What is New?

WHAT IS NEWEST ON THIS BLOG?
September 26 New Post: Dealing with Overwhelming Emotions From Narcissistic Abuse, an Introduction. Comes With a Discussion on Dysregulated Emotions.
August 21 New Post: Things Narcissists Get Wrong About Punishing Their Scapegoat Adult Children. Includes Some Discussion on Medical and Emotional Issues in Both.
August 11 New Post: If people don't want to hear what you have to say, it is normal for you to not want to hear what they have to say either. Comes with a discussion on narcissism
July 30 New Post: Is It Possible that Gen Z and Millennials Having to Work 2 - 3 Jobs Is Contributing to the Nationwide Trend of Estrangement With Parents in the USA?
July 21 New Post: Don't Narcissists Care About Hurting You?
July 14 New Post: Reviews of "Narcissistic Rehab", "Narcissistic Detox" and "No More Narcissists" on Facebook
June 23 New Post: How I Came to Forgive the Narcissists in My Life (and it may not be what you think)
June 6 New Post: Why Do Sycophants Feel They Need to Follow Someone Who is So Unethical, Power Hungry, Cruel and Narcissistic? Comes with Personal Stories and a Deep Dive Into the Subject.
May 18 New Post: Family Obligation and the Scapegoat. Do You Owe Your Narcissistic Family Anything?
April 26 New Post: An Update: New Studies on Scapegoats of Narcissistic Families, Wills and Narcissistic Parents, Dissociation, and Some Other Topics of Note
April 6 New Post: Why Scapegoats of Narcissistic Families Are Unlikely To Turn Into Sycophants. Part II.
March 29 New Post: A Domestic Violence Situation and Tale - from a well known Canadian Musician.
March 9 New Post: Why Scapegoats of Narcissistic Families Find It Impossible to Turn Themselves Into Sycophants. Comes with a Discussion on Largely Involuntary Independent Thinking, C-PTSD and Healing.
February 28 New Post: Don't Get Narcissism Mixed Up With Alzheimer's Disease. How Similar Are They? Comes With a Discussion on Brain Science in Narcissistic Families and in Alzheimer's Disease
February 16 New Post: Perspecticide and Being Invalidated Often Feels Unsafe and Even Downright Dangerous On the Receiving End. Comes With a Discussion on Narcissism.
PERTINENT POST: ** Hurting or Punishing Others to Teach Them a Lesson - Does it Work?
PETITION: the first petition I have seen of its kind: Protection for Victims of Narcissistic Sociopath Abuse (such as the laws the UK has, and is being proposed for the USA): story here and here or sign the actual petition here
Note: After seeing my images on social media unattributed, I find it necessary to post some rules about sharing my images
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Why Children Do Not Make Good Narcissistic Supply, Raising the Chances of Child Abuse (with a section on how poor listening and poor comprehension contributes to it)

(note: in my rush to get this published, I noticed I made a mistake in what the daughter says to her mother. 
But I decided to leave it in as it can be interpreted as "it's not enough" or "I'm not enough". 
Sometimes when mistakes happen this way, they are perhaps unconscious ways of saying two things at once.
I'm reminded of John Lennon, as he used to have double meanings in his phrasing. Paul McCartney refused to see them as mistakes and encouraged Lennon to use them, so I'm doing that in this case)


INTRODUCTION
AND WHY I DECIDED TO PUBLISH THIS POST BEFORE
I PUBLISH THE ONE ON HOOVERING

For those of you who have been reading my blog regularly, I was supposed to publish my article on hoovering (hoovering means "attempts to win you back into a relationship with someone who has abused you), however I thought this article might explain why hoovering often has everything to do with narcissists missing your form of narcissistic supply.

Hoovering has everything to do with getting the narcissistic supply from you again that they miss. 

The hoovering that narcissists do can sometimes work in getting you back, but it often leads to a pretty miserable trauma bond if it does work, and not a very healthy one or happy one. You can tell how unhappy it is by either reading the article that follows or in particular, reading the section below entitled "NARCISSISTIC SUPPLY IS ALSO BASED ON WHAT NARCISSISTS HEAR
AND THEIR OWN INTERPRETING PROCESS IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY HEAR" (they don't hear much without a lot of distortion of facts - which hopefully becomes clear as you read).

The point is that you will always be relating to their disorder in every conversation you have with them, in everything you do for them, and in relating to them in general. Their disorder rules both them and you, and as I said, every conversation.

And since their disorder often means they are abusive, the abuse and the disorder go together. If they've abused you before, they will most likely abuse you again because that is the form that their personality disorder has taken. 

Most narcissists are abusive, and escalate abuse as long as you're in their life, and it's not anything new, and it doesn't have anything to do with you as I hope you will see once you've seen the section about what narcissists hear below. They will also be doing things very, very similarly to how other narcissistic abusers behave. All of the same tactics, even many of the phrases, are alike between one narcissistic abuser to another. Even what they rage about is similar.  

Anyway, I was looking around for articles I thought I'd written about narcissistic supply, and I found this one somewhat done, the one I'm publishing here.  This one is about children, but I think you can apply it to adult relationships in some way too. 

As usual, I have links to many things I raise as well as giving you other articles for you to look through at the end of the post. 

(note: this introduction will probably be taken down once the post on hoovering is up)

HOW NARCISSISTIC SUPPLY
BECOMES A CHILD'S BURDEN

While our computer was down, I was reading articles on my phone and came across this article by Bernadette Donovan titled If you want to maintain a close bond with your kids as you get older, say goodbye to these 7 behaviors, published by Daily Motivation News (or DMN).

In it she lists these things parents should let go of:

1) Trying to be their best friend
2) Dismissing their feelings
3) Overprotecting them
4) Not respecting their privacy
5) Micromanaging their lives
6) Ignoring your own flaws
7) Failing to listen

With the exception of the first and third things listed in this article, I thought, "Wow! This sounds so much like narcissistic parenting!" For the first and third things on the list I changed them in this way:

1) Trying to make them into narcissistic supply (flattering sycophants)
2) Dismissing their feelings
3) Forgetting that they are a person with a personality, thoughts, feelings and ambitions of their own and most likely with more capabilities in those areas than you may be giving them
4) Not respecting their privacy
5) Micromanaging their lives
6) Ignoring your own flaws
7) Failing to listen

A lot has been written about narcissists having children in order to get narcissistic supply from them. Narcissistic supply refers, in this case, to helping the narcissistic feel good about themselves (praises and flattery, helping them feel in charge and in command, making them look good in social circles, giving them undivided attention and special treatment, letting them win arguments, and enabling them to influence the lives of others in both altruistic and bullying ways, as well as enabling them to have domination, power and control when ever they want to have it).

I think we can see why children cannot live up to these impossible standards of narcissistic supply and why these children might adopt trauma responses to these demands and expectations instead. The major trauma responses are fawn, fight, flee and freeze, although more are being added as I write this.

For most of us, if we aren't giving our narcissistic parent what they deem as good or adequate  narcissistic supply, they rage at us and punish us. Some of the ways they might punish us are replacing us with someone else in their affections, or showing contempt for us, or they run smear campaigns on us, or rage at us some more, and more and more, until we break down and "give in", or they hit us, or demand praise (no "ifs ands or buts" forcing us to adopt inauthentic expressions), or neglect us, or criticize us to the point where we lose sight of our best qualities. Part of most of these punishments entail trying to make us a sycophant child even if we don't want to, giving up the self and eroding ethics in order to be a full time, ever-ready, on-demand, totally controlled and manipulated, endless source of narcissistic supply for the parent. 

The punishments are different from one narcissist to the next, but if you are a person who is relating to a person with heavy narcissistic traits, the types of punishments are likely never to change, no matter how much they promise otherwise, even in a hoover, and often narcissists add new abuses to the ones they are already using. It is because abuse escalates including adopting even more punishing tactics and methods. 

Pity the poor child who has to live under these codes of conduct, right? As well as the chaos making and never-enoughness narcissists feel towards their kids and use it to destroy a child's self esteem, sense of safety, learning, ambitions and sense of self that differentiates from the parent's personality, as well as the parent's demands and opinions. 

Why opinions? Because narcissists see their children as an extension of themselves. The golden child is seen to have the narcissist's best traits and breeding, and the scapegoat the worst traits of the narcissistic parent.

Indeed, if you are listening to your narcissistic parent bash away at your self esteem, see if they are really talking about their own worse traits first rather than yours, and I'd bet you'll find that narcissists are quite successful self-labelers in this regard rather than other-labelers. 

There is a reason why they are so poor at other-labeling, which I get to later in the post. 

But for now:
They are not able to see children for themselves, as individuated, or notice there are differences from their own behaviors to theirs because of their propensity to have black and white thinking (splitting - the psychological term for it) and on-going projection, projection being extremely common among narcissists as a defensive mechanism especially when they feel like their grandiosity is being threatened or eroded, when they are jealous, and when they are trying to alter reality (the truth).

Usually projection comes with rage too, at least as far as narcissists are concerned. I'd even go as far as to say that the more rageful they are when tearing a child's self esteem apart, the more projection they are using. From all I have seen, rage and projection go together, almost always, and once they go through the rage/projection phase, they will play the victim shortly afterward and expect apologies from a child who doesn't have the qualities the parent is saying they do - especially for covert narcissists and malignant narcissists. 

So the apologies from the child are not going to be authentic, only fear-based, only because the parent wants the apologies and demands them, and most children find if they don't apologize that they will be punished for not agreeing to their characteristics matching the narcissist's. That brings up a host of other problems for the child, injustice only being one tiny aspect of the egregious problems that come from feeling forced to apologize when you don't mean it and did not do what the narcissist accuses you of doing. 

Looking through forums, scapegoats overwhelmingly feel that they were not treated well, or reasonably, or consistently, or fairly, or even kindly for the most part. They may have had some bread-crumbing, or the parent managed down the child's expectations of love or reasonable treatment, or they may have had some enticement to keep them "in the game" albeit in a controlled, serving, hurt state, but for the most part they weren't treated right in childhood. A lot of the reason why can be explained by the projection and rage combo throughout their childhood, and the threat of it day in and day out which produces hypervigilance in the child and has emotional, psychological and physical manifestations, which often carry into adulthood (another link). 

Parents who are narcissists will not care what this does to their child except if the child backs away, avoids them, no longer shares with them, or abandons them. But the physical, emotional and physiological aspects of what their child is going through will either matter very little to them, be rapidly belittled or dismissed, and for malignant narcissists, the symptoms that the child is manifesting won't matter at all to them. Narcissists are blame-shifters.

There is no way to get through to them that what they, the parent, is doing to them. The reaction the child will get will almost always be is the blame-shifting one, or the "that's not me, that's you!", "That's your fault, not mine!", or with coldness, "I'm sorry you feel that way. Maybe you just need to run away and never come back", or "I can't help what you're feeling! Those are YOUR feelings to deal with, and deal with alone," or "Your feelings are always kind of crazy. Do you want me to take you to psychiatrist so that he will put you on meds that make you feel bad? Hmm? Is that what you want?". All of this, of course, is just more escalation of the projection, blame-shifting and rage. 

The help for these symptoms has to come from outside the narcissist's realm of influence - just about always. 

And if the narcissist is trying again, and again, to pass their own worst qualities on to a child, it mostly means that the child will be abused if that child isn't already. Since the child serves as the narcissist's worse qualities, it is, for all sakes and purposes, a type of self-flagellation. It explains to some degree why they DARVO (i.e. play the victim after abusing). They've victimized themselves, because in the end, the scapegoat who receives all of this abuse often goes no contact after one trauma response after another trauma response, and nothing works to clear away the conflicts (fixes by narcissists only work in the narcissist's favor, never in the child's favor). In terms of feeling healthy, loved, cared about, fulfilled in the world, un-abused, scapegoats are serving no good in the role the parent put them in. 

The narcissist is left with their worst traits to face yet again (or pass on to another person through innuendo or suspicions or coercion - the more likely outcome ... they always have a number of scapegoats to dump on).

What narcissists are often left with is either no children, or a golden child who isn't a good enough servant, sycophant, enabler, flatterer, mind slave, phrase-repeater of the narcissist, or grateful enough. Again, never enough-ness plays into most relationships that the narcissist has, even, to some extent, the golden child. Just one little minor flaw in either sycophancy or mirroring can set a narcissist into a rage, and the golden child isn't exempt from it, especially if they are the only one left of the children who will deal with the narcissistic parent.  

That is because the personality disorder never changes. The personality disorder is always in charge and culpable, not the people surrounding the narcissist who the narcissist has decided to pick on. Raging, projecting, giving you the silent treatment, conspiracy theories, chaos dramas, scapegoating, playing the victim, head games, and breadcrumbing you on love, attention, care, and sometimes food, and other needs you have as a child, are all due to narcissistic traits that almost all narcissists use on at least one of the children.

Reminding yourself continually that narcissistic traits are part of every conversation you have with that parent, I think erases trying to make sense of anything they have to say or do. It's a lot easier to DEEP them too (a method devised by the mental health community to deal with narcissists), once you realize that narcissistic supply, power and control are all that they care about. 

Talking about the narcissist: In the end it doesn't pay to project your own worst qualities on to others, but narcissists lack the wisdom and foresight to see this, certainly the kind of narcissist who abuses to try to get their own way in everything, everywhere and with everyone. If they are raging about not getting their way and playing the victim, they aren't enlightened, and probably will never be enlightened or learn anything new except more drastic splitting and projecting.

For us though, it is like playing a record that skips and hoping that it won't skip and replay the same parts over and over again. That's not going to happen because there is a scratch that the needle touches which puts the needle back into the prior groove. Nothing new or better is going to happen with the narcissist either which is why scapegoats, especially, go with the flee response in the end. 

WHAT THIS HAS TO DO WITH NARCISSISTIC SUPPLY

The reason why children don't make very good narcissistic supply is because:

1. Children need consistent care, consistent love, consistent respect, consistent incorruptible empathy, to trust the parents in their life to put the child's best interests at heart at all times, to provide safety from violence and exploitation and abuse from others, emotionally regulated parents, lots of parental and adult patience, to be taught by example by parents, honesty, and truth - all impossible goals for a narcissist. 

2. What narcissists care about most (and demand) is money, complete loyalty (even though most are incredibly disloyal themselves), flattery, competition, being spoiled, being the center of attention, being put on a pedestal, having a high reputation that does not necessarily resemble their own character, to have power, control, domination and a scapegoat (or scapegoats) in their family life, to have the last word, to play head games without it being noticed, to have loyalists and sycophants who do what they are told to do by the narcissist without question, to win every argument, to lecture others without it being construed as controlling behavior, to triangulate without anyone suspecting or noticing, to have agendas and manipulations that they hope most people are blind to, to be able to be disloyal without repercussions, to be able to blame-shift anything they feel is uncomfortable on to someone else without repercussions, to be able to rage at people without repercussions that make the narcissist feel ashamed and put the narcissist in a precarious social position, to be able to lie and be believed, to be able to rage and abuse and have it kept secret by their victims and have this behavior normalized by their victims, to have children and a spouse make them look good no matter what they do or say  - most are impossible for children to fulfill. If they do fulfill some of this, then it is highly toxic for the child, and it is a relationship that is truly toxic as well. 

Thus trying to fit children into the mold of fulfilling all of these narcissistic supply demands does not work, and if it does for awhile, it probably won't last. There will be a lot of disappointments for the narcissist. There may even be heartbreak for those children who can no longer live under these expectations. 

There are reasons why adults fulfill these roles better, but it doesn't mean that the relationships are less toxic. 

Sycophancy when demands for narcissistic supply are involved has enormous repercussions for adults, so imagine what it does to a child. Either a child is going to hang on, against all odds, to ethics or "give in" to the narcissist because of the narcissist's threats, abuse or coercive control. I think we can all see that "giving in" to the worst parts of them, the most evil parts of human nature, is not a good thing.  

It doesn't produce what is best in humans which are the things I listed that children need (consistent love, consistent care, respect, honesty, truth, etc) plus compassion, peace, inventions, creativity, higher capacity for learning, building rather than destroying, diplomacy instead of threats and invasions, all of these things are what our higher, more evolved, selves want and need, just as we did as children. 

A lot of what narcissists represent is a de-volution of our species, not an evolution, and I think even small children can see the difference, and know that going that way, even if it's because there are threats over their heads, will never garner the results that a utopia of on-going peace and love will garner. 

If violence is so much a part of our species, then why do people who are exposed to it get PTSD? Even our minds are not made for it. And anyone, even the strongest among us, can get PTSD - except primary psychopaths (and who would want to be them?). With enough "giving in" to a world of criminality, invasions, violence, wastelands of burnt up buildings and trees, endless triangulations, endless head games, endless lies and untruths, endless competitions and breaking of the rules, and all the other sincerely bad-for-anyone narcissistic supply demands that are never about respect for others, and the autonomous lives others lead, children still know the difference between peace and hell. 

And they also know they have a choice: to be fawning sycophants to bullies, bribers, coercive controllers, invaders, liars, cheats, triangulators, people who create unloving environments with fleeting belonging, or to be strong and seek a better life for themselves and the next generation. 

Narcissists will always test us, and turn our world upside down when they aren't getting the next narcissistic supply they think they want so badly. It's up to us to test ourselves though, and our strength, and our resolve "not to cave into" all of this (if one can dare to dream of a better life than being hostage to narcissistic supply). 

NARCISSISTIC SUPPLY IS ALSO BASED ON WHAT NARCISSISTS HEAR
AND THEIR OWN INTERPRETING PROCESS IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY HEAR

In addition to what they require for narcissistic supply, they are terrible at listening (poor at "other-labeling" as I said earlier in the post, but there is so much more to it, and includes most everything in discussion except "the gray rock topics": impersonal subjects like cooking, nature, travel, space, chemistry, physics, engineering, gardening, laundry, art, etc - and many therapists will tell you that these are the only discussions you should have with a narcissist if you are going to keep a narcissist in your life). 

To make matters worse in talking about interpersonal topics, the narcissistic supply they do receive is going to be distorted because of what they are able to hear and not hear. Here are some examples:

Everything they hear from other people has filters: 
* suspicions about what they are hearing
* projection
* their ego is involved ("is what is being said flattering to me or not?" - this kind of thinking style)
* worried that they will be betrayed ("how much loyalty do they have for me in what they are saying?" - this kind of thinking style)
* worried that you will see - into their insecurities, secrets and their evil side and denounce them
* a distrustful nature
* lack of empathy - you can only get so far having a conversation with a person with a lack of empathy. It's as if they say internally to themselves, "If I'm being called on to have empathy he (or she) has something to think about." 
     Not caring about your feelings nullifies a lot of what you have to say, as well as nullifying a whole swath of the conversation. Talk about selective hearing! Which I discuss next:
* selective hearing and selective interpreting (only hearing how things might effect them in the future - Dr. Ramani has an excellent video on this)
* denying they are ever culpable for anything
* too ready with come-backs before you get to say what you want to say - At the point where they have their come-backs is the point where they stop listening to you, even if you've said "let me finish what I have to say" or "please don't interrupt me."
     A lot of conversations with narcissists are about verbal sparring, rather than a conversation with sensitivity that takes both of you into account. It's not about sharing. Or ideas. Or going on a "perspective adventure" or about opening the "empathy chakra." 
     If you listen to them, the interruptions of their "come-backs" are most often defensiveness, or because they think their "come back" is so brilliant and so important that they can't wait until you're finished to speak. 
     While some of us non-narcissists do this on occasion too, especially if we were not loved as children, or the parenting style with us was insecure attachment, the difference is that we can can grow out of this whereas the narcissist won't. 
* giving the person they are hearing either flaws or attributes which they put ahead of what they are hearing from that person, i.e. the narcissist filters what they are hearing through what they think the personality of a person is, and whether they like that person or not.
     If they dislike you, or hate you, they won't hear what you have to say no matter what. 
     How to tell if a narcissist hates you:
     For overt grandiose narcissists: they tell you that, usually more than once. And you can tell because they don't care what you feel. 
     For covert vulnerable narcissists: it's harder to tell, but some tell-tale signs are the cold shoulder, snippy one-word answers when you ask them what is wrong, they are spreading false narratives about you to others, they engage in some smear-campaigning about your character, they look affronted when you speak to them, they dismiss most of what you have to say, and they "rain on your parade" when you are happy or celebrating something. 
     For malignant narcissists, they scheme against you, and sometimes take things from you which are not theirs, or are joint property, or they brainwash children to think of you as dangerously insane or as a monster. 
     If they hate you, I see no point in talking to them, because as I said, they aren't interested in a word you have to say and it can be dangerous as they most often want to hurt people they hate, as well pointless. They aren't even open to whether they may have gotten you wrong, and frankly they don't care if they get anyone wrong. 
* interpreting other people's words as lying to them (where suspicions come in) - and that's because they often lie especially when they want to feed their grandiosity that it is projection that others lie as much as they do
* feeling that they can read other people's minds and that other people can read their mind enough to know why the narcissist is angry or hurt over something (totally delusional and contributes to distortion of what they hear in a major way)
     If you need to question this and you are scapegoat, how many things did you experience as a child that the narcissist never knew was happening. If they can read minds so well, and there was a huge event or many events in your life that you felt you had to keep secret, or did keep secret, and impacted you emotionally, then they don't read minds.  
     Even when you experience something with a narcissist, narcissists gaslight a lot, and insist that you didn't experience something that you both know you did. This isn't exactly mind-reading: it is the opposite.
* insisting that people are thinking, feeling and experiencing certain things that those people are not thinking, feeling or experiencing (called invalidation and perspecticide), also contributes majorly to distortion of information and the truth. All narcissists invalidate and try to devalue the perspective of others.
* feeling that they understand body language and facial expressions more than they actually do.
     They feel they have enough information from body language to judge and brand others with their opinions. It's very much like the former in that they insist they know what you're thinking, feeling and experiencing when they do not.
     They feel they know other people when they do not.
     If they insist that a look on your face, or an attitude in your voice means something about you (when it doesn't), they are pretty far down the rabbit hole of distorting reality in most, if not all, situations.
     Sociopaths, psychopaths and alcoholics often see hostility when there isn't any - often it's a brain matter in all three cases. For the sociopath, it's often the result of their own hostility and hypervigilance (fight or flight responses), and exploitation of others. For the psychopath it is because of their autonomic nervous systems which are different from others in the population and control their brain. And for alcoholics it is because alcohol distorts their perspectives, especially in this area. 
     Malignant narcissists are part sociopath, and this can increase seeing hostility in others when there isn't. 
* gaslighting - trying to distort reality to fit the narrative they want that will make them look better, or superior, to exploit the truth, or to exploit the child. They also assume others gaslight them too. My post on gaslighting is HERE. 
* interpreting other people's words and actions as "acting" (again where suspicions come in, and this is where we get false accusations) - and it also has to do with the fact that they put on acts and change their personalities, likes and dislikes to mirror people. They don't really have much of a personality, or they have the beginning of one that was arrested in childhood. This means they are chameleons and mirrors who largely use other people's personality styles, expression styles, styles of dress and hair, pretend their interests are the same as yours, to express themselves. Not having their own developed and accepted personality aside from the personality disorder which dictates how they act and perceive, means, in essence that you are talking to the personality disorder.
     What does this mean exactly?:
     Narcissists are extremely predictable and they don't differentiate that much from other narcissists except in DNA, the most outstanding traits among them all being a lack of empathy, divide and conquer objectives and strategies (triangulation), arrogance, entitlement, exploiting, dysregulated emotions (most often in the form of raging overtly or covertly), and most often bullying or coercing too. 
     If you try to explain to them why you weren't acting or why you wouldn't have a reason to act, they will put their beliefs before your words, thereby silencing you to say anything more.
     Eventually what this turns into (and every child abuse victim with a narcissistic parent can relate to this in spades, even a golden child who is more likely to take on acting for both safety and promotion reasons) is that when you are not acting, you are deemed to be acting, and when you are acting (mainly to appease the parent) you are deemed not to be acting. It proves they have no idea what truth is or how it should be treated. 
     Most people treat the truth reverently.
     In fact, for the narcissist, the truth is an amorphous thing that can be molded and interpreted any old way to fit agendas and win arguments.
* arrogance - The narcissist can't hear you because everything other people have to say is discounted to a large degree because they think they are superior to others. Also, unless the communication isn't of a flattering nature that's enhancing their arrogance, or dis-flattering enough to detract from their arrogance, they tend to get bored and go "off-line" (not hear). This is when you get the brick wall kind of stare. Or they might do a double-take and ask you to repeat something. Or they might leave the room when you are in mid-sentence. 
    Again, Dr. Ramani brings this up in the same video I'm looking for. Unless the conversation has to do with them, and the effect on their future, they can't be bothered to hear what you have to say. 
* lack of object constancy - people they originally love bombed are treated drastically differently by the narcissist. Often a difference of opinion, or an argument, or being away from the narcissist for a short period of time can mean they devalue you and discard you from their life. 
     For narcissists, the lack of object constancy means constantly losing relationships and meaningful connections. 
     Utilitarian love also falls under the category of lack of object constancy. 
     If you're trying to communicate with someone who has a lack of object constancy, it can feel uneasy, baffling, tumultuous, unreliable, often like a wall of silence, and often the ultimate conclusion that most of us make is that they are untrustworthy. With a lack of trust in them, communication either becomes purely emotional or goes completely off-line, especially when you realize that even emotions don't move them. 
     It can also produce trauma because the high majority of us have object constancy, value it and assume others are just as invested in it, innately understanding that if we have an argument, a different opinion or are away for awhile, we don't stop communicating with them afterwards. 
     When parents do this to children, neglect is usually the outcome, but abuse can also follow especially if the child reacts (which most children tend to do), thereby setting off the parent's shame-rage cycle, producing more and more trauma for the child as the narcissist's shame-rage cycle intensifies and escalates. 
     The message that the lack of object constancy sends to a child is to be silent and not react (i.e. develop a freeze response - very unhealthy), eventually producing estrangement. 
     Most narcissistic parents realize the impulsivity that led to their decision of a discard, and that is when they hoover. If the child is successfully hoovered back into the relationship, it tends to be a cycle of abuse, with discards followed by hoovers. As mentioned before, in the case of children "discards" tend to mean neglect (emotional, psychological, physical), abandonments, silent treatments, absurdly long "time outs" with the more severe outcomes being false imprisonment (and for child abuse victims that usually means locking a child in a room and not allowing him or her to come out for days, weeks, months or years, a criminal offense ... I discuss one of the more egregious cases in this post, but the phenomenon of locking a child abuse victim in a room for hours or days by their abuser is not unusual and is part of the escalation and intimidation process). 
     For the child, the outcome of estrangement is the healthiest outcome even though it comes with a lot of grief. For the parent, they lose narcissistic supply because of the impulsivity that innately comes from a lack of object constancy, and as a result can often go through a narcissistic collapse, with on-going paranoia becoming the final outcome (paranoia is discussed later in the post). 
* a belief that they are always winners and the most intelligent person in the room no matter what the reality is around them. This is tied to their arrogance which I discuss above. The reason why it's hard to communicate with a person with a mindset like this, is that any suggestion that they haven't thought through things enough, or actually didn't win something, will set off their rage, and will mean that they will turn vindictive towards you or give you the alternate challenge that you must be loyal to them under any and every circumstance, via sycophancy. 
     And yes, insisting you be a sycophant can be a form of punishment because most of us don't like being sycophants. 
* belief oriented - They are primarily belief-oriented, not fact oriented, and they believe that others are too. In fact, I'd bet they believe we are in a constant world of distorted facts, distorted agendas, fakeness and fake flattery in order for exploitation and sabotage to take place. Again, this may be as projection-oriented as anything they judge. 
* tactic, agenda and manipulation oriented - everything they say is oriented to get more narcissistic supply, power, control and domination over you and others. Unless your issues can be manipulated to that end, they are not that interested. It is one reason why, when you go to them about a dire issue, they get bored or largely discount it as unimportant. You are more likely to be judged, lectured at, and told what to do without them understanding much about your issue. In other words you won't get comprehension about the issue, or empathy, or a solution which makes sense or will be effective. 
     If you complain that the issue is not resolved, they often shut the conversation down (i.e. silence you, which can have the effect of you turning away from them and adopting other relationships where people are more capable of listening than they are, which in turn, enrages them - it's hard to figure out why, when they really don't want to hear you out, or to be empathetic, understanding, and give you fixes that actually work. 
     The problem with relating to someone who is so tactic and manipulation oriented is that those things  will always come first in your conversations with them. They may want to play "the great sage" and lead you in a certain direction, but it is too self-oriented to be effective for you.  
* exceptional confirmation bias - once they've made up their minds (and it can seconds), especially in judging other people, they've made up their minds for good. Most of the confirmation bias they have took very little investigation, very little thought (mindless), most often impulsive even if it's "a forever decision", and distorted by their ego and flawed interpretations. Sometimes the flawed interpretations are CPTSD - triggered interpretations, especially for covert vulnerable narcissists, the narcissists who  weren't spoiled or the golden child. 
     Confirmation bias is usually way more pronounced in narcissists than it is in the general population. 
* distortion of past events - this can make it almost impossible to discuss present events that are tied to the past events. 
* insisting on the distortion of reality, and pressuring you to agree to the false narratives they tell - again, real communication cannot happen with this agenda. It's coercion instead of a conversation. 
* intolerance of other people's differences, different ways of looking at things, different thoughts and perspectives, different lifestyle, their creativity, their openness to new ideas, and autonomous decision-making - again, with intolerance, there is no hope of a real conversation. This can turn to coercion by the narcissist pretty fast. They are notorious for obsessive criticizing, making fun of people, and vilifying those who don't think and believe exactly in the way they do, or in the way they want people to think and believe. 
     Sometimes people feel so intimidated that they renounce their former perspectives, personality and dress to fit in with the narcissist and their group of sycophants, but again, this isn't healthy and there will be repercussions along the way because of that fact. The worst part of it is that there is not much self-pride in being a sycophant. 
     Just as often, however, people feel put off by the menacing disdain, and feel good about who they are, how they think, and their perspectives no matter how much they are being criticized by the narcissist and their flying monkeys. This is especially true of people with integrity. They can just as easily have a bad opinion of the narcissist as the narcissist has of them.
     The resisters of the narcissist may also move into more autonomous thoughts and perspectives than usual (seen as rebellion by the narcissist) because they feel hypervigilant or sick internally being around the narcissist and their sycophants. Some of us are a lot more sensitive to the health signals in our body enough to want no part in being any kind of narcissistic supply for narcissists, and some of this may also come from very early childhood experiences of not feeling well around adults who did not have our best interests at heart. Hypervigilance at an early age can have its positives in that it can be counted on to be a "detector of toxicity" 
* never enough-ness - this is a huge topic among child abuse survivors: "I was always told as a child that I was not enough and didn't do anything good enough", "I was always told I wasn't good enough for them", "The dog was treated better than I was", "Mom always expected apologies, but when I gave them to her, even when I did nothing wrong which was a big sacrifice and self-flagellation on my part, it still wasn't good enough", "Nothing was ever good enough for my Dad. He'd rage all night about how his workers, no matter how many he had hired and fired over the decades, were never good enough for him. He terrorized everyone he knew, even us kids, to work harder and harder for him to no avail."
     Narcissists never feel satisfied with the amount of narcissistic supply you already give them, even if and when they become your whole world, when your whole life is relegated to their demands, so in that way they are like bottomless pits, trying to get ever more narcissistic supply. 
     The reason they can't hear you when you are deemed to "not be good enough" is that they are focused on that rather than what you are saying. The want, want, want - is all that matters to them. 
     Some of the phrases you hear are: "You better do this when I get home", "You better not disappointment me or you'll get it", "You better do ----", "You better believe me when I tell you", "You better do it the way I like", "You better not do it your way or you'll mess it up and I'll be furious", "You better not say anything to anyone about this", "So I rule your life; it's all that you deserve", and so on. 
     There isn't a "you" in these demands and commands - they have managed your expectations down to being a puppet for them, the ultimate in narcissistic supply. If you try to make it "I'm in this too, and I have my own ways of thinking things through and doing things", most often they aren't interested in your methods. "Don't tell me how you do it, you do it the way I tell you to do it."     
     Narcissists aren't just self centered in terms of them thinking primarily about themselves, they are self centered in just about any way you can think of, including not taking into consideration that you are person, a person with a brain of your own, that you have your own ways of doing things, that if you have reached your total full capacity in adulthood, you are creative enough, are smart enough, have enough feelings, are capable of learning as much, and that you are capable enough, and that you are "enough." You are as enough as they are enough. 
     Don't fall into the trap of their "never enough" bullying style of thinking when it comes to yourself. 
     Be aware that all narcissists have this "never-enoughness" problem, and that it's their personality disorder driving it, not you. 
     Actually the never-enoughness is a burden, an albatross, that they carry as it promotes more negative thoughts such as rage that won't go away, obsessional thinking about who they hate, resentment, jealousy, obsessions with labeling others and criticizing them, envy, obsessions about hurting others, acting happy when they don't feel happy, playing the victim when they know they were the perpetrator, acting arrogant and grandiose when they feel inadequate, and just about every negative feeling and action they have is generated through this "never-enoughness". 
     Even if they have a narcissistic collapse and try to get a pity party going to tell you that they always felt they weren't good enough to others, realize also that it is part of the personality disorder. Unless they are depressed, or suicidal, it's just another desperate act to get narcissistic supply. 
* gratitude shaming - there is such a thing as "gratitude shaming" in narcissistic abuse ... and it also goes with the narcissist grasping at getting positive narcissistic supply after they haven't treated you well. Gratitude shaming is about the narcissist shaming you because they feel they are not receiving enough gratitude for who they are and what they've done. 
     Gratitude shaming tends to happen right after they've abused you, or criticized you, or bread-crumbed you, or cheated on you, or blamed you for things that weren't your fault, or after they've hit you, or when they're trying to hoover you back after they've abandoned you. 
     It's about shaming you for noticing that they are cruel to you - you're supposed to ignore that and show gratitude instead. 
     From someone who lives in a constant state of "never-enoughness" when it comes to you and everyone else!? 
     Again, it's both hypocrisy and projection. Why projection? Because they don't show gratitude for who you are and what you do when they live in a constant state of criticizing you, flaw-picking, dreaming up the next false narrative about you, and ultimately abandoning you, showing you constantly that you aren't "good enough" for them.  
     It should show you that sycophancy, gratitude, not noticing the bad stuff about them, not holding them accountable for the hurtful things they do, and being a mind slave to them are all that really matter to them. The question for you to ask is that all that matters to you too? And are you willing to be bullied so that the narcissist can get it (note: narcissists bully people to get what they want, including gratitude) - because if you want more from a relationship than being a sycophant, bullied, and supplying flattery when they are harming people, including you, then their tactic of gratitude shaming is not going to work on you. 
     Trying to relate to someone who is ungrateful in spades and who shames you for being ungrateful yourself when you've brought up the things they do that are hurtful, means you're only going to be heard if you've agreed to be one of their flatterers/sycophants, and a full time agree-er and repeater of all of their thoughts, phrases and agendas, i.e. a constant source of narcissistic supply.
     No one needs to be narcissistic supply to a narcissist.
     In fact, it baffles me why so many people sign up for the job willingly especially when a narcissist is wielding power so destructively, so abusively, and when it will be noticed by others that you have an affiliation to them, and their bullying. You have a right to talk about things that aren't flattering to them, especially if they've been thoughtless and cruel to others or to you (which they will be if they are narcissists). If you go along with sycophancy, they keep living in this cloudy fantasy world that all people flatter them even when they are mean, and that something is direly wrong with you or anyone else who dares not to be a sycophant. Are you going to go along with everything they want to the point of destroying yourself or others? Are you going to fight for them and take the blame for them when their cruelty gets noticed and other people want them to be accountable? Why, it's like being a mindless soldier of a corrupt leader. 
     I would say that having a reputation as a thinking, questioning, research-guided, non-sycophant is a way better life than a non-thinking, dictated-to, phrase-repeater, robot-like sycophant. 
     Will they try to punish you for rejecting this job they want to put you in? Sure they will. Probably even hurt you more than you imagined, because remember: they get what they want through bullying.
     But after awhile they'll probably stop after they find better sources of narcissistic supply than you were. That can happen pretty fast, so maybe it's worth the wait. Again there are plenty of people who are willing to be sycophants (just look at our present government in the USA). Let them do the job if they choose.
     Also if you threatened them with demands for narcissistic supply in every conversation and told them they needed to kiss your ring and make you their leader, would they do it? Of course not! They'd throw a tantrum. 
     If you're a child, you can't get out of this unless you are physically abused, sexually abused, starved, locked up in a room or basement, recorded emotionally abusive situations and showed them to authorities, or they pushed and shoved you around, at least in the United States, although some states have begun to tighten laws particularly about coercive control. Anyway, as an adult you have a right to leave this thankless childhood job behind, especially if you can not get caught up in learned helplessness type of thinking patterns that keep you stuck dealing with this.   
     I think it's obvious you can't talk to a person with a mind-set like this unless you've advertised that you're looking desperately for work or volunteerism as a sycophant ("desperate, will do any job" kind of advertising too).       
* paranoia - narcissists have extraordinary levels of of paranoia, especially over the people they hurt.
     Why?
     Because if they feel hurt, they rage and very often retaliate and scheme how to hurt the other people worse than they were hurt (escalation is always the name of the game for narcissists who abuse and use abuse to solve their problems). They figure you're like that too. 
     And because they are paranoid of being found out in terms of the amount of abuse and retaliations they enact, they rage at the person they are abusing, hoping that the intimidation will keep the person (or child in this case) in a state of silence about the abuse. 
     It doesn't take much to hurt a narcissist either (they are much more sensitive to being hurt than to hurting others, by a long shot, which is where the imbalance comes in as well as the lack of empathy). The smallest inconsequential phrase can do it, especially if they feel it hits their reputation. Not getting invited to a party can do it. Refusing to engage with them in gossip can do it. Yawning can do it. A facial expression that they don't like can do it. Expecting an apology from you when you didn't do anything wrong can do it. Or they just distort the truth so much that they see things or hear things that don't exist, also somewhat common among narcissists.  
     The amount of rage, or the ending of a relationship over these kinds of things, the amount of retaliations exhibited over these things, the amount of false narratives and smear campaigns over your character afterwards, the amount of fear they want to put into you, tells the story of how hurt they are (or how much they feel their reputation is being threatened more likely).
     How much they want to hurt you back is also something to keep an eye on. It tells the story of how much empathy they have for you as opposed to how sorry they feel for themselves. If it's incredibly lopsided where they are playing the victim all of the time, and painting you as the victimizer when they've retaliated to extremes, that explains how high they are on the narcissism scale, and how low they are on the truth-telling scale.
     If the reaction is much, much more abusive than the yawning, or slip, or thoughtless phrase you gave them, then that's the story of how abusive they are, and how far they'll go to abuse you without regrets or thoughts like "I don't feel good about going any farther with this", and how regulated they are, and how dangerous they are.
     And yes, they mean to hurt you. It's rare for a narcissist to say, "I didn't mean to hurt you." Or "I regret hurting you as much as I did." They will almost always justify the hurt, and try to normalize the amount they hurt you with as well. 
     And the reason they hurt others to the extent they do is because they don't have thoughts like "I didn't mean to hurt her as much as I did", or the emotional regulation to even consider these perspectives even if there are others who question the narcissist's ambitions to hurt others. 
     They also generally inflict a lot more pain on others than they receive, so that should also speak volumes about who they are and to what lengths they are willing to go with damaging other people. 
     Paranoia that they will be "found out" in terms of this level of abuse and retaliation, especially if it concerns their children (as most people care about the fate of children, and care about child abuse), can increase their paranoia a lot.
     The more obsessive they get about hurting you and keeping it a secret, the more paranoia they are enduring - you can count on it. 
     One of the reasons they end relationships permanently, even with their own children, is because they are so incredibly paranoid at being found out, that in order to play the victim successfully, they can't have that child in their life. If you're hearing, "I need to protect myself from my child. My child is a monster!" the relationship with that parent should be over. Also, don't ask why they are smearing your name again, ask yourself if this is just another case of projection, especially if the retaliation went above and beyond what ever you did or were perceived to have done. They can't allow themselves to have a relationship with you if they feel the desire to play the victimhood game to an absolute hilt. 
     Often the child will end the relationship just after the narcissistic parent did just to let the narcissist know that they are not going to come back begging, or putting up with the narcissist's false narratives, which is discussed in the "lack of object constancy" section above. It has to do with a combination of the shame-rage spiral and narcissistic collapse, traumatizing the child enough that the child flees  (i.e. the flee trauma response kicks in ... again, the main trauma responses are fawn, fight, flee, freeze). 
     And this, folks, is just one of many reasons why about 90 percent of scapegoats are estranged from a parent. 
     Once the narcissist is displaying this much paranoia and this much fake victimhood, there really is nothing to talk about with them again. You're just going to run into their shame-rage spiral again and again, only so much worse, so much more violent or annihilating for you, with worse "punishments" and retaliation than the last time. They want the narrative so badly (with you only, not with others) that they hurt you so badly because you seemed threatening to them (i.e. more like their reputation). Abusive parents who have killed or neglected their children even use this narrative and you can look up cases of this for yourself. It's a DARVO on steroids. 
     Even if you haven't gotten to the point of slipping up (yet), or forgetting to invite them to a party (yet), or haven't had a facial expression that made them furious (yet), their paranoia will still run the show and the conversation, and in this case it might be that you'll do one of these things *some day* just like all of the rest of the people they've known throughout the years, endlessly disappointing them over narcissistic supply, that they won't be able to help themselves and hurt/trash you again. 
     All psychologists say that if you get too close to narcissists you'll get hurt. Narcissists probably even know this, otherwise their paranoia wouldn't be so off the charts.
     Enablers and sycophants who normalize, give credence to their lies about being victimized, DARVO-ing for them, and give credence and narcissistic supply to all their paranoias, are actually setting themselves up for their own dismissals and retaliations from the narcissist however many sycophants are willing to totally break with their own ethics and reputation. 

With all of this going on it stands to reason that a child being understood by a narcissistic parent or caretaker is going to be unfeasible and often leads to an insecure attachment style or a disorganized attachment style. 
     
WHEN CHILDREN GIVE THEIR PARENT
THE NARCISSISTIC SUPPLY THEY WANT

Even when you give them the narcissistic supply they want, they often say things like:

* "You don't really mean that" (especially if they've hurt you a lot, or egregiously)
* "You're a liar. I know one when I see one." 
* "You're just saying that because you want 'that toy' for Christmas!" 
* "You can stop flattering me now. There's some ulterior motive going on here."
* "You can stop now. I know what flattery is really about!"
* "Do you really mean it? You must be one of my closest, most loyal friends", especially if you believe they were the victim of someone else (when they really weren't). And later on when they perceive that you found something out that contradicts their narrative, or when they "believe" you might have found something out, they might say, "You aren't as loyal as I thought you were", or "Just how loyal are you to question how I treated my (add person's name here)?" 

For the golden child, having to provide constant narcissistic supply to get the parent regulated and consistent emotionally, it can still be looked at as a form of child abuse, and definitely a form of parentification.  

For one thing, there is too high a risk of the golden child abandoning his authentic budding personality in return for being a mirror and sycophant to his narcissistic parent. Narcissists focus very heavily on how the behaviors of others aren't good, or good enough, for them. The constant need for narcissistic supply will also mean the parent will spend most of their time with the child either disapproving of behavior or approving of behavior, and because they can't comprehend what children are saying to them, the parent fills in the blanks of how their children behaves with their own personality traits (projection - and this is ultimately why and how narcissists create roles such as the golden child and the scapegoat).  

There are also so many down-sides to being a full time sycophant to an adult and losing your own personality, interests, thoughts, attitudes, reality and judgements to adopt the parent's. Golden children also run a high risk of becoming another narcissist by taking up Jekyll and Hyde behavior which can start by observing the parent doing it: being the ultimate lapdog flatterer, but then complaining about the parent behind their back.

All of the narcissists I have known manifested Jekyll and Hyde behaviors and some of it was sickening, like praising a person's singing abilities in the most sticky-sweet kind of way while they were present, and over and over again, for instance, and then laughing and making fun of them endlessly after they left the house, about how they were irritating and out of key in their vocal style was after the singer had left the house (mocking and play acting the most irritating parts of their vocal styles).

In general, narcissists spend a lot more time trash-talking about other people in this way than any kind of authentic admiring, and this is one reason their heads are full of negativity, why their attitudes are negative, why their judgements of others are so negative, and why they live as a "never-enough" grasping narcissistic supply addict. They continually make rash decisions based on the narcissistic supply they are receiving too, like for instance, changing their Last Will and Testament at a second's notice over how much narcissistic supply they believe they are receiving (and through all of the filters mentioned above). 

I would say that many golden children aren't particularly happy being close to their parent, that it's anxiety-producing, and sometimes down right nauseating, especially when the parent is trying to get them to believe in an event that isn't true, and that never comported with reality, but they are too afraid of losing the gravy train, so keep up the pleasing behaviors regardless, saying "yes" to all of the crazy-making false narratives, whereas scapegoats give up on pleasing their parent, being stuck in the parent's never-enoughness mind-prison. 

In other words, the molding and constant labeling of the child is completely over-done and often completely wrong. As I've said in the section before this one, most narcissistic parents do not care about reality/truth or of seeking it (that it should be, and can be, manipulated for their own agendas). Many children from narcissistic families are constantly being molded and groomed to accept the judging and labeling to the point where the child's defenses of their actions, thoughts and feelings are either not taken into account at all, or where the parent's ego feels threatened because narcissists feel they have to be right in every situation, even if it's a gross injustice of the authentic reality, that it's a hit to their "superior image" or self esteem if a child challenges their beliefs. And the child endures their parents rage or abuse once again over it (in the manner of the shame-rage spiral and most often the cycle of abuse).  

Anyway, when a child lacks in being a good source of narcissistic supply, the narcissistic parent often gets rageful or punishing over it, no matter what other circumstances the child is enduring, further challenging the relationship with that child, and challenging the endurance of that child to take on more trauma symptoms.

If the child is not going through anything major, the challenge is going to be either a mild punishment (favoring another child temporarily and intermittently neglecting the child who is a lousy narcissistic supply giver), or abusing the child (absurdly long time outs, favoring another child permanently, on-going neglect, silent treatments and rejections, repeated scenes of raging at their child, tearing their child's self esteem and interests apart, hitting, triangulation, betrayal, gaslighting, false narratives to describe them, including most of the punishments and abuses I talk about in the right hand column under "narcissistic abuse section" ... which also continues in this section, and if you were scapegoated, in this section.

IN CONCLUSION

Talking to a narcissist means that their personality disorder is going to be the main thing you'll be relating to and up against. You're not going to find convictions of morality because they don't have any. You're not going to get them to see your side of view because they don't care about reality or the truth. You're not going to find empathy because they either don't have any, or it is on the very low side. You're not going to find reasonable solutions because they don't have any. You're not going to find conversations satisfying because they are too self centered to think about how they, or anything else in your life, effects you. You're not going to find a satisfying connection with them because they are incapable of love, at least adult love (it would resemble more how a distracted 2 year old expresses love). And you're not going to find any kind of consistency of affection (more like hate followed by love bombing or hoovering, followed by more hate, followed by another hoover, round and round, especially if you are anyone else other than the golden child). You're not going to find ways of talking to them without triggering their rage, shame and jealousy because there aren't many positive emotions inside them to overcome the negative ones. 

Think of them as either a spoiled rotten golden child who had to give up their budding personality to please a bully or abusive caretaker ... or conversely, a small insecure, shame-filled, imperfect child, at least in terms of what one caregiver or bully possibly labeled them as in early childhood years: expecting impossible standards in perfectionism in deeds, looks and words that matched the bully's demands resulting in covert vulnerable narcissism. Both kinds of child's personalities were somehow arrested in early childhood, and they've surrounded themselves with a thick wall of impenetrable arrogances, made up stories, denials, defenses, armaments and battle tactics. While they operate these defenses, armaments and battle tactics with a lot of impulsiveness and rage, the wall is too thick to hear you. And that's what talking to a narcissist really feels like. 

Being fully estranged means not talking to your parent. And most of these reasons are why children of narcissists find themselves not wanting to talk to their parent, besides the trauma symptoms they undergo by getting too close to the narcissist (even adults get trauma symptoms from getting too close to a narcissist), and this is especially the case if the narcissist's child got burned and exhausted by being "a not good enough sycophant" or they were the narcissist's abused scapegoats. 

FURTHER READING

Do narcissist parents have children for supply? - forum, myptsd.com

The Impact of Narcissistic Supply -  by LaKeisha Fleming, and reviewed by Ivy Kwong, LMFT for Very Well Mind

The Concept of Narcissistic Supply
Pleasing a narcissist is thankless, like filling a bottomless pit.
When you say "Yes" to a person, make sure you are not saying "No" to yourself
 
- by Darlene Lancer, JD, LMFT for Psychology Today 

What Is Narcissistic Supply? - by  Nakpangi Thomas, PhD, LPC, TITC-CT, medically reviewed by Lynn Byars, MD for Choosing Therapy

An Insight into the Mind of a Narcissist - by LaKeisha Fleming, and reviewed by Ivy Kwong, LMFT for Very Well Mind

The Unraveling of a Narcissist: What Happens When the Narcissistic Supply is Lost - TherapyWithAb.com

What Happens When The Narcissist Has No Supply? | When A Narcissist Collapses - by Dr. Emily Mayfield for Mindset Therapy (You Tube)

a lack of narcissistic supply - what does it mean - a Google search

No Narcissistic Supply Self Supply Or Forced Supply - by psychologist, Sam Vaknin, for Vaknin talks
(note: Sam Vaknin, by his own accounts, has been diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and has described himself as a malignant narcissist, so the perspective is both as "an insider", i.e. inside the mind of a narcissist, and through his education in psychology)

another article along the same lines as the one above: The Narcissist's Reaction to Deficient Narcissistic Supply - by Sam Vaknin for Healthy Place

Impacts and Management Strategies - Bay Area CBT Center (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)


FOUND ON FACEBOOK:










Wednesday, September 5, 2018

my mother rejects me and doesn't love me because ...

© Lise Winne

Please note: this post is about an abusive parent, not about parents or parenting in general. Read about what constitutes an abusive parent from this post.  

Abusive parents are generally rejecting and unloving. They practice, make-up, break-up on a consistent basis with most of their children, unless the child is a "golden child favorite" (favoritism).

The graphic above are all typical reasons abusive parents will give you for your not being loved.  

Also, the above reasons for why Mom does not love you are defined as emotional abuse. Abusive mothers can sometimes tell their children that they love them, but rejection is not love. In other words, the love they claim to feel is not believable. Love requires empathy. A lack of empathy is not love; it is the opposite of love. 

Your mother may claim that you don't love her, so in reaction, she doesn't love you. This is retaliatory tit-for-tat parenting and that kind of reaction is always categorized as child abuse (and yes, adult child abuse counts too). Note: it is the mother's responsibility to love her child first, starting during the infancy stage, to get the child accustomed to being loved and loving back. A loved child will usually reciprocate love. A rejected child won't. It's as simple as that. 

The reason why unloved children stop demonstrating love to a rejecting mother is because they feel it is of no use, and that they are too flawed for their issues and feelings to be taken seriously or heard (especially if they are under-age). They give up trying to be lovable or trying to love, especially if their mother put them on a merry-go-round cycle of make up, devalue, discard. There are only so many merry-go-round trips a child will take before getting off of the merry-go-round altogether. 

Most adults of child abuse gradually begin to feel that "there is something wrong with Mom", especially when they are exposed to a lot of other mothers who love their kids unconditionally. They see the same "mistakes" being made that they made with their mother, except these "other mothers" never reject over the same mistakes. They may laugh, they may lecture, they may look with concern and ask their child how they are feeling, they may temporarily leave the room for awhile, but they don't reject or isolate their child from understanding and love. Children from abusive homes do eventually wonder why they aren't being unconditionally loved like so many children in other homes are, they may crave unconditional love, but they also know that their parent is not comfortable with a child who has self esteem, so they will constantly try to lower their child's self esteem for the purpose of putting themselves in charge at all times, and this means withdrawing love. The reason for abuse is power and control (an like an addict they will be demanding that you give them more power, control and domination over your life - or else). 

The less self esteem you exhibit, the more likely you are to be accepted by Mom. If you cry the blues and say, "I'm so flawed! How could you ever love me! You're right, I'm crazy, I don't praise you enough, I'm ugly, you have every right to love my siblings more than me, I'm too sickly, I'm a basket case, and I'm especially a basket case without you!" the abusive parent is likely to want you back ... until they find another flaw they don't like and you are thrown away like so much trash from their hearts yet again. 

The thing about these constant makeup/breakups is that the flaws they reject you over will be for smaller and more erroneous reasons than the last time. Some abusive parents beat or reject their kids over a look on their face, for their child confronting their parent about being stolen from, for forgetting to re-cap the toothpaste, for any kind of expression at all other than pain and tears -- yes, it gets as ridiculous and petty as that.

So, why does it get this petty? Why does it increasingly go in the direction of Turpin-style parenting where just about anything is game for rejection, devaluation, isolation and abuse? 

Good question. It has to do with entitlement. Most abusive parents grow up in homes that were also abusive, but they also felt more entitled in some way too. 

For instance, it could be that the abusive parents your mother had only loved her "if" while at home, but her parents made all of their children sound like model children ("better than"), without a flaw in the world, in front of strangers. Your mother's parents may have upheld a false image of the family, in other words.

Another instance is that your mother's parents may have insisted that their children all compete with each other for parental love and affection. Your Mom may have been favored by their parent while the other children were in various stages of rejection, and in return for being rewarded, they felt they always deserve rewards (entitlement). They might have been rewarded for sibling abuse even, and rewards have a lot to do with how a person conducts themselves later on. Your parent may feel that abuse will work in any relationship, to use it in any situation. 

Another instance is that your mother may have had cruel rejecting parents, and therefore learned to be rejecting and cruel to get what she wanted from others. While they accepted being rejected by their parents, they may have normalized being cruel and rejecting themselves when they reached adulthood, so they practice it on their own children (privilege). Thus they expect to be rewarded by being rejecting and cruel -- this would be more unconscious than the above instances. 

These are just a few ways that abusers reach the point of on-going and ever-growing needs to have their entitlement desires fulfilled (i.e. being rewarded for things they want at the expense of others). They are willing to hurt their children to fulfill their needs for absolute power, absolute control and entitlements that go beyond natural human limits. One reason they pick on weaker unsupported individuals (like children) is because they feel weakness equals "giving in". 

One reason why suicide rates for abused children are much higher than for non-abused children is because child abuse victims have been brainwashed by their parents to think that it is their life duty to take care of their parent's needs, their parent's super sensitive feelings, their parent's need for absolute control over them, while sacrificing all of their own. When the child is seen as not fulfilling the desires of the parent and are rejected over it, the child often thinks about self destruction, including suicide. Believe it or not, it's a natural feeling -- brainwashing will pull a child's mind in that direction. 

One reason I put a question mark in the spot of "she likes to hurt me" is because while it is a conscious choice in some parents to hurt their children (those vengeful, retaliatory, tit-for-tat parents for instance), it is unconscious in other parents (who grew up with abuse and therefore think it's absolutely "natural and normal" to hurt their children to get what they want out of them without thinking of their children's feelings, and without thinking of alternatives of relating to children). 

It is often hard to tell if they intentionally want to hurt us, but it isn't hard to tell if they love us or not. The more rejecting they are, the least loving they are (they aren't practicing love, after all; they are practicing rejection and devaluation instead). You will have to accept that your parents don't love you, just like so many other survivors come to an acceptance about it and disengage. It will get easier to accept as time goes on, especially if you can find a good domestic violence therapist and a good trauma specialist.

Time and good company (like spending time with mothers who love all of their children equally and unconditionally, without the unreasonable demands in the graphic above) heal some of the wounds.

Saturday, April 29, 2017

narcissists and children



Note: before reading this post, you may want to check out my post on how to tell if you have abusive parents here.

This post focuses heavily on Dr. Judy Rosenberg's work. But first I will explain tell-tale signs of narcissistic abusive parenting:

One way to tell if you have a narcissistic or sociopathic parent is what the cartoon is about (and Dr. Judy Rosenberg confers it in her videos and writings): the parents place themselves, their needs, desires, wants, agendas, way ahead of their own children.

Here are some instances where parents put their desires and needs first:
1. A woman in her early thirties is diagnosed with Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Her mother, who has booked a trip for a safari, does not cancel, and is away for two months, never calls. They are estranged now.
2. A sixteen year old girl attempts suicide and is hospitalized. Her mother decides during her hospitalization on a sudden wedding with her boyfriend, and takes off for Europe for a honeymoon. These "parents" were deemed unfit, and mother and daughter are estranged.
3. A girl child is sexually molested by her older brother for most of her childhood. The parents punish the brother when he commits incest, but do nothing else, and the abuse continues. They cannot bear to report the son because of the stigma it would bring on the family, plus they don't want to see him incarcerated. He stays with his parents through old age. When the daughter finally leaves home at age 18, she changes her name so that she won't be found. She is in her sixties and hasn't seen her parents since she was in her early twenties.
4. A boy child is born to parents who are divorcing. The father is granted full custody, but when he becomes romantically involved, his female partner will not marry him if the boy is living with them. The boy is 12, and the father decides to send him off to the boy's mother (the one who lost custody). She is involved in a successful career, so sends the child off to boarding school and summer camps (he rarely sees his mother, in other words). The son commits suicide at 16 while at boarding school.
5. An alcoholic mother is violent towards her children: breaking furniture on them, throwing kitchen utensils at them, getting into rages. The father puts his wife first, and tries to lecture his children about how to tip-toe around their mother's rages, but the school intervenes, reports the incidents to Child Protective Services, and the parents are deemed unfit. The children are to go to a foster home, but the father sets up residence separate from the mother, commits to counseling, and is granted custody. They all attend individual and family therapy. The mother goes into detox, and they attend AA, AL-ANON, and Alateen. All ends well.

Note: just about all psychologists agree that these kinds of situations are not good for children (the last one worked out because of an intervention). These examples aren't all examples of narcissistic parents obviously, but these are good examples of how parents put themselves first.

Normal parents overwhelmingly put their children first. This includes the welfare of their children, and their children's feelings and safety. Functional families talk through feelings and are open to the experiences of their children, whereas toxic parents tell their children what their feelings are and what their experiences are (in other words toxic parents superimpose feelings, thoughts and experiences onto their children and then try to get their children to believe in the parents views and interpretations -- mostly dark ones). Normal parents are invested in keeping their children feeling secure in parental love. They are in tune and sensitive to their child's feelings and plight. They try to treat their children fairly. They also are consistently loving and engaged, and look forward to seeing their children, and being part of their children's lives. They have an interest early on in their children developing healthy interests, relationships with others and ever-more autonomy.

Narcissists are the opposite. They believe that their child exists for parental needs, wants, desires and parental perspectives. If a child does not place Mom or Dad on a pedestal, the child often finds himself devalued, called "crazy", and discarded. Narcissistic parents are either intermittently rejecting (child neglect) or totally engulfing. They make it known very early on that the child is to serve parental views, desires, wants and needs. The parent builds the relationship with the child based on how much narcissistic supply the child can provide (narcissistic supply basically boils down to: the child praising and attaching themselves to the parent no matter how abusive and rejecting the parent is).

Besides putting themselves above their children, these are the ways narcissistic parents act towards their children:

Trauma bonding:
Instead of the usual love-bonding that most parents and children experience, narcissists use trauma bonding. I have yet to do a post on trauma bonding, but the premise of trauma bonding is a child running after a rejecting parent. I present to you a picture of trauma bonding in this way: the parent and child are out in the desert. The parent has all of the food and water. The parent kicks his or her child, tells the child to go away, insults the child endlessly, perhaps beats the child mercilessly, and maybe even leaves the child for dead in the desert, but the child still runs after the parent (for survival and because the parents possess the food and water). Any normal person can understand why trauma bonding is a horrific bond, but for abusive narcissists, it is the primary bonding between parent and child that trumps all other bonds. Trauma bonding often results in estrangement and it can produce many, many problems for both perpetrators and victims that last and continue down the generations.

Expecting children to compete with their sibling for parental love and favoritism:
Instead of equal time with each of their children and emphasizing fair play between children, abusive parents typically expect their children to compete for parental rewards like love and decency. Sibling rivalry and/or sibling abuse is often ignored because the parent expects the children to fight dirty for them. Instead of promoting honesty, they expect children to uphold lies that make the parent look good (infallible). Instead of expecting their child to develop healthy interests, they either show no interest in their child's interests and career, or they try to micro-manage their children's lives and careers. Instead of expecting their child to develop healthy relationships with others, they try to make themselves all-important to their child. On-going enmeshment and meddling control is usually expected. Parental rejection/abuse is common when the child veers off into his own decision-making (to instill into their child to always think of the wound the parent inflicted -- more on how to avoid this trap in another post). All of the rejections and ultimatums usually have isolation of their child from the family at the core of the agenda, coupled with co-dependency with the parent.

If the parent finds he cannot control the child, he tries to control how the family sees the child.

If the child is a scapegoat, the parent has an investment in making sure his or her child fails and is used in the family as a punching bag (i.e. for bullying); if the child is a golden child, the parent has an investment in making sure his or her child succeeds above his or her other children. Thus a reward system is set up to ensure this will happen (in many cases it does not, despite the parent's wishes).

Retaliation against their children:
Other tell-tale signs are that abusive narcissistic parents try to get even with their child instead of the normal "talking things out" and "sympathizing" approach. Yes, isn't it amazing? -- they actually seek revenge against their own children! The revenge is often enacted when the child fails to provide narcissistic supply or refuses to let the parent control them (control meaning subverting to a role the parent wants for you, even if that role is the scapegoat role).

Lack of trust that helps to promote lasting bonds:
It is also very, very common for narcissists to have affairs, get divorces, fight tooth and nail for custody of the children, and then abuse or reject the children once they are granted custody. Narcissists also lie, break promises and gaslight children quite a bit.

Weddings:
Adult children of narcissists often complain about how their parent ruined or did not show up for their wedding to the point where it is fairly common for narcissistic parents to either upstage it in some way, take total control of it in a way that does not please the child (particularly deciding guest lists), or not attend at all.

Disabling their children, or being helicopter parents around issues of their child's success:
They also are known for trying to disable their child in some way. Some of the most common ways are:
* trying to keep their child from going to college
* trying to get their child financially dependent on them
* encouraging co-dependency so that the child stays at home even through their thirties and forties
* dressing up their child so that it reflects well on them (see my post on Jon Benet Ramsey) or dressing them down so that the parent feels they have won a beauty contest against their own child
* trying to reserve children for family roles (either a family pet or a family scapegoat)
* trying to keep children emotionally immature and reactive instead of smart and proactive
* discouraging a child's talent -- highly independent think-for-youself children are very threatening to abusive narcissistic parents
* being a "stage Mom or Dad" and manipulating the situation so that the child goes in the direction of failure, or a type of success that the parent wants, rather than what the child wants
* discouraging their child's voice by constant interference and gaslighting (i.e. "That never happened ... the way it happened was ..." -- getting a child to be dependent on their parent's perceptions instead of the child's own).
* intermittent rejections and acceptances
There are many more, of course, but these are common.

Using the last will and testament as a weapon:
Abusive parents overwhelmingly use the last will and testament as a constant threat. Most narcissistic and sociopathic parents leave their estates to one favored child or to a select few of their grandchildren who they deem to be good sycophants. In other words, it is a reward system based on what they want, rather than on caring about their child's fate in old age, or creating fairness and equality among their children.

Cutting out their child (sending the message that they aren't a part of the family):
Cutting their children out of family photos also seems to be an extremely popular pastime among overt narcissistic parents. Cutting their children out of family events or out of their lives, seems to be typical of covert narcissistic parents.

Grooming children to accept abuse as an initiation into family-belonging:
Most narcissistic and sociopathic parents groom their children to accept abuse and to think of it as "normal". This constant grooming is something that children feel they must endure to get Mommy or Daddy's love. But it does not stop there. Most children of narcissists also have to endure being gaslighted constantly, erroneously blamed and punished, compared endlessly with their siblings, expected to fight with their sibling for Mom or Dad's love (which often creates sibling abuse), put into roles which define their stature in the family (roles discussed and featured below via videos), and if they are scapegoated, expected to endure smear campaigns (which further lowers their stature within a family). Narcissistic parents also try to micro-manage their children's lives (through enmeshment and constant interrogations), alter the truth so that they, the parent, looks good and truthful, while one of their children looks bad and like a liar. They expect perfectionism in deeds or looks, and if perfectionism isn't achieved, to walk on eggshells over intermittent rages and rejections. Plain and simple, abusive narcissists and sociopaths love to hurt their children, and hurt them as severely and egregiously as they can without getting caught or of being suspected of child abuse.

Ganging up
Narcissists need spouses who are "total enablers". Empaths are going to object to how a narcissist treats others, so narcissists either aren't attracted to empaths in the first place, or they make an empath spouse miserable, cheat on them or abandon them. In general, the narcissist/empath pairing does not work for the narcissist. Narcissists generally try to pair themselves with another Cluster B personality so they will not feel challenged. Narcissists are attracted to Borderlines. Sociopaths are attracted to Narcissists. So, how do you tell who your narcissistic parent is partnered with? If the person is another narcissist, they will have all of the same traits as your parent. If they don't exhibit the same traits, here is the other way that you tell: if your narcissist did the chasing, the partner is likely to be a borderline. If your narcissist was chased, the partner is likely to be a sociopath.
Other ways to tell:
* Borderlines are extremely impulsive, wear their emotions on their sleeve, have lives which are so much more chaotic than other people's lives, vacillate wildly between love (idealization) and hate (sometimes on a daily basis, with a dizzying number of very passionate make-ups and tear-soaked breakups), have many friends, attracted to the public eye, have very loud temper tantrums, and often have problems with addiction.
* Sociopaths are into punishing (mostly animals, innocents and children, but can be others too). The best way to tell if your narcissist is partnered with a sociopath is to talk to the suspected sociopath about empathy. They will always try to find a way to justify why empathy should not be used and why people need to be hurt, trapped, losing, getting "what they deserve", punished, ridiculed, overlooked, etc. They love to talk endlessly about consequences. If they are a step-parent, their agenda is often to make the children of the narcissist very uncomfortable (through subtle threats, toying, digs and insults, mockery, denigrating lectures, guilt trips about what they are owed, non-empathetic responses, and other tactics). They also use the opportunity to get rid of the narcissist's children, reasoning that the children are not providing enough narcissistic supply. In other words, they will play with the narcissist's perceptions in a way that makes it seem that no child is giving enough narcissistic supply, thereby finding a way to get rid of all of the narcissist's support. Not all sociopaths are violent (especially those that did not come from broken homes), but it is very rare to find a sociopath who is not highly manipulative, extremely haughty and insulting, or sadistic in some way. The sociopath's agenda towards the narcissist's children is to find excuses for prolonged and sadistic time-outs and "punishments", whereas borderlines will just have screaming fits with the narcissist's children and support. The narcissist/sociopath combination should always be abandoned (I will tell why it is necessary in this post).

Smear campaigns and slander:
Where most parents talk glowingly about their children, narcissists are known for trying to smear the reputation of one of their children. They usually deem one of their children to be too insane to have a relationship with, thereby isolating their child so that he or she can be used for the exclusive purpose of abuse and blame.

These nine videos of interviews with psychologist Judy Rosenberg are so excellent that everyone from unloving toxic families should see these videos. She explains so well what children go through and how narcissistic parents got the way they did. For the most part, these videos stand on their own in terms of how narcissists relate to children that there is not much to add other than some opposing "schools of thought", which are in the middle and towards the end of this blog. The other schools of thought are important, particularly because they give you more options on how to deal with narcissists than the options that Dr. Judy presents (they are all relevant options, however).

For a more in-depth look at abusive parenting, and how to tell if you have abusive parents, go HERE.

These videos are very much in line with so much of what I have discussed on this blog:

note: These videos are long, so I suggest playing them while doing a mindless task. It is more of a radio program than a video in that there really is nothing to see except her "mind-map".

Effects of a Narcissistic Mother on Her Children with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

Effects of a Narcissistic Mother on Her Children (part two) with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

Narcissistic Fathers with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

Narcissistic Fathers (part two) with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

The next few videos cover family systems theory as it relates to families headed by a toxic narcissistic parent. Not all narcissists are abusive, but the overwhelming majority are. One of the reasons that narcissists and sociopaths tend to be abusive is because they have either no empathy, or very little of it. They do not care about their children's plight or feelings. 

A very, very small number of narcissists seek therapy, but only when they come to an absolute breaking point (like homelessness, war, suicide attempts, kidnapping, gang rape, a grueling incarceration experience -- anything deeply traumatic). 

In my own research, I learned about each of the four different types of roles in narcissistic authoritarian families (and they differ somewhat from Dr. Rosenberg's). 

Some of the differences include:

* Ms. Rosenberg claims that the golden child is most often the eldest. The reading I did on the subject points to the youngest.
* Ms. Rosenberg claims that the scapegoat is most often the youngest; where as the reading I did on the matter points to the middle child. 
* Ms. Rosenberg claims the lost child is a conformer. My studies on the subject stated the lost child pretends to be a conformer on the outside, but often inside is a rebel. This would account for why so many lost children are unusually quiet, go off in a corner or to their rooms, take off without saying where they are going, and why many leave their parents suddenly in adulthood without saying a word. Christopher McCandless, who I have written about HERE, would be your typical lost child. This is the child who feels that talking about feelings, thoughts and experiences with the parent does little good so has given up trying, and removes himself every chance he gets. It would appear that he likes books, science experiments, or projects more than family get-togethers. And yes, he is often forgotten. Dr. Rosenberg also claims the lost child is the most likely to commit suicide. What I learned was that scapegoats have the highest suicide rates, followed by the lost child, then the golden child, with the mascot the least likely to kill himself. The other thing I learned was that these roles are not hard and fast, and that many scapegoats turn into lost children in the end; i.e. give up, go quiet, move away, and do not try to have significant relationships within the family.
* The video on the golden child is mostly about the parentified version of the golden, the one who is still the favorite child, who cannot have an identity separate from what the narcissist wants, but is only out to please Mom or Dad. I also read that too. But I also learned that over half of goldens are abusive (starting with terrorizing and abusing siblings with the parent's consent, graduating to child and/or spousal abuse). I write about bully golden children HERE. The lesser half of goldens are ultra-empaths and sacrifice everything for Mom or Dad's every need and every wish, often to their own detriment, often ending up living with parents too. At any rate, all researchers agree that goldens are the least likely to have their own identity separate from the parent's.

Narcissistic Dysfunctional Families and The Scapegoat Child with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

Narcissistic Dysfunctional Families and The Lost Child with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

Narcissism and the Mascot Child with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

Narcissistic Dysfunctional Families and The Golden Child with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

In the last video (following my writing), Dr. Judy covers narcissists' rage over perceived criticisms and how and why narcissistic mothers "denigrate, devalue and discard" their own children (quotes are hers).

On narcissistic rages over criticisms:

She suggests that targets of narcissistic rage do their absolute best not to criticize narcissists (to avoid the inevitable "denigrate, devalue and discard", but also to keep safe). At the same time she knows that a child can be terrorized for a facial expression (which the narcissist can interpret as a heartbreaking criticism, even though it was never meant to be that -- it's in the video).

There are two schools of thought on this. If you walk on eggshells, being hypervigilent about how you look at them and what subjects you can speak to them about, it is incredibly unhealthy for the target. Plus it puts all of the responsibility on the target for acting right, which is what narcissists love and count on from the people around them. It also makes the narcissist think he is more special than others because others will walk on eggshells while he never has to: he feels he can rage, insult, reject, and beat up his target emotionally or physically all he wants without consequence. Anyway, most targets know that narcissists will pick something to rage about regardless of how good the target is. Narcissists find something to rage about even if they have to make it out of thin air; in other words, they twist events to "denigrate, devalue and discard" no matter what you do and how you act. It makes the target feel fearful and responsible while the narcissist feels entitled to rage, escalate and abuse over any darned thing. It is also allowing them to be hypocritical without comment: they feel entitled to criticize, belittle, denigrate, poke and prod, while you have to be ultra-sensitive and ever-vigilant about any expression that sweeps across your face -- a totally lopsided relationship (most lopsided relationships are extremely toxic).

So the other school of thought is to call narcissists out on their debased behavior, rather than walk on eggshells. Also to do the exact opposite of what they want and expect.

A lot of targets get sick and tired of the hypervigilance: let's face it: narcissists are always trying new tricks to upset their targets, and they are always testing boundaries and grooming you for more and more abuse. Of course, it is not wise to call them out if you are living with them or if they have a history of violence, so you will have to figure out if it is worth it, and how much narcissistic injury your narcissist can take.

Although I have mostly focused on perpetrators of abuse in the over-all blog so far (so that victims know who they are dealing with, and the tricks of the abuser's trade), it is important to understand that some victims, particularly victims of sexual abuse and physical abuse have very little tolerance for the walk on eggshells, or fashion-a-mask-so-that-you-don't-look-like-you-are-criticizing "them" policy.

Victims of chronic childhood sexual abuse especially have very little tolerance for commands, demands, coercion and threats because those are the things that caused them harm, great harm, in the end. It is how they got tricked and conned into performing sex acts. A "nice" predator with candy can also turn into "mean predator", using brutality and force, and it won't make much difference what your facial expression is. Also, child victims of sexual abuse can do very little to keep safe from abuse except to have hiding places, good running skills, look disgusting and dirty, smell, or have a contagious disease or virus, and sometimes that doesn't even help them avoid abuse. Facial expressions are just another drop in the bucket as to what can go wrong. Victims of sexual abuse tend not to trust authority, and to be very, very resistant when it comes to authority figures telling them what to do. It can even trigger a PTSD episode. So they tend to be as independent from authority as they possibly can.

Victims of on-going childhood physical abuse are also highly resistant to authority. If a parent chronically wounded them (whipping them with switches, for instance), they are not going to be dealing with demands, commands and arm-twistings well either. In the case of switches where a parent demands that a child cut off a tree limb for his own beating, these children grow up resenting and distrusting authority for the most part. Unless they become narcissists or borderlines themselves, they tend to see injustice every where, and they have a strong desire to "set things right." It is illegal to whip a child until he is wounded these days (classified as extreme child abuse), but back in the 1920s through the 1960s parents could treat their children like slaves if they wanted, leaving deep welts, whip-lashes and permanent injuries, even get them lobotomized, and get away with it.

So it is unrealistic to expect that children growing up in these conditions are going to worry about facial expressions or how a few words might enrage a narcissist. They are more "flight" types of people when it comes to abuse than trying to work through the on-going system of their parent's denigration and discards, and living with hypervigilance day in and day out about it all.

Since they rebel against authority, and are hyper sensitive to injustice, they are probably going to be calling narcissists out rather than being careful and walking on eggshells.

So, say you also cannot walk on eggshells, that it makes you sick, that it is just not in you to do so. Say that you will accept their discards with grace (i.e. finding ways of making lemonade out of the lemons they throw at you). For instance, their silent treatment of you is meant to hurt you, but you can turn it into a blessing if you know how to work it -- more on that in another post. The thing is, calling them out on their lies and gross behavior actually can stop the escalations in some of them because they become paranoid that others will find out who they are, rather than focusing so much of their attention on attacking you. Strangers, superficial friends, and relatives they haven't seen in a long time are much, much more important to them than you are because it is the peripheral people innocent to the predatory games of the narcissist who will provide the newest best source of narcissistic supply. They are counting on it. When they rage at you and do their disappearing acts, these superficial relationships mean the world to them.

Of course, they will be using smear campaigns on you to keep up an attack by proxy, but there is a way to keep a step ahead of them. If you have read about narcissists at all, you will know that almost all narcissists' tell others that their victims are insane (too insane to have a relationship with). This is called gaslighting and all victims of abuse experience it.

You can go to an event with 500 other survivors and they were all smeared in this way, it is that predictable. Since you know they will be using this tactic, you can prepare yourself (even the simple task of gathering your mental health records if you have been to therapy for abuse can take that weapon away from them, for instance -- more later on other strategies for another post).

The other reason they use silent treatments is to "teach you a lesson", especially if you are their child (and yes, they treat adult children like they are still six year olds). You are supposed to be doing a lot of self reflection and self blaming -- on why you caused them to rage, abuse, neglect and reject you (the age old: "You brought this upon yourself" tactic). They are so sure that you will be hanging your head in shame and guilt the whole time, and that your loneliness and sadness will be unbearable, but you can use these expectations of theirs to your advantage too. The thing is, you know they won't be doing any self reflection about their hyper criticisms of you, their denigration of you, and you know they are hypocrites, so it really is absurd to be wasting your time in taking part in their fantasies that you will be wringing your hands in the deepest darkest hole of shame while they go about feeling completely absolved of abusing you. So, stop the self-blaming, and lonely self-isolating activities altogether, if you can help it. Counter what they want for you.

When you do finally see them, you can use their hypocrisies to explain what you have learned. For instance, when they ask "What have you learned?" you can do all kinds of creative things with your answer including: "Exactly the same lessons that you learned when we were away from each other" or you can be sarcastic like "Your life is so much better off without your children. That is the one thing I have discovered. Why, you should keep doing that. You have two other children left" or "I fell in love and learned what real love is about" or "I learned that social isolation is immoral" -- it can be anything you want that challenges their agenda to hurt you. Since they haven't got a clue as to how to self-reflect, they rarely know how to respond either. All they really know how to do is to manipulate and attack (or to be happy with superficial flattery -- real and unreal). Narcissists aren't all that creative, so they will most likely use attacks that they've tried before, hoping those attacks will work again in putting you in your place. But counter them by giving them answers which are the least predictable. Keep them stunned and off-guard.

They may come back with cruel phrases like "Yes, my life really is definitely better off without you", watching for your reactions of pain, but you can come back with "I understand that this is what makes you feel you are a great mother (or father). Now, if you'll excuse me ..." Indeed, what ever they do, they will just keep trying to bully you, blame you and hurt you, but they don't want to work too hard at it, they count on some semblance of predictability in your behavior. Notice I use the word predictability. Don't give it to them!

Also, realize fighting with them isn't worth more than a few come-backs. Believe in the phrase:

I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.
-- quote by George Bernard Shaw

But suppose you can't get away from the pig in them. Suppose they just keep throwing the pig at you, goading and taunting you endlessly. After all, most abusers want to make you uncomfortable, and they'll insist that you stay in the game so that they can "win".

The comeback here can be "I have nothing to say" repeated over and over and over again. And walk away from them. Believe it or not, they will feel they won because to narcissists when aggression meets with passive resistance, they feel they have won.

Generally this method, unlike Dr. Judy's, is to deflect and avoid their barbs. Be ironic (narcissists are least in touch with irony, but most everyone else around you will "get it" if you are in a crowd, for instance).

I would never tell a narcissist that you self reflect, even if you do. They aren't going to like what the self reflections amount to anyway, they are so single-minded and rigid in their thinking, so you might as well not even go there in your conversation with them. If you want to tell them that you have been thinking endlessly about them, you can exaggerate it to the extreme (again this might make them smile and back off on the bullying, but everyone else will get that you are clowning with them).

In fact, the "other school of thought" teaches you mainly to do the opposite of what they want and demand because it is the healthiest thing for them and for you.

I ascribe to the latter school of thought rather than Dr. Judy's school of thought on how to handle narcissists because there is only so much mirroring, bullying, walking on eggshells, keeping quiet and serving up narcissistic supply that I want in my life. I don't believe in being steam-rolled, or cowering in a corner, or thinking about whether my facial expressions are going to be a "punishable offense by them", and I'm an activist anyway, so it feels right for me not to be their drug of choice.

One of the things I have found about narcissistic mothers is that an overwhelming number of them are staunch Women's Libbers. Women's Liberation is about putting women on equal footing with men, and on growing a sisterhood with other women to fight against male domination. Obviously this should include daughters. Women's Liberation is about the unrealistic expectations that men have about women in terms of tightly defined "roles", and about resisting the subservience of those roles. The things is, what is expected of children of narcissistic women's libbers is the opposite of women's liberation: it is about being quiet, subservient, walking on eggshells and often being unfavored and compared negatively to a male sibling. So these narc mothers send the message that Women's Liberation is for them only and not for their daughters. Blech, it is hard to hide disgust about that awful hypocrisy!

I'd rather that narcissists just deal with the real world of narcissistic injury like all the rest of us big girls and boys do.

Which is to say that I think that walking on eggshells just feeds a narcissist's delusions about themselves as being entitled to special treatment.

On putting children first before the mother:

I agree with Dr. Judy that a mother should put her child first. The overwhelming number of mothers do, and feel a joy and a natural calling for it. They abhor child abuse and neglect, and build relationship bonds through empathy.

And I understand that narcissists are the opposite: they put themselves first and foremost. They are devoid of empathy. They can barely think of the child as something separate from fulfilling their own desires, whether those desires are to keep the child down, or to raise them up to reflect well upon themselves.

For children of narcissists who don't want to be like their narcissistic parent, you have to figure out what kind of good boundaries to set. If you have narcissistic parents, you may feel you don't know how to parent. Some children of narcissists are so used to being doormats and people-pleasers for their parents that they don't know anything else. While I think it is mostly a good idea to put your kids first, you can also run yourself ragged doing so. Moderation in everything is the best choice. You might have worked ultra hard for your mother's love, but she abused you anyway. So you may be groomed to care of your child's every feeling, every little stubbed toe, every pang of hunger, every little feeling that you think you might have hurt (but didn't). Perhaps you are so super sensitive to your children's feelings and aches and pains because you grew up caring too much about your parent. Maybe you cannot sleep at night because you are so worried about the needs and well being of your child.

The problem with being a total opposite of your abusive parent is that if you spoil children too much, and tell them they are wonderful no matter what they do and how they act, or over-look every "fault" to drive home that you accept them and love them unconditionally (the love you never received), you might be bringing up another narcissist (just like your parent!). While being cruel, rejecting and punishing is not good parenting, being overly tolerant and a door mat is not good parenting either. Treat your children with respect, but put some boundaries up with them too (such as not letting them get away with murder). Talk to your kids, be aware and concerned with what they are thinking and feeling, but don't let them abuse, insult, degrade and treat you like a slave.

When we grow up with parents who are narcissists, we don't have good role models for parenting, so I suggest going to therapy to make yourself into the best parent and role model you can be. Fortunately many of the younger generation are doing that now and doing it without shame (it is no longer stigmatizing to attend therapy or anger management classes; it is something to be proud of ... self reflection is the cool brave thing to do). When we carry messages in our minds that our parents taught about us, or tried to force on us, then we run the risk of damaging the next generation in the same way.

When we work on ourselves for the next generation, we also have, for the most part, lifelong, respectful, deep, loving relationships with our children.

Breaking Free from Narcissistic Mothers with Dr. Judy Rosenberg:

further reading:

Be The Cause: Healing Human Disconnect -- by Dr. Judy Rosenberg (maker of the videos above)

13 Ways Being Raised by a Narcissist Can Affect You -- Dan Neuharth, PhD MFT (recommended Psych Central article)

Family Systems Theory -- Kerr, Michael E. “One Family’s Story: A Primer on Bowen Theory.” The Bowen Center for the Study of the Family. 2000. http://www.thebowencenter.org

Family Systems Therapy -- from the GoodTherapy.org site, a site run by a number of practicing therapists


Emotional Cutoff and Family Stability: Child Abuse in Family Emotional Process -- by Walter Howard Smith Junior

(you'll note that in healthy parent-child relationships, parents actually apologize and self reflect, something that narcissistic parents almost never do) 

19 Signs You Were Raised By A Narcissistic Parent -- from the administrators of the Health Foundation website
briefly these signs include: they tried to control you through codependency, they laid on the guilt thick, they only loved you when you did what they wanted, they liked to "get even" with you, they never respected your boundaries, they competed with you, they "owned" your accomplishments, they constantly lied to you, they never listened to (or cared) about your feelings, they constantly insulted you, they exerted explicit control over you, they gaslighted you, they "parentified" you, they had a "favorite" or "golden" child, they reacted intensely to any form of criticism, they projected their bad behavior onto you, they never displayed any empathy, they were infallibly correct and never did anything wrong, they liked to present a perfect family image to outsiders.

The 5 most common themes in narcissistic families, from 'flying monkeys' to the 'needy sibling' - by Lindsay Dodgson
discusses other family roles than the standard ones ...

I'm Done Letting You Treat Me Like Sh*t Just Because You're 'Family' -- by Kieanna Ryann
excerpt:
"Family is supposed to be our safe haven, but very often, it's the place where we find the deepest heartache."
I am slowly learning that some people are no good for me, no matter how hard I try to make things work.
You've made it pretty clear I'm not good enough for you. I got it.
Honestly, the fact that you're mean doesn't bother me a bit.
It's the fact that you disguise yourself as a nice person that bothers me a whole lot.
Being my parent, you were supposed to be the person I looked up to, my role model.
You were supposed to always be there for me, not disregard my feelings and pick sides in family arguments.
I shouldn't have had to compete with other siblings for your attention and you shouldn't be picking favorites but that's what I constantly find you doing, day after day.
You are disrespectful, insensitive, controlling and a bully.
You use threats, try to belittle me, and act like I'm a bad person so you don't feel guilty about the way that you treat me.
I'm sorry, but maybe you should look at how you're treating me before you bitch about how I react to it.
You're supposed to be the adult, but the minute I say one thing wrong, you throw a tantrum like a two-year-old that didn't get its way.
You have no boundaries. You feel entitled to say whatever you feel is true, and throw your opinion around whether it's rude, hurtful, or not true at all.
No matter how innocent and untarnished my words may be, you interpret it as a threat to your ego, and it gets to the point that the minute I open my mouth, you're standing there, chest puffed out, ready for a fight.


Characteristics of Narcissistic Mothers -- by Parrish Miller

The Differences Between a Sociopath and a Narcissist -- from Sanctuary of Abused website


Perfection in Abusive Relationships: Parents and Partners Who Expect Perfectionism, and Punish if They are Not Receiving It -- my own post



What victims of maternal child abuse do NOT have


A graphic to go with today's post (and so true)
found on the Toxic Mom Toolkit website:

another one found on the StopTheNarcissistsNow/facebook page:

And here's a funny roll-on-the-floor one that any survivor will get: