talk between the golden child and the parent. It is also not uncommon for the parent to ask for advice on how to treat the other children (treating the golden child like a co-parent).
Golden children are predominantly groomed to take on the parent's perspectives: how others in the family are to be viewed, of the scapegoat deserving abuse, of them deserving a preponderance of the family resources, of them deserving a preponderance of power and control that other members are not allowed, of them deserving to be placed on a pedestal.
A lot of golden children are so enmeshed that they take on the parent's personality. They can also be the object of parental incest, both emotionally, psychologically and physically. At the very least, there is a lot more physical touching and coercive touching (not necessarily sexual) than children receive in normal families.
A lot of golden children end up to be the only ones who have a relationship with their parent when the parent is old, even when the parent has many more children.
Where the invalidation comes in for the golden is that any deviation in personality, perspective or autonomy from what his parent desires can mean scorn and lectures and an insistence on the parent getting his way. The invalidation also is noticeable in terms of autonomous decisions, especially when it comes to a mate (a sign of emotional incest).
Because the golden child is groomed to please the parent at all times, the golden can create a false self to please the parent, meaning he can be two-faced. Lying to the parent is done to keep some part of himself autonomous from the parent, however small. This creates a dilapidated authentic self that is never fully developed.
The invalidation can be as severe as what the scapegoat experiences, however the scapegoat always knows that they are not loved for themselves. The golden child, because of the constant love bombing, never really sees that they are not loved beyond their enmeshment with their parent, though most of them see it if they "buck the system" in terms of what the parent wants from them.
Over half of golden children become narcissists themselves, though the parent won't necessarily know it unless they stick a spy camera somewhere and see a Jekyll and Hyde personality. Some golden children also experience claustrophobia because they are always the "go-to" child when the parent needs narcissistic supply (and narcissistic supply needs can quickly overwhelm a golden child since, in many cases, the parent has eyes only for him - the other children tend to take a significant back seat). The relationship often becomes "too close for comfort" for a golden. A nervous laugh, over-ingratiation, baby talk, talking to the parent as an authoritarian as though the parent is the child, and fraud can be seen in golden children who are feeling overwhelmed by their parent's needs. Goldens can feel unsuccessful, stunted, held back from their dreams (even when they are receiving a lot of money from the parent), lonely (from not having a relationship with their siblings) and have survivor's guilt about their siblings. Winning the sibling rivalry game that the parent has set up can either create entitlement to always be first (inside the golden), or guilt that they are receiving unmerited rewards when their siblings are receiving no rewards.

Lost Child:
When an abusive parent who is narcissistic or sociopathic has a lost child, which they do if they have one of the children take on the scapegoat role, and another to take on the golden child role, the lost child embodies all of the fears of the narcissist: that you have to pretend not to notice the abuse or who is getting hurt by the abuse, that you can't speak out about the abuse, that you need to be quiet when someone else is being abused, that you need to not be interested in emotional subjects or in having an emotional or reactive nature, that you cannot take part in family issues, that you are better off being distracted by things, objects, interests and projects.
The Lost child is the forgotten child, the one who goes off to read in a corner, the one not interacting in the family drama, the quiet one, the one who wants to get away, the one who uses the freeze/avoid response and finally the flight response to the abuse going on around him.
The authoritarian quote of "children should be seen but not heard", the lost child would be the model child in that situation. If he tries to get out of the role, typical responses are:
"That's not like you to behave like that."
"Why would you want to be like (scapegoat child) and be in trouble with us all of the time?"
"Acting this way just isn't you. You are always so quiet. Why speak up now when we have punished (scapegoat child)? Do you really want to be in the same boat?"
"I've had enough! Go to your room where you always go!"
"You're too smart to get into this conversation with us! Surely you see the consequences!"
"I really don't want to hear what you have to say! After years of not speaking up, do you think I care to hear what you have to say now?"
"I know you feel left out, but you've always been more interested in (such-and-such a project) than in being part of the family."
This is all very manipulative in terms of keeping the child quiet and in the role.
In terms of invalidation, it is about not only invalidating the child's perspectives and reactions, but invalidating their developing emotional natures too, so that they have no real understanding of how to be intimate with a partner later on. Emotional subjects are scary subjects, so they are ignored. A lot of partners who end up with a lost child from an abusive home do not understand why this lost child seems allergic to discussions having to do with themselves or their joint children.
Some lost children have the opinion that they aren't emotional, that they are pragmatic instead. They also tend to describe themselves as loners. They are often self-driven to the point of working too hard. Since they are not allowed to have a fight reaction like the scapegoats are allowed to have, they deal with emotional issues by escaping.
The problem for the lost child is that they often end up as the scapegoat (once the original scapegoat has left, and most scapegoats do). When they were the lost child, they were able to escape into their own projects and fantasies. Now all of a sudden they cannot.
In addition, they were groomed to desensitize to the scapegoat and the scapegoat's issues.
So when they are put into the scapegoat role and their parent is starting to pick fights with them, or denigrate them, they have very few defenses to work with that will result in a healthy outcome. They have also been told that it isn't like them to get into arguments, to be emotional, or to get involved in family disputes, and that they shouldn't try it unless they want to end up like the scapegoat. Plus they have also already seen how the arguments with the original scapegoat were no-win double-bind arguments.
So lost children tend to take the flight reaction: staying quiet about their plans to leave, leave without telling anyone where they are going, or if they are still young, trying to hide until they can fully escape. Lost children are the most prone to suicide. When they do decide to commit suicide, many of them do it without saying a word to anyone.
Stuffing emotions like anger and hurt can create mental health problems, and physical problems, or autonomous reckless behaviors that puts them at high risk for dying.
So in a way, they are invalidated in terms of their emotions and presence. The invalidation of their entire selves is both inflicted by the parent and adopted by the lost child.

Mascot:
When an abusive parent who is narcissistic or sociopathic has a mascot, which they do if they have one of the children take on the scapegoat role, another to take on the golden child role and another take on the lost child role, the mascot embodies the illusion that the family is a happy, fun, endearing family with a few quirks and a few quirky members. Putting a child in this role might seem necessary if you want to hide abuse in a family, i.e. put a face or mask on it and make one child show how wonderfully fun the family is.
So the mascot is encouraged early on to be cute and endearing. Everything they do is funny, from the little drawings they make, to the way they eat at the table, to the words they make up. It is a way for the whole family to be distracted from the abuse and the toxic power games going on by the narcissistic parent.
Basically their role is to advertise. The advertising goes something like:
"We're a good family. Look how happy this member is! The problem is with (the scapegoat)."
"We are a cheerful family! We have a few problems like everyone else, but (our mascot) can tell you how happy he is!"
If he gets out of role the typical responses are:
"But you're always so good-hearted and funny. Why the sad face? Cheer up!"
"It's not like you to be upset or to cry. You have always been so good at cheering yourself up, and everyone else."
"What can possibly be wrong? You know what a happy family this is! And you're mostly happy in it! Why would you ever stick up (for the scapegoat)!"
"Tell our neighbors that everything is fine here! You know how to do that! Just be your ingratiating happy self!"
"Tell a few jokes to the Jones's when they arrive! Then you won't be so focused on (such-and-such) a dysfunction!"
"When can we see your happy self again? We miss that so much!"
In his own way, the mascot practices fawning (and is expected to fawn), and flight (the flight response here is getting away from being targeted by getting out of upsetting family issues and abuse by being funny) and freeze/avoid. The freeze/avoid response is very much like the lost child's, but instead of projects, the mascot's project (dictated by the parent, molded by the parent and pressured to be accepted by the child) is to be fun, funny and uphold the family image.
A lot of comedians have admitted to being from either cold overly mannered families where perfection was overly emphasized or from toxic abusive families. Comedy was a way to deal with all of it, but underneath, many have spoken out about how depressed they really were.
The problem with a child being put in this role is the same for the others: only one type of expression is allowed, and being a proper mascot also means advertising the family as functional even when it is not. Like the golden child, the mascot is applauded for acting, and for not having an authentic self. The only emotion not invalidated is happiness and fun; the rest are invalidated. So the mascot can be as stunted in emotional growth, in emotional expression, and in emotional literacy as the other children. On the inside, they can be deeply depressed. Even suicidal.
Why the depression? Imagine being in a war and seeing destruction everywhere around you. You are not allowed to grieve or say anything about it. You have to act happy and funny even when the bombs are falling and you don't feel like it. That's a lot of burden to put on an underage child.
When mascots get put into a scapegoat role (which they will eventually if the scapegoat[s] leave, which they often do), the mascot will be picked on, and will be encouraged to argue and fight the no-win fights that the other scapegoats were expected to fight. Even the humor will be attacked. So the survival strategy of providing fun and humor will be taken away. So while they take their humor outside the family in order to survive in the world, they see that it no longer works in surviving in the family, so the family can have another "no contact" child, or yet another suicide (depending on how the other scapegoats survived through their ordeals).

WHAT IS THE BACKGROUND OF WHY SO MANY ABUSERS AND NARCISSISTS

PRACTICE INVALIDATION AND PERSPECTICIDE

Abuse, which is what being invalidated is, is primarily passed from one generation to the next. If the abuser doesn't have children to abuse, it gets directed in other ways. That's where you come in if you are a spouse or partner.

Note: children tend to break away because they feel that situations with narcissists are "no win" situations. "No-win" is the right term because in survivor forums, they feel they are always in a game with their parents of "lose-or-win." A lot of it is based on roles that narcissists and sociopaths put everyone in their lives in, including their own children. If a child feels their situation is "no-win" except for diverting strategies (fawn, fight, flight, and freeze/avoid, which basically comes down to the same strategies that therapists recommend, the fawn response being finding subjects or words that will please a narcissist, flight being "no contact", freeze/avoid being "the gray rock method", and fighting touted by most therapists as being too dangerous and "no win" to indulge in).

When therapists leave out the fight response (or rebellious response), which is the safest way to go so it is understandable why they do not recommend fighting or arguing ... except that scapegoats who fight for their equal rights and defend themselves, and do not allow the narcissist to totally dominate them or insist that the scapegoat define his own character the way the narcissist does, find that defending themselves gives them the strength to survive after the narcissist discards and destroys. I will be getting to why in another post.

Scapegoats are not allowed to fawn or gray rock all that much by the abusive parent ... because to the parent their child is "acting out of role/character" and this is when the scapegoat is goaded, prodded and bullied - to get them to argue with the narcissist.

The truth is that many scapegoats do so much better than their siblings especially if they do not let their parents' insults effect their self esteem (which is what fighting-to-defend means). Of course, in the context of the family, the fights are no-win with the parents (often because of double binds - which I will discuss in another post), but it doesn't stop the scapegoat from continuing the fight, even if it is just running to the local domestic violence center or the police, or joining other survivors, or leading movements to stop child abuse.

Scapegoats who are devalued by narcissists often devalue the narcissist too (another type of fight reaction, though they often do it for different reasons: pointing out hypocrisies, lies, under-handed dirty tricks, broken promises, their lack of integrity).

So if you are their spouse or partner, you too will be either devalued or destroyed if you try to get out of role. Your role will be different than these child roles, but like them, you go from being highly valued (like the golden child) to not valued at all (like the scapegoat), and it can happen in the blink of an eye because of the splitting.

In a way, invalidating can also be a gaslighting technique (abusive tactics tend to overlap), especially if the invalidation is about:

* you can't do things right

* you are too crazy (or the narcissist claims they can't listen to you because you are too crazy)

* you are too spacey

* what is wrong with your mind?

* why can't you think straight about anything?

* why are you disagreeing when Mr. or Ms. narcissist is so right?

* What's the matter with you? Are you deranged or stupid?

* you aren't acting right: you're supposed to be cheerful and do everything that is asked of you.

* something has changed about your moods or your mind; you aren't the person the narcissist thought you were (where splitting comes in)

* insistence that you need to see a psychiatrist, be in a mental institution, because your mind isn't the way it used to be

* given mental health diagnoses

* and generally invalidating your experiences (and the emotions and thoughts that arise from your experiences) in hopes that you will allow the narcissist to describe your experiences instead, and try to convince others that their narrative is the true narrative, with or without your permission (where trying to isolate you and smear campaigns come in)

The majority of abusers come from authoritarian families. In authoritarian families, children are expected to put their parent's feelings first (and often while squelching their own). Most authoritarian families are male-dominated as well, which means that male children will have precedence over female children in terms of resources and priorities. This is often upheld by both men and women authority figures in the family.

You can see why this model can enable and produce a lot of abuse in it.

The famous quote of authoritarian families is: "Children are to be seen, and not heard", the ultimate in invalidation of the child being able to express himself or herself genuinely.

So the invalidation and the abuses around invalidation goes in stages from children "being seen and not heard", to being invalidated when they are heard (which is where arguments come in), to being invalidated because they are arguing (where parents try to get the child to conform to the parent's views), and sometimes to being abusive/punishing if the child expresses emotion, opinions, thoughts, perspectives, experiences and beliefs that the parent either does not like or feels their authority is in jeopardy.

* Advice turns into coercion - because parents deem themselves to be the ultimate authorities.
* There are mixed messages about disclosure and non-disclosure - as long as it comports with what the authoritarian parent wants to hear.

Being interrupted, being told "I don't want to hear it," being stonewalled, arguing on top of one another, dominant sorts of statements ("You never were very good at deciphering the truth, poor thing" as one instance) and the silent treatment are all instances of invalidation in close personal relationships.

The reason why the authoritarian family often breeds abuse, mental health issues and criminality is because there are only two roads for children: to comply, or not to comply. Either road has terrible consequences for the children, and for the whole family (I will discuss in a future post).

Children learn from example first. So if the parent is very, very controlling and dominating, the child will either bend in conformity (approve) or lean away in rebelliousness (disapprove). The benders and the rebels will usually be put into "all good" and "all bad" categories too.

While most psychologists and therapists see golden children becoming narcissistic the most among siblings, it doesn't necessarily mean that all golden children become narcissistic, or that only golden children become narcissistic. There are a lot of factors that go into narcissism, but one of the leading factors (that most psychologists and therapists can agree on) is some part of the upbringing where a child is being exceptionalized.

If your partner or spouse acts entitled (but at the same time is hypocritical), exceptionalism, another narcissistic trait, is at the core of why. His or her parents practiced making their child too exceptional too often, and now it has gone to their head. The dopamine in the brain got tied to who will treat them exceptionally before the brain was fully developed instead of who will treat them normally (with constancy, civility and respect, and putting siblings on an equal level).

When I talk about normalcy, I am referring to what we see in other families who are not abusive:
* constancy in the flow of love, in treatment, in care, in regard (contrast that with narcissistic treatment: the love is inconstant, the treatment varies drastically and often does not make sense or is tied to whether the child is providing narcissistic supply to the parent, the care and regard for the child is spotty and often falls under child neglect because the parent's interest in the child ebbs and flows)
* give-and-take (you are both people, and therefor both have equal weight in a mutual discussion, not based on whether you are treating them with exceptionalism, that they deserve more than you do, a problem with abusive parents, and with authoritarian families)
* love that is constant (i.e. doesn't flip between love and hate or love and discards as we see in love bombing: it is not based on whether you are treating them with exceptionalism where if they don't feel you are treating them exceptionally enough, they turn the love off)
* working through issues in a civil, dignified and respectful manner (i.e. that you are both open, relaxed and want to solve a problem for both of your benefits, and not conditional upon whether they are getting their way because they deem themselves too exceptional to not get their way)
* intimacy in talking and sharing (i.e., just talking and sharing without advice, patronizing statements, judgments, mind games, tenseness, or over-emphasizing opinions, and not conditional upon whether they are dominating you in some way via exceptionalism)
* trust (i.e. you both submit to trusting one another with the good faith that your trust will not be sacrificed or broken, and not conditional upon whether they will be trustworthy towards you in terms of conditions: breaking or keeping promises as long as they feel exceptionalized by you, regarding you with validation as long as you validate them more than you validate yourself, and so on).

When their brains are being wired by parenting that is primarily and overwhelmingly either rewarding or punishing/hurtful (and going back and forth between these two drastic extremes), the child learns to split too, and to associate dopamine only with exceptionalism, whether that is making the parent feel exceptional, or whether that is making the child feel exceptional (most of it is about making the parent feel exceptional, and being rewarded for it by the parent making the child feel exceptional).

Programming the brain in this way leads to tragedies in relationships, and can lead a child to only seek reward, not intimacy.

Also, if the parents were known to punish their children with invalidation/ignoring because the parent decided the child was not validating the parent(s), then there is often a lot of fear in the child too, another emotion that can wreak havoc with a developing mind and emotions. In effect, the parent is retaliatory against their own child, so the child has to develop coping strategies (most of which only work sporadically and dependent on how the narcissist feels at any given time, and perceives events - walking on eggshells strategies).

One of the primary definitions of narcissism is "validation-seeking" (the article I have linked is well worth reading). I would beg to argue that along with that validation-seeking is trying to get other people to see them as more exceptional than other people too. When they aren't getting validated, and not told they are exceptional, they become angry and enraged instead. The rage is a sign of entitlement, but it is also a sign of blaming.

They blame you for not giving them what they feel they desperately want and need: that drug tied to their dopamine levels (that they think they deserve), and the drug is: "You are exceptional." When they feel that you are withdrawing that drug from them, they think you mean to hurt them, gravely so. And you will notice that if you flatter them, the rage is somewhat diminished (but often comes with: "Don't try that again" threats, which is to let you know that they will not control their rage towards you).

To most of us the rage doesn't make sense, but if you are aware of the reward/punishment extremes of their childhood, and how their developing brains must adjust to it, it makes sense.

The problem is that their entitlements to exceptionalism are never regulated, so many narcissists are abandoned in the end. The problem for the people around them is that "being exceptional" means calling the shots in your life (not acceptable as they know your life a lot less than you know your life). And because they are so insecure, they often sabotage your life and well being even when they say they have the best of intentions.

Like an alcoholic, the search for narcissistic supply is going to come first and foremost over any relationship, over any kind of healing in your relationship, over any kind of education about their condition, over everything. Expect it. And just as an alcoholic has to make the choice of whether to drink or not, the narcissist has to assess whether they will keep treating people the way they are known to treat them. Neither kind of addict will change unless things get pretty bad for them (usually).

If they feel they aren't getting enough narcissistic supply from you, they will go elsewhere, and also use that other person to gang up on you.

If they are malignant narcissists (narcissists with sociopathic qualities), they will punish you if they think you are not looking at them as an exceptional being (i.e. more exceptional than others). This blackmail will often mean that they are looked at as less exceptional, and this is where their blind spot is. They are unable to see how blackmailing and arm-twisting will not get them what they want, especially in close personal relationships.

If anything, a lot of survivors focus on, and try to remember the worst part of the narcissist so that they won't get sucked back into a relationship with them again. And there is usually plenty to choose from between their lies, broken promises, lack of empathy, callousness, triangulation, the attention-seeking things they do like boycotting your wedding or some other event, or if they are a partner having an affair with your best friend, the destruction they wreak in your life as well others lives, inability to self reflect (and blame instead), inability to understand others (because they are so focused on blame and projection), and the inconsistency.

It's the inconsistency and swinging wildly between love and hate which really takes a toll on survivors (and which survivors tend to have the longest memory about).

Some of the extremely rare narcissists who have woken up will admit that they tried to disable "their loved one" to such an extent so that that their loved one would never leave them. It happened to Lisa Romano.

When we look at the last section where I talked about children being put into roles, the children can all be deemed to be exceptionalized (except, perhaps, the scapegoat) according to role:

* The golden child can be exceptionalized by being a mirror (a mini-me version of the parent), is put highest on the pedestal in terms of rank and of importance, is favoritized, is deemed to be good at being told what to do, how to act, how to conduct themselves, told what to believe, told who and who not to talk to, and in the case of malignant narcissists and sociopaths, told who and who not to abuse (or in parent's terms, who "to punish").

* The lost child can be exceptionalized in terms of his projects and distractions being of the highest importance, so lost children can and do put work, being solitary, having the autonomy to be with their projects, above everything else.

* The mascot can be exceptionalized in terms of his humor and fun, and showing the best possible "mask" to outsiders, and rewarded for it as well. If you don't laugh, or don't feel like laughing, the lack of exceptionalization in this area can turn mascots into depressives.

* The scapegoat is not particularly exceptionalized as he is invalidated to such an extreme, but if we were to go out on a limb, the exceptionalization might be in the realm of being willing to argue or disagree with the parent even when it is a "no-win" argument (an abusive parent, again, will not feel exceptionalized unless he or she feels they are "winning" the argument against their scapegoat). So scapegoats can go out into the world being disagreeable or fighters, whether that is for good causes or bad causes.
My own experiences with this is that scapegoats don't have to feel exceptionalized, but a rare number possibly do.
This is perhaps where a very insecure boss who rules with an iron fist comes in: he tells himself he will never be put in "the down bullied position" ever again so overcompensates by being ruling and dictatorial to finally get the upper hand he never had in childhood.
Many scapegoats work themselves to death, hoping that the world will see them as "exceptionally talented" or as an "exceptional worker who never quits" or as "exceptionally intelligent" or as "exceptionally moral and on the right side of issues" and so on.
They have also been raised to believe that exceptionalism is what to strive for, rather than in a balanced life with intimacy, vacation time, restful sleep, etc.
But will a scapegoat who has been invalidated on steroids while growing up, use it on others? Very doubtful. I haven't known about a single case except second hand in one lone instance: someone talked to me about their boss and how he was beaten, bullied and ostracized as a child, and now is a terror who fires an unprecedented number of good workers. So it happens, I suppose, if rarely, and probably blindly too.

To conclude this section:

Narcissists feel entitled to use perspecticide and invalidation because, most likely, they grew up seeing their own parents use it a lot, within an authoritarian-style family. They were also taught to de-sensitize towards the scapegoat, so they are unempathetic when you cry out that invalidation is not nice, that it hurts, that it isn't fair, that it is hypocritical (since they want validation all of the time), and that it is dysfunctional. "Talking to a brick wall" is very much how you will feel if you try to talk to your partner or spouse about invalidation (or any abuse tactic). They were rewarded for being unempathetic when they saw their parent(s) being invalidating towards another sibling in their early home life.

HOW INVALIDATION AND PERSPECTICIDE EFFECTS US

For children, as I have mentioned before, it means their parent taking over the narrative in terms of what the child is experiencing, feeling, thinking, and believing. The child is rendered without a voice.

This means that the child cannot have his needs met by the parent. Depending on how much of it is going on, it can mean child neglect on every level: physical, emotional, psychological, learning, safety, etc.

Some instances:

* "Mom, I'm hungry." Invalidating answer: "No you're not. You just had food an hour ago."

Continued: "That was just a cracker." Invalidating answer: "I don't want to hear another word of this."

* "Mom, I'm being beaten up in school by a gang of boys." Invalidating answer: "What did you do to deserve it?" or "What did you say to them that made them do that to you."

* "Mom, grandpa sneaks into my bedroom every night to play doctor with me. I don't want to play doctor!" - sexual abuse. Invalidating answer: "How dare you say something like that about your own grandfather! He would never do that! Little liar!"

* "Mom, I feel sick." Invalidating answer: "No, you don't. You're faking it." - typical for scapegoats.

* "Dad, (my brother) is hurting me. He's always finding an excuse to punch me. My guts are so sore from being punched there." Invalidating answer: "Boys will be boys! Just slug him back!"

Continued: "But he's stronger than me. I don't want to do this any more." Invalidating answer: "You're a sissy then. Is that what you're telling me?"

* "Dad, I'm feeling sad. I don't want to go that party." Perspecticide answer: "No, you're not. You are angry and you are going to go, and that is all there is to it. Put on a happy face." - teaches a child to be inauthentic if it is done a lot.

If you grew up with a lot of this (weekly or daily basis), no, it is not normal by a long shot. It is definitely a sign of either substance addiction in the parent, or a Cluster B personality disorder.

The more invalidation and perspecticide there is, the more invisible the child will feel, and the more it will define his character if he is not rebelling against it (thus how a scapegoat develops). In retaliation, the parent will be even more invalidating to fight the child's rebelliousness. As the parent tries to render the child more and more invisible and invalid (why the silent treatment and stonewalling develop in dysfunctional parents to cope with rebelliousness) to the point where the child is basically rejected.

Some children will accept the rejection, and some children will not accept the rejection, only to be rejected again. Parental rejection is usually cyclical and is not something that goes away magically. It is a pattern (cycle of abuse), and used for issues large and small. It is especially used for scapegoating. Rejection over the parent not being able to control the narrative, is retaliatory parenting, period.

Rejection and being retaliated against does a lot of damage to a child, and to the relationship between parent and child. The child's main relationship to the parent will be filtered through the child's fear: they will not look to their parent for love, care or comfort, for truth, for reasonableness, for safety, for stability and constancy, for acceptance -- all the things we associate with a good family. The child will also be seen as not not seeing the parent as an exceptional being (except in the way that the parent gets away with hurting the child over and over again) - so the parent feels insulted by that instead of working towards being a better parent. The main way that the parent is viewed is "Scary, inconsistent, subject to rage at any moment, is out to hurt me and destroy me."

A child's identity, even if he gets away from his parent, will probably always be dogged with some insecurity about his own identity and character. That is particularly true if the invalidation was severe and had some sort of rejection attached to it - one reason why therapy is necessary if you are ever going to heal properly. Rebelliousness and enforced boundaries or separation are healthy reactions to not being cared about by your parent.

Some thoughts that run through a child's mind who has been molded by invalidation:
"No one cares what I have to say. Why speak up about anything?"
"It's not like anyone notices me."
"I'm not really lovable. I'm not loved for myself."
"My world is always being rocked."
"I can't seem to focus. I don't know who I am." - a sign of PTSD from childhood abuse
"I don't know what I'm good at after a childhood of being told I'm not good at anything."
"Why would that person want a relationship with me?" - a sign of being taught "You're not good enough" or "You're reject-able."

And of course, there is ongoing rebellion. Some of these are healthy rebellions and some are not.

Instances of unhealthy ones:
* being an addict (from a parent who invalidated or devalued your mind - gaslighting, or played with your perceptions)
* unable to hold down a job (from a parent who invalidated or devalued your abilities and strengths)
* unable to focus on a line of work (same as above - can also mean PTSD)
* unable to define yourself or keep track of your affairs (the result of a parent who tried to dominate how you handled your affairs)
* unable to keep from rebelling in every job you have (again for being gaslighted and told you were incompetent and the only way to be competent is to be controlled by your parent or family of origin
* getting into abuse relationships (familiarity, the inability to know that you deserve better, being treated with invalidation by your parents so that you normalize it so that when other abusive people invalidate you, you won't think anything is wrong: it's just par for the course).
* becoming a ruthless boss (where people will listen to you and be scared of you instead ... it will not break the cycle - it is abusing power)
* not taking care of yourself when you are sick or not taking your illnesses seriously (from a parent who told you that were "faking it" when you were sick)

Instances of healthy ones:
* not letting your parent(s) define you (getting into professions that defy their expectations of you and their beliefs about you)
* public speaking, writing, teaching, performance occupations (rebelliousness about "not being heard")
* adopting or being adopted into a "family of choice" (not being willing to endure abuse just to "belong" to a family, choosing people who are compassionate towards others)
* being ethical and reasonable (being rebellious about what you grew up with: the unethical treatment of abuse)
* not allowing abuse in your personal life or private life (rebelling against what you grew up with and using self-care to be a more functional adult to those around you who are counting on you)
* treating people fairly and not abusing power (rebelling against what you saw while growing up)
* fighting for new laws for child abuse victims (rebelling on a national scale so that no one will be able to do what your parents did without legal repercussions)

For partners who are enduring invalidation and perspecticide (and the devaluation that goes along with it), realize that there is so little hope that your partner will change. At least this will help you to figure out what you want to do with your life.

All of the same kinds of internal dialogues can start happening in you too as they do for child abuse victims:
"I must not have anything relevant to say if I'm not being heard."
"I'm not lovable. At least the love switches on and off in drastic ways." (a sign of splitting in your abuser, and the unregulated emotions that characterizes most abusers)
And so on ...

The thing to remember for partners is that if you have children with these people, the children are likely to be treated like the children I have written about in this post.

With narcissists, it is always about counter parenting rather than co-parenting (it's a competition, in other words, and you undoing the damage they keep doing to others in the family). You may be on the defensive a lot, your children will be acting out, some of your children will need your protection, and in the end, when your spouse isn't getting all of the say and control over you and the kids, they will put you through affairs (again, it's their ambition to be dominant and exceptional - and you will be deemed "wrong" for not seeing them as exceptional and dominant as someone else sees them), and then a nightmare divorce and custody battle can ensue - most of the time narcissists put you through the most damaging divorces and custody battles that they can.

Partners can have very low self esteem after being with a narcissist. The pent up thoughts and emotions can also make you feel un-well, if not sick. Invalidation can create physical symptoms like stomach upsets, headaches, an inability to sleep, and a lowered immune response. The "mental tapes" of the same scenes replaying over and over again, the insults, the shock over the lies, broken promises, smear campaigns and callousness can effect you for at least seven months or usually much longer (these are PTSD symptoms, which again will be triggered every time you have to deal with your ex over the kids).

Talk to a domestic violence counselor, but these people are generally not good to put trust into, invest a lifetime with or to have children with. Don't try to "win" them if they are at the devaluation stage as it feeds their dysfunction and they get worse and treat people worse as a result.

When you are an adult, you have more choices to get out, even if you have to get out slowly for financial reasons, or because you are afraid. A domestic violence center can usually help you with strategies and a good long-term plan, and dispel your indecisions about leaving because "he is sometimes loving" (it's normal to want to deny the splitting and danger that is happening in your relationship, but it can also be very damaging to you, emotionally, psychologically and physically).

In conclusion:

See the many helpful articles and the video below at how invalidation effects you and what you can do to change how it effects you:

further reading:

Narcissists, Sociopaths and Abusers: Why is There So Much Lying, Deceiving, Rewriting of History, Secrets and False Narratives? - my own post (and kind of a sequel to this post)

What Really Happens in a Controlling Relationship (The harsh reality of "perspecticide" in a coercive control relationship) - by Lisa Aronson Fontes Ph.D. for Psychology Today

Perspecticide: Erased by Your Partner (The harsh reality of "perspecticide" in a coercive control relationship) - by Lisa Aronson Fontes, Ph.D. for domesticshelters.org

Manipulative people brainwash their partners using something called 'perspecticide' — here are the signs it's happening to you - by Lindsay Dodgson for Business Insider

Perspecticide: The “brainwashing” technique used by manipulators - by psychologist,
Jennifer Delgado for Psychology Spot

6 Signs That You May Be A Victim Of Perspecticide - administrators of Apost

What is Invalidation? 5 Things You Shouldn’t Say - by psychologist Jamie Long

Understanding Invalidation - by Karyn Hall, Ph.D. for Psych Central

Invalidated Child: Invisible Adult - by Jonice Webb, Ph.D. for Psych Central

The Narcissistic Mother: One of the Most Frightening of All Personalities - by Carmen Sakurai, Certified Cognitive Behavioral Coach and Advocate for Victims of NPD Abuse for Psych Central

discusses invalidation

How Society Gaslights Survivors of Narcissists, Sociopaths, and Psychopaths (A Guide for Therapists, Law Enforcement and Loved Ones) - by Shahida Arabi for Psych Central

Narcissistic Invalidation: No Likes, No Dislikes, No Emotions, No Opinions, No Nuthin’ - by Lenora Thompson for Psych Central

Narcissistic Invalidation: Even Your Tastebuds Are Wrong! - by Lenora Thompson for Psych Central

Invalidation: Marco Pierre White claims “I didn’t make Gordon Ramsay cry. That was his choice to cry.” - by Lenora Thompson for Psych Central

3 Ways Malignant Narcissists Destructively Condition You to Self-Sabotage - by Shahida Arabi for Psych Central

discusses invalidation

Childhood Trauma: Overcoming the Hurt of Invalidation - by Sarah Newman, MA, MFA for Psych Central

Childhood Neglect and the Impact of Invalidation - by Sarah Newman, MA, MFA for Psych Central

11 Lasting Effects of Invalidating Parents - by Audrey Sherman, Ph.D. for Psych Central

19 Lasting Effects of Abandoning or Emotionally Unavailable Parents - by Audrey Sherman, Ph.D. for Psych Central

Invisible, Powerful Childhood Emotional Neglect - by Jonice Webb, Ph.D. for Psych Central

Don’t Rely on Others to Validate Your Feelings - by Sharon Martin, LCSW

Invalidation: I Refuse to Have This Discussion! ("When we invalidate people or deny their perceptions and personal experiences, we make mental invalids of them. When one's feelings are denied a person can be made to feel crazy even when they are perfectly mentally healthy" - R.D. Laing, MD, psychiatrist) - by Adelyn Birch for Psychopaths and Love

Emotional Invalidation: A Form of Emotional Abuse - by Sharon Martin, LCSW

It’s Time to Stop Giving Unsolicited Advice - Sharon Martin, LCSW

What Is Psychological Invalidation? How It Happens And Its Effects - by Jenny Chang

The Painful Effects of Emotional Invalidation - from Emerging From the Dark Night website (for children of abuse)

22 Things I Do Now Because I Experienced Emotional Abuse as a Child - from the Mighty.com website

How to Stop Being So Controlling and Accept Uncertainty - by Sharon Martin, LCSW

Controlling Your Partner Is Illegal, But Not in the U.S. (British victims are better protected from their controlling, abusive partners) - by Lisa Aronson Fontes Ph.D. for Psychology Today

When Every Boy Is Guilty, Every Girl Becomes a Monster -- by Sarah Hoyt

Excerpt:

The girls? As with my son’s harassers, there might be no remedy for them. Not unless they hit bottom, realize what they are and decide to change. And very few people do that. Once you realize you can control others and force them to dance to your tune, few people ever step back. Few people can. And chances are, never having been taught to examine their actions or be self-reflective, these girls, now women, will never even be able to realize they’re not perfect.

Burning Coals of Emotional Abuse: Minimizing, Invalidating & GasLighting - by Shenandoah Chefalo for ACEs Connection

Emotionally Abusive People Brainwash Their Partners By Using ‘Perspecticide’ – And How To Spot The Signs It’s Happening To You - Texts From Last Night

Are You Invalidating Your Partner – Without Realizing It? - by Suzanne Phillips, Psy.D., ABPP

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nOtBrSMzf4

From Dr. Les Carter:

"7 Steps To Winning The Narcissist's Invalidation Game"

Lisa Romano quote:

quote by Andrei Lankov

artwork by me:

WHAT THIS BLOG IS ABOUT

research, writing, art, illustrations and cartoons about abuse, bullying and narcissistic disorders in terms of what it means for the victim and perpetrators

I also explore alcoholism as it relates to anger management issues

I am a mandated reporter in the state of NY. This means I report signs of bullying and domestic abuse to authorities

I am a former art teacher. My goal is to get an MSW and to be an advocate for survivors of child abuse, spousal abuse, incest, scapegoating and school bullying.

advocate of CoDA, ACOA and Alanon

my purpose is to help others

Blog table of contents below, but I suggest reading the featured blog post first below to understand what abuse is and who it is perpetrated by

Disclaimer: do not use these posts to treat any condition; please see a professional therapist or psychologist.

SCAPEGOATING IS MOB BULLYING:

"The purpose of the scapegoat is to pass responsibility onto someone else. Usually this person is unsuspecting at first and agrees because they are trying to get along with others. This technique of passing the buck is very common with narcissists, sociopaths, and addicts. Narcissists can't allow their ego to be tarnished by an error. Sociopaths do it for the sport of it."

~ Christine Hammond, Licensed Therapist

ARTICLES I RECOMMEND:

1 Toxic Families who Scapegoat

2 The Role of the Family Scapegoat in Dysfunctional Families

3 The Narcissistic Conspiracy: Scapegoating, Smear Campaigns and Black Sheep - How Narcissistic Groups Bully Their Chosen Victims

What is New?

Saturday, February 12, 2022

Netflix Series Review: Maid

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

invalidation and perspecticide: why narcissists and sociopaths use it and the effects on their victims